WATERBURY, Conn. – A Connecticut
probate judge charged with choking his wife was accepted into a
diversionary program on Tuesday that could result in charges against him
being dismissed.
Judge Martin Landgrebe appeared Tuesday in Waterbury
Superior Court and was accepted into the state's family violence
education program. If Landgrebe completes the program, charges of
misdemeanor strangulation and disorderly conduct would be dismissed next
year.
Landgrebe continues to preside at Housatonic Probate Court in New Milford. He and his lawyer declined to comment on Tuesday.
Assistant State's Attorney Karen Diebolt did not
object to Landgrebe's entry into the program. A full protective order
barring Landgrebe from having contact with the woman was downgraded
during Tuesday's court hearing to a residential protective order, which
means he can have contact with the woman but has to stay away from her
home.
Court documents do not identify the alleged victim,
but Landgrebe's lawyer, David Moraghan, previously told the Connecticut
Law Tribune that the woman is Landgrebe's wife.
Landgrebe turned himself in to police on Aug. 9 after
learning there was a warrant for his arrest following a fight with the
woman, according to court documents. The woman told police that
Landgrebe pinned her in the grass by holding her throat, but that at no
time did she have difficulty breathing.
Landgrebe told police he was defending himself. His lawyer has said that Landgrebe actually was the one who was assaulted.
Landgrebe filed for divorce soon after the incident, but withdrew the filing on Sept. 7, according to court documents.
Full Article & Source:
Probate judge granted program that could erase attack charge
Saturday, September 24, 2016
Gentle Tomcat Comforts Elderly Veterans In Need Of Love And Support
Animals have special healing abilities, and anyone who has ever been sick with their pet around will surely agree with me.
Though medicine is important when fighting off an illness or healing a wound, there is something about snuggling up to your furry friend that instantly makes you feel better.
This phenomenon is definitely not just in our head; there are plenty of nonprofits and organizations that use sweet service animals as a means to comfort people in times of need.
Even health centers are beginning to utilize the power that pets and purrs can have on the human spirit.
Salem VA Medical Center in Salem, Virginia, even partnered up with a local animal shelter to find the perfect pet to offer love to their many veterans.
Then they found Tom the cat, who made everyone in the hospital a little happier with his furry happy presence.
Check below to learn more about this amazing animal.
Rizzo and Hart were right, the entire air is a little bit happier and homier with a sweet kitty stalking the ward.
Thanks to Tom and his special powers, these vets always have a healer, a friend, and a little source of happiness. (Click to continue)
Full Article & Source:
Gentle Tomcat Comforts Elderly Veterans In Need Of Love And Support
Though medicine is important when fighting off an illness or healing a wound, there is something about snuggling up to your furry friend that instantly makes you feel better.
This phenomenon is definitely not just in our head; there are plenty of nonprofits and organizations that use sweet service animals as a means to comfort people in times of need.
Even health centers are beginning to utilize the power that pets and purrs can have on the human spirit.
Salem VA Medical Center in Salem, Virginia, even partnered up with a local animal shelter to find the perfect pet to offer love to their many veterans.
Then they found Tom the cat, who made everyone in the hospital a little happier with his furry happy presence.
Check below to learn more about this amazing animal.
Thanks to Tom and his special powers, these vets always have a healer, a friend, and a little source of happiness. (Click to continue)
Full Article & Source:
Gentle Tomcat Comforts Elderly Veterans In Need Of Love And Support
Investigation Reveals “Epidemic” of Illegal Nursing Home Evictions
Advocates for the elderly are calling attention to nursing home
evictions that violate federal law. Their complaints find support in an
Associated Press investigation.
According to elder law attorneys, nursing homes are weeding out their most challenging residents, including those with dementia and severe disabilities. Nursing homes want to replace those residents with others who require less attention from staff.
About 1.4 million patients live in about 15,600 nursing homes. Both numbers have been steadily declining as children increasingly find other housing options for elderly parents, including assisted living facilities and in-home care providers. Perhaps because demand is declining, the AP investigation suggests that nursing homes are maintaining profitability by “cherry picking” the easiest patients.
The AP determined that complaints about involuntary transfers and evictions have increased by 57% since 2000. More than 11,000 discharge complaints were made to ombudsmen in 2014, making transfers and evictions the top-reported grievance that year.
An elder law attorney who directs the Michigan Elder Justice Initiative told the AP that evictions and involuntary transfers are emotionally devastating to nursing home patients, who are deprived not just of a home but of the community to which they have formed an emotional bond. Evictions separate patients from the friends and companions who provide a shield against depression.
A trade association for nursing homes takes the position that procedures are in place to assure that evictions comply with the law. The association’s senior vice president told the AP that some patients “require so much staff attention to manage them that the other residents are endangered.”
Advocates for the elderly agree that patients are evicted when nursing homes perceive them as taking too much staff time. They contend that the solution is to hire more staff, not to discharge the patients who need attention. Advocates also complain that nursing homes discharge patients whose children have made complaints about substandard care.
Managing only “easy” patients allows nursing homes to handle more patients with fewer staff members. Maintaining a balance of “easy” and “difficult” patients, on the other hand, requires nursing homes to increase staffing levels. Elder advocates argue that too many nursing homes maximize profits by operating with too few staff members.
Elder advocates also point to nursing homes that discharge patients who are on Medicaid so that beds can be made available for private-pay patients. Nursing homes make substantially more money per patient when they are not limited to the Medicaid reimbursement rate.
According to an elder law attorney with Community Legal Services of Philadelphia, illegal evictions have reached epidemic levels. After reviewing nursing home violations in Philadelphia over a three-year period, the attorney could find only one instance in which an operator was actually cited for an involuntary discharge. The citation that was issued in that case carried no fine. Knowing that eviction rules have no teeth, nursing homes don’t worry about the law’s bite.
Proposed reforms range from stronger enforcement of existing laws to holding nursing home administrators personally liable for illegal evictions. Assuring that patients understand their legal rights is another option. Higher reimbursement rates for Medicare patients, particularly those with dementia who may require more staff time, might also encourage nursing homes to comply with existing laws.
Full Article & Source:
Investigation Reveals “Epidemic” of Illegal Nursing Home Evictions
According to elder law attorneys, nursing homes are weeding out their most challenging residents, including those with dementia and severe disabilities. Nursing homes want to replace those residents with others who require less attention from staff.
About 1.4 million patients live in about 15,600 nursing homes. Both numbers have been steadily declining as children increasingly find other housing options for elderly parents, including assisted living facilities and in-home care providers. Perhaps because demand is declining, the AP investigation suggests that nursing homes are maintaining profitability by “cherry picking” the easiest patients.
AP Analysis of Nursing Home Evictions
The Associated Press examined complaints filed with the federal Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program. Each state has an ombudsman who attempts to resolve problems faced by residents of nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and other adult-care facilities.
The AP determined that complaints about involuntary transfers and evictions have increased by 57% since 2000. More than 11,000 discharge complaints were made to ombudsmen in 2014, making transfers and evictions the top-reported grievance that year.
An elder law attorney who directs the Michigan Elder Justice Initiative told the AP that evictions and involuntary transfers are emotionally devastating to nursing home patients, who are deprived not just of a home but of the community to which they have formed an emotional bond. Evictions separate patients from the friends and companions who provide a shield against depression.
Nursing Home Regulations
Nursing homes are permitted to discharge or involuntarily transfer patients under certain conditions. The Nursing Home Reform Law of 1987 permits patients to be involuntarily transferred or discharged when:
- the facility can no longer meet the needs of the patient’s welfare;
- the patient no longer needs the services provided by the facility;
- the safety or health of individuals in the facility is endangered by the patient; or
- the patient has failed to pay for care (provided that the patient has been given 30 days’ notice of nonpayment).
Eviction Motivations: Safety or Profitability?
Nursing homes must attempt to alleviate disruptive or aggressive behavior rather than turning to transfer or discharge as a first option. Patient advocates say that nursing homes stretch the rules, claiming (for instance) that they cannot provide adequate care for a patient with dementia even though the patient is still in the early stages of the disease, or that the patient poses a safety risk even though the patient’s behavior has been disruptive but nonthreatening. In many cases, the facility could provide adequate care but would prefer to serve patients who are less demanding.
A trade association for nursing homes takes the position that procedures are in place to assure that evictions comply with the law. The association’s senior vice president told the AP that some patients “require so much staff attention to manage them that the other residents are endangered.”
Advocates for the elderly agree that patients are evicted when nursing homes perceive them as taking too much staff time. They contend that the solution is to hire more staff, not to discharge the patients who need attention. Advocates also complain that nursing homes discharge patients whose children have made complaints about substandard care.
Managing only “easy” patients allows nursing homes to handle more patients with fewer staff members. Maintaining a balance of “easy” and “difficult” patients, on the other hand, requires nursing homes to increase staffing levels. Elder advocates argue that too many nursing homes maximize profits by operating with too few staff members.
Elder advocates also point to nursing homes that discharge patients who are on Medicaid so that beds can be made available for private-pay patients. Nursing homes make substantially more money per patient when they are not limited to the Medicaid reimbursement rate.
Poor Enforcement of Laws
Patients are entitled to appeal a discharge or transfer decision. Even when patients are aware of that right and muster the resources to pursue an appeal, nursing homes often disregard adverse decisions. A number of children told the AP about nursing homes that refused to follow orders to readmit their parents.
According to an elder law attorney with Community Legal Services of Philadelphia, illegal evictions have reached epidemic levels. After reviewing nursing home violations in Philadelphia over a three-year period, the attorney could find only one instance in which an operator was actually cited for an involuntary discharge. The citation that was issued in that case carried no fine. Knowing that eviction rules have no teeth, nursing homes don’t worry about the law’s bite.
