Tuesday, June 8, 2021

Shelby County DA, advocates say speak out against elder abuse

by: Alex Coleman

MEMPHIS, Tenn. — A 50-year-old Memphis caregiver is facing elder abuse charges.

It’s a problem that’s on the rise and one that wasn’t always reported, especially during the pandemic.

“They are on the rise because the awareness is on the rise,” said Amy Weirich the Shelby County District Attorney General.

One of the latest suspected cases of elder abuse happened on May 18, at the Inn-Town Suites on Ridgeway Road. Police arrested 50-year-old caregiver Helena Cates and charged her with aggravated neglect and financial exploitation of an elderly adult.           

Police say Cates was supposed to be caring for 80-year-old Revel Foren. She was found in Cates’ motel room extremely dehydrated and emaciated with a swollen left arm, left leg and upper right arm.

Weirich says her office is giving more attention to elder abuse cases.

“That is to look at cases of allegations of abuse against our vulnerable adults and see if someone can or should be prosecuted for that abuse, that neglect or that financial exploitation,” said Weirich.

Weirich says enhanced sentencing is also additional weapon.

“It’s given us another tool in the toolbox and now we’ve got a group that meets on a regular basis here in Shelby County, the group has grown since we started, and they review every allegation,” said Weirich.

Melanie Keller is the president and CEO, at Meritan, a large home health company. She says the pandemic is the cause of another problem for seniors.

“Due to in general isolation, people not getting out and about as much and now we’re seeing as a lot of these restrictions are being lifted and people are becoming more engaged, unfortunately we’re seeing the number of cases that are being reported,” said Keller.

Both Keller and Weirich say the public does have a responsibility to report elder abuse.

“My philosophy has always been when in doubt speak out,” Keller said.

Weirich added, “Not only should they, they have to because under the law the State of Tennessee they have a duty to pick up the phone and report that.”

Next Tuesday is World Elder Abuse Awareness Day. On that day, the Shelby County District Attorney’s office and other agencies will raise awareness about abuse, neglect and exploitation.


Full Article & Source:

Monday, June 7, 2021

Kimberly Guilfoyle: Only a sick society would tolerate legalized abuse of vulnerable citizens

by Kimberly Guilfoyle


I’ve seen plenty of disturbing things happen during the time I’ve spent in and around politics and the legal system. Few are as disturbing or heartbreaking as the rampant scourge of guardianship and conservatorship abuse.

It’s not a red state or a blue state problem. Nor is it unique to any one region of the country. From coast to coast, elderly, infirm, and otherwise vulnerable Americans are effectively being imprisoned, isolated, and swindled by people who are supposed to be looking out for their best interests. Worst of all, it’s happening under the direct auspices of the legal system, which is supposedly set up with the express purpose of protecting the vulnerable.

The people who are victimized by this process typically lack the ability to defend themselves, either because of advanced age or mental deficiency. In some cases, the mere perception that someone suffers from a mental deficiency is enough for the courts to deny them control over their own lives and disregard their most fervent wishes.

In theory, guardianship is a compassionate process designed to make sure that a responsible person is looking after people who are incapable of looking after themselves. In practice, however, guardianship is often exploited by unscrupulous characters who go to great lengths to take advantage of their wards. In some of the most heart wrenching instances, guardians severely restrict access to friends and loved ones, depriving their wards of their greatest joys in life for no apparent reason other than to prevent friends and family from interfering in the guardian’s decision making.

In my home state of Florida, Jan Garwood described being “kidnapped and forced into a locked facility” by a “fraudulent guardian.” She only managed to escape after being trapped in an assisted living facility for three years thanks to a smuggled cell phone and a secret Facebook page.

In neighboring Alabama, the family of deceased heiress and philanthropist Joann Bashinsky is still fighting a legal battle with her court-appointed guardian over five months after her death. It’s difficult to fathom why Judge Lee Tucker, who has jurisdiction in the case, hasn’t dismissed it by now – after all, the person supposedly in need of the court’s “protection” is no longer alive. In this case and so many others, based on my years as a prosecutor, something certainly doesn’t smell right.

Fortunately, increased public awareness of guardianship abuse seems to be making a difference. The issue is receiving attention from popular culture in the form of the “Free Brittany” movement and the popular Netflix movie “I Care A Lot,” and as more people are becoming aware of the problem, politicians are taking notice.

In my former home state of California, lawmakers are considering reforms designed to enhance scrutiny and oversight of guardians, as well as create guardrails to protect people from being unfairly deemed mentally unfit to manage their own health and finances.

The guardianship process is supposed to help and protect vulnerable people who lack the ability to care for themselves. All too often, it is abused as a legalized way to pillage their estates while cutting them off from the outside world – including their own friends and family.

