Friday, May 7, 2010

Abusive Conservatorship Harmful to Ward's Children Too

David Tate informed Danny’s ex-wife today that there would be no more monetary support (that Danny has always faithfully paid) for Danny’s children come June, 2010 because there’s no more money…

Hey Housch, how’s that steak taste???

Source:
Free Danny Tate

See Also:
Facebook: Friends for Danny Tate's Defense

13 comments:

  1. Abusive Conservatorship's are harmful to everybody involved except the abuser and their accompolises. MANY Court appointed guardianships fall into this same category. It's "Highway Robbery"

    ReplyDelete
  2. These conservators don't care about anyone except themselves. Wonder if David Tate has made any friends on this venture. Excluding those he is paying of course. I know what I think of him!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The courts do not care. Law enforcement stands by and allows financial abuse we understand this well because my husband was put under guardianship in NJ without the judge even allowing my husband to speak.

    Sloan Kettering wrote without treatment he would die but in reality it was Sloan Kettering that was harming my husband, it is illegal to off label Chemotherapeutic agents without the approval of the FDA if the drug is not approved because it can be lethal. The drug is Temador and it is not approved for low grade gliomas.

    We had a Power of Attorney and Health Care Proxy but that means nothing in New Jersey. As the Public Advocates office told me it is for the good of the disabled that anyone and for any reason can file Guardianship complaints. The reason they stated the ward should pay everyone's court costs is because people would not file if they had to pay.

    Luckily when my husband's doctor in Boston can off of sabatical he gave us the evidence we needed for me to be the Guardian. It gets better though the Surogate's office does not monitor accounting how I know is because I have been waiting for some accounting papers from the state that were wrong ..... and I still have not gotten the correct accounting from the state and the Surrogate never sent a letter of why there is a delay in reporting. Hum ......

    When we asked the Union County Courts to put people up on perjury charges nothing happened, when we asked for people to be investigated for attempted extortion we have a voice tape that if I did not pay a fired court appointed attorney the judge would take my husband away. Mr. Romankow in the prosecutors office says he does not see extortion.

    Our child has been exploited and tormented over the whole ordeal.

    Now the best part in the Rules of the court in NJ it states a Guardian can litigate but now that we have filed for Invasion of Privacy the judge states only a Guardian who is an attorney can litigate. She might have to assign a Court Appointed Attorney.

    The goal at all costs deny the Ill, Disabled, the Elderly their right to Due Process.

    Parents are their children's Guardians but again a child can not be protected by a Guardian Parent in court it has to be an
    Attorney.

    What a SCAM.

    FREE DANNY FREE MATTHEW, FREE ALL WHO ARE UNDER UNCONSTITUTIONAL GUARDIANSHIPS IN THE UNITED STATES

    I wonder if the Governor of his State will feed his children, insure them a good college education, and provide them good quality healthcare without first making his family beg.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm not on Facebook but on Danny's site they should ask everyone to Email Kareem Dale Kareem_A.dale@who.eop.gov/- (Kareem Dale is the Special Assistant to the President - surrounding Disability Policy) at the White House asking for A Special Hearing in front of the Judicial Committe run by John Conyers surrounding the Unconstitutional and Abusive Judicial Proceedings going on across the country surrounding the ill, disabled and elderly in regards to Guardianships.

    Subject Line: Free Americans from Unconstitutional Guardianship Law.

    If thousands send a request for the Special Hearing maybe someone will listen

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bi-annually, at the least, I get a letter from the County Prosecutor [title IV-D division] concerning my child support .... and at least bi-annually I respond and say, great ..... but you will have to collect this from my court-appointed guardian..... Then I continue forth and ask why they are not enforceing a support oder on my behalf .... I am an 'adult ward', no different than a child in the eyes of the law...

    Court records indicate I owe something like 90,000.00 in past due child support.

    As was told to me by Attorney John Cremmer, contributing author to the guardianship chapter of Henry's Indiana Porabte Law & Practice treatsie ---- "boy,, they have a problem with you" .... and I could not agree more ....

    Where is my support ????

    p.s. I used the same approach years ago when the IRS contacted me and told me I owed $522,000.00 plus in back taxes ---- I said great, collect it from my guardian. The woman from the IRS ask me --- does he have the money ?? and I replied, I sure hope so, I owe you don't I??

    ReplyDelete
  6. legally, the moment Danny Tate was put under guardianship ---- his kids should have received social security from his dad' account as a disabled parent ....

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hey, Tim you're on to something here!!! They didn't do that did they? You know why? It wouldn't fly!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Tim it makes me sick to read how you have been impacted this has to stop and those who know how wrong and damaging the guardianship racket it will be in a tough spot when it is uncovered what they knew when they knew about it and what if anything they did about it

    is there any chance of recovering what was taken from you?

    ReplyDelete
  9. And, how much did PH spend? How much did that steak cost Danny Tate? About $17,000.00??? PH got his while the daughters of Danny Tate receive $00.00

    ReplyDelete
  10. Let's go over this -- it's more important for Paul Housch to get paid than Danny Tate's children get their support????

    ReplyDelete
  11. Yes Betty you got that right. What a wonderful system by design to stuff the lawyers pockets with their wards hard earned money and the judge blindly rubber stamps ORDER approving fees. Usually the victim is elderly and most people don't care what happens to old people but this victim is young, a dad with young children, now maybe people will take notice what can happen to them.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Sue and Jerry,

    First of all please know that my sons wanted for nothing materially. Their mom stole millions from me and so she has purchased their allegience.

    Second, you need to know that the atty appointed my guardian soon after converting my estate -- he became a judge in the county --- as have three other attorneys who were involved in my case. There is also two part-time county prosecutors involved as part-time private attorneys ....

    Can I recover what has been taken from me --- well, I can certainly not recover the time lost with my sons, nor the time lost while adrift in this sea of corruption. I may well recover some of my money ... and that would be great of course --- but no amount of money can make a guardianship victim whole again ... my life, like the many other victims, has been changed forever..... and for what, someone else's love of power, money and greed.

    BTW --- In the movie "Ricochet" Denzel Washington can be quoted as saying --- "Losing one's mind has some remarkably redeeming social value". Our power is in our weakness --- vicitms need to harness that weakness, and you will be amazed at what power you truely have...

    My adversaries regret the day they started this -- their careers are about to end, yet never will I be at true peace. There simply is no recovering.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Tim: I have no doubt that your "adversaries regret the day they started this." You have truely taken the weekness and made it a strength. Thank you for reaching out to others.

    ReplyDelete