But
his decision to hand the money to daughter Rebecca Brown for deposit in
a bank account after he moved out of his family home into an apartment
realized his worst fears. The government has confiscated the
79-year-old’s $82,373 life savings, and does not plan to give it back,
according to a lawsuit.
Federal officials call it a necessary tool to combat crime. But to Rolin and his daughter, Rebecca Brown, it’s outright robbery.
As
Brown traveled from Pittsburgh to her Massachusetts home last summer,
carrying the money that her father had entrusted to her, she was stopped
by agents from the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and the
Transportation Security Administration. Even though she was carrying the
money domestically, which is perfectly legal, they challenged her over
the amount, then took it away.
To
date, Rolin has yet to retrieve the money. On Wednesday they sued both
agencies both on their behalf and seeking class action status for the
legions of people in their position.
Brown
had been carrying her father’s money to deposit in a joint account, she
said in a statement from the Institute for Justice, a nonprofit with a
libertarian bent that works to safeguard people’s constitutional rights.
She
stuffed it into a plastic container and stowed it in her carry-on
luggage, having checked online to determine that carrying that amount of
cash domestically was legal.
The
DEA agent who met Brown at the gate wanted her to corroborate her story
by calling her father, she told The Washington Post. But Rolin has
started to decline mentally, so he could not verify everything the agent
thought he should.
“He
just handed me the phone and said, ‘Your stories don’t match,’ ” Brown
told The Washington Post. “ ‘We’re seizing the cash.’ ”
They searched her bags, finding no contraband. Neither has a criminal record.
That
was last summer. A few months later, the Institute for Justice said in a
statement, both received notice that the money would be permanently
confiscated under civil forfeiture, which allows law enforcement to take
money even in the absence of a criminal conviction. In their case, they
haven’t even been charged.
“You
don’t forfeit your constitutional rights when you try to board an
airplane,” justice institute senior attorney Dan Alban said in a statement.
“It is time for TSA and federal law enforcement to stop seizing cash
from travelers simply because the government considers certain amounts
of cash ‘suspicious.’ ”
Neither agency would comment, according to The Washington Post,
with DEA spokeswoman Katherine Pfaff saying, “We can’t comment on
ongoing litigation,” and a TSA spokeswoman, Jenny L. Burke, telling the
newspaper by email that “as a matter of policy, TSA does not comment on
pending litigation.”
The 52-page suit,
filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court for Pennsylvania’s Western
District, seeks return of the money, as well as “compensatory damages,”
and to “put these systematic unlawful and unconstitutional policies and
practices to an end.”
“Terry’s
and Rebecca’s story is not unique,” the lawsuit alleges. “What happened
to them illustrates the systematic policies or practices of TSA and
DEA: seizing cash from air travelers based solely on the presence of
what these agencies believe to be ‘large’ or ‘suspicious’ amounts of
cash.”
“We did nothing wrong and haven’t been charged with any crime, yet the DEA is trying to take my father’s life savings,” Brown told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. “His savings should be returned right away, and the government should stop taking money from Americans who are doing something completely legal."
“We did nothing wrong and haven’t been charged with any crime, yet the DEA is trying to take my father’s life savings,” Brown told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. “His savings should be returned right away, and the government should stop taking money from Americans who are doing something completely legal."
Full Article & Source:
Father and adult daughter sue feds over confiscated life savings
Sounds bad on the surface but I have to ask: Why was she transporting that large sum of cash to another city when she could have deposited it in Pittsburgh? I don't know who she banks with but it doesn't really matter, you can open an account anywhere and transfer the money electronically. A lot safer than carrying that much money around with you. That being said, for the government to take money just because they "suspect" you, sounds unconstitutional, and if it isn't, it should be. People have a right to carry their money around, I know the government will say it's a way to catch terrorists and drug dealers but our freedom to carry money shouldn't be compromised because of that.
ReplyDeleteIf this woman has no history of criminal behavior, drug dealing or terrorist activity then how does the government justify keeping her money? What law gives them that right? Is there more to this story?
I would just delete the first parts of your response........it’s not illegal for someone to be carrying cash
ReplyDelete