Tuesday, August 3, 2010

Motions Argued in Lawsuit Against Former Administrator, Rita Hunter

Judge David Dally promised a ruling next week after motions were argued Wednesday in a lawsuit against Rita Hunter, former Jasper County public administrator, and St. John’s Regional Medical Center.

The lawsuit was filed by Kenneth Hall, now of Monett, who contends that Hunter and St. John’s acted improperly in actions that made him a ward of the public administrator’s office.

Attorneys for Hunter and the hospital contend that the suit in Jasper County Circuit Court in Joplin should be dismissed.

Lynn Myers, a Springfield attorney who is representing several plaintiffs in actions against Hunter, said Hall was declared incompetent in 2006 after a probate court hearing of which relatives were not notified and that Hall was not allowed to attend.

“They could have contacted his relatives; phone numbers for his mother and his daughter were in his pocket,” Myers said. “He was appointed a guardian without prior notice at a hearing held without his presence and without him having the opportunity for a jury trial.”

He said the facts of the case are similar to those involving Emma France, whose guardianship was declared void by Probate Judge David Mouton after he ruled that provisions of state law were not followed in actions that made her a county ward.

After Hall, who was 39 at the time, was made a ward of the county, he was placed at Magnolia Manor, a nursing home in Purdy in Barry County. His case was transferred in 2007 to Barry County for supervision by the Barry County public administrator. He is now independent, after his guardianship was ended in August 2009.

Myers said St. John’s was named in the case because the hospital, while Hall was a patient, petitioned to have the public administrator named as his guardian. Myers contended that the hospital erred by including a medical certificate describing Hall’s condition as part of the open court file.

Joplin attorney Jason Higdon, representing St. John’s, said the hospital should be dropped from the case because Myers’ filing failed to show that the hospital “conspired with the public administrator to deprive (Hall) of his civil rights.”

“They must show there was a meeting of the minds, and we don’t believe the petition comes close,” he said.

Both he and Doug Harpool, a Springfield attorney representing Hunter, said the case should be declared moot because the guardianship had been set aside.

Harpool also said Hunter was not responsible for any legal deficiencies.

“If there were legal problems, they weren’t the fault of Rita Hunter,” he said. “She’s not a lawyer. There were two lawyers and a judge in the courtroom. It’s not fair to hang it on her.”

Myers is asking for a declaratory judgment ruling that Hall was improperly made a ward of the county, and for the return of money spent from his estate during that time. Damages also are being sought.

Investigation
The state started an investigation into operations of the Jasper County public administrator’s office after Rita Hunter left at the end of 2008 and took all the office files with her. Federal agencies took over the probe several months later.

Full Article and Source:
Motions Argued in Lawsuit Against Former Administrator


See Also:
Former Public Guardian Rita Hunter Lawsuit Update

10 comments:

Thelma said...

If Hunter "wasn't at fault," why did she run with the papers? One can only assume there was wrongdoing, based on that fact alone.

Anonymous said...

Agreed Thelma... if Hunter is not guilty WHY take the files?

Betty said...

Neer forget what Rita Hunter did to Emma France and her family.

Anonymous said...

I think they should all be held responsible. The Judge, the attorneys, the nursing home, and Hunter ....... it's just a big racket .......

Larry said...

I am glad to see more victims of Rita Hunter speaking up. The more suits, the merrier!

Connie said...

Looks like Rita Hunter and St. John's Regional Medical Center had themselves a profitable little racket going.

I pray for success for Kenneth Hall.

Millie said...

"...aftera probate hearing of which relatives were not notified and that Hall was not allowed to attend..."

Shame on the judge who let that happen. I hope he/she is under review from the disicipline committee.

And I am glad Mr. Hall is free. I hope he finds his way to NASGA.

Anonymous said...

No, attorney Myers, rather than they "could have contacted his relatives", they FAILED to do so. Deliberately, I'm sure, since the phone numbers were in the man's pockets.

This is a miscarriage of justice and Rita Hunter needs to pay the piper. So does the judge and the hospital.

What a way to treat vulnerable people. It makes me ashamed to be an American.

Anonymous said...

Whatever the discipline committe decides is not enough punishment for a Judge that lends him/herself to allow this entire charade to go on.Judges are NOT above the law,in fact, they are supposed to set an example of what a good, honest citizen should do.These types of innapropiate behaviors by judge,professional guardians or attorney's, in fact, anyone who participates in this horrible crime, should go in front of a jury trial- where people in danger of having this happening to them,can decide this bunch's fate!
After all, judges are appointed by the people... If Rita Hunter as a Public Guardian had a wards'(Emma France) family arrested a couple of years ago,for which she was sued, for worngfully putting Ms. France under guardianship; Ms. Hunter is NO stranger to how the "system" works. It infuriates me to read that Ms.Hunter should not be held liabable as there were two attorneys and a judge present in the courtroom at the time, as if she did not take part on the events, I feel, that all of those who were present and knew better, should be sued,and tried as criminals for allowing what seems to be a coordinated effort(along with the hospital)in conspiring to defraud someone for the sake of taking their money disregarding someone else's life/fate once they are determined to be incapacitatted,and forcibly held in an institution for life...

Anonymous said...

The right to jury trial is supposed to be inviolate according to state and federal constitutions.

They (the legislooters) just don't tell you about that right to a jury trial, even in guardianship.

IF YOU DON'T KNOW YOUR RIGHTS; YOU DON'T HAVE ANY!

So? Now what?

Join NASGA; learn your rights.
Fight for reform through legislative amendment of these sick, self-serving laws.