Saturday, March 21, 2026

Maine has known for decades that its probate system needs improvement. Now is the time to do it.

by Opinion Contributor


John Brautigam is executive director of Legal Services for Maine Elders. James Haddow is a Maine attorney in private practice who has handled contested guardianships and other probate matters for decades.

Probate court judges address some of the most personal and consequential legal matters for Mainers: Who can make life choices for you if you cannot, who can manage your money, and what happens to a family home after a death. Most of us hope never to need to have a judge answer such questions. Many of us will.

Consider an older Mainer whose memory is failing. One child is trying to keep her safe at home. Another worries that bills are going unpaid and that she is being pressured to sign documents she does not understand. A guardianship case is filed so the court can decide whether someone should be appointed to make decisions on her behalf. In a system built for speedy, consistent, and impartial justice, the court would promptly schedule a hearing, appoint counsel to represent her if appropriate, and the probate judge would make a clear unbiased decision that protects her rights while addressing her urgent needs.

Unfortunately, while such decisions may be clear, there is no guarantee that they are free from judicial bias.

Maine still runs probate as it did in 1855: as 16 separate county courts, each with its own probate judge. Probate judgeships are generally part-time and filled by county-based elections. All other Maine judges are appointed subject to a vigorous screening process that involves a public legislative hearing and state Senate confirmation. And they also receive required judicial training that is not available to probate judges.

Probate judges are also exempt from the judicial ethical rules that prohibit all other judges from practicing law. Even when everyone involved acts in good faith, this structure can create the appearance of bias or conflicts and can undermine public confidence in judicial decisions. The roles of attorney and judge are vastly different and inconsistent: one must fulfill a duty to clients, and the other is strictly bound to serve the public interest.

Guardianship and conservatorship cases are especially high stakes. They can take away a person’s authority over where they live, what care they receive, and how their money is spent. In many cases, respondents appear without counsel, even when appointment may be required or available.

Maine has known for decades that the probate structure needs modernization. In 1967, Maine voters approved a constitutional amendment that directed the Legislature to replace the county-based probate system with a different system with full-time judges. Multiple studies and commissions have returned to the same conclusion: probate adjudication should be brought into the state judicial branch, with full-time judges, consistent procedures, and the administrative support that comes with being part of a unified court system.

This does not mean scrapping what works. Registers of probate perform important local functions and over the years probate code changes have given them increased powers. They now may fully process informal cases like the probate of an uncontested will without need of a judge’s involvement. Reform should preserve those roles.

The change that matters most addresses who decides cases that determine rights and responsibilities. Probate judging should operate like other judging in Maine: full-time, accountable, and insulated from the pressures that come with elections and private practice.

We are two attorneys who understand the high stakes of probate matters from different vantage points: legal aid and private practice. We have seen families arrive in crisis, confused by process and frightened by delay. We have also seen how a well-run hearing, with clear rules and meaningful representation, can protect a vulnerable person while reducing conflict among relatives. Updating this structure is desperately needed to ensure a fair, timely, and consistent process.

A bill this session, LD 1766, would move probate adjudication into the judicial branch and create full-time judgeships. This change is long overdue. Maine’s probate courts should be modern courts, not a patchwork where lawyers serve as judges in their spare time.

Equal justice under the law is not a slogan. In probate, it is the difference between dignity and chaos for people at the most vulnerable moments of their lives. 

Full Article & Source:
Maine has known for decades that its probate system needs improvement. Now is the time to do it.

Farwell Man Charged with Embezzling over $400,000 from 82-Year-Old

LANSING – Yesterday, Phillip Lee Sprague, 62, of Farwell, was arraigned in front of Magistrate Steven R. Worpell, Jr. of the 80th District Court in Harrison on one count of Embezzlement by an Agent $100,000 or More, a 20-year felony, and two counts of Embezzlement by an Agent $50,000 or More but Less Than $100,000, each a 15-year felony, announced Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel. It is alleged that Sprague embezzled from an 82-year-old victim who had sustained a traumatic brain injury.

Sprague allegedly obtained more than $400,000 of assets from the victim. Of that, more than $300,000 was reportedly obtained through changes the victim made to his Will and Trust to benefit the defendant instead of the victim’s children and grandchildren.

“While the majority of caregivers support adults in their care, my office will not tolerate those who steal from the very people they are meant to protect from such exploitation,” said Attorney General Nessel. “We remain committed to seeking justice for vulnerable victims and their families.”

