Saturday, September 29, 2012

Pauper v. Probate: Tennessee on Trial


 
IN THE FIRST CIVIL COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION
 
Pauper Case No. : PD2
v. 
                                                                          
Probate Court Filed: September 25, 2012

(The Biggest Business in the World)

JUDGE “WE, THE PEOPLE…”, PRESIDING
________________________________________________
 
So far, this federal lawsuit filed in the US District Court of Kentucky seems to be gaining traction. Considering the pro se litigant is typically summarily dismissed, it appears the magistrate has found good cause to demand responses from all Defendants. 
 
Also, a legal mind with a substantial cirriculum vitae has blogged about the Conservatorship of John Daniel Tate confirming that Judge Randy Kennedy “pretended to terminate” the conservatorship.
 
 
 
Further orders entered in Kennedy’s court have left the conservatorship “open” and the conservator, David E. Tate, under fiduciary oath. This defies logic and common sense, shows an abuse of power, judicial retribution, and, most importantly, invokes distrust with the citizenry bringing the entire judiciary into disrepute.
 
Conservatorship/guardianship should never be adversarial. In the ex parte hearing, before Danny Tate had ever been in the court room, Judge Randy Kennedy announces this as a “contentious conservatorship”.
 
 
This reveals motive and why probate creates a legal fiction to justify their legalized racketeering. Advocate groups refer to it as “the protection racket”, i.e. looting of estates before one is in the grave under color of law and guise of protection.
 
Also, conservatorship/guardianship is not meant to be punitive. This, and all known conservatorships in the 7th Circuit Court, Davidson County at Nashville, TN, have exemplified just the opposite, proving egregiously punitive.
 


Full Article and Source:
Pauper v. Probate: Tennessee on Trial

See Also:
State bar association hears horror stories about problems with Tennessee's conservatorship law

11 comments:

  1. Danny Tate has so much determination and must be admired for sticking in there no matter what they throw at him. Go Danny!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Judge Randy Kennedy should be run off the bench and out of Tennessee!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Wishing and praying for your success, Danny, and for Kennedy's judicial demise.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The Danny Tate case has haunted me from day one. That David Tate could be walking around free after what he did to his brother blows my mind. And that Paul Housch and Michael Hoskins bid against each(after running up the debt the home was auctioned to settle) other to own Danny Tate's home is a picture I might never get out of my mind.

    Tennessee is not safe place, especially for entertainment celebrities who have alot of assets.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Keep fighting the fight, Danny. May the truth prevail.

    Www.probatesharks.com

    ReplyDelete
  6. Kennedy needs to be placed under the guardianship confines Mr Tate was! Mr Tate should also receive as part of the states remediation, seven times that of what was taken from him in this judicial scam, including but not limited to, ALL of judge Kenneys PERSONAL assets-- his home, bank accounts, retirement funds and social security. Kennedy needs to a lifetime guest of Tennessee's department of corrections!

    ReplyDelete
  7. The Tate case is a poster case because it involves a young vibrant man who was able to speak and defend himself, yet they got him. And they bankrupted him and plunged him into debt.

    And Danny keeps coming. I'm with Anonymous 1: Go Danny!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I still believe good triumphs over evil so this one will be won by Danny Tate.

    ReplyDelete
  9. He is an amazing man, and I wish there were some way to help.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Judge Randy Kennedy's credibility crumbles a little more each day. Karma is chasing him.

    ReplyDelete
  11. i agree with advocate and friend sonds like a good plan with restitution to make danny tate 'whole' although danny will never be who he was before this wrongful conservatorship case began but it would be a good start

    ReplyDelete