The request for censure marks the commission’s fourth formal charge in 12 years against Judge Janice Clark, of the 19th Judicial District, but is only the first to be made public, court records show.
Clark’s attorney, Bob Downing, said Thursday that regardless of what the Supreme Court decides, the case has already taken its toll on Clark, who has spent “an enormous amount of money” responding to the allegations.
He said the case, which comes as Clark heads into her next election campaign, might also have cost her an opportunity for a federal appointment.
Full Article and Source:
Judge Janice Clark Faces Possible Censure for "Judicial Misconduct"
A "proper" hearing?
ReplyDeleteWhat is a "proper" hearing?
The latest trend in bad guardianship is an emergency petition with no notice, and nothing that can resemble a "proper" hearing.
I wonder why she just doesn't resign and be done with it.
ReplyDeleteWell said, Thelma. And as for Anonymous, there is too much money involved in guardianship/conservatorship cases. No judge or guardian wants to "resign." They all must be FORCED out, & if the judicial commissions REFUSE to take action, as it appears they did SEVERAL times with this judge, they must be forced out by the PUBLIC, by refusing to re-elect.
ReplyDelete