A Jasper County Circuit Court jury on Friday found in favor of Rita Hunter, former county public administrator, and Charlene Kelly, her deputy, in a lawsuit brought by the daughter of a former ward, accusing the former county officials of malicious prosecution.The jury deliberated for just on hour before returning the verdict, with 11 members in favor of the finding, and one opposed.
Dolores Forste sued Hunter and Kelly for damages, contending she was the victim of malicious prosecution when she was arrested and jailed for nearly a month for refusing to return her mother to Jasper County. Forste’s mother, Emma France, then a 95-year-old Carthage resident, had been made a ward of the office in a court action that was later voided after the court found no attempt was made to notify relatives and that France was not allowed to be at the hearing, both requirements of state law.
Lynn Myers, Forste’s attorney, expressed disappointment, adding “the jury had to decide on what were able to tell them, and there were some limitations.
“We will definitely appeal,” he added.
Doug Harpool, the Springfield attorney representing Hunter and Kelly, emphasized in closing arguments that Forste admitted on the witness stand that she took her mother from the county without Hunter’s permission and refused to return her, saying that’s what formed the basis of the charges. He said a prosecution cannot be considered malicious if it starts with truthful statements to police.
Hunter is the subject of other lawsuits filed by former wards of her office, which she occupied from 2005 to 2008. She also is the subject of federal investigation into operations of the administrator’s office. A state investigation was launched after Hunter left office in December 2008 and took with her files from the county office. Some computer records also were erased. Hunter later turned over boxes of files, and others were recovered via a search warrant served by the Missouri State Highway Patrol. Later, the state probe was taken over by federal investigators.
Full Article and Source:
Jury Finds in Favor of Former Jasper County Officials
See Also:
Motions Argued in Lawsuit Against Former Public Administrator, Rita Hunter
Our justice system is so twisted... and that's an understatement!
ReplyDeleteSounds like a fix to me.
ReplyDeleteThere you have it - justice is truly dead.
ReplyDeleteI can't believe a jury didn't convict Hunter.
ReplyDeleteI am sorry for Emma France and her daughter.
When the plaintiff's hands are tied and tape over their mouths I guarantee you the jury did not hear what they needed to hear to come to a just verdict. Yes, the fix was in, big time.
ReplyDeleteEverything is rooted to the fact that Rita Hunter unlawfully put Emma France under guardianship. Everything that happened after that act is because of the action Rita Hunter originally took.
ReplyDeleteRita Hunter wasn't malicious? I can't believe anybody would make that statement.
I am afraid an appeal would be throwing their money away.
ReplyDeleteThe Court of Appeals is just another set of judges wearing different robes.
We think we can get justice by taking our case to more judges? It's a joke.
I once sued the University Of Notre Dame for malicious prosecution, and so I can safely say that this case pobably should have been sued as "Abuse of Process/Malicious Use of Process" as opposed to malicious prosecution.
ReplyDeleteThese are very diffent causes of action, each with its distinct elements .....
next to impossible to make a malicious prosecution case out when the act complained of has in fact been judicially sanctioned and is cloaked in "color of law".
So, what we see in this case may well be the result of simply suing the wrong cause of action.