Proposed reforms range from stronger enforcement of existing laws to holding nursing home administrators personally liable for illegal evictions. Assuring that patients understand their legal rights is another option. Higher reimbursement rates for Medicare patients, particularly those with dementia who may require more staff time, might also encourage nursing homes to comply with existing laws.
Full Article & Source:
Investigation Reveals “Epidemic” of Illegal Nursing Home Evictions
Friday, September 23, 2016
9 Investigates: Woman says court-appointed guardian took 88-year-old aunt to unknown location
FLAGLER COUNTY, Fla. - The niece of a Flagler County woman called 9 Investigates after she said the 88-year-old matriarch of her family was taken to an unknown location by a court-appointed guardian.
Lillie White was declared incapacitated five years ago and has been a part of Florida’s Elder Guardianship system ever since.
A court filing stated White was “taken to an anonymous location” by a recently-appointed temporary guardian on Aug. 30, and her family hasn’t seen or heard from her since.
“She was not in danger. There was no emergency situation. There's no justifiable reason for her to be taken from her home,” White’s niece, Teresa Kennedy, said.
A Flagler County judge gave an elder law attorney the role of emergency temporary guardian in July after Kennedy’s mother, who is White’s sister, was removed from her position as guardian due to questions about her ability to provide proper care.
Family members dispute the allegation and said the longtime guardian was not afforded due process during the hearing in which she was removed.
WFTV legal analyst Belvin Perry presided over White’s original guardianship case in Orange County in 2013. Perry recalled a contentious court battle amongst White’s family members over who should control and inherit the woman’s assets, including a substantial trust.
“The judge will appoint a neutral third party to act as guardian so the judge can get an impartial read on what's going on,” Perry said.
White’s case isn’t unique; There are more than 3,000 people currently being cared for through Florida’s Guardianship system; Anyone can petition for a person to be declared incapacitated in Florida, leading to control over their finances and, in some cases, with whom they socialize.
AARP estimated the amount of elder assets being controlled by guardians nationwide to be $1.5 billion.
White’s temporary guardian couldn’t talk about the case, but court records provided to 9 Investigates by White’s family showed the decision to move White to respite care was based upon attorney observations and recommendations of an independent care management consultant. The filing also noted that White “has never once asked about her sister nor her niece and has not asked to go home.”
“I don’t know why they're not telling us where she is,” Kennedy said.
There is a hearing Friday morning for plenary guardianship, which would give the guardian full control over White's every move.
The family said they plan to attend the hearing.
Full Article & Source:
9 Investigates: Woman says court-appointed guardian took 88-year-old aunt to unknown location
Lillie White was declared incapacitated five years ago and has been a part of Florida’s Elder Guardianship system ever since.
A court filing stated White was “taken to an anonymous location” by a recently-appointed temporary guardian on Aug. 30, and her family hasn’t seen or heard from her since.
“She was not in danger. There was no emergency situation. There's no justifiable reason for her to be taken from her home,” White’s niece, Teresa Kennedy, said.
A Flagler County judge gave an elder law attorney the role of emergency temporary guardian in July after Kennedy’s mother, who is White’s sister, was removed from her position as guardian due to questions about her ability to provide proper care.
Family members dispute the allegation and said the longtime guardian was not afforded due process during the hearing in which she was removed.
WFTV legal analyst Belvin Perry presided over White’s original guardianship case in Orange County in 2013. Perry recalled a contentious court battle amongst White’s family members over who should control and inherit the woman’s assets, including a substantial trust.
“The judge will appoint a neutral third party to act as guardian so the judge can get an impartial read on what's going on,” Perry said.
White’s case isn’t unique; There are more than 3,000 people currently being cared for through Florida’s Guardianship system; Anyone can petition for a person to be declared incapacitated in Florida, leading to control over their finances and, in some cases, with whom they socialize.
AARP estimated the amount of elder assets being controlled by guardians nationwide to be $1.5 billion.
White’s temporary guardian couldn’t talk about the case, but court records provided to 9 Investigates by White’s family showed the decision to move White to respite care was based upon attorney observations and recommendations of an independent care management consultant. The filing also noted that White “has never once asked about her sister nor her niece and has not asked to go home.”
“I don’t know why they're not telling us where she is,” Kennedy said.
There is a hearing Friday morning for plenary guardianship, which would give the guardian full control over White's every move.
The family said they plan to attend the hearing.
Full Article & Source:
9 Investigates: Woman says court-appointed guardian took 88-year-old aunt to unknown location
At 85 he foiled a financial scam; other seniors aren't so lucky
Eleanor & Stanley Podolski, Jr. |
He landed here after
wandering off from less-secure facilities. Podolski, 88, has dementia.
Still, he remembers growing up in north St. Louis. Being a butcher
there, then a loan officer at Pulaski Bank when it was on Cass Avenue.
He remembers being involved with St. Stanislaus Kostka Church, an independent Catholic congregation with Polish roots.
But
he needed prompting to remember how he foiled a crime a few years ago
that victimizes more folks like him every year. Somebody tried to rob
part of his precious nest egg.
It wasn’t done with a mask
and gun. Rather, blame fell to a woman he liked dealing with who sat at
a desk off to the side of the teller windows at Regions Bank, 11920 New
Halls Ferry Road, in Florissant.
Podolski invested
$25,000 in certificates of deposit there in 2013 with the help of
Kathryn Ann Smith, now 66, a bank associate, according to a police
report that laid out what happened next.
When Podolski’s
certificates matured, police records say Smith suggested that he put the
cash in a money market account, which he did.
Six months passed.
Then
Podolski wanted the cash in the money market account to be invested in a
new batch of certificates of deposit. Smith was to complete the
necessary forms. Podolski received a letter in the mail — without
Regions Bank letterhead — detailing the five different CD accounts.
When
Podolski checked his balances one day, there were discrepancies. With
the help of his son, a former auditor and bank board member, they found
monthly withdrawals they didn’t know about from the former money market
account worth at least $22,000.
He had been the victim of
a type of abuse that can be a tricky arena because it’s often laced
with shame, diminishing mental health, stressed family dynamics and
hopelessness.
Experts say financial exploitation of the
elderly typically involves a person in a position of trust: anyone from a
caregiver to a longtime hairdresser. There’s also the garden variety of
scam artists who befriend seniors by telephone, online or in person.
And
it’s a crime that will be a threat for a long time, with about 10,000
people turning 65 every day nationwide. Pockets of St. Louis County in
particular, which saw tremendous growth following World War II, are ripe
territory for financial abuse of older adults.
There are systems in place to help, but with limited effectiveness.
A
Missouri law passed last year, for example, gives financial firms
greater authority to step in if they have cause to believe a senior is
being exploited.
The state, meanwhile, has seen a spike in calls to its elder abuse hotline.
In
2015, there were 27,595 calls to the hotline, of which 5,497 were about
finances. In 2012, there were 23,693 calls, including 4,174 regarding
finances, a fourth of which are typically substantiated.
“We
are worried that elder abuse is underreported, not just in Missouri,
but nationally,” said Celesta Hartgraves, director of the state’s
Division of Senior and Disability Services.
She said more
people will be abused as the number of older adults increases. She said
seniors can be lonely. They tend to listen to scams. Some have greater
financial resources yet suffer cognitive declines. They are often
embarrassed to report being taken advantage of.
“Seniors are really attractive targets for that kind of fraud,” Hartgraves said.
Raising suspicions
Podolski’s case is unusual in that the victim got his money back just before dementia set in.
But that’s probably only because Stanley Podolski had a son — and a former bank auditor at that — as an advocate.
Even then, it took pushing for answers.
Podolski
said in an interview that he had told the bank branch manager about his
suspicions of missing money, but the manager initially suggested that
it was Podolski, 85 at the time, who was probably mistaken. The manager
described Smith, who had worked at the bank for years and was about to
retire, as golden.
The more Podolski and his son pressed,
the less the bank’s story held up. Surveillance tape didn’t place
Podolski at the bank at the time of withdrawals. Signatures were off.
And, amid Podolski’s chats with the manager, Smith walked off the job,
never to return.
St. Louis County police found her at
home, in the 10400 block of Durness Drive. Her elderly mother let them
in and a detective explained the investigation. According to the police
report, Smith said she had no idea what the detective was talking about.
The detective, who didn’t believe her, showed her a withdrawal slip.
“That’s my handwriting, but that was for my mother’s money market,” Smith told police.
She
clammed up and refused to say more without an attorney. Police arrested
Smith on the spot. She was accused of forgery and financial
exploitation of the elderly, charges to which she pleaded guilty.
“I caught her,” Podolski said from the retirement home.
Eleanor, his wife of 66 years, sat beside him, helped him navigate his history.
“She probably thought he wouldn’t remember,” Eleanor said about her husband being targeted.
Changing the law
In
typical cases, seniors aren’t financially savvy enough to detect fraud,
or don’t have children who hawkishly monitor their finances. There are
seniors who have their savings drained and are too embarrassed to talk
about it.
Financial institutions are aware of the risks
but have been somewhat limited by what they can do if they suspect
someone is taking advantage of a client. But the laws are changing.
Wells
Fargo Advisors formed an elder abuse task force in recent years at its
St. Louis headquarters to spot suspected abuse and poor judgment. The
firm said it has worked with the attorney general’s office to get
clients assistance and guardianship.
The task force looks
for red flags, like when a 92-year-old client worth $8 million appeared
confused and thought his accountant worked for the post office. It
turned out no fraud was taking place, but Wells Fargo Advisors asked
police to do a wellness check and filed a report with Adult Protective
Services for possible self-neglect. The man has since been moved to an
assisted-living facility and his neighbor is in the process of being
appointed guardian.
