This article exposes using embezzled funds from senior guardianship
accounts as a primary financial tool to commit voter fraud. This is a
national problem having several players including the American Bar
Association, social workers, cooperative physicians, court systems, and
attorneys who make a nice living by financing voter fraud.
The example I’ll use for this article, is based upon numerous
documents of obtained evidence from Clark County, Nevada. I will expose
how the money flows from law firms, trust accounts and unaccounted for
property sales is used to force undocumented citizens to commit voter
fraud. I will reveal the story of one undocumented citizen who uses the
name Hector, who was recruited by a Clark County official to commit
voter fraud. I will explain why Nevada is hiding this corruption.
Nevada makes money by protecting private guardians who have bragged
about stealing hundreds of millions from unsuspecting families.
Unfortunately, Clark County, along with the state of Nevada, is
convicting citizens who never registered as professional guardians.
These citizens are being convicted of elder exploitation to hide this
corruption. The beneficiaries of this corrupt system are politically
connected individuals. The facts will shock you.
I’m a retired Clark County, Nevada clerk who witnessed guardian abuse
on a major scale. I observed how stolen funds were used to commit voter
fraud in Las Vegas, Nevada. I have personally witnessed the
establishment of fraudulent guardianships. Fraudulent guardianships are
encouraged by the Clark County court system because the money from
guardian confiscated accounts finances voter fraud.
Paying people to
commit the crime of voter fraud requires large amounts of underground
funding. My observations will expose the truth behind private guardian
corruption and how the state Attorney General and Las Vegas District
Attorney are protecting the true embezzlers.
Due to a serious illness, I’ve decided to share what I know about the
private guardian for hire system, which has never been discussed in the
news media.
Guardian Fraud Begins With a System That Tolerates Lack of Accounting
In order to finance an off the books operation, a source of undocumented
money is needed. Missing funds in estate accounts controlled by private
for hire guardians is the perfect source of capital for a voter fraud
campaign. The missing money is either ignored by the court system or
passed over as normal procedure by commissioners and judges charged with
overseeing these accounts. A former Clark County hearing master said
senior citizens losing money was simply a process of growing old.
Hearing Master, Jon Norheim, was the Guardianship Commissioner who made
this statement. I was in Jon Norheim’s court when this statement was
made on November 3, 2006 to a shocked audience of attorneys and
families. In countless guardianship cases, embezzled funds were never
found. Jon Norheim and his boss, Judge Charles Hoskin, have been banned
from hearing adult guardianship cases. Sadly, Commissioner Norheim is
being allowed to oversee juvenile guardianship cases. The banning’s
occurred because Commissioner Norheim and Judge Hoskin became quite
controversial and over exposed as a result of victim family complaints.
Please review the links in this article to substantiate this statement.
The cause for the system’s tolerance for missing money results because
these funds are needed to operate a powerful organization which commits
voter fraud. I witnessed undocumented individuals being recruited for
this practice.
How the Voter Fraud Organization Operates
Votes can be purchased by local politicians who need to win a close
election. One private Nevada guardian actually owns the largest election
billboard sign company in Las Vegas. His name will be mentioned later
along with substantiating links to back up my statements. The
organization will force undocumented citizens to vote for a particular
candidate or ballot proposition. If the undocumented citizen refuses,
deportation will be the final consequence. Union officials and political
Party operatives apply pressure on these undocumented citizens to
ensure they vote in the ballot box on Election Day. Several unions and
corrupt officials supply the voter fraud organization with a list of
undocumented workers living in Las Vegas who are likely candidates for
committing voter fraud. The undocumented citizens appear on the RADAR
because they committed some crime. These crimes include unpaid parking
tickets, driving without a license and driving under the influence. The
fact major political parties are opposed to voters providing
identification during an election is further proof such a system exists.
If voters had to provide identification during the act of voting, it
would be difficult for undocumented citizens to commit voter fraud.
One undocumented citizen named Hector was convicted of three counts
of driving under the influence. Hector claimed that a deputy DA working
in the Las Vegas District Attorney’s office had his record wiped clean
because he could get ten other undocumented citizens to vote in the 2016
election for certain candidates and propositions. Hector worked hard to
perform this task because three convictions meant permanent loss of his
driver’s license. Hector alleges his record was sanitized by the DA’s
office. Another interesting fact concerns Clark County’s former public
guardian, Jared E. Shafer. Mr. Shafer owned and operated the largest
election billboard sign company in Las Vegas, which is known as Signs of
Nevada. Mr. Shafer served as public guardian in Clark County from 1979
through 2003. Shafer’s connection with Clark County departments granted
this private for hire guardian special access to undocumented citizens
who were vulnerable for recruitment for voter fraud. Many Las Vegas and
Clark County officials obtained votes along with special sign pricing
from Jared Shafer’s company, which is known to locals as Signs of
Nevada. In return for legal and political favors cooperative officials
received free signage from Mr. Shafer to finance their election
campaign. Articles about Shafer’s signs are found online. I will discuss
at a later point in this article how the votes of undocumented citizens
influenced elections in Nevada.
Court Activity in Voter Fraud
Courts ignored corrupt guardian activity until 2013. Cracks in this
voter fraud system first appeared with the arrest and conviction of
Patience M. Bristol. I personally worked on this case. Bristol removed
over $2 million from the court designated ward accounts she was charged
with protecting.
The District Attorney charged Bristol with 20 counts of
exploitation. The system allowed Ms. Bristol to plead guilty to only
one count of elder exploitation. The DA had videos of Patience Bristol
pawning stolen jewelry, which the system chose to ignore. Unfortunately,
at Bristol’s sentencing, four victims appeared before the court to
testify. Bristol was quoted as saying “I didn’t pay enough to the right
people.” The voter fraud system resulted in Bristol’s crimes being swept
under the carpet. The bulk of the missing money went toward recruiting
and controlling the votes of undocumented citizens. The reference links
in this article will provide additional details. Major political parties
in Nevada received the bulk of senior citizen missing funds, which were
used for the voter fraud campaign. These funds went to boost the vote
count for local politicians running for office in Clark County, Nevada. I
was present when Patience Bristol’s former boss and private guardian,
Jared E. Shafer, said, “Bristol knew the right people to pay. She didn’t
give enough.”
Full Article & Source:
Guardian Corruption Finances Voter Fraud in the United States
I never understood why guardianship wards are given the right to vote and not the right to make any other decisions. There had to be a method in this madness.
ReplyDeleteHow many votes are old people stuck in nursing homes without even glasses and making marks instead of signing?
ReplyDeleteInteresting!
ReplyDeleteThis is more pervasive than one might think. Because the charges involve political corruption, the indictments are often sealed and cloaked in secrecy. Moreover, the headlines are more likely to highlight the political corruption component of the story, and ignore completely or minimize the embezzlement that funds the criminal enterprise. For another example, go here: http://estateplanningcenter.blogspot.com/2015/08/ohio-guardian-and-ex-probate-judge.html
ReplyDelete