A Probable Cause Conference has not yet been set.

###

Please note: For all criminal proceedings, a criminal charge is merely an allegation. The defendant is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty. The Department does not provide booking photos.

Source:
Farwell Man Charged with Embezzling over $400,000 from 82-Year-Old 

Friday, March 20, 2026

Detroit judge among four charged with exploiting vulnerable adults

(The Center Square) – Four Michiganders, including a sitting judge, have been charged by the U.S. Department of Justice with embezzlement-related charges.

All four are residents of Detroit and allegedly conspired to steal hundreds of thousands of dollars from incapacitated individuals.

United States Attorney Jerome F. Gorgon, Jr. made the announcement recently, which U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi applauded over the weekend.

“No one is above the law – judges included,” Bondi said. “Using the power of the bench to allegedly take advantage of vulnerable people is a particularly vile crime. Thank you to our great prosecutors in Eastern Michigan.”

Nancy Williams, Avery Bradley, Andrea Bradley-Baskin and Dwight Rashad were all charged in a federal indictment. The indictment came as part of an investigation by the FBI and the IRS. 

Full Article & Source:
Detroit judge among four charged with exploiting vulnerable adults 

See Also:
Feds Turn Up Heat On Detroit Judge As Guardianship Scandal Widens

Feds: Stealing from dead gave judge a luxe life in auto exec's home

Detroit judge, 3 others charged in alleged scheme to steal thousands from vulnerable and incapacitated people

Press Release: Sitting Judge and Three Others Charged with Scheme to Steal Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars from Vulnerable and Incapacitated Wards 

Detroit News: Detroit Judge Teamed With 2 Criminals to Help Buy And Sell Homes of the Vulnerable

FBI probe of Detroit probate court could lead to indictment

Omaha woman sentenced in financial exploitation of vulnerable adult case


by Jake Anderson

An Omaha woman accused of financial exploitation of a vulnerable adult was convicted and sentenced in the case.

Andrea Heim was found guilty of misdemeanor theft by unlawful taking, according to court documents.

She was sentenced to 18 months of probation in the case. As part of a plea agreement, an abuse of a vulnerable adult charge was dismissed, court documents state.

Heim and Patrick Thornton, a couple who lived together, were "assigned caretakers" who received the adult into their home in March 2025.

Although the couple received a monthly stipend of $755 to offset the adult's room and board costs, investigators reported finding bank records totaling over $2,500 in unauthorized purchases on the adult's personal debit card. 

Full Article & Source:
Omaha woman sentenced in financial exploitation of vulnerable adult case

Thursday, March 19, 2026

More Iowa care homes cited for violations related to disabled residents’ money

State: Residents’ debit cards and gift cards used for ‘fraudulent’ purchases

By: Clark Kauffman

Mosaic-East 42nd Street, a Des Moines care facility for people with intellectual disabilities. (Photo via Google Earth)

Three more Iowa care facilities for people with disabilities are accused by state regulators of violations related to the alleged misuse of residents’ money.

In recent weeks, a total of four Iowa care facilities that serve intellectually disabled individuals have been cited for violations related to the alleged misuse of residents’ money or assets.

In the most recent case, state inspectors allege that in January 2026, the staff at Mosaic-East 42nd Street, a Des Moines care facility for people with intellectual disabilities, initiated an investigation that showed one resident’s money was being spent on household goods and grocery items that should have been provided by the facility itself.

As an example, inspectors alleged the resident’s debit-card receipts from Dollar General documented the purchase of $29 worth of toilet paper, as well as $57 spent on trash bags, wall hooks and other items. In addition, a step stool, batteries, carpet deodorizer, cake mixes, frosting, cereal and other grocery items were purchased using the same resident’s debit card, and those purchases totaled just under $93.

The resident’s service agreement with Mosaic states it is not the responsibility of the resident to purchase food or household supplies for the facility, inspectors allege.

In speaking to state inspectors, the home’s direct support supervisor reportedly acknowledged that none of the household goods or groceries should have been purchased using the resident’s debit card and instead should have been purchased using Mosaic’s money.

The Iowa Department of Inspections, Appeals and Licensing cited the home for nine regulatory violations related to an alleged failure to report allegations or abuse, failure to properly report the results of investigation, and failure to separate an accused abuser and their victims.