In another case, Wells Fargo Advisors
intervened when a widower in his 60s formed an online relationship with
someone he believed to be a 37-year-old woman. He eventually sent her
$26,000 when she asked for money to resolve a legal matter. The man’s
daughter caught on but wasn’t authorized to make decisions on her
father’s account.
Eventually, Wells Fargo Advisors
contacted the attorney general’s office, and an investigator was
assigned. The man is being assessed for guardianship.
Ron Long leads the task force, which was formalized in 2014.
“A
lot of it was the numbers continued to grow,” Long said of suspicious
cases. “The thought was to have a central place for financial advisers
to call.”
He worked with lawmakers to create the Senior
Savings Protection Act, which was enacted in Missouri in 2015. It allows
broker-dealers to notify certain parties of potential financial
exploitation.
They can also refuse disbursement of funds from a
brokerage account for up to 10 days.
Wells Fargo Advisors
has relied on the new law just once since it passed. The state has
received six complaints and is working to train brokers on how to make
use of the law.
Meanwhile, California-based Wells Fargo
bank was recently slapped with a historic $185 million fine and more
than 5,000 employees have been fired for opening accounts without client
knowledge as a means to boost sales figures.
On a
smaller scale, Kirkwood financial adviser Robert S. Beyer II, 45, was
just convicted in federal court on charges stemming from promising
investors 8 percent to 18 percent annual returns from Heroic Life
Assurance Company, which had a foundation bankrolled by a fictitious
wealthy South American named Jesus Cristobal. Officials said the
victims, in their mid-50s and early 60s, lost about $300,000.
Saying sorry
Much of the responsibility to ferret out abuse remains in the awareness of seniors themselves and their caregivers.
After the incident at Regions Bank, Podolski’s son, Stanley Podolski III, took over control of his parents’ finances.
“I can’t believe that my dad was the only one” who was ripped off by Smith, he said.
He and his parents shook their heads at the sentencing.
“We couldn’t believe that she didn’t get any jail time,” said Eleanor Podolski.
Smith
pleaded guilty and was sentenced to five years’ probation. If she
fulfills the terms of probation, the forgery and exploitation of the
elderly convictions will be wiped from the public record.
Ed
Magee, spokesman for St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Robert
McCulloch, said it was a matter of getting restitution or jail time.
“It was either or,” Magee said by email. “I am sure the victim wanted the money.”
Had
a weapon been involved, he said, there would have been a 10-year
minimum sentence for first-degree robbery. In this case, forgery and
exploitation of the elderly didn’t have minimum sentences.
He said
Smith, who lost her job, had no prior convictions.
“Her
record will be clear after five years but will always be available to
law enforcement and can be used in any future prosecution if needed,”
Magee said.
In an interview, Smith took drags from a
cigarette as she sat on her front porch, which had a large U.S. flag
tacked up from Labor Day.
“It was stupid, really stupid, and I am paying for it,” said Smith, one of her six grown children sitting beside her.
Smith
said she left studies in speech therapy years ago to raise a family.
They lived in a Glasgow Village home that she stays in now.
She
said she went to work at the bank in 1992 to help pay for private
school for her children. First she was a teller, then a teller
supervisor. She was a financial services rep when she got into trouble
in 2013.
She said she didn’t know why she stole from Podolski.
“I
just always figured I’d put it back, but it didn’t happen,” she said,
though she said she paid back the money after being arrested.
An
official from Regions Bank, based in Birmingham, Ala., was apologetic
and said the case in Florissant spawned companywide changes. Those
include security alerts and internal reviews whenever associates process
transactions on inactive accounts.
“There is nothing we
value more than the trust of our customers, and, unfortunately, in this
case, one of our former associates violated both the trust of her
customer and the trust we had in her as well,” bank spokesman Jeremy
King said by email.
He said Regions Bank checked to see if other clients were targeted. “Thankfully, no additional cases were found.”
Smith didn’t want to comment about what the bank could do to decrease the risk of forgery.
But,
she said, with the availability of online banking services by computer
and cellphone, there’s no reason not to check your balances most days.
Full Article & Source:
At 85 he foiled a financial scam; other seniors aren't so lucky
How False Stereotypes About People With Disabilities Hold Employers Back
More than 25 years after the passage of the Americans With
Disabilities Act (ADA), physical architecture and some educational
opportunities thankfully have changed, but many negative attitudes and
stigmas about people with disabilities have not. Indeed, a major Princeton study shows that while people with disabilities are seen as warm, they are not seen as competent.
Meanwhile, a study published by Cornell Hospitality Quarterly
analyzed results from a survey of employers at 320 hospitality
companies in the United States. It found that all the companies share a
concern that those with disabilities could not do the work required of
their employees. Another top concern was the potential cost of
unspecified accommodations they might need to provide for a person with a
disability under the provisions of the Americans With Disabilities Act. This is despite the fact that most such accommodations are not exceptionally costly.
There is also evidence that employers fear legal action should they terminate an employee with a disability. It is far more difficult to prove discrimination for not being hired in the first place. So, given the perception that people with disabilities aren’t competent, and could potentially be costly, why would an employer take the risk of hiring them?
There is also evidence that employers fear legal action should they terminate an employee with a disability. It is far more difficult to prove discrimination for not being hired in the first place. So, given the perception that people with disabilities aren’t competent, and could potentially be costly, why would an employer take the risk of hiring them?
One of the employers who took the “risk” was Randy Lewis, former Vice
President of Walgreens and Fortune 50 executive, who led Walgreens’
logistics division for sixteen years, as the chain grew from 1,500 to
8,000 stores. Randy introduced an inclusive model of hiring people with
disabilities at Walgreens’ distribution centers that resulted in 10
percent of its workforce consisting of people with disabilities — all of
whom are held to the same standards as their colleagues without
disabilities.
The outcome? Study after study turned out to be myth-busters. The employees with disabilities were more productive and loyal than their non-disabled peers! And most accommodations? Either free or cheap. But even when the relatively few more expensive accommodations were factored in, the overall costs of accommodations were far outweighed by the low turnover rates and better tenures of the employees with disabilities. Grateful for opportunities, and in many cases thriving on repetitive tasks, they are so loyal to Walgreens that recruitment costs were saved as the employees continued to stay in their jobs and deliver excellent results. You can learn more about this in Randy’s new book or on the Walgreens website.
The outcome? Study after study turned out to be myth-busters. The employees with disabilities were more productive and loyal than their non-disabled peers! And most accommodations? Either free or cheap. But even when the relatively few more expensive accommodations were factored in, the overall costs of accommodations were far outweighed by the low turnover rates and better tenures of the employees with disabilities. Grateful for opportunities, and in many cases thriving on repetitive tasks, they are so loyal to Walgreens that recruitment costs were saved as the employees continued to stay in their jobs and deliver excellent results. You can learn more about this in Randy’s new book or on the Walgreens website.
Other companies such as Ernst and Young (EY), have also found
inclusive hiring to be a winning ticket. Starting with its founder,
Arthur Young, EY has always embraced differing abilities. Trained as a
lawyer, Arthur was deaf with low vision and he wasn’t able to
comfortably practice. He turned to finance and the new field of
accounting to build his career. His disability drove him to innovation
and entrepreneurship, which played a pivotal role in the development of
EY. Finding and engaging diverse talents has been a key part of EY’s ongoing success.
Malcolm Gladwell’s new book, “David and Goliath,”
extols the strength of people with disabilities. Because traditional
ways of doing things don’t always work for people with disabilities,
Gladwell demonstrates that they compensate for that in ways that benefit
the workforce by developing incredible ways to innovate and succeed.
AMC Theaters, Lowe’s, many grocery stores and others are also getting
outstanding results by hiring employees with disabilities. So what are
other employers waiting for? They are still blinded by negative
stereotypes. It’s time for people with disabilities to be seen for what
they can do, and not for what they cannot. What can people with disabilities do? Think about it.
Beautiful music from a deaf man? It happened. Ludwig von Beethoven.
A Super bowl champion NFL player who is deaf? It happened. Derrick Coleman.
A Nobel Prize for a scientist who failed in school? It happened. Albert Einstein.
Secrets of the universe being revealed by a man who uses a wheelchair
and who can no longer speak? It’s happening. Stephen Hawking.
It’s time to change the narrative of how we see people with disabilities, so employers can see the abilities
they have and the positive impact on their business’s bottom line. It’s
amazing that such a small change can have such a big impact. It can —
if it is done in a focused and strategic way.
Employing people with disabilities may take a little more forethought and planning. The U.S. government recently changed their expectations of federal contractors who now must become at least partially inclusive of hiring people with disabilities. There are many groups that can help in the process including Business Leadership Network, Project Search, National Organization on Disability and others.
Employing people with disabilities may take a little more forethought and planning. The U.S. government recently changed their expectations of federal contractors who now must become at least partially inclusive of hiring people with disabilities. There are many groups that can help in the process including Business Leadership Network, Project Search, National Organization on Disability and others.
As the Baby Boomers continue to age, a powerful answer to labor and
talent shortages already exists in our own backyards — our own family
members and neighbors with disabilities who want to work.
Recognize the disability. Imagine the possibility. Respect the ability. Full Article & Source:
How False Stereotypes About People With Disabilities Hold Employers Back
Thursday, September 22, 2016
Families of Abused Nevada Seniors Blame Politics for Senate Hopeful’s Inaction
Catherine Cortez Masto |
The family members accuse Jared Shafer, a former Clark County, Nev., official who runs a private guardianship firm, of bilking family members’ estates of hundreds of thousands of dollars.
