By James McGinnis Staff writer
Leasing an apartment may be more complicated than assuming
legal guardianship of an incapacitated person in Pennsylvania and dozens of
other states across the U.S.
On Friday, the Register of Wills/Orphans’ Court Association
of Pennsylvania released a set of new “best practices” for government agencies
managing thousands of cases of adult guardianship. Such cases, filed in
Orphans’ Court, typically involve older Pennsylvanians in the care of family,
friends or professionals.
The new recommendations come as Pennsylvania’s senior
population explodes. In 2010, the U.S. Census estimated 2.7 million, or 21
percent of the state population, was over age 60. By 2030, the Census
anticipates 3.6 million Pennsylvanians could be 60 age or older.
At the same time, the number of “substantiated” elder abuse
cases is climbing. The Pennsylvania Area Agency on Aging reported 4,991 cases
of “substantiated” elder abuse in 2013, the latest figures available. The
number of cases was up 7 percent from the year prior. Most involved neglect; 16
percent involved stolen money.
Among the recommended best practices, county governments
should contact court-appointed guardians who fail to submit required paperwork,
said Don Petrille, Bucks County’s register of wills.
“We want to make sure the guardians are filing annual
reports,” Petrille said. “The majority of counties do not contact them.”
Three years ago, Bucks created an electronic filing system
to immediately contact guardians who failed to file required follow-up
paperwork.
“Nothing would have happened before,” Petrille said. “The
statutes that exist right now do not prescribe a penalty.”
Bucks had no exact figures on adult guardianship available
on Tuesday. Some of the cases stretch back decades, Petrille said.
The National Center for Court Statistics believes more than
1.5 million Americans are under adult guardianship, though that’s only a guess,
officials admit.
“We’ve tried to collect these statistics,” said Brenda K.
Uekert, director of the Center for Elders and the Courts for the NCCS, based in
Washington, D.C. “I wish I could say the situation is improving, but it’s not.
“Only two states keep a record of financial assets held under
guardianship — Minnesota and Idaho,” Uekert continued. “In those two states, we
found more than $1 billion in assets under control. People take advantage of
the system all of the time.”
In 2014, the Social Security Administration commissioned a
NCCS study on adult guardianship cases and government payouts to
court-appointed guardians. Two-thirds of court officers surveyed said they
didn’t know how much of the Social Security benefits paid to an incapacitated
person was going to guardians.
Nationwide, most court officers surveyed said they didn’t
require criminal background checks or review credit reports on prospective
guardians.
Responding to such concerns, Pennsylvania’s Supreme Court commissioned
a 38-member elder law task force. In November, the task force released a
284-page report with 130 recommendations for attorneys, caregivers, county
administrators, courtroom clerks and judges.
The list includes new standards for guardians who could be
subjected to criminal background and credit checks, periodic reviews and
mandated training on liability and ethics.
The task force recommended professional certification for
so-called “professional guardians,” caring for more than two persons at a time,
and legal guidebooks for Pennsylvania’s judges.
Falls District Judge Jan Vislosky said she’d love some
guidance. Legal disputes involving the elderly can be among the most difficult
cases, Vislosky said.
“We have established guidelines for the mentally disabled
and physically disabled,” Vislosky said. “If there were some tips for us and
some direction, then that would make things easier.”
The district judge described a recent landlord-tenant
dispute. The case involved an older woman sharing a home with her adult
children.
The older homeowner alleged she was being denied access to
her kitchen, but the adult children, renting part of the home, told the judge
their mother had a history of leaving the stove on.
“If I start to dive into these issues with questions, then I
start to take on the role of counselor or adviser,” Vislosky said. “As a judge,
I have to maintain a judicial distance.”
At the same time, the courts need to be careful about
regulations imposed on guardians, Petrille said.
“We don’t want compliance regulations to be so strict and so
onerous that it keeps people from guardianship,” said Petrille. “We don’t want
people to throw their hands up and say I can’t do this anymore.”
Also, families aren’t trained on how to handle the guardianship
paperwork, Uekert said. “If you were in charge of your mother’s or father’s
estate, could you file a decent audit of the finances?”
Full Article & Source:
Thank you for this article about guardianship abuse. I appreciate every good article that raises awareness.
ReplyDeleteThe change is coming!
DeleteI agree with Stand Up. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with StandUp! Thank You!
ReplyDeleteGood question! This out of control system needs S.W.A.T intervention. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteI definitely think I'm going to have to share this one.
ReplyDeleteThe problem is the system is guarding the guardians!
ReplyDeleteLegal Evil...
Deletecorruption within the "system" across the nation!
THIER jobs are not to monitor and enforce gaurdianship laws as they are written, but instead they themselves break laws written as to simple protect each other PERIOD!
they strip families, send wards to their premature graves and bleed estates dry. Families are denied the "truth and justice" the judiciary system is suppose to provide. The gaudians, attorneys, doctors and facilities that all work with and for the "system" and violate "laws" should ALL be held accountable!