Attorney General Hector Balderas sounded the alarm Friday for more
oversight of professional firms that handle money for vulnerable people,
disclosing that his office has “credible evidence” that an Albuquerque
company siphoned about $50,000 from nearly 250 clients after inheriting
their cases from the now-defunct Ayudando Guardians Inc.
The AG’s
allegations against Guardian Angels Representative Payee Services,
located on San Pedro NE, represent the third time in less than two years
that a private company entrusted to manage finances for special needs
or otherwise vulnerable people has been accused of embezzling their
funds.
No arrests have been made, but AG agents executed a search warrant
Thursday at the firm and removed several dozen boxes of documents. The
owner/operator of the company, Pamela Crumpler, had no comment Friday
when contacted by the Journal.
Balderas cited the “critical
investigation” of the firm in asking Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham in a
letter Friday for her assistance in combating the “guardianship crisis
in our State.”
“In the wake of this investigation and previous
scandals,” Balderas wrote, “we have the opportunity to trigger all
available state resources and create more oversight in these matters.”
He noted “systemic failures of state and federal governments that must be immediately addressed by all stakeholders.”
“The
current lack of state regulation and oversight of guardianship and
representative-payee services presents a clear and present danger of
repeated exploitation of this population that deserves our immediate
attention, intervention and protection,” he wrote.
Ayudando
Guardians Inc., one of the state’s largest guardian and representative
payee services firms, was closed by the U.S. Marshals Service in late
August 2017 after its two principals and two family members were
implicated in a $4 million embezzlement of client funds.
The
four defendants are awaiting trial in federal court on money
laundering, fraud and other charges linked to the scheme that
prosecutors say supported a lavish lifestyle that included vacation
cruises and luxury cars.
Ayudando’s estimated 1,400 clients were
transferred by U.S. Marshals to other guardians or firms, like Guardian
Angels, whose website states that it is a nonprofit corporation formed
for “charitable purposes.”
As a representative payee, the company
charges a monthly fee to receive clients’ Social Security or other
government benefits, annuity payments or settlement proceeds, and pay
their expenses for food, housing and other needs.
In the federal Ayudando case, prosecutors chiefly focused on the federal military veteran benefits allegedly embezzled.
Months
before the Ayudando revelations broke in 2017, state securities
regulators announced that more than 70 clients of Desert State Life
Management of Albuquerque were the victims of a separate $4 million
embezzlement.
The clients of that now-closed firm, which acted as
conservator and fiduciary for developmentally or physically disabled and
elderly individuals, are still trying to recoup their losses. Meanwhile
Paul Donisthorpe, former CEO of the firm, is to be sentenced in U.S.
District Court in Albuquerque on Feb. 22 after pleading guilty to money
laundering and wire fraud.
In his letter to Lujan Grisham, Balderas stated that in December 2017
he received a request from Albuquerque’s state district court judges
asking that his office review “certain civil guardianship matters which
were not investigated or prosecuted federally.”
That resulted in
the investigation of Guardian Angels Representative Payee Services,
which inherited nearly 250 of Ayudando’s clients who needed help
managing their funds. Balderas told the governor it was tragic that
these individuals had been victimized after their cases were transferred
by the U.S. Marshals to Guardian Angels.
Guardian Angels, like
any other representative payee organization, “takes complete control
over how these funds are expended, and where that money is ultimately
deposited,” Balderas wrote in another letter Friday to officials with
BBVA Compass Bank, based in Birmingham, Ala.
Guardian Angels is
accused of taking advantage of a promotion by Compass Bank, in which the
bank would deposit $200 into a newly created account that met the
promotional requirements.
“Unfortunately,” Balderas wrote, the CEO
of Guardian Angels “shifted the accounts of 247 vulnerable persons to
BBVA Compass.” Then the CEO withdrew the $200 promotion from each
account and deposited the funds into “an account only she had control
of.”
“Investigators in my agency have probable cause to believe
that the CEO of GARP converted these funds to her own personal use, to
the detriment of these vulnerable persons, to pay her own personal
financial obligations,” stated Balderas’ letter to the bank.
In an affidavit to search the company’s premises, an AG investigator
stated that during a guardianship hearing before state District Judge
Shannon Bacon of Albuquerque last September, the court-appointed
guardian from Professional Guardianship Associates told the judge she
had concerns about a protected person’s bank account.
Guardian
Angels had been appointed to act as representative payee a year earlier
for that individual, and the guardian learned the protected person’s
bank account had been transferred to Compass Bank without notifying the
guardian.
When she inquired of Guardian Angels about the $200
bonus, the guardian was told there had been a mistake by the bank and
the money should have gone directly to the representative payee firm.
After
the judge was told of the discrepancy, Guardian Angels transferred the
$200 back into the protected person’s account. That prompted the AG
search of other clients’ accounts.
A search warrant executed last
November by the AG showed expenditures and transaction that Guardian
Angels “would not have been able to conduct … had it not been for the
bonus money GARP unlawfully obtained from 247 of its clients,” the AG
investigator stated in an affidavit.
Full Article & Source:
AG says vulnerable clients were victimized a 2nd time
For many, it may be the third time. .. first by family, then by guardianship, and then by guardianship again.
ReplyDelete