Shafer brushed off threats of legal action by invoking his connections to Masto, the Democratic candidate for Senate hoping to replace Harry Reid.
“Jared Shafer knew that Masto would never take a report” due to her family’s ties to Shafer, said Charles Pascal, whose mother-in-law died under Shafer’s care, in a Tuesday interview. “Why can these guardians do these things? They can do these things because they believe that no action will be taken.”
Nevada’s guardianship program has sparked controversy over allegations by the families of state wards that court-appointed guardians, who assume control over the estates of the elderly and indigent, extract excessive fees without providing basic levels of care.
The issue was thrust into the Nevada Senate race last month when the Freedom Partners Action Fund, a Super PAC that supports Masto’s opponent, Republican Rep. Joe Heck, highlighted the controversy in a television ad charging that Masto “let Nevada seniors down.”
Freedom Partners announced a $1.2 million television buy on Wednesday to broadcast a separate ad detailing additional complaints of abuse in Nevada’s guardianship program, and Masto’s apparent lack of action on behalf of families that asked her office for assistance.
The initial ad, titled “Abuse,” focused on Guadalupe Olvera, a World War II veteran placed in Shafer’s care after his wife and legal guardian passed away in 2009. “When the family pleaded directly with Catherine Cortez Masto for help, she turned them away,” the Freedom Partners ad claimed.
Rebecca Schultz, Olvera’s daughter says that Shafer billed her father’s estate for thousands of dollars in excessive and unsupported expenses. Those included payments to a case manager since imprisoned on felony charges of abusing the elderly after she was found to have stolen from state wards in her care and pawned their belongings.
A California judge terminated Shafer’s guardianship of Olvera in 2013, but not before Shafer billed the estate for another $240,000 in legal fees.
The Masto campaign called the Freedom Partners ad “another misleading ad by the billionaire Koch Brothers” in a statement on its website.
The campaign noted that Masto, as attorney general, “created a Senior Protection Unit to ensure investigators and prosecutors had the tools to pursue those who abuse, neglect or exploit seniors.”
The campaign also pointed to legislation “prepared with [Masto’s] support” that created a licensing system for Nevada guardians and imposed stricter financial oversight. That legislation was not introduced in the state legislature until after Masto left office.
The Masto campaign did not respond to a request for further comment.
Schultz says Masto refused to directly assist in Olvera’s case. When she asked for help, Masto’s office sent Schultz a brief letter saying that the issue was outside of the attorney general’s purview.
Schultz believes that Masto’s family’s relationship with Shafer was one reason that she did not offer any assistance. Manny Cortez, Masto’s late father and a long-time fixture in Las Vegas politics, was a friend of Shafer’s, according to former Las Vegas city councilman Steve Miller.
The two occasionally worked together directly. Cortez sat on the board of a nonprofit that employed Shafer as its secretary and granted funds to the Manuel J. Cortez Elementary School, which is named for Masto’s father.
When Schultz threatened to take legal action to terminate Shafer’s guardianship, she says he brushed it off by noting his relationships with Masto and her father.
“Mr. Shafer and his cronies had indicated that Ms. Masto would NOT do anything since her deceased father, Manny Cortez, was buddies with Shafer and she will continue to whole heartedly protect her daddy’s old friends, no matter how criminal they may be,” Schultz wrote on the website of the National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse.
Shafer did not respond to requests for comment made through the website of his guardianship company, Professional Fiduciary Services of Nevada, Inc.
Pascal relayed similar conversations with Shafer, who Pascal says “removed over $350,000 in fees from [his mother-in-law Marcy Dudeck’s] estate trust account even though he hadn’t performed any guardian services.”
DuDeck was one of Shafer’s wards, though she lived in a nursing home in California at the time. Patience Bristol, the Shafer associate who would later end up in prison on elderly abuse charges, facilitated DuDeck’s removal from her California nursing home in violation of a court order in 2006.
He immediately sought help from then-California attorney general Jerry Brown. Brown’s office referred him to Masto because DuDeck was a ward of the state of Nevada.
Pascal recounted the conversation with a staffer in Masto’s office.
“I got a staff member on the phone who said ‘we don’t take reports on guardians,’” he recalled. “I said but what happens when someone is kidnapped? … They put me on hold. Then they asked me the name of the guardian. I said the guardian’s name is Jared Shafer. Then I was put on hold again. They came back and said ‘we don’t take reports on Jared Shafer or any guardian.’”
Like Schultz, Pascal says Shafer invoked his connections to Masto’s family when threatened with legal action.
Pascal remembers telling Shafer that he would take the issue up with Masto directly. “He says, ‘go ahead.’ He says, ‘Let me tell you something, Catherine’s father put me in as a guardian, we were friends for years. Try filing a report and see what happens.’”
In its statement on Freedom Partners’ ad, the Masto campaign defended its lack of action against Shafer, noting that the AG’s office “was legally prohibited from giving legal advice or opinions to private citizens.”
However, Masto’s Republican successor, current attorney general Adam Laxalt, has made guardian abuse a priority issue. He joined Las Vegas and Clark County officials in March to announce “a joint investigative and prosecution team to help combat guardianship and elder exploitation in Nevada.”
By June, Laxalt’s office was prosecuting two Nevada guardians. It also moved that month to steer federal mortgage settlement funds to a legal aid center for the explicit purpose of combatting guardian abuse.
Pascal effusively praised those and other recent efforts to address the guardianship controversy. “Everything that Masto didn’t do, Laxalt is doing,” he said. “I’ve had calls from his office myself.”
There is still work to do to root out abuse in the system, he added.
“When you turn a battleship, you don’t turn it on a dime,” Pascal said. “Laxalt’s got 30 years of corruption he’s gotta turn.”
He sees Masto as a product of, if not a participant in, that system.
“She stands for the old guard, that old guard of Boss Tweed corruption, whereby you’ve got your contributors, your friends, and this is way it always was, and this is the way it always should be,” he said.
“She’s yesterday. And that’s the whole problem, because yesterday doesn’t work anymore.”
Full Article & Source:
Families of Abused Nevada Seniors Blame Politics for Senate Hopeful’s Inaction
Newest Nevada Senate ads focus on guardianship abuse, Kochs
LAS VEGAS (AP) — At least seven new ads are up on Nevada airwaves this week in the state's high-stakes U.S. Senate race.
The newest include a spot released Wednesday by Freedom Partners Action Fund, which is linked to the billionaire Koch brothers. It makes a similar argument as one of the group's older ads that Democrat Catherine Cortez Masto didn't do enough to prevent private guardians from abusing seniors.
The former Nevada attorney general says she helped shape a bill offering solutions that was introduced after she left office.
Meanwhile, the Harry Reid-linked Senate Majority PAC released an ad Tuesday dramatizing Republican Rep. Joe Heck answering calls from the Koch brothers on an iPhone and suggesting he does their bidding.
Heck's camp says such arguments are hypocritical because huge PACs also support Democrats.
Full Article & Source:
Newest Nevada Senate ads focus on guardianship abuse, Kochs
The newest include a spot released Wednesday by Freedom Partners Action Fund, which is linked to the billionaire Koch brothers. It makes a similar argument as one of the group's older ads that Democrat Catherine Cortez Masto didn't do enough to prevent private guardians from abusing seniors.
The former Nevada attorney general says she helped shape a bill offering solutions that was introduced after she left office.
Meanwhile, the Harry Reid-linked Senate Majority PAC released an ad Tuesday dramatizing Republican Rep. Joe Heck answering calls from the Koch brothers on an iPhone and suggesting he does their bidding.
Heck's camp says such arguments are hypocritical because huge PACs also support Democrats.
Full Article & Source:
Newest Nevada Senate ads focus on guardianship abuse, Kochs
Old and Alone: The Epidemic of Elder Abuse in America
In 2015, 77-year-old Elaine Latshaw was found dead in her home in
Mahanoy City, Pennsylvania, covered in her own urine, feces, and blood.
Her foot was so destroyed by gangrene that the bones were protruding,
according to local news reports.
An autopsy later attributed her death to "aspiration pneumonia due to
multiple pressure ulcerations, gangrene, and malnutrition due to
hypertensive vascular disease with vascular dementia."
Local police say her death was no accident. This summer, Latshaw's son John and his girlfriend Dorothy Robinson were charged with the third-degree murder for their failure to care for Latshaw.
The couple, for their part, say they were simply following Latshaw's wishes—and that she wanted to die.
By 2040, more millennials will be caring for the elderly than for the next generation of children. One in ten of those people will be abused—emotionally, physically, or both—and for 90 percent of those abused, it will be at the hands of their own family and caretakers, according to the National Council on Aging.
"It really is a national hidden scandal," said Sherri Snelling, CEO and founder of caregiver support service Caregiving Club, who has worked in and outside of the government to advocate for elder rights. "There's a lot of shades of gray to this."
Full Article & Source:
Old and Alone: The Epidemic of Elder Abuse in America
Local police say her death was no accident. This summer, Latshaw's son John and his girlfriend Dorothy Robinson were charged with the third-degree murder for their failure to care for Latshaw.
The couple, for their part, say they were simply following Latshaw's wishes—and that she wanted to die.
By 2040, more millennials will be caring for the elderly than for the next generation of children. One in ten of those people will be abused—emotionally, physically, or both—and for 90 percent of those abused, it will be at the hands of their own family and caretakers, according to the National Council on Aging.
"It really is a national hidden scandal," said Sherri Snelling, CEO and founder of caregiver support service Caregiving Club, who has worked in and outside of the government to advocate for elder rights. "There's a lot of shades of gray to this."
