New Mexico could “leapfrog” into a dramatic new way of placing people
under legal guardianships and conservatorships under recently unveiled
national reforms.
The model reforms, crafted by the national
Uniform Law Commission for states to adopt around the country, are being
considered by a New Mexico guardianship task force and a state
legislative committee.
If enacted by the Legislature as is, the reforms would add more openness to New Mexico’s closed guardian/conservator system.
Law professor David English, of the University of Missouri at
Columbia, has spent 30 years studying guardianship reform and
spearheaded the drafting of new model guardianship laws for the
Chicago-based Uniform Law Commission.
Last week, he traveled to
Albuquerque to present the 2017 revision, which stemmed from two years
of national study of guardianship issues. He spoke before a New Mexico
probate lawyers’ group and the state Supreme Court commission studying
guardianship reform.
“What struck me when I first looked at New
Mexico, I was very surprised as a general matter that guardianship
proceedings were not open to the public. That’s not consistent with how
most other states address the issue,” he told the guardianship
commission on Friday.
In New Mexico, guardianship proceedings are
sequestered and closed to the public. The only publicly available record
is a court docket sheet identifying the parties involved and a general
list of the actions and filings in the case.
But, in Missouri,
where English lives, the public can attend hearings in which judges
decide whether a guardian should be appointed for an incapacitated
person. Typically, those placed under guardianship or conservatorships
are elderly, those with dementia or Alzheimer’s or others who need help
with their decision-making or finances.
He said the intent of the
new reform laws would be to open guardianship proceedings to the public,
unless the person for whom the guardianship is being considered asks
for a closed hearing or a judge decides otherwise.
“It’s very
important that the public have some access to what’s going on in
guardianship cases,” English told the guardianship commission. “At least
be able to attend the hearing.”
Access to court filings that
include financial and health information would still be confidential,
but family members of those under guardianship could get access to
annual reports and other filings required of guardians and conservators.
“The theory is you want greater disclosure to, not to the whole
world, but to the people who have a high level of interest in the
welfare of the person under guardianship so they can get copies of the
reports and accounts and raise issues with the judge,” English said.
Visitation
If
adopted, the new Uniform Law Commission guardianship law would provide
more eyes and ears – and thereby more accountability – to New Mexico’s
system, English told the Journal.
Over the past year, family
members have complained to the New Mexico guardianship commission and
the Journal about being barred from seeing their loved ones for weeks or
months once a professional guardian is appointed. Some professional
guardians restrict visitation or have allowed only monitored meetings,
contending that certain relatives upset the person under guardianship.
“Visitation
has long been an issue in guardianships,” English told the state
commission on Friday. “But it’s gotten a lot of added attention in the
last few years.”
He said there are guardians “who in some cases
will prohibit all visitation. I think it’s a matter of convenience (for
the guardian) and that’s not good.”
But allowing unlimited
visitation or outside contact could subject the person under
guardianship to those who might financially exploit or abuse the person,
English said. “It’s always a balancing test.”
Under the new uniform
law, a guardian wouldn’t be allowed to restrict visitation except by
court order.
“An individual should be able to interact with family
and others the same as if they were not under a guardianship,” English
said.
The list of people entitled to advanced notice about a
potential guardianship appointment would also be expanded and they would
be entitled to subsequent notice of hearings in the case.
‘A blunt solution’
Gov.
Susana Martinez’s spokesman said recently that the governor hadn’t
decided whether to place guardianship reform on the call for the 30-day
session in January, which is typically limited to budgetary issues.
Regardless,
the Legislature’s Courts, Corrections and Justice interim committee has
been discussing a version of the new uniform laws.
English said
the new model laws highlight the need for alternatives to guardianships
and conservatorship by allowing single legal transactions, such as when
someone needs the authority to admit a person to a nursing home or to
sell a vacant house.
“Guardianship can be a really blunt solution
compared to something less sweeping,” English said.
For instance, there
are cases in which a court can issue an order and solve the problem
“without subjecting the person to the rest of their lifetime being in a
guardianship or conservatorship,” he said.
A key provision would
require guardians and conservators to present a plan, including their
projected fees, within 60 days to the court.
“One of the problems
is that conservators would come to court and sometimes their fees come
as a big surprise,” he said. English cited a case in Virginia in which a
“very honest” attorney was charging $250 an hour to perform tasks in a
guardianship case “when a secretary could have done the work for a
fraction of the cost.” Typically, fees paid to conservators and
guardians are deducted from the assets of the protected person.
The
new uniform laws would permit bonds to be required of conservators – a
protection already proposed by the New Mexico guardianship commission
and recently put into place by district judges in Albuquerque.
“Given
human nature, there’s a certain percentage of conservators who will
steal, sometimes they are lay people, sometimes professionals,” English
said. Studies have found about 10 percent of cases involve criminal
activity by conservators, he added.
In response, some states have
hired auditors, a remedy proposed by the Supreme Court’s guardianship
commission. In Minnesota, English said, a former police detective is the
chief auditor who scrutinizes financial accountings filed by
court-appointed conservators.
Extensive changes
The
proposed Uniform Law Commission revision, if adopted in New Mexico,
could increase the workload of attorneys who petition the courts to
place someone under a guardianship. Judges might also have to spend more
time reviewing aspects of the care and finances of the incapacitated
person, and inquiring into what other alternatives to a proposed
guardianship or conservatorship have been attempted.
English said
the Uniform Law Commission has overhauled its model guardianship laws at
least three times since 1969. The last change in the law in New Mexico
was 1997.
“This is such a leapfrog for us as far as the changes
being so extensive,” said Albuquerque attorney Gaelle D. McConnell, a
Supreme Court commission member. “Is it because New Mexico hasn’t kept
up with previous uniform acts?”
“That’s probably a lot of it,” English responded.
Full Article & Source:
New reforms in guardian law presented
I hope it's not a fight to pass reform in NM
ReplyDeleteGuardianship/Conservatorship should be abolished---period! If anyone gives a damn about the elderly or impaired, they deserve protection to the extent their practices and wishes are honored, and their freedoms remain intact. The community where they reside can choose panelists who transparently conduct meetings that all concerned attend, where voices are heard,and where decisions are appealable. This ending the widespread exploitation & isolation of anyone targeted by the professional and familial predators. Aging should not be conscription to one camp or the other.
ReplyDeleteAnonymous, I agree with every word you have said except that the system be abolished. Not all family has good intentions and with drug addiction on the rise, if we didn't have something in place to help these people, they would suffer. I believe the system should be looked at and overhauled extensively.
ReplyDelete