![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhz8-5fIA2vg3Zi61FlPYrEKx8ei-OFPmtX8OZWk8-zldV_e2R0x8NB7sSyTVvQq7DYCm3TvHVTy7K2CxfBjUVRY9SvnWsMRxtSf7ISqJR1NWva6AXToLqkrYG1UtNplIDT4161LtLWgXY/s200/Michael+Jackson.jpg)
A three-justice panel of the California Second District Court of Appeal unanimously affirmed a probate judge's ruling that Joe Jackson didn't have standing to intervene in his son's estate.
A copy of the opinion was not immediately available.
Despite being excluded from his son's 2002 will, Joe Jackson had been seeking to have some control over financial affairs.
Source:
Court Rejects Michael Jacson's Father's Appeal
Haven't seen the opinion, but standing is a well-established principle, and if that's the case, so be it.
ReplyDelete