Rep. Ed Henry |
The
Hartselle lawmaker was originally indicted May 31 for allegedly
engaging in a conspiracy with a Montgomery doctor, Gilberto Sanchez, to
defraud Medicare. The superseding indictment filed last week alleges he
engaged in similar conspiracies with Dr. Punuru Reddy of Decatur and Dr.
Nicole Scruggs of Huntsville.
Henry’s lawyer said prosecutors filed the new indictment to put pressure on his client.
“By
adding the two new defendants into Ed’s case, they hope that one or
both will succumb to the pressure and then become witnesses for the
prosecution,” Birmingham lawyer Max Pulliam said.
Reddy
and Scruggs, who did not return calls Tuesday, have not filed responses
to the superseding indictment. Henry pleaded not guilty to the original
indictment and has filed motions seeking to dismiss it.
Sanchez,
who pleaded guilty to drug distribution, health care fraud and money
laundering charges in November, is not named as a defendant in the
indictment.
“In an effort to
apply additional pressure to Ed Henry, the government has charged two
additional citizens with being partners in crime with Ed,” Pulliam said.
“These citizens practice medicine in Decatur and Huntsville, and
neither has any relationship with Sanchez, the real criminal. Like Ed,
these citizens helped people get the health care they needed and saved
the taxpayers money.”
Henry's
business, MyPractice24 Inc., provided chronic care management for the
patients of doctors who contracted with the company. Chronic care
management involves coordinating medical care and billing issues for
Medicare patients with two or more serious health conditions.
Henry entered into an agreement to
provide chronic care management services to Reddy’s Medicare patients at
a rate of $22.65 per month in August 2015, according to the indictment.
Consistent with Medicare regulations, the doctor would bill Medicare
for the services, and Henry’s company would invoice the doctor.
Because
chronic care management involves no face-to-face time with a doctor,
and is handled primarily by telephone calls between the patient and a
non-physician, the indictment indicates many patients would reject the
service if they were required to pay their own money, either through the
20 percent co-pay amount or if their deductible had not been met.
“Henry
assured Reddy that a physician could ‘write off’ a co-pay obligation if
a patient refused to pay,” according to the indictment. “Henry said
that to do so, all that Reddy would need to do would be to write
‘financial distress’ on the patient’s bill.”
Henry
instructed Reddy that he should refrain from submitting reimbursement
claims to Medicare until well after the beginning of the year “so as to
allow patients to pay their annual deductibles on other services,”
according to the indictment. To facilitate this, the indictment alleges,
Henry agreed to delay invoicing Reddy until after the doctor had
received reimbursement from Medicare.
Reddy
began sending bills for the co-pay amounts on the chronic care
management services soon after entering into the agreement with Henry,
but patients resisted. “The patients stated that they did not wish to
pay out-of-pocket for a service that did not include seeing or speaking
to a physician,” according to the indictment.
Reddy instructed his front desk staff to
waive the co-pay amount, typically $8, on services provided by Henry’s
company anytime a patient complained about the charge, according to the
indictment. He initially signed each waiver. He eventually “grew tired
of signing co-pay waiver documentation forms,” according to the
indictment, and had his staff use his signature stamp to waive the
co-pays of patients who complained.
Non-routine
waivers of Medicare co-pays are not considered kickbacks, according to
the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services guidelines, but doctors
who routinely waive co-pays with the intent of attracting patients
violate the federal anti-kickback law.
Pursuant
to Henry’s instructions, Reddy also refrained from submitting claims to
Medicare for chronic care management services provided from January
2017 until May of that year, according to the indictment, thus
increasing the likelihood the patients’ deductibles already had been
met. Henry’s company delayed submitting invoices to Reddy for those
months until June 2017, when he sent combined invoices for $31,137, the
indictment claims.
The
allegations concerning Henry’s interactions with Scruggs are similar,
although in Scruggs' case the indictment claims Henry bribed her by
hiring an employee to work in her office at no cost to the doctor.
“MyPractice24
would pay the entirety of the employee’s salary,” according to the
indictment. “Nevertheless, Henry advised Scruggs that Scruggs would be
permitted to use the MyPractice24 employee to perform clinical work not
related to chronic care management.”
The employee “spent significant amounts
of time doing work at Scruggs’ direction that was unrelated to chronic
care management,” the indictment alleges. “Henry knew that the employee
was doing so.”
Henry also paid
an employee at Sanchez’s office, according to the original and
superseding indictments. In that case, Henry initially paid the employee
$1 per referral, leading to monthly kickback payments of hundreds of
dollars, according to the indictment. He later hired her and had her
provide chronic care management services for Sanchez’s patients while
also providing services for Sanchez, according to the indictment.
According
to Alabama Secretary of State records, Henry incorporated MyPractice24
in July 2015, shortly after Medicare guidelines were changed to allow
reimbursement of chronic care management services. The indictment
alleges his partner in the venture was a Decatur resident identified
only as “G.C.” According to Secretary of State records, Greg Cheatham is
a director of MyPractice24. A call to Cheatham’s office was not
returned.
A call to Reddy’s
practice was not returned Tuesday. A voicemail option for patients
calling his office for chronic care management was not operational. His
lawyer, Anthony Joseph of Birmingham, did not return a call late
Tuesday.
Scruggs did not return a call to her practice, Legacy Medical Care LLC.
The Alabama Board of Medical Examiners
database shows no restrictions on either Reddy’s or Scrugg’s medical
licenses and reflects no public reprimands or disciplinary actions.
“Ed paid no kickbacks to anyone and like Ed, these citizens are guilty of no crimes,” Pulliam said.
Sanchez’s
medical license was surrendered Dec. 31, 2017, while he was under
investigation by the board, according to the database.
Henry’s
arraignment on the superseding indictment is scheduled in Montgomery
for Aug. 8 before U.S. District Judge Wallace Capel Jr. A pretrial
conference in Henry’s case is scheduled the following day.
Henry
announced early in 2017 he would not seek a third term this year. He is
still the state representative, earning $1,927 every two weeks.
Full Article & Source:
Indictment charges Decatur doctor, Ed Henry with kickbacks and bribery
I wonder if anyone really knows how much Medicare and Medicaid fraud is costing us taxpayers?
ReplyDelete