According to the inspectors’ report, the home’s internal investigation of January 2026 indicated a direct support supervisor working for Mosaic had “potentially misused” clients’ money in 2024 and 2025. The home’s investigation “lacked any action taken against the alleged perpetrator,” inspectors reported.

When asked about that, the manager allegedly explained to inspectors that the alleged perpetrator — presumably the direct support supervisor — was suspended for three weeks, at which point the home concluded any allegations of abuse were unfounded and so the facility let the individual return to work.

DIAL fined the facility $325, according to state records.

Patrick Costigan, Mosaic’s vice president of service line management, said Tuesday the “safety and well-being of those we support is our top priority” and that the company took “immediate action” in response to reports of resident funds being misused.

“Following a comprehensive internal investigation by Mosaic and an external investigation by Iowa Health and Human Services, the allegation was found to be unsubstantiated. Both investigations concluded that the claim was not supported by evidence. While we respect the process required to ensure transparency, we are pleased to put this matter behind us and return our full focus to providing high-quality support to individuals with developmental disabilities in our community.”

Door Dash meals, groceries purchased

It’s not the first time the Mosaic-42nd Street facility has been cited by the state for violations related to the alleged misuse of clients’ money.

In 2025, state inspectors reported that an employee of the home was reported to have used a female resident’s debit card throughout January 2025 to purchase food “for the house” through Door Dash.

Inspectors documented nine instances over four weeks in which the woman’s debit card was used to pay for Door Dash meals, with the cost of each meal ranging from $10.24 to $130.72.

When inspectors looked into the matter in March 2025, they reported that the resident’s debit card had been funded with an infusion of only $30 per month, and that the card, which the facility had custody of, could no longer be located.

Another Des Moines care facility for intellectually disabled people that’s operated by Mosaic was cited recently for similar violations.

Mosaic-Easton, which is located on Des Moines’ Easton Boulevard, was cited earlier this month for failing to properly report all allegations of abuse and exploitation. In that case, a direct support supervisor potentially misused client funds in 2024 and 2025, and the home allegedly failed to ensure it had completed a full accounting of the personal funds of all seven residents.

Inspectors allege the home’s investigations coordinator reviewed one client’s purchase history and found several instances in which household goods, cooking supplies and grocery items were purchased. The home’s direct support supervisor reportedly acknowledged to inspectors that none of the household goods or groceries should have been purchased using the resident’s debit card.

As with the East 42nd Street home, the Easton facility’s manager of traditional services allegedly stated the matter wasn’t reported to regulators since there was not “a specific victim” in the case.

The alleged perpetrator in both the East 42nd Street and Easton Boulevard homes may be the same individual, as the state inspectors in each of the two cases were reportedly told that Mosaic had concluded the allegations of abuse were unfounded and so the individual was allowed to return to work.

Walmart and McDonald’s gift cards fraudulently used

In December 2025, the state alleged that the staff at one of REM Iowa’s care facilities for people with intellectual disabilities, located on 33rd Avenue in Cedar Rapids, failed to protect residents from abuse through financial exploitation.

The inspectors cited an incident in September 2025 in which a resident’s Walmart gift card was “spent fraudulently” and no receipts for the purchases could be found. In addition, inspectors said, four McDonald’s gift cards belonging to a separate resident were spent fraudulently in July and September of 2025.

Separately, inspectors cited the Walton Group Home in Burlington for failing to obtain written consent to use the money of “an unknown number” of current and former residents when purchasing items to furnish the residential care facility over the past nine years.

State officials say that as of December 2025, the disabled residents of the home had not been reimbursed for their losses, and the home’s owners say no criminal referral has been made in the matter. The Iowa Department of Inspections, Appeals and Licensing has fined the home $500.

According to the recent findings of DIAL’s health-facility inspectors, a worker at the 12-bed care facility reported to DIAL in July 2025 that a table inside an office at the home, used only by the facility’s staff, had been purchased with a particular resident’s money. The worker then showed a DIAL inspector an enclosed tub and shower in a bathroom that was attached to the office of the former administrator.

“Behind a closed shower curtain was a 4- to 5-foot high pile of appliances and kitchen items, including a vacuum cleaner, two sets of pans, two sets of dishes, four of silverware, plastic drinking cups, 40 piece storage containers, an electric griddle, a stock pot with lid, four baking sheets and 16 plastic bowls,” inspectors reported.

The worker reported that she believed all of the items had been purchased with residents’ funds.

