State Sen. Scott Wiener’s conservatorship bill failed to gain support at Tuesday’s Board of Supervisors meeting. |
Wiener’s bill, SB1045, would give counties more control over those programs. Under state law, counties can hospitalize people for 72 hours only if they pose a danger to themselves or others. The supervisors defeated a resolution to support it, after the five progressives said they weren’t ready to take a position.
Breed praised Wiener’s approach, saying the current law, written in the 1960s, is archaic and frustrating. Moreover, it doesn’t allow cities to compel treatment for people using psychoactive substances other than alcohol, she said.
She said that nearly half of all psychiatric emergency room visits in San Francisco involve methamphetamine use, not alcohol.
“We cannot watch people languish like this,” Breed said. “Under current law we can’t adequately intervene.”
Breed is in the last sprint of a tight race for mayor against Supervisor Jane Kim, who was forced to take a stance on the contentious conservatorship issue when Breed brought the resolution before the board. She was among the dissenting votes.
Yee and Supervisors Hillary Ronen and Aaron Peskin said the resolution should be subject to a committee hearing, which would allow experts to testify.
One owner, Peter Owens, drew ire from housing activists two years ago when he evicted an elderly woman, Iris Canada, from her apartment in the building. She died last year at age 100.
Owens had accused Canada of living elsewhere with family members while thwarting his conversion effort. But that argument fell flat in City Hall.
Full Article & Source:
SF supervisors decline to support Sen. Wiener’s conservatorship bill
This is good news!
ReplyDeleteConserving the homeless would get off the street and make good money for the hospitals and facilities, but would it really help the homeless? I doubt it. I am glad this bill failed as well. There has to be another answer for this problem.
ReplyDeleteAnytime anyone is trying to push such a major change through, my alarms go off. In so many ways, SF encourages homelessness and drug use, only to then want to come in to "help" these individuals. Nothing like breaking something so that you can fix it at your own profit!
ReplyDelete