Rachel Aviv’s “What Does it Mean to Die?”
profiles Jahi McMath, outlining this resilient and courageous young
girl’s situation in much of its depth, conveying the complex nature of
Jahi’s medical and legal situation as it relates to the neurological
criterion for death (“brain death”) and many medical, bioethical,
philosophical, and religious dimensions of the issue of human life. Unfortunately,
in this same piece the New Yorker presents editorialized speculation
and hearsay on Terri Schiavo as if it were objective news. Worse, after
nearly two weeks of appeals, the New Yorker’s “fact checking” staff and
editors refused any correction.
The New Yorker editorializes that footage of Terri Schiavo appearing conscious and aware “had been edited, giving the illusion that she was tracking people with her eyes, even though she was blind”.
These “fact free” assertions dramatically misleads readers about the nature of the early 2000s Terri-related footage. A much more objective and medically sound characterization in the form of a correction was proposed to the New Yorker but rejected: “Short video footage of Dr. Ronald Cranford’s neurological examination of Terri Schiavo on behalf of her husband, Michael Schiavo, remains controversial, due to the uncertain nature of her visual and cognitive abilities”. CONTINUE
The New Yorker editorializes that footage of Terri Schiavo appearing conscious and aware “had been edited, giving the illusion that she was tracking people with her eyes, even though she was blind”.
These “fact free” assertions dramatically misleads readers about the nature of the early 2000s Terri-related footage. A much more objective and medically sound characterization in the form of a correction was proposed to the New Yorker but rejected: “Short video footage of Dr. Ronald Cranford’s neurological examination of Terri Schiavo on behalf of her husband, Michael Schiavo, remains controversial, due to the uncertain nature of her visual and cognitive abilities”. CONTINUE
* * *
Full Article & Source:
New Yorker Presents Editorialized Speculation on Terri Schiavo, Offers No Correction
I am so sorry for this. The Schiavo family has suffered enough. Shame on the New Yorker.
ReplyDeleteI had hears The New Yorker has lost credibility and this confirms it.
ReplyDeleteThis burns me up. Why don't they just fix it? Terri Schiavo's memory doesn't deserve this.
ReplyDeleteThe New Yorker should make this right. What's wrong with them?
ReplyDelete