Inspectors then reviewed records showing that in April 2024, an employee had submitted paperwork asking one resident’s guardian or payee to add $1,750 to that resident’s debit so the money could be spent on “home decor.” A receipt from a local furniture store showed that two dressers were then purchased for $950, as well as a dining table for $470.

A subsequent review of expense receipts associated with one resident’s finances revealed that individual’s money was used to purchase bottled water, mini bowls, tumblers, baking pans, a vacuum cleaner and a griddle. In December 2025, inspectors interviewed that resident’s guardian, who stated she had not authorized any of the purchases and “felt betrayed by the actions of the former administrators to the point she considered moving her ward from the facility,” inspectors reported.

Although Walton Group Home has implemented new practices to prevent any additional misuse of residents’ money, inspectors reported in December 2025 that the home “had not taken any steps to reimburse residents for the funds which were used to purchase items without their guardian’s written authorization.”

The administrator of the home explained that she “did not know where they would start to determine the extent of the misappropriation,” inspectors reported.

According to Theresa Magnussen, the regional executive director for Walton Group Home’s owner and operator, Imagine The Possibilities Inc., the matter has not been referred to authorities for any sort of criminal investigation.

She also declined to comment on the state’s allegations and said the state’s published report of its findings speaks for itself. 

Full Article & Source:
More Iowa care homes cited for violations related to disabled residents’ money 

Wednesday, March 18, 2026

Is “The Bad Guardian ”Based on a True Story? What to Know About the Real-Life Accounts of Guardianship Abuse That Inspired the Movie

by Emily Blackwood

Melissa Joan Hart in 'Bad Guardian'.Credit: Netflix
Melissa Joan Hart in 'Bad Guardian'.
Credit: Netflix

NEED TO KNOW

  • In 2024, Melissa Joan Hart and La La Anthony starred in the Lifetime thriller The Bad Guardian

  • The film followed Leigh, played by Hart, as she fought to free her elderly father from a court-appointed guardian, Janet (Anthony)

  • Though the story is fiction, The Bad Guardian's creator said it was inspired by real-life accounts of guardianship abuse that "really happens"

The Bad Guardian chronicles the nightmare of one woman's fight to free her father from his greedy court-appointed guardian — a tale that's all too real for many people.

In the 2024 Lifetime thriller, Melissa Joan Hart stars as Leigh, a woman whose father (Eric Pierpoint) is appointed a court-ordered guardian after he falls while she's out of town.

Though the aide, Janet (La La Anthony), appears to be helpful at first, "things quickly take a terrible turn" and she "doesn’t waste any time placing him in a nursing home, auctioning off his house, all worldly possessions, and using the excuse that the proceeds are needed for his care," per the official synopsis.

Though guardianships and conservatorships have come under scrutiny in recent years due to high-profile cases involving Wendy Williams and Britney Spears, executive producer Elizabeth Stephen has said The Bad Guardian isn’t based on a single story. Instead, the film draws from numerous real-life accounts of alleged abuse within a system meant to protect vulnerable people.

So, is The Bad Guardian based on a true story? Here’s everything to know about the real-life accounts that inspired the movie — and how its stars say it compares to the conservatorship battles that have dominated headlines.

Is The Bad Guardian based on a true story?

Eric Pierpoint in 'Bad Guardian'.Credit: Netflix
Eric Pierpoint in 'Bad Guardian'.
Credit: Netflix

No, The Bad Guardian isn't based on one specific true story. However, the film's executive producer drew inspiration from real-life accounts of abusive guardianships that she learned about through news coverage and by speaking with people from organizations fighting to protect vulnerable seniors from abuse.

“Every single turn of events is true," Stephens told Tampa Bay 28 in May 2024. "It's all real ... this is the stuff that really happens ... they get into the system, and then, as you know, it's almost impossible to get out.”

She continued, "It's just shocking. Anybody that I watched the film with, they all talk back to the screen, and they look at me and say, 'No, this couldn't happen. No.' "

The movie's director, Claudia Myers, echoed a similar sentiment to Storius Magazine in June 2024, noting that "everything that happens in the film is something that victims of guardianship abuse have experienced."

What is guardianship abuse?

La La Anthony, Melissa Joan Hart, and Luis Bordonada in 'Bad Guardian'.Credit: Netflix
La La Anthony, Melissa Joan Hart, and Luis Bordonada in 'Bad Guardian'.
Credit: Netflix

The U.S. Department of Justice defines guardianship abuse as neglect or the financial, physical, emotional or psychological mistreatment of an older person or a person with a disability. Guardians who take advantage of people in their care can include family members, professional guardians, agencies and even non-profits.

