At the conclusion of a two-day review of the state’s judicial discipline system Wednesday, lawmakers said they are satisfied that they have plenty of evidence to justify an overhaul.
While some of the proposed changes to the Court of the Judiciary — the body that investigates ethical complaints against judges and decides whether to punish them — would bring the commission more in line with its counterparts in other states, other changes would be unusual. In any event, members of a special legislative committee, the second one in as many years to review the Court of the Judiciary, said testimony from several disgruntled litigants suggests change is needed.
“Hopefully, we can make our members understand from these hearings … that it’s serious, and not just to take the word of their hometown judges that there is no problem when there is a problem,” said state Sen. Mae Beavers, R-Mt. Juliet, who was angered earlier this year when state judges spoke to lawmakers and helped kill her proposal to drastically alter the Court of the Judiciary’s structure at the end of the legislative session.
Beavers and her allies hope to resurrect the proposal, or one like it, when the legislature reconvenes in January, but no specific time frame was provided. The Court of the Judiciary is made up of 16 members, including 10 judges appointed by the state Supreme Court. Beavers’ proposal would reduce the commission’s size to 12 members appointed by the speakers of the state House and Senate, and only five would be judges.
Sen. Mike Bell, R-Riceville, said allowing the Supreme Court to appoint judges to “judge judges” is a conflict of interest and that the court’s appointing power needs to be stripped.
Full Article and Source:
TN Legislators Push to Overhaul Board That Disciplines Judges
Victims need to have input here!
ReplyDeleteJudges shouldn't judge each other.
ReplyDeleteI know Judg Randy Kennedy is up in front of the board. We'll know if they really mean to do a better job by how they handle him.
ReplyDeleteHurrah for Tennessee. In PA, everyone acknowledges that the disciplinary board is corrupt, but no changes are made.
ReplyDelete