Full Article & Source:
Old and Alone: The Epidemic of Elder Abuse in America
Wednesday, September 21, 2016
Palm Beach Clerk's Office Honored for Guardianship Fraud Program
Sharon Bock, Clerk of Courts Palm Beach County Melanie Bell |
Palm Beach County's Clerk & Comptroller office uncovered more than $5.1 million in unsubstantiated disbursements, missing assets and fraud in the probate court's guardianship program.
Clerk Sharon Bock implemented a guardianship fraud program and hotline in 2009 to allow anonymous tips on waste and financial fraud in court-appointed guardianships over the elderly, minor children and other wards. She has since audited and investigated more than 900 cases involving allegations of missing money or property, suspicious loans, financial transfers, unauthorized access to bank accounts, conflicts of interests and other violations of federal, state or local laws, according to a statement Tuesday.
That work earned Bock's program international recognition at the 4th World Congress on Adult Guardianship held Sept. 14-17 in Berlin, where it was the only U.S. venture among eight others honored for innovation.
"The exploitation of our most vulnerable citizens is not only an issue in the United States, it is a worldwide crisis," Bock said. "I have made it my mission to team up with leaders on a national and international level to strengthen guardianship laws."
Full Article & Source:
Palm Beach Clerk's Office Honored for Guardianship Fraud Program
Tragic consequences when nursing homes neglect substance abuse
Kenneth “Bubba” Levesque was taking medicine to quell his cravings for heroin when he entered Braemoor Health Center last summer. Massive infections had forced the amputation of his lower left leg, and he needed help learning how to walk again with a prosthetic limb.
Levesque, a teddy bear of a man, seesawed between addiction and recovery many times over the years, and told his family that this was his wake-up call, that he was finally going to “get clean” while in the Brockton nursing home.
But state records show that three days after Levesque was discharged from Braemoor in March, the 43-year-old was dead from an opioid overdose, a grim coda to his seven months at the nursing home.
During those months, according to state reports and Levesque’s family, he received escalating doses of opioid medications and no substance abuse counseling — at the very time he had vowed to banish narcotics from his life.
Even as regulators and health leaders have launched myriad initiatives to combat the opioid crisis in Massachusetts, nursing homes — where potent pain medications are routinely administered — remain distant outposts.
Few nursing homes are prepared to identify and treat residents with a history of substance abuse, and even when they do, services to care for such patients have typically not been a priority, say addiction and long-term care specialists.
The issue became news this summer when Braemoor became one of at least two Massachusetts nursing homes where state inspectors declared patients in “immediate jeopardy” because of serious violations, including lack of substance abuse treatment and staff training.
Braemoor’s parent company — which has faced other concerns about quality of
care — says it has since significantly improved treatment for residents with addictions.
The critical gap in substance abuse care is expected to grow as baby boomers reach an age when they begin entering nursing homes at a hastening rate, specialists said.
“The addiction crisis is going to be in patients in every demographic, and it behooves nursing homes to learn how to take care of [these] patients,” said Dr. Sarah Wakeman, medical director of the substance use disorder initiative at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Physicians need to be more aware of drug addiction in nursing homes, according to Dr. James Gessner, president of the Massachusetts Medical Society. But that may be about to change. Gessner said the society’s panels on opioid therapy and on geriatric care will soon discuss ways to help physicians better address the issue.
“This is not age-dependent, not social- or economic-background dependent, and it certainly has to be an issue when taking care of our elderly patients, especially with the many mediations our elderly patients are on,” Gessner said.
A June report from the federal Office of Inspector General found that millions of older Americans received prescriptions for commonly abused opioids last year through Medicare, the government insurance program for people over 65.
Nearly one-third of beneficiaries getting prescriptions through Medicare received at least one of these drugs. And on average, these patients each had five opioid prescriptions in 2015, the report concluded.
‘The addiction crisis is going to be in patients in every demographic, and it behooves nursing homes to learn.’
Nursing home leaders say they are asking state health regulators for guidance on how best to care for the rapidly growing number of patients coming through their doors with drug addictions.
Tara Gregorio, senior vice president at Massachusetts Senior Care Association, the industry trade group, said administrators worry about visitors slipping nursing home patients opioids and other drugs.
“Some have called for limiting visitors and room searches, but it’s unclear if [state Health Department] regulations would allow for that,” Gregorio said. “And there are concerns about discharge to the community, are we doing it in a way that complies with the department’s regulations.
We believe there are discussions that need to happen on a regulatory front.”
The state Health Department said in a statement it is “in the process of finalizing written treatment guidelines to assist nursing homes in caring for those suffering from substance misuse.”
The guidance arrives too late for Levesque’s family, who say they were repeatedly rebuffed when they asked nurses at Braemoor Health Center about the powerful narcotics Levesque was receiving.
“I got into an argument with the lady who discharged him because they were sending him onto the street with nothing. No [addiction] counseling, nothing,” his sister, Robin Levesque, said.
“We begged them for a place for Kenny to go when he was coming home,” Levesque said. “And they said, ‘I don’t know what to tell you. Go to the emergency room.’ ”
Braemore’s parent company declined to answer questions about Levesque’s care.
The other nursing home recently penalized for lacking substance abuse treatment was Parsons Hill Rehabilitation & Health Care Center in Worcester. A patient there overdosed on heroin after injecting the drug directly into a tube that nurses had inserted so an ankle infection could be treated with intravenous antibiotics.
He survived.
A state investigation did not detail how the patient obtained heroin while at the nursing home but found he wanted help with a substance abuse problem and had not received it. The investigators concluded that Parsons Hill failed to develop substance abuse care plans for that patient and eight others who struggled with addictions, including one who also admitted using heroin while at Parsons Hill.
In the wake of the Braemoor and Parsons Hill cases, the state Health Department in May trained its nursing home inspectors about abuse of drugs in nursing homes to help them recognize whether facilities are providing appropriate care to patients with addictions, according to the department.
Synergy Health Centers, the New Jersey company that owns Braemoor and 10 other Massachusetts nursing homes, said in a statement the company instituted procedures to identify and treat substance abuse problems at all its nursing homes.
Those measures include identifying residents at risk of addiction and referring those with a history of substance abuse to treatment.
The company also is educating staff about chronic pain, opioid use, and addiction. Additionally, it is conducting weekly support meetings for residents run by specialists. Finally, Synergy said it enhanced surveillance in outdoor smoking areas.
Parsons Hill said in a statement it enhanced its procedures, including “increased staff education and awareness in the areas of substance abuse disorders, and has contracted with a licensed alcohol and drug counselor to provide on-site support services.”
The statement did not say whether Athena Health Care Systems, the Connecticut company that manages Parsons Hill, has enhanced substance abuse care at its 18 other Massachusetts nursing homes, or those it manages in Connecticut and Rhode Island. Athena declined to answer further questions.
For patients who have already started down the path to substance abuse treatment, finding a spot in a nursing home can prove vexing. Mass. General’s Wakeman said nursing homes sometimes misunderstand federal regulations regarding treatment of patients receiving medicine to block opioid cravings.
That prompts the nursing homes to claim — erroneously — they cannot accept such patients, forcing Wakeman to regularly hunt for nursing homes for patients who need longer-term care, but who also are receiving treatment for substance abuse.
A New York nonprofit, The New Jewish Home, is trying to make it easier for addicts to find care in nursing homes.
Two years ago, it embarked on an experiment involving 120 patients that included Alcoholics Anonymous meetings in the nursing home, talk therapy, and care by specialists who replaced potentially addictive drugs with medications that don’t lead to addiction.
Program workers paid close attention to patients as they were discharged, to ensure they had ample support, including outpatient therapy and home visits.
Executives for the New Jewish Home said they have not yet calculated how much the intensive program costs for each patient, but have committed to continuing it.
In the first two years, the company found that roughly two-thirds of patients who had been addicted to alcohol or drugs reported no relapse one month after discharge.
“If that home visit indicated a relapse, I would do a second home visit with them, to make sure they are getting whatever services they need,” said Sherry Samaroo, coordinator of the geriatric substance abuse recovery program for the nonprofit.
Full Article & Source:
Tragic consequences when nursing homes neglect substance abuse
Levesque, a teddy bear of a man, seesawed between addiction and recovery many times over the years, and told his family that this was his wake-up call, that he was finally going to “get clean” while in the Brockton nursing home.
But state records show that three days after Levesque was discharged from Braemoor in March, the 43-year-old was dead from an opioid overdose, a grim coda to his seven months at the nursing home.
During those months, according to state reports and Levesque’s family, he received escalating doses of opioid medications and no substance abuse counseling — at the very time he had vowed to banish narcotics from his life.
Even as regulators and health leaders have launched myriad initiatives to combat the opioid crisis in Massachusetts, nursing homes — where potent pain medications are routinely administered — remain distant outposts.
Few nursing homes are prepared to identify and treat residents with a history of substance abuse, and even when they do, services to care for such patients have typically not been a priority, say addiction and long-term care specialists.
The issue became news this summer when Braemoor became one of at least two Massachusetts nursing homes where state inspectors declared patients in “immediate jeopardy” because of serious violations, including lack of substance abuse treatment and staff training.
Braemoor’s parent company — which has faced other concerns about quality of
care — says it has since significantly improved treatment for residents with addictions.
The critical gap in substance abuse care is expected to grow as baby boomers reach an age when they begin entering nursing homes at a hastening rate, specialists said.
“The addiction crisis is going to be in patients in every demographic, and it behooves nursing homes to learn how to take care of [these] patients,” said Dr. Sarah Wakeman, medical director of the substance use disorder initiative at Massachusetts General Hospital.
