The Minnesota Attorney General’s Office recently prosecuted a legal guardian, Terri Ann Hauge doing business as Estate Resources, Inc., who was suspended from the practice of law in Minnesota in 1995 for lying to clients and mishandling cases.
Because existing law does not require disclosure of professional licensing actions, Hauge was subsequently appointed to serve as a guardian for dozens of vulnerable adults.
That was bad news for them: A complaint filed by the Attorney General’s Office and court documents alleged that:
• In one case involving a ward under her care who only received $650 in Social Security per month, Hauge drained $22,666 from his bank accounts over a seven month period, leaving him with $34.
After Hauge was removed as his guardian-conservator, county social services found that he was living in a squalid apartment with no edible food.
Legislation is in the works by Rep. Debra Hilstrom, chair of the Minnesota House Judiciary Committee, and Sen. Ron Latz, chair of the Senate Judiciary Committee.
The Minnesota Attorney General’s Office supports the proposed legislation, which it says would improve Minnesota’s background check process for guardians and conservators and provide stronger safeguards against financial exploitation by:
• Expanding background checks to include whether a guardian or conservator has ever been denied a professional license by the state related to the responsibilities of a fiduciary duty, or whether they’ve had a license conditioned, suspended or revoked.
• Requiring that guardians and conservators disclose additional information that may bear on their soundness as a guardian, including whether they have filed bankruptcy, been found civilly liable for fraud or misrepresentation, have outstanding civil monetary judgments against them, or have an order for protection or harassment restraining order issued against them.
• Providing that background checks be conducted every two years, instead of every five years as the law currently provides.
• Requiring that guardians disclose the above information, as well as any changes in their criminal history, within 30 days of the incident.
Full Editorial and Source:
Editorial: Time to Fix State's Guardianship Laws
Well it is about time that someone notices that there is a problem in NYS guardianship besides the victims and their familes. Thank you Joseph Ax and Reuters. May Gods work be done and spirit of Christmas touch the hearts of of familes effected by the system that has gone bad, Diane and Dorothy Wilson, Gary and Sara Harvey, Dee King and Dan Gross and Annie McKenna ans the list goes on...HO HO HO
ReplyDeleteThank you for exposing the issues in guardianship. Many familes and victims in New York State for years in our courts have been blinded by the issue or choose to ignore and take legal myths and make a ruling based on mystery, speculatons without having any evidence of facts and in some cases like my husband's guardianship the facts are ignored. Bedsores, infections, isolation, the profit of their private and public clients.My husband is under guardianship in Chemung County NY and DSS was appointed and somehow APS got involved that the commissioner of DSS designated with no order of access or special proceeding commensed. Since their involvement my husband Gary Harvey has been isolated for 6 years, kept in a stark environment with 3 security cameras, a private investigating servcie to monitor my 4.5 hours per visit at the expense of tax payers and familes. There is no accountability in Chemung County and the appearance of impropriety in my husband's case would make your head spin. The judge,attorneys, and the unlawful agencies, the hospital and doctor involved all connected to the same law firm and share the same theme.
ReplyDeleteIt's beyond time! The big question is why is it taking so long?
ReplyDeleteGreat editorial!
ReplyDeleteGood question Betty...no excuse at all unless it is the rubber stamping of funds til it is gone and they all line their pockets with your loved ones cash.
ReplyDeleteThank you Santa...all I want for Xmas is my loved one back.
ReplyDeleteYou should really read the report...I wonder why the victims were not inclued. I wonder why NASGA or NOTEGA was not informed or included on this planning committee.
ReplyDeleteCount-santioned financial exploitation - that's what needs the fix.
ReplyDelete