By Walter F. Roche Jr
Davidson's former Public Guardian, Jeanan Stuart, and lawyers for Metro
are battling each other in a suit brought by a woman who was placed in a
conservatorship without her knowledge while recovering from serious
head injuries.
In the suit now pending in Davidson Circuit Court Ginger Franklin of
Hendersonville has charged that Stuart violated her fiduciary duties by
placing her in a group home that didn't suit her needs and then ignoring
her pleas to end the conservatorship.
Stuart's lawyers contend their client was acting as a Metro employee and
should be protected from any liability under a state law, the Tennessee
Governmental Tort Liability Act, limiting the claims that can be filed
against a government agency or individual employees.
"She was elected by Metro Council," a recent filing states, adding that
she also was issued a Metro employee ID badge and Metro provided her
with bond coverage.
Stuart resigned from her post last year simultaneous with an
announcement by Probate Judge David "Randy" Kennedy that he would no
longer appoint her in any conservatorship cases.
In the Franklin case, Stuart's lawyers filed papers naming Metro
government as a third party defendant. Metro countered charging that
the statute of limitations had run out by the time the claim was made
and that Stuart's alleged actions fell outside of those that can be
protected under governmental immunity.
"Contrary to Metro's assertions the complaint alleges breaches of
fiduciary duty for which Metro would be liable," a recent filing by
Robyn E. Smith, Stuart's lawyer, states, adding that Stuart should be
immune.
"Metro government also gratuitously asserts that the complaint alleges
only intentional torts for which it would not be liable," the filing
adds.
In its latest filing Metro lawyers state that while they still want the
case dismissed, if it does continue that "discovery be limited to
ascertaining the employment status of Ms. Stuart."
Citing a prior ruling in the case by Judge Hamilton Gayden, Metro lawyer
Jeff Campbell stated in a filing that the court's original decision to
deny proceeding under Governmental Tort Liability Act was "correct."
In another filing seeking dismissal of the claims against Metro,
government lawyers argued that "absent an allegation of direct
negligence on the part of a supervisor of Ms. Stuart, the government
maintains its immunity for intentional torts."
Franklin's lawyer, Michael G. Hoskins, in response to Stuart's move to
invoke the governmental immunity statute wrote, "The Metro government
did not have any authority to direct or supervise defendants actions as
conservator."
Full Article & Source:
Former Public Guardian, Metro in Court Faceoff
Looks like Jeanan Mills Stuart is scraping the bottom of the barrel for excuses.
ReplyDeletePraying for you, Ginger. God is on your side.
ReplyDeleteThe public guardian sounds desperate!
ReplyDeleteGinger Franklin: I hope as a result of your suit, Jeanan Mills Stuart is left with nothing - no home, no personal belongings - let her see how it feels.
ReplyDeleteI should be more forgiving but I keep thinking of that phrase, "There's a special place in hell for...." I find it very appropriate to what the Public Guardian did just because she could.
ReplyDeleteYou will prevail, Ginger. Right always does.
ReplyDeleteA prime example by design walls of MUCK to protect themselves from responsibility and accountability while Jeanan Stuart was unjustly enriching herself in the courtroom of the infamous JUDGE RANDY KENNEDY the only probate judge in Davidson County TN.
ReplyDeleteHe will get you while you are alive or dead dolling out the cases to his pals A list gets the big bucks now how does one get on the A list?
Hmmmmmm not hard to figure that one out....connect the dots....$$$....$$$$