Diane Dimond, a journalist and author of We’re Here to Help – When Guardianship Goes Wrong, wrote in a press release shared with PEOPLE in March 2024 that "some 2 million Americans" are under a guardian or conservatorship — and that 98% of people placed into this kind of care "never get out."

She added that there are "zero federal laws to regulate the guardianship/conservatorship system."

Is The Bad Guardian inspired by Wendy Williams and Britney Spears?

Wendy Williams on August 29, 2017 in Atlanta, Georgia ; Britney Spears on July 22, 2019 in Hollywood, California.Credit: Paras Griffin/Getty ; Steve Granitz/WireImage
Wendy Williams on August 29, 2017 in Atlanta, Georgia ; Britney Spears on July 22, 2019 in Hollywood, California.
Credit: Paras Griffin/Getty ; Steve Granitz/WireImage

No, The Bad Guardian is not inspired by Williams' or Spears' cases. In fact, Hart even said that the movie is the "opposite" of the "Hit Me, Baby One More Time" singer's widely publicized legal battle.

“I was aware of the Britney Spears situation but that seemed very different,” Hart explained in a May 2024 interview with TV Insider. “That was her own father coming in and putting her in a conservatorship, and then her trying to break out of that and the whole Free Britney thing."

She continued, "It was almost like the opposite of this story in a sense. That’s the only kind of understanding I had of a guardianship before the movie.”

What has Melissa Joan Hart said about The Bad Guardian?

Melissa Joan Hart attends the premiere of the live-action
Melissa Joan Hart attends the premiere of the live-action "How To Train Your Dragon" on June 7, 2025 in Los Angeles, California.
Credit: MICHAEL TRAN/AFP via Getty

In her TV Insider interview, Hart said that The Bad Guardian story "seemed unbelievable" to her until she learned more about the "$2.9 billion business" of guardianships. She added that it's especially devastating for families like her character's, who don't have the money to “fight the big fight against the corruption that happens in a lot of these cases."

"Someone can move in and take over a family member and take over everything from their medical decisions to their bank accounts to their home, their property, everything," the actress continued. "I really like the idea of shedding light on this and maybe helping people find some information to find a way out of it.”

Though Hart believes that "there's a place for guardianships," she maintained that "anywhere there’s a lot of money, there’s power and greed and corruption."

Full Article & Source:
Is “The Bad Guardian ”Based on a True Story? What to Know About the Real-Life Accounts of Guardianship Abuse That Inspired the Movie 

Charleston man accused of defrauding elderly couple of $48K, records say

by STAFF REPORTS

Records say 49-year-old Preston Tyrell Hugle is accused of defrauding an elderly couple. (WVDCR)

KANAWHA COUNTY, W.Va. (WCHS) — A Kanawha County man accused of stealing tens of thousands of dollars from an elderly couple was arrested Monday, deputies said.

Preston Tyrell Hugle, 49, of Charleston has been charged with three counts of fraud and related activity in connection with an access device, credit card fraud, computer fraud, identity theft, burglary, petit larceny, grand larceny and financial exploitation of an elderly person, protected person or incapacitated adult, according to jail records.

In August 2025, detectives began investigating a fraudulent bank account, according to a criminal complaint filed in Kanawha County Magistrate Court.

The complaint said transactions and transfers took $48,000 from an elderly couple.

According to investigators, video from a neighbor’s doorbell camera appears to show Hugle tampering the victims’ mailbox around the time a fraudulent debit card was activated.

Records said a review of surveillance footage appears to show Hugle using a stolen credit card at multiple businesses in Charleston.

Hugle is awaiting court proceedings inside South Central Regional Jail. 

Full Article & Source:
Charleston man accused of defrauding elderly couple of $48K, records say 

Tuesday, March 17, 2026

St. Andrew’s Resources for Seniors System Settlement Ends Class Action Over Feb. 2024 Data Breach


by Tracy Bagdonas 

St. Andrew’s Resources for Seniors System has agreed to settle a class action lawsuit that alleged the senior and elder care services provider failed to protect the sensitive information of its current and former employees and patients from a February 2024 data breach.

