Our state government is considering a bill (S.B. No. 48) to make physician-assisted suicide legal.
This bill, introduced by Sen. Edward Meyer, is a dangerous precedent of the codification of state sanctioned euthanasia. Albeit it is self-inflicted, it is euthanasia nonetheless.
To give this power to the government is to surrender an inalienable right that should only be held by the individual.
I do not claim that those suffering from a painful and incurable disease should not be allowed the dignity of a peaceful and painless passing. However, I do deny the need of our state government, or any government, to make such a law. Such issues of life and of death are the sole purview of the individual.
Many people are weary of the “slippery slope” argument because of its misuse in the debates on gay marriage. But, if this bill is passed then we would be taking that first step toward state sanctioned euthanasia.
Sure, one could argue that cooler heads would prevail and that the brakes would firmly be applied before we hit such a grotesque landmark.
However, consider Belgium, which is now considering an expansion of a physician-assisted suicide law to include the mentally impaired and children. Belgium, a post-industrial, modern society, secular and liberal, entertains the idea that it would be acceptable to make the most vulnerable members of their society candidates for euthanasia.
Full Article & Source:
LETTER: State physician-assisted-suicide law dangerous
If the law passes, what will the State do to protect vulnerable adults from those who wish to end their lives?
ReplyDeleteI agree. It's dangerous. The wrong kind of people will use this to their advantage.
ReplyDeletePeople should be free to choose, but not be manipulated by others.
ReplyDeletePeople should be free to choose, but not be manipulated by others.
ReplyDeleteThis is very dangerous. We don't want to see suffering of any kind but it is not our place to decide life or death
ReplyDelete