Physicians need to be more aware of drug addiction in nursing homes, according to Dr. James Gessner, president of the Massachusetts Medical Society. But that may be about to change. Gessner said the society’s panels on opioid therapy and on geriatric care will soon discuss ways to help physicians better address the issue.
“This is not age-dependent, not social- or economic-background dependent, and it certainly has to be an issue when taking care of our elderly patients, especially with the many mediations our elderly patients are on,” Gessner said.
A June report from the federal Office of Inspector General found that millions of older Americans received prescriptions for commonly abused opioids last year through Medicare, the government insurance program for people over 65.
Nearly one-third of beneficiaries getting prescriptions through Medicare received at least one of these drugs. And on average, these patients each had five opioid prescriptions in 2015, the report concluded.
‘The addiction crisis is going to be in patients in every demographic, and it behooves nursing homes to learn.’
Nursing home leaders say they are asking state health regulators for guidance on how best to care for the rapidly growing number of patients coming through their doors with drug addictions.
Tara Gregorio, senior vice president at Massachusetts Senior Care Association, the industry trade group, said administrators worry about visitors slipping nursing home patients opioids and other drugs.
“Some have called for limiting visitors and room searches, but it’s unclear if [state Health Department] regulations would allow for that,” Gregorio said. “And there are concerns about discharge to the community, are we doing it in a way that complies with the department’s regulations.
We believe there are discussions that need to happen on a regulatory front.”
The state Health Department said in a statement it is “in the process of finalizing written treatment guidelines to assist nursing homes in caring for those suffering from substance misuse.”
The guidance arrives too late for Levesque’s family, who say they were repeatedly rebuffed when they asked nurses at Braemoor Health Center about the powerful narcotics Levesque was receiving.
“I got into an argument with the lady who discharged him because they were sending him onto the street with nothing. No [addiction] counseling, nothing,” his sister, Robin Levesque, said.
“We begged them for a place for Kenny to go when he was coming home,” Levesque said. “And they said, ‘I don’t know what to tell you. Go to the emergency room.’ ”
Braemore’s parent company declined to answer questions about Levesque’s care.
The other nursing home recently penalized for lacking substance abuse treatment was Parsons Hill Rehabilitation & Health Care Center in Worcester. A patient there overdosed on heroin after injecting the drug directly into a tube that nurses had inserted so an ankle infection could be treated with intravenous antibiotics.
He survived.
A state investigation did not detail how the patient obtained heroin while at the nursing home but found he wanted help with a substance abuse problem and had not received it. The investigators concluded that Parsons Hill failed to develop substance abuse care plans for that patient and eight others who struggled with addictions, including one who also admitted using heroin while at Parsons Hill.
In the wake of the Braemoor and Parsons Hill cases, the state Health Department in May trained its nursing home inspectors about abuse of drugs in nursing homes to help them recognize whether facilities are providing appropriate care to patients with addictions, according to the department.
Synergy Health Centers, the New Jersey company that owns Braemoor and 10 other Massachusetts nursing homes, said in a statement the company instituted procedures to identify and treat substance abuse problems at all its nursing homes.
Those measures include identifying residents at risk of addiction and referring those with a history of substance abuse to treatment.
The company also is educating staff about chronic pain, opioid use, and addiction. Additionally, it is conducting weekly support meetings for residents run by specialists. Finally, Synergy said it enhanced surveillance in outdoor smoking areas.
Parsons Hill said in a statement it enhanced its procedures, including “increased staff education and awareness in the areas of substance abuse disorders, and has contracted with a licensed alcohol and drug counselor to provide on-site support services.”
The statement did not say whether Athena Health Care Systems, the Connecticut company that manages Parsons Hill, has enhanced substance abuse care at its 18 other Massachusetts nursing homes, or those it manages in Connecticut and Rhode Island. Athena declined to answer further questions.
For patients who have already started down the path to substance abuse treatment, finding a spot in a nursing home can prove vexing. Mass. General’s Wakeman said nursing homes sometimes misunderstand federal regulations regarding treatment of patients receiving medicine to block opioid cravings.
That prompts the nursing homes to claim — erroneously — they cannot accept such patients, forcing Wakeman to regularly hunt for nursing homes for patients who need longer-term care, but who also are receiving treatment for substance abuse.
A New York nonprofit, The New Jewish Home, is trying to make it easier for addicts to find care in nursing homes.
Two years ago, it embarked on an experiment involving 120 patients that included Alcoholics Anonymous meetings in the nursing home, talk therapy, and care by specialists who replaced potentially addictive drugs with medications that don’t lead to addiction.
Program workers paid close attention to patients as they were discharged, to ensure they had ample support, including outpatient therapy and home visits.
Executives for the New Jewish Home said they have not yet calculated how much the intensive program costs for each patient, but have committed to continuing it.
In the first two years, the company found that roughly two-thirds of patients who had been addicted to alcohol or drugs reported no relapse one month after discharge.
“If that home visit indicated a relapse, I would do a second home visit with them, to make sure they are getting whatever services they need,” said Sherry Samaroo, coordinator of the geriatric substance abuse recovery program for the nonprofit.
Full Article & Source:
Tragic consequences when nursing homes neglect substance abuse
Nursing home to pay $3.5 million to settle illegal patient transfer allegations
A California nursing home and two physicians who worked at the facility will pay more than $3.5 million to resolve allegations that they took part in an illegal patient transfer scheme, authorities announced on Friday.
The settlement, reached in early August, resolves a whistleblower lawsuit brought by a former employee of Westlake Convalescent Hospital in Los Angeles. The employee's suit claims the facility paid kickbacks to a “care consortium” the city's Skid Row district to transfer patients to a hospital for unnecessary medical services between 2008 and 2010.
The patients were then transferred from the hospital to Westlake for unnecessary skilled nursing stays. The facility also allegedly billed Medicare and Medi-Cal for these services.
Jasvant Modi, M.D., a physician at the facility, allegedly admitted patients from the nursing facility to the now-shuttered hospital and back again to extend their Medicare-covered stays. His wife and fellow physician, Meera Modi, M.D., also reportedly signed medical orders for non-payable services provided to patients admitted through the scheme.
McKnight's call to Westlake for comment was not returned by press time.
The case is linked to a larger scheme to defraud federal and state health programs by illegally recruiting mostly homeless Skid Row residents for medically unnecessary hospital and nursing home stays, authorities said. Another physician pleaded guilty to his involvement in the scheme in 2013.
Ricardo Gonzales, the whistleblower who brought the case, received $534,471 from the settlement.
Full Article & Source:
Nursing home to pay $3.5 million to settle illegal patient transfer allegations
The settlement, reached in early August, resolves a whistleblower lawsuit brought by a former employee of Westlake Convalescent Hospital in Los Angeles. The employee's suit claims the facility paid kickbacks to a “care consortium” the city's Skid Row district to transfer patients to a hospital for unnecessary medical services between 2008 and 2010.
The patients were then transferred from the hospital to Westlake for unnecessary skilled nursing stays. The facility also allegedly billed Medicare and Medi-Cal for these services.
Jasvant Modi, M.D., a physician at the facility, allegedly admitted patients from the nursing facility to the now-shuttered hospital and back again to extend their Medicare-covered stays. His wife and fellow physician, Meera Modi, M.D., also reportedly signed medical orders for non-payable services provided to patients admitted through the scheme.
McKnight's call to Westlake for comment was not returned by press time.
The case is linked to a larger scheme to defraud federal and state health programs by illegally recruiting mostly homeless Skid Row residents for medically unnecessary hospital and nursing home stays, authorities said. Another physician pleaded guilty to his involvement in the scheme in 2013.
Ricardo Gonzales, the whistleblower who brought the case, received $534,471 from the settlement.
Full Article & Source:
Nursing home to pay $3.5 million to settle illegal patient transfer allegations
Tuesday, September 20, 2016
Pa. halted anonymous nursing home complaints for 3 years, audit finds
HARRISBURG — The Pennsylvania Department of Health risked “residents' safety” by refusing to accept anonymous complaints against nursing homes for almost a three-year period, Auditor General Eugene DePasquale said Tuesday.
Halting anonymous complaints violates
federal policy and is “a decision that is absolutely breathtaking,”
DePasquale said at a news conference. He said he suspects it was “an
action intended to silence critics.”
It occurred from 2012-14 under the former administration of Republican Gov. Tom Corbett.
Michael Wolf, who became acting state
Secretary of Health in October 2012, was nominated by Corbett in April
2013 and confirmed by the Senate in May 2013. Now a vice president of a
health care management company, Wolf could not be reached Tuesday for
comment.
DePasquale, the state's fiscal watchdog,
said his auditors found no records indicating the rationale for the
decision to stop accepting anonymous complaints.
The audit covered January 2014 through
October 2015, a total of 22 months, DePasquale's staff said. During that
period, 4,062 complaints were filed against for-profit and nonprofit
nursing homes. The complaints resulted in 47 sanctions, 32 of them
monetary, according to DePasquale's office.
Dr. Karen Murphy, the current agency
secretary and Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf's appointee, said the department
resumed accepting complaints from anonymous tipsters in 2015. Complaints
increased 63 percent after the agency rescinded the policy of not
accepting anonymous complaints, the audit said.
Asked what percentage of anonymous complaints were validated, Murphy said about 10 percent.
While the agency fully cooperated with the
audit and many of the recommendations have been implemented, it still
has “work to do” in assuring appropriate staffing levels, DePasquale
said.
The level of care provided to 80,000
Pennsylvanians in nursing homes is directly affected by staffing levels,
Depasquale said, and the state health department did little to enforce a
law requiring 2.7 hours of direct nursing care per day for each
resident.
In 7,325 instances of the agency completing a
nursing home survey, it issued 13 citations — “an unbelievably low
number,” DePasquale said.
