The
association representing Pennsylvania’s Area Agencies on Aging said
that two major findings in a report released last week criticizing the
Department of Aging’s oversight of elder abuse investigations was
inaccurate.
WRITTEN BY NICOLE C. BRAMBILA
A
statewide association representing Pennsylvania's 52 Area Agencies on
Aging responded to a report criticizing the Department of Aging's
oversight of elder abuse investigations, saying the two major findings
were inaccurate.
Rebecca
May-Cole, director of the Pennsylvania Association of Area Agencies on
Aging, or P4A, said Tuesday that State Inspector General Bruce Beemer
and his office erred in finding 20.4 percent of the reviewed cases did
not conduct in-person interviews within 72 hours. May-Cole said the
regulations only require an attempt.
Also
at issue was the report's determination that in nearly half of the
cases local agencies did not complete abuse investigations within 20
days.
Released
last week, the State Office of Inspector General's summary report was
critical of the Pennsylvania Department of Aging's oversight of
protective services. The report focused on whether the network was
complying with state statutes and timelines for investigations.
Clarke Madden, Beemer's spokesman, could not be reached for comment.
Pennsylvania's
aging population has increasingly made elder abuse a high-visibility
issue. Over the past decade the number of complaints has surged roughly
40 percent, and advocates expect the problem to worsen as Baby Boomers
age.
"It's
difficult and I in no way want to blame it all on the funding,"
May-Cole said. "But it really is difficult when there's been no
significant increase in many, many years."
To keep up with the demand, May-Cole estimates another $6 million is needed annually.
Although
tasked with protecting Pennsylvanians 60 and older, local agencies
provide a range of services that are often more visible to seniors, such
as community centers and feeding programs.
May-Cole added, "There's this balance that needs to happen."
The
inspector general summary report contained a dozen recommendations that
included a centralized call center for reporting and increased
training.
Clayton
"JR" Reed, the association's Protective Services and Guardianship
Committee chair and executive director of the Lehigh County Office of
Aging and Adult Services, said the network's shortcomings could be
addressed with updating the state statute.
"Nobody's talking about looking at legislation," Reed said. "The laws were written in 1987."
A
possible fix, Reed said, would be extending the length of time to
complete reports from 20 to 30 days, something that would be in line
with timelines for investigations by Child Protective Services. He also
suggested increasing the number of investigators to lower caseloads from
about 30 to 20.
While highlighting some very real issues, the way Reed sees it, performance reports can detract from what's important.
Full Article & Source:
State group critical of elder abuse report
PA is a mess and I don't blame the Area Agencies for wanting to set the record straight. OK, they've done that. Now fix the problem.
ReplyDeleteThere are always multiple individuals guilty in an Elder Abuse case. Whistleblowers are absolutely frazzled because 1 division can only handle 1 guilty party then tells whistleblowers to report events to local authorities. How about if 1 person from a centralized data bank did the intake, filtered to proper division, joined together to handle investigation, reported it to proper authorities then filed charges against those guilty. In our town local authorities are protecting family's law firm partner who started events leading to and enabling the abuse -- now all parties have banned together to protect each other, causing Mom to be isolated because visitors have been threatened to be arrested, including clergy, for making false statements.
ReplyDelete