Dear editor,
Nobody
disputes financial elder exploitation is a significant problem that
needs to be addressed. The disagreement is in how best to solve it.
Significant time and effort, with input
from multiple agencies and organizations, has gone in to addressing the
financial elder abuse issue with no easy solutions on how to protect
vulnerable seniors. The authors of bills SB 428 (AB 482) and SB 429
(AB481) and the bills’ supporters believe that banks and financial
professionals are best suited to “protect” you from financial elder
abuse. Yes, Banks. Not your loved ones, trusted advisors, or your own
legally documented agents (with the safeguards built into the current
statute). Banks. Internet searches relative to banks reveal the
following:
Searching “Wells Fargo Fraud Violations”
shows violations including fraudulently opening up accounts in their
customer’s names and charging fees. They were fined $185 million by the
US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau in 2018 and are facing another
$3 billion settlement with the Justice Department and the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Searching “Bank of America Fraud
Violations” shows they admitted to violating mortgage-backed security
laws by failing to make accurate and complete disclosures to investors,
leading to a $245 million settlement with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Searching “US Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau Enforcement Actions” produces pages and pages of actions against
financial institutions for violations of law.
The question is: Are financial institutions
best suited to protect consumers from financial abuse? The authors of
the bill believe that banks should be given broad power if you are 60 or
over. There are no guidelines or requirements for training on the
identification of financial abuse. In addition, there is no liability
or consequence to banks if they mistakenly claim financial elder abuse
has occurred. The burden of proof falls to you, your loved ones,
trusted advisors, or your legally documented agent to prove that
financial elder abuse is not occurring. During that time your assets may
be frozen thereby triggering fees, causing delays that can lead to loss
of benefits and resulting in adverse effects to your financial health/
creditworthiness. Other considerations include:
Will the bank reimburse you for fees/ NSF check problems caused by them?
Will the bank reimburse you for the costs of proving your position that financial abuse is not happening?
How does one prove that something is NOT happening?
Will the bank pay for your fees or lost benefits caused by delays in resolving the issues?
The banks will continue to be allowed to
refuse to honor your power of attorney if an untrained bank teller
believes abuse is taking place. Although current law allows this, the
current law also provides safeguards that demand a written explanation
to the customer, and holds banks liable for wrongfully refusing to honor
a power of attorney. The new law wipes all of that out if the bank can
make a claim that it believed, even wrongly, that financial elder
abuse was taking place.
The result of any legislation should be to
solve a problem. We can all agree that many people with the right
intentions are trying to solve the elder abuse issue. That is a very
good thing. The concern is that these bills as written are the wrong
solution for the financial elder exploitation problem. As an elder law
attorney, I believe the bills are going to have the unintended
consequence of creating (not eliminating) financial problems for elders.
The proposed legislation falls short of protecting vulnerable seniors from financial abuse.
Scott Kissinger
Wisconsin Rapids Full Article & Source:
Letter to the Editor: Proposed elder abuse bills will not fix problem
No comments:
Post a Comment