by: Ava Boldizar
COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – A bill in the Ohio Statehouse seeks to establish a presumption that all adults with developmental disabilities are capable of making their own decisions unless otherwise determined by a court.
Senate Bill 35, sponsored by Sens. Michele Reynolds (R-Franklin County) and Jerry Cirino (R-Kirtland), was introduced in January. Along with declaring that adults with developmental disabilities should be presumed capable of managing their affairs, the bill would legally establish a “less restrictive” alternative to guardianship, called “supported decision making” (SDM), according to Reynolds.
SDM allows individuals with developmental disabilities to retain
their legal decision making authority while receiving support from
chosen advisers who can help them understand, make and communicate their
decisions. The bill would allow the advisors to be formally chosen
through a written plan, or chosen informally.
In a guardianship, a family member or other entity is in charge of an individual’s affairs and ultimately makes decisions for them, when a court finds that person is incapable of making their own decisions due to a mental disability, according to the nonprofit Disability Rights Ohio.
“This legislation addresses a significant need in our current system,” Reynolds said at the bill’s first hearing in February. “Many adults with developmental disabilities find that full guardianship is more restrictive than necessary, while complete independence may not provide adequate support.”
Under the bill, entering into a SDM plan could not be used as grounds
for a court to find that an adult is incapable of managing their own
affairs. Adults with developmental disabilities who use a SDM plan would
be allowed to act independently of their advisors and end the plan at
any time. The bill additionally clarifies that adults with developmental
disabilities could not be forced into a SDM plan.
Reynolds said that the approach recognizes that “disability exists on a spectrum” and that many adults with developmental disabilities are capable of making their own decisions. Twenty-three states have enacted similar legislation, according to the lawmakers.
“Supported decision making protects adults with developmental disabilities from exploitation because they maintain control over their own lives and decisions,” Cirino said.
If the bill were to pass, the Ohio Department of Developmental Disabilities would develop example SDM plans and educational materials.
The bill had its second hearing earlier this month, where 13 entities
testified in support of the legislation, including the Down Syndrome
Association of Central Ohio and the Ohio Association of County Boards of
Developmental Disabilities (OACB).
“Unfortunately, in many instances, guardianship represents an all-or-nothing decision for the courts to make when they are asked to balance a person’s health and safety with their ability to make decisions about their own future,” said Jake Dowling, a legislative affairs manager with OACB. “Supported decision making offers a middle path that preserves both.”
Greg Carter, the parent and legal guardian of an adult with developmental disabilities, told NBC4 he questions how the legislation would affect those currently under a guardianship arrangement.
“A parent who has been a part of their child’s life all along should not have to jump through any hoops to continue in the role of decision maker for their loved one simply because the calendar turns a page,” Carter said. “I question the motivation and need for a [policy] such as this.”
While a hearing for opponent testimony has not yet been held for the
legislation, some critics of the concept have come out against a
recently introduced budget bill including language that would codify SDM
in Ohio law.
Caroline Lahrmann, an Ohio mother, testified against the budget bill (HB 96) saying those with developmental disabilities can already have friends and family assist them with decision making without new legislation. Harris Capps, a parent and legal guardian, echoed the same sentiment, calling sections of the bill addressing SDM “unnecessary” and “redundant.”
“SDM as policy could result in a degradation of Ohio’s guardianship system while providing more opportunities for frivolous lawsuits,” Capps said.
Current Ohio law requires those with developmental disabilities to be able to manage their financial affairs if they are able, participate in decisions that affect their lives, and select a parent or advocate to act on their behalf.
Cirino introduced a similar bill in the last General Assembly that
did not pass before the end of the legislative session. SB 35 was
assigned to the Senate Judiciary Committee and currently has one
Republican cosponsor.
Full Article & Source:
Bill addresses decision-making for Ohioans with developmental disabilities