The St. Andrew’s class action settlement received preliminary approval from the court on January 21, 2026 and covers all living individuals in the United States who received notice, including notice of this settlement, informing them that their private information may have been impacted by the February 2024 data breach.

Court documents estimate that the private information of approximately 12,304 living individuals was potentially impacted by the breach.

The court-approved website for the St. Andrew’s data breach settlement can be found at StAndrewsDataSettlement.com.

According to the website, St. Andrew’s settlement class members who file a timely, valid claim form have multiple options for reimbursement.

Class members who submit with their claim form documented proof of out-of-pocket losses stemming from the data breach are eligible to receive a one-time cash payment of up to $5,000.

The settlement agreement states that class members must submit documentation prepared by a third party to receive reimbursement for out-of-pocket losses but may not receive compensation for expenses that have already been reimbursed by another source, including the credit monitoring and identity theft protection offered by St. Andrew’s as part of the data breach notice.

Class members may also receive reimbursement for up to four hours of lost time spent responding to the data breach, at a rate of $20 per hour, subject to the $5,000 out-of-pocket losses cap.

In lieu of these benefits, St. Andrew’s settlement class members may instead file a claim form with no proof or explanation required to receive a one-time alternative cash payment of $50.

Class members may receive their payout via check or credit monitoring, the agreement notes, and all checks must be cashed within 90 days of issuance before expiration.

In addition to any monetary benefits, all St. Andrew’s settlement class members may also file a claim to receive an enrollment code for two free years of CyEx Medical Shield Complete, which includes one-bureau credit monitoring, per the agreement.

To file a St. Andrew’s data breach claim form online, class members can head to this page and log in using the unique ID and PIN found on their received copy of the settlement notice. Alternatively, class members may download a PDF of the claim form from the site to print, fill out and return by mail to the settlement administrator.

All St. Andrew’s settlement claim forms must be submitted online or by mail by May 21, 2026.

Finally, St. Andrew’s has agreed to make certain changes to its information security practices; all enhancements will be funded separately from other settlement benefits, court documents state.

The court will determine whether to grant final approval to the St. Andrew’s data breach settlement following a hearing on June 8, 2026. Compensation will begin to be distributed to class members only after final approval has been granted and any appeals are resolved.

The St. Andrew’s class action lawsuit alleged that the Missouri-based elder care organization failed to implement reasonable cybersecurity measures to protect the patient and employee information stored on its systems, which led to a data breach starting on or around February 8, 2024. According to the settlement site, private information that may have been compromised during the breach includes current and former patient and employee names, addresses, Social Security numbers, driver’s license and state identification numbers, passport numbers, military identification numbers, financial account information, payment card information, health insurance information and medical information.

Full Article & Source:
St. Andrew’s Resources for Seniors System Settlement Ends Class Action Over Feb. 2024 Data Breach 

‘Hidden and misunderstood’: national plan to tackle elder abuse


By Karl Hoerr 

The Federal government launches a 10-year plan to prevent, respond to and eliminate the abuse of older people in Australia. According to the government, one-on-six older Australians has been abused by someone they trust, typically a family member.

Announcing the National Plan to End the Abuse and Mistreatment of Older People 2026-2036, Attorney General Michelle Rowland and Minister for Aged Care and Seniors Sam Rae said older people experiencing abuse or mistreatment often don’t seek help, “as this form of abuse and family violence is often hidden and misunderstood”.

The government says it is committing additional funding to specialist services, including lawyers and social workers.

“Every older Australian has the right to live free from abuse, mistreatment, and neglect,” said Rowland. “At its core, the Plan is aimed at ensuring all Australians can grow older with their dignity and choices intact,” she said.

“The National Plan is the result of years of close and ongoing work with the states and territories to support older Australians as they age,” added Rae.

Age Discrimination Commissioner Robert Fitzgerald AM welcomed the Plan. “Elder abuse is prevalent and a growing national problem,” he said. “It is one of the clearest and most harmful expressions of ageism, with significant social, legal, and economic implications.”

Fitzgerald says the plan adopts a “human rights-based approach”, with the protection and promotion of people’s rights not only a “moral imperative” but also a “necessary pathway” to systemic change.

“Critically, the Plan includes the recognition of ageism as a driver of abuse, the inclusion of targeted initiatives to address and end ageism, as well as a new focus on recovery and healing for older people who have experienced abuse.”

Full Article & Source:
‘Hidden and misunderstood’: national plan to tackle elder abuse