Friday, February 26, 2010

"Irreconcilable Differences"

An Upper Darby woman who admitted to bilking an elderly, partially blind Lower Merion woman for whom she worked as a home health aide apparently needs a new lawyer.

Aretha Wellington, who is awaiting sentencing on charges she stole more than $140,600 in cash and jewelry from the elderly woman, and her lawyers Gregory Noonan and John L. Walfish have developed "irreconcilable differences," according to papers filed Friday by the defense lawyers in Montgomery County Court.

Walfish and Noonan claimed Wellington has represented that she is unhappy with her present lawyers. The lawyers indicated they cannot continue to represent Wellington "under the present circumstances."

The lawyers have asked Judge William J. Furber Jr. for permission to withdraw from the case.

Furber has not yet scheduled a hearing on the matter.

Last May, Wellington, 33, pleaded guilty to felony charges of theft by unlawful taking and access device fraud, or credit card fraud, in connection with incidents that occurred between August and September of 2006.

Wellington, who remains in jail without bail pending sentencing, faces a possible maximum sentence of seven to 14 years in prison on the charges.

Full Article and Source:
Home Health Worker Who Bilked Elderly Client Needs New Lawyer

6 comments:

  1. I hope she gets a new lawyer quickly so the hearing can move on. Justice delayed is justice denied.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Well, it happens. Most people in guardianship go through several lawyers trying to find a good one, so it stands to reason the same would be true in other cases.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I want her to go to jail for the rest of her life. But at the same time, I want it done properly. If she can't get along with her lawyers, or vice versa, then she let her get another lawyer so she will have all the consitutional protections everyone deserves.

    ReplyDelete
  4. And who the hell is paying her legal fees???

    ReplyDelete
  5. Who was making sure the little old lady had all the constitutional protection she deserved?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Maybe this woman needs to understand that no attorney can help her. Bet she didn't agree to the deal the attorneys proposed.

    ReplyDelete