He cited examples of insufficient penalties,
such as a resident with a history of wandering, who fell down a flight
of stairs in a wheelchair. Staff responded immediately, but the patient
later died in a hospital. The facility was cited for violations and
fined $4,000.
In another instance, after a complaint from a
family member that a patient was “dirty, frail and unresponsive,” the
person was found to be malnourished and dehydrated. The patient was
receiving too much anti-psychotic medication, DePasquale said, and later
died in a hospital.
As a matter of policy, the names of the homes are not cited in the audit, DePasquale said.
Murphy said citations issued to homes are publicly available on her agency's website.
Pennsylvania's maximum civil monetary penalty is $500 per day.
A comparison of selected states in the audit
showed the maximum penalty is $100,000 in California, $10,000 in New
York, $10,000 per day in Texas, and $25,000 in Illinois, which may be
doubled.
Russell McDaid, president and CEO of the
Pennsylvania Health Care Association, an advocacy group for nursing
homes and their residents, applauded Murphy for requesting the
performance review audit from the auditor general, including ways the
department can improve its enforcement.
However, McDaid cautioned that “more stringent penalties do not alone improve care.”
“It is important to note that when any
sanction or penalty is considered, the most important goal is to
identify the practice in question, take steps to correct the practice
and ensure that any sanction does not jeopardize the facility's ability
to improve resident care, comfort and safety,” he said. “Taking
financial resources away from the bedside does not improve resident
care.”
Full Article & Source:
Pa. halted anonymous nursing home complaints for 3 years, audit finds
Rhythms of a Great Day
Managing time takes on a whole new meaning when you’re a full time caregiver. Flying by the seat of your pants is not an option when a loved one is depending on you for basically everything. You have to find a way to use your time wisely while making your loved one feel secure and cared for. Working out a good schedule can take a lot of pressure off of you and make your loved one’s days a lot better. A good schedule can be a lifesaver should someone have to step into your shoes for a few hours or even a few days.
Walking a Mile in Another’s Moccasins
Can you imagine having to depend on someone else for your meals, your transportation and even your personal hygiene? Most of our parents have lived their lives fiercely independent, something they prided themselves on. Now they have to depend on one of their children? What a humbling experience that must be. Working out a good schedule can make them feel they have a little more control over their day. Knowing when they will eat, get dressed, take a little nap and watch their favorite shows can make them feel a lot more secure. So include them in the planning of your schedule when at all possible. Some of our folks like to sleep in a while in the morning while others like to rise very early. Consider what is comfortable for them.
Have a Schedule But Be Flexible
Having a good schedule is like having “good bones” to your day. How you “flesh it out” from one day to the next will depend on the health of your loved one and the appointments that must be kept.
Don’t Keep It a Secret
Once you work out a good schedule, make sure to write it down and post it on the refrigerator or another conspicuous place so your loved one can see it. Also let other family members and frequent visitors know when your parent likes to take a little nap or watch that favorite television show. Should someone have to relieve you, they’ll be aware of the routine and feel more comfortable helping you.
Meals and Snacks
Planning meals and snacks can also save you a lot of time and unnecessary additional trips to the store. Go over the week’s menu with your loved one. You might find out their food choices have changed. Remember older people really enjoy something sweet each day, even if it’s yogurt, fruit or those little pudding cups. Soup is also a good choice for seniors. It’s easy to eat and comforting. Just try to choose the lower salt varieties.
The Last Important Thought
Being a caregiver has to be the hardest job on earth. I cannot stress this enough — take care of yourself! Caregivers often fall ill while caring for someone they love. You must take time to eat right, sleep right and get away from time-to-time. If you don’t, you will burn out, or get sick or both. Don’t wait until you’re at the end of your rope; find a local in-home care agency before you need them.
Full Article and Source:
Senior Care Advice: The Rhythms of a Great Day
Walking a Mile in Another’s Moccasins
Can you imagine having to depend on someone else for your meals, your transportation and even your personal hygiene? Most of our parents have lived their lives fiercely independent, something they prided themselves on. Now they have to depend on one of their children? What a humbling experience that must be. Working out a good schedule can make them feel they have a little more control over their day. Knowing when they will eat, get dressed, take a little nap and watch their favorite shows can make them feel a lot more secure. So include them in the planning of your schedule when at all possible. Some of our folks like to sleep in a while in the morning while others like to rise very early. Consider what is comfortable for them.
Have a Schedule But Be Flexible
Having a good schedule is like having “good bones” to your day. How you “flesh it out” from one day to the next will depend on the health of your loved one and the appointments that must be kept.
Don’t Keep It a Secret
Once you work out a good schedule, make sure to write it down and post it on the refrigerator or another conspicuous place so your loved one can see it. Also let other family members and frequent visitors know when your parent likes to take a little nap or watch that favorite television show. Should someone have to relieve you, they’ll be aware of the routine and feel more comfortable helping you.
Meals and Snacks
Planning meals and snacks can also save you a lot of time and unnecessary additional trips to the store. Go over the week’s menu with your loved one. You might find out their food choices have changed. Remember older people really enjoy something sweet each day, even if it’s yogurt, fruit or those little pudding cups. Soup is also a good choice for seniors. It’s easy to eat and comforting. Just try to choose the lower salt varieties.
The Last Important Thought
Being a caregiver has to be the hardest job on earth. I cannot stress this enough — take care of yourself! Caregivers often fall ill while caring for someone they love. You must take time to eat right, sleep right and get away from time-to-time. If you don’t, you will burn out, or get sick or both. Don’t wait until you’re at the end of your rope; find a local in-home care agency before you need them.
Full Article and Source:
Senior Care Advice: The Rhythms of a Great Day
How courts protect vulnerable Alaskans—the elderly
Justice Alaska on Hometown Alaska returns after its brief summer hiatus with a three-part look at the protective role courts play on behalf of the most vulnerable citizens—the elderly, children and new immigrants.
On this week’s program, special concerns of the elderly—from fraud protection to court-appointed guardians—will be our focus.
Older Alaskans are the fastest growing population group in the state. Practically everyone has an older relative or a neighbor aging in place. With that chapter of life comes challenges over health and medicine, safety and security, independence and even the dangers of loneliness.
Courts have a role; they can appoint a helper. This can come in the form of a limited or an expansive power of attorney; a conservator who basically pays the bills and files the taxes; or a guardian who oversees all aspects—from health and safety to finances. Guardianship is not a forever role; it can be reviewed, calibrated or reversed.
A magistrate judge working in this area said his first impression was the good work of helping those in need. But with time, he more fully realized that guardianship means eclipsing some rights—a decision the courts take very seriously.
If you have an aging relative or a friend and neighbor you worry about, bring your questions and concerns. Learn how to enlist the court’s help, and more chillingly, hear accounts of fending off too-good-to-be-true charlatans and opportunists who prey on vulnerable and lonely seniors.
Full Article & Source:
How courts protect vulnerable Alaskans—the elderly
Monday, September 19, 2016
My Mother's Nursing Home Horror
On December 2, 2014, I traveled from Connecticut to Illinois to visit my 85-year-old Mom at a nursing home in Glen Carbon, Illinois. She'd been living there near to my older sister, Belinda, since early January 2012 when my sister, in a swift kamikaze strike behind my back, took her from my care, bundled her onto a plane and spirited her into Illinois.
It had been quite a while since I'd last seen her. Thus, when I walked into the living room of the nursing home, I was absolutely appalled. Somewhat small and fragile from the start, she must have lost at least an additional 40 pounds. Not only that, she was immobilized on a full-body chair, the like of which I had never seen before.
The sight of her was such a shock that for an hour and a half I just cried, while she, despite being lost in a fog of dementia, patted my hand and tried to comfort me. When she had left Connecticut in 2012 she was a feisty, loud-mouthed, opinionated old lady; now she was a shrunken gnome tied to a chair. Within two weeks of my visit, she died.
So what happened?
My mother was abused in a way that is typical of what is going on as boomers dispose of their elderly parents.
I had a sense that the situation was going south the moment my sister put my mother onto an Alzheimer's unit at Meridian Village in Illinois. It was a locked unit.
As soon as my Mom was safely secured in the unit, my sister and her family immediately went on a lengthy vacation. My mother was stunned. My Mom thought she'd be living in my sister's basement apartment experiencing the good life. She couldn't have been more wrong.
How did my sister get the power to do such a thing, you might ask? Unknown to me, in the years prior to my father's death in 2009, Belinda conducted what you could only call a love-bombing campaign where she inveigled herself into all aspects of my parents' lives. Thus, when my father died, it turned out that my parents had naively appointed her as power of attorney, which gave her total authority.
Complicit with my sister, the staff at Meridian Village immediately tripled the antipsychotic medication that my mother was taking although she was a small, elderly lady of only 110 pounds.
When I found this out, I protested to Ms. Beth Sahuri, Director of Nursing, and gave her a 2011 report from the U.S. Department of health and Human Services indicating that the use of antipsychotics in the elderly with dementia can often lead to early death. She ignored it.
I agree that my Mom was an opinionated, annoying, demanding older lady who often got on my nerves. For instance, when she was living with me she'd sometimes wake me up at 6:00 in the morning and demand a home-cooked breakfast right away. At one point, she visited our neighbors to let them know that I was a mean daughter. My mother could also hit people. Still, she was so fragile that there is no way that her "hitting" could have had any more impact than a light pat on the arm.
Her medical team at the University of Connecticut didn't consider such behavior grounds to increase her medication, stating, "We feel that the patient's symptoms are adequately controlled on the current regimen and that the risk of patient fall, daytime somnolence, and possible hypotension is sufficient reason to not add any further medication."
