Thursday, June 12, 2014

Panel recommends 6-month suspension for former Judge Hale - again


Despite the Ohio Supreme Court signaling for harsher punishment, the court’s disciplinary board is defending its belief that a six-month law-license suspension is appropriate for former Judge Harland H. Hale.

A stiffer sanction would be out of line compared with the penalties imposed on other lawyers in positions of public trust, says the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline.

Hale resigned as judge of Franklin County Environmental Court on May 24, 2013, after he fixed a speeding ticket for a lawyer defending him against sexual-harassment lawsuits.

Last fall, the board recommended a six-month suspension for Hale for acting with “selfish or dishonest motive,” but the justices rejected the suggestion and asked the board to consider tougher punishment.

In a filing on Monday, the board did not back off its recommendation, even after finding Hale gave false testimony at a March 3 hearing about when he resumed practicing law by failing to disclose five clients he was representing.

The board said Hale was guilty of one incident of misconduct — fixing the speeding ticket — while other public-sector lawyers have received half-year suspensions for ongoing misconduct and criminal convictions.

Among others, the board cited the disciplinary cases and six-month suspensions of former Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann and former Department of Public Safety chief lawyer Joshua Engel.
Dann resigned amid a sex-and-ethics scandal in 2008. His law license was suspended following misdemeanor convictions for receiving improper compensation and lying on his financial-disclosure statements.

Engel was fired in 2010 for illegally intercepting emails to state public-safety officials from the inspector general and a Dispatch reporter. He was convicted of misdemeanor counts of disclosing confidential law-enforcement information from the inspector general.

Full Article & Source:
Panel recommends 6-month suspension for former Judge Hale - again

4 comments:

  1. Stories like this one point out the need for psych testing before appointment.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I DO agree Thelma, Some of these Judges just think they are far above the law themselves. Time for new rules for them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. A slap on the wrist for blatant conflicts of interest, cover ups, and criminal conduct.

    Shameful.

    ReplyDelete
  4. He should have been disbarred and have it done with. Fixing a ticket is illegal.

    ReplyDelete