No human institution can ever be perfect, but a compassionate society cannot allow the legal system to be used for such abominable ends. Guardianship abuse must be stopped so that the process can be returned to its original compassionate purpose.

Full Article & Source:

Lawyer is disbarred after missing multiple hearings; he blamed PTSD caused by his medical condition

By Debra Cassens Weiss

A Virginia lawyer’s license to practice law has been revoked after former clients testified that he left them in the lurch while his license was suspended earlier this year.

Lawyer Jonathan Preston Fisher, 45, of Blacksburg, Virginia, lost his license at the end of a remote disciplinary hearing May 21, the Roanoke Times reports.

An online entry said he violated Virginia Supreme Court rules on the duties of suspended lawyers.

According to the Roanoke Times, Fisher has an “extensive history of run-ins with judges and other attorneys.” Judges cited him for contempt for failing to appear in court—citations that were later dismissed—and he was fined for swearing at a prosecutor and threatening to sue his office.

Fisher has attributed his problems to having too many clients and to the post-traumatic stress disorder he has as a result of brittle bone disease. He told the Roanoke Times in May 2019 that he has had more than 50 broken bones because of the disorder, known as osteogenesis imperfecta.

The Virginia State Bar’s disciplinary board noted Fisher’s health problems when it suspended him for two months beginning Feb. 1. The board said Fisher failed to appear for trials of several clients and failed to tell several other clients about their convictions. He also failed to safeguard client property because of trust accounting and fee violations, the disciplinary board concluded.

When the board included descriptions of the cases, they concerned traffic violations.

The board said Fisher had no prior disciplinary history, and he cooperated in the bar investigation that led to the suspension.

“He lives with significant medical and mental health concerns,” the board said, “including a permanent physical disability causing him to use a wheelchair which would be wholly disabling for many.”

He also “exhibited remorse for his actions and made efforts to mitigate the harm to his clients by paying fines and costs for clients and refunding certain fees, even if not always timely,” the board said.

One of the people testifying against Fisher in the new disciplinary hearing was former client Kimberly Ann Brock of Christiansburg, Virginia. She has sued Fisher, alleging that he didn’t tell her that his license was suspended and didn’t refund the $4,000 fee that she paid him. Brock told the Roanoke Times that she still hasn’t received a refund.

“I hope that he gets the help he needs now, and that nobody else gets hurt,” she told the Roanoke Times.

The ABA Journal was unable to reach Fisher for comment at the phone number listed by the state bar.

Full Article & Source:

Former nursing home director pleads to endangering 3 residents

By Alex Rose


MEDIA COURTHOUSE — The former regional director of operations at St. Francis Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare in Darby pleaded “no contest” Wednesday to three counts of recklessly endangering another person that state Attorney General Josh Shapiro said resulted in the deaths of three residents in 2017.

Chaim “Charlie” Steg, 40, of 1100 block of Coughlin Street in Lakewood, N.J., is scheduled to be officially sentenced to six to 23 months of electronic home monitoring Oct. 25 before Common Pleas Court Judge Anthony Scanlon.

In the interim, Steg will be placed on home monitoring beginning Wednesday. He will be given credit for time served on the device when he is sentenced in six months, according to the plea agreement worked out by Senior Deputy Attorney General Mark Levenberg, Deputy Attorney General Benjamin McKenna and defense counsel Art Donato.

“No amount of money, no number of criminal charges brought or pled to is going to be enough for the families who missed out on their final years with their loved ones,” said Shapiro at a press conference announcing the plea Wednesday morning. “But I think it’s important to remember this: Every resident here in Delaware County and all across the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania deserves to be safe, they deserve to be treated with respect and with dignity, and they also deserve to be heard when they speak up and they speak out.”

Steg was charged with the three misdemeanor counts by a statewide investigating grand jury that heard testimony from 22 witnesses and reviewed 78 pieces of evidence, according to an affidavit of probable cause for his arrest written by Attorney General’s Office Special Agent Jennifer Nutter. Darby Borough Detective Brian Pitts was co-lead investigator in the case with Nutter.

The investigation was launched in August 2017 after staff at Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital notified Delaware County Services for the Aging of concerns about the poor health conditions of several residents who had been transferred to the hospital. COSA, in turn, notified the A.G.’s Office and Darby Borough Police.

One of those patients, an 87-year-old identified as “B.W.,” died at the hospital Aug. 15, 2017, due to a massive fecal obstruction in her colon and dehydration, according to the affidavit. She was already suffering from a urinary tract infection and sepsis when she came to the hospital, which ultimately caused her death, the affidavit says.

Another 86-year-old identified as “O.G.” died at the hospital Aug. 20, 2017, from septic shock and severe dehydration after suffering from Stage IV pressure ulcers that exposed his tendon and bone, according to the affidavit. There was no evidence O.G. had received any medical treatment for his wounds, the affidavit says. St. Francis staff allegedly ignored concerns from his family, who ultimately were the ones who got him into the hospital Aug. 13, 2017, a week before his death.

The third resident, 87-year-old “L.C.,” developed a severe pressure wound that should have been noticed weeks earlier if properly trained staff were performing routine care, the affidavit says. The wound required debridement at the hospital Aug. 15, 2017, after which L.C. returned to St. Francis. Staff there again failed to properly monitor her, however, and she died Sept. 7, 2017, after developing a bacterial infection in her blood.

A medical expert reviewed each of the patients’ records and determined their deaths were not isolated incidents, but the result of systemic failures within St. Francis, the affidavit says.

The grand jury also determined the injuries and deaths the three residents suffered were avoidable and the result and Steg’s failure to address well-known staffing shortages at the 273-bed facility.

“Despite making multi-million dollar annual profits, Steg … recklessly chose not to adequately invest in adequate staffing and did not adjust other operational factors within his control to mitigate the ongoing staffing crisis,” the affidavit says. “St. Francis was understaffed on a daily basis for months at a time and much of the staff they did have was inexperienced and not sufficiently trained.”

One former administrator told the grand jury that staffing at St. Francis was a “revolving door,” while another former staffing coordinator testified she had complained more than 40 times between December 2016 and April 2017 about staffing shortages, but Steg did nothing about it, according to the affidavit.

Steg additionally discouraged or forbade outside agency staffing because it was more expensive, creating further strain, the affidavit says. Many witnesses said new hires rarely stayed longer than orientation.

Shapiro indicated these are the only charges that will stem from this investigation and declined speaking about any other ongoing investigations his office might be conducting in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, which also left many medical facilities and nursing homes short staffed.

The Pennsylvania Department of Health conducted a survey of St. Francis in August 2017 and found widespread and systemic deficiencies, including multiple cases of neglect, according to the affidavit.

St. Francis’ staffing budget called for three direct care hours per resident per day under Steg’s leadership, according to the affidavit, but DOH found 4.1 hours was needed, given the conditions there and the acuity of residents.

The department nearly shut the doors on the facility, but instead declared an “Immediate Jeopardy” situation that Shapiro said barred any new residents from coming in.

Shapiro said two related business entities – “1412 Lansdowne Operating LLC,” which did business as “St. Francis Center for Rehabilitation and Healthcare” and ran the day to day operations of the facility, and “Catholic Facilities Operating LLC,” which paid Steg’s salary – have also agreed to pay a $1.2 million civil settlement as a result of the investigation.

The settlement requires St. Francis to maintain an increased minimum staffing level and undergo an additional year of monitoring to ensure compliance through quarterly audits by the Department of Health – violations of which will extend supervision by another three months for each infraction, Shapiro said.

He added that the businesses have already paid fines of $550,000 to the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services and DOH, and will additionally place $600,000 into escrow for the benefit of St. Francis residents. They will also provide $100,000 to the non-profit group Center for Advocacy for the Rights and Interests of the Elderly, Shapiro said.

“It is the law to uphold the obligation to keep residents safe,” said Shapiro. “If a facility cuts staff to the point that they can’t give residents the care they need, we’re going to find out and we’re going to hold them accountable.”

In addition to electronic home monitoring, Steg will have three years of probation and will not be able to staff, manage, own, or operate the nursing, clinical, or medical services of any skilled nursing facility for five years. He will also pay a $15,000 fine and a total of $21,213 in restitution to the families of the victims.

Full Article & Source:

Sunday, June 6, 2021

They stole $500K from her uncle, cops say. She fled to Spain. Her son’s behind bars

By Carli Teproff

A woman and her son face charges after Hialeah police say they forged documents and stole about $500,000 from her 93-year-old uncle. She fled to Spain. Her son has been arrested. Getty Images/iStockphoto

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article251913358.html#storylink=cpy

A 93-year-old man was left “penniless” after police say his niece and her son forged documents and stole his Hialeah home and cash valued at $500,000, the Miami-Dade State Attorney’s office announced Friday.

The son, Italo Nelli, 19, was arrested and charged with an organized scheme to defraud and elderly exploitation. He faced a judge Friday.

His mother, however, “did not want to get arrested,” and fled to Malaga, Spain, he told investigators.

A warrant was issued for Hadee Toledo, 50, who is