Meridian Village, however, continued to over-medicate my Mom, and kept her in bed to the point where her feet became swollen and developed ulcers. Not only that, despite my protests, the psychiatrist at Meridian Village, Dr. Sanjay Nigam, raised my mother's medication even further, and for the remainder of her time there my mother received major doses of Seroquel, Buspar, Remeron, Trazodone, Depakote, Abilify, and Lamictal, etc.
How did the doctor justify this? He simply changed her diagnosis!
Throughout 2011, the University of CT diagnosed my mother with Mild Dementia, and Major Depressive Disorder notably without psychotic features. The Institute of Living, which did an additional evaluation, specifically stated that she had "no frank delusions." In contrast, at Meridian Village, her doctor expanded my mother's diagnosis to include borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective schizophrenia. He said my mother was hallucinating and psychotic.
How is it possible that within six months of being at Meridian Village, my mother's diagnosis changed from depression without psychotic features to depression with psychotic features?
Furthermore, how did my mother, at the advanced age of 83, suddenly develop three major diagnoses she'd never had before in her entire life?
I'm not the only person who questioned the way my mother was being over-medicated. Two consultant pharmacists filed reports for the record deploring the use of antipsychotic medication with my mother as a form of restraint. My Mom's doctor simply brushed off these precautions, stating, "The patient is psychotic." (Click to continue)
Full Article & Source:
My Mother's Nursing Home Horror
It had been quite a while since I'd last seen her. Thus, when I walked into the living room of the nursing home, I was absolutely appalled. Somewhat small and fragile from the start, she must have lost at least an additional 40 pounds. Not only that, she was immobilized on a full-body chair, the like of which I had never seen before.
The sight of her was such a shock that for an hour and a half I just cried, while she, despite being lost in a fog of dementia, patted my hand and tried to comfort me. When she had left Connecticut in 2012 she was a feisty, loud-mouthed, opinionated old lady; now she was a shrunken gnome tied to a chair. Within two weeks of my visit, she died.
So what happened?
My mother was abused in a way that is typical of what is going on as boomers dispose of their elderly parents.
I had a sense that the situation was going south the moment my sister put my mother onto an Alzheimer's unit at Meridian Village in Illinois. It was a locked unit.
As soon as my Mom was safely secured in the unit, my sister and her family immediately went on a lengthy vacation. My mother was stunned. My Mom thought she'd be living in my sister's basement apartment experiencing the good life. She couldn't have been more wrong.
How did my sister get the power to do such a thing, you might ask? Unknown to me, in the years prior to my father's death in 2009, Belinda conducted what you could only call a love-bombing campaign where she inveigled herself into all aspects of my parents' lives. Thus, when my father died, it turned out that my parents had naively appointed her as power of attorney, which gave her total authority.
Complicit with my sister, the staff at Meridian Village immediately tripled the antipsychotic medication that my mother was taking although she was a small, elderly lady of only 110 pounds.
When I found this out, I protested to Ms. Beth Sahuri, Director of Nursing, and gave her a 2011 report from the U.S. Department of health and Human Services indicating that the use of antipsychotics in the elderly with dementia can often lead to early death. She ignored it.
I agree that my Mom was an opinionated, annoying, demanding older lady who often got on my nerves. For instance, when she was living with me she'd sometimes wake me up at 6:00 in the morning and demand a home-cooked breakfast right away. At one point, she visited our neighbors to let them know that I was a mean daughter. My mother could also hit people. Still, she was so fragile that there is no way that her "hitting" could have had any more impact than a light pat on the arm.
Her medical team at the University of Connecticut didn't consider such behavior grounds to increase her medication, stating, "We feel that the patient's symptoms are adequately controlled on the current regimen and that the risk of patient fall, daytime somnolence, and possible hypotension is sufficient reason to not add any further medication."
Meridian Village, however, continued to over-medicate my Mom, and kept her in bed to the point where her feet became swollen and developed ulcers. Not only that, despite my protests, the psychiatrist at Meridian Village, Dr. Sanjay Nigam, raised my mother's medication even further, and for the remainder of her time there my mother received major doses of Seroquel, Buspar, Remeron, Trazodone, Depakote, Abilify, and Lamictal, etc.
How did the doctor justify this? He simply changed her diagnosis!
Throughout 2011, the University of CT diagnosed my mother with Mild Dementia, and Major Depressive Disorder notably without psychotic features. The Institute of Living, which did an additional evaluation, specifically stated that she had "no frank delusions." In contrast, at Meridian Village, her doctor expanded my mother's diagnosis to include borderline personality disorder, bipolar disorder, and schizoaffective schizophrenia. He said my mother was hallucinating and psychotic.
How is it possible that within six months of being at Meridian Village, my mother's diagnosis changed from depression without psychotic features to depression with psychotic features?
Furthermore, how did my mother, at the advanced age of 83, suddenly develop three major diagnoses she'd never had before in her entire life?
I'm not the only person who questioned the way my mother was being over-medicated. Two consultant pharmacists filed reports for the record deploring the use of antipsychotic medication with my mother as a form of restraint. My Mom's doctor simply brushed off these precautions, stating, "The patient is psychotic." (Click to continue)
Full Article & Source:
My Mother's Nursing Home Horror
Are U.S. Probate Courts Abusing the Elderly?
When Texas Probate Judge Gladys Burwell ordered Juliette Fairley to pay $20,000 in cash for litigation costs associated with her 85 year old father’s guardianship proceedings, she allegedly violated the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure as well as Fairley’s right to due process under the U.S. Constitution.
The daughter of Mr. Fairley, a 22 year veteran of the U.S. Air Force, didn’t have the financial means to pay the dollars that Bexar County Probate Court requested and was subsequently disqualified from being her father’s primary caregiver.
“Guardianship is such an enormous business operation,” says Dr. Sam Sugar, a physician and founder of Americans Against Abusive Probate Guardianship (AAAPG), a nationwide advocacy group in Florida. “It’s worth trillions of dollars nationally and is enabled by the judicial system in all 50 states because there is no federal oversight or control.”
According to court records, two of Mr. Fairley’s Texas physicians wrote letters that were submitted to the Court, stating that he did not need medical care.
Within a month, however, while under his daughter’s care in New York, cardiologist Dr. Nicholas DuBois updated Mr. Fairley’s blood pressure medication from Lisinopril to Losartan to alleviate frequent urination, pulmonologist Dr. Diego Diaz prescribed him Fluticasone for an infection that was causing congestion, Dr. Borcich prescribed the military veteran liquid Carafate to help him eat and Dr. Natasha Nayak ordered eye testing for Mr. Fairley’s glaucoma, according to petitions filed with the Court. “My father has a history of various medical conditions which require regular monitoring and treatment,” Miss Fairley stated in an affidavit dated July 8, 2016 filed with the appellate court.
Instead of holding the Texas caregivers accountable for denying the legally blind man medical treatment, Judge Burwell allegedly isolated the father from his advocate daughter by issuing an order that limits face to face visitation to a mere four hours per month and that creates a cost barrier by requiring payment of $50 an hour to visit Mr. Fairley at Trisun Care Center’s Lakeside retirement home property in San Antonio.
Trisun Care Center management did not reply to a request for comment. “It’s a profit scam when family members are court ordered to pay to visit with their loved ones,” said Michael Larsen, author of Guardianship: How Judges & Lawyers Steal Your Money (Germain Publishing, February 3, 2016). “This has already been happening in divorce cases where children are ordered to live in foster care or group homes and it’s now happening with the elderly in probate court guardianship cases.
Times are changing, however slowly. At the federal level, a report on guardianship abuse, conducted by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) for the Senate Select Committee on Aging, is expected to be released at the end of October 2016, according to Sugar. “The life of a court appointed guardianship depends on enslaving innocent and vulnerable elderly victims,” said Sugar.
Full Article & Source:
Are U.S. Probate Courts Abusing the Elderly?Within a month, however, while under his daughter’s care in New York, cardiologist Dr. Nicholas DuBois updated Mr. Fairley’s blood pressure medication from Lisinopril to Losartan to alleviate frequent urination, pulmonologist Dr. Diego Diaz prescribed him Fluticasone for an infection that was causing congestion, Dr. Borcich prescribed the military veteran liquid Carafate to help him eat and Dr. Natasha Nayak ordered eye testing for Mr. Fairley’s glaucoma, according to petitions filed with the Court. “My father has a history of various medical conditions which require regular monitoring and treatment,” Miss Fairley stated in an affidavit dated July 8, 2016 filed with the appellate court.
Instead of holding the Texas caregivers accountable for denying the legally blind man medical treatment, Judge Burwell allegedly isolated the father from his advocate daughter by issuing an order that limits face to face visitation to a mere four hours per month and that creates a cost barrier by requiring payment of $50 an hour to visit Mr. Fairley at Trisun Care Center’s Lakeside retirement home property in San Antonio.
Trisun Care Center management did not reply to a request for comment. “It’s a profit scam when family members are court ordered to pay to visit with their loved ones,” said Michael Larsen, author of Guardianship: How Judges & Lawyers Steal Your Money (Germain Publishing, February 3, 2016). “This has already been happening in divorce cases where children are ordered to live in foster care or group homes and it’s now happening with the elderly in probate court guardianship cases.
Times are changing, however slowly. At the federal level, a report on guardianship abuse, conducted by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) for the Senate Select Committee on Aging, is expected to be released at the end of October 2016, according to Sugar. “The life of a court appointed guardianship depends on enslaving innocent and vulnerable elderly victims,” said Sugar.
Full Article & Source:
Labels:
AAAPG,
Appeal,
Book,
Cash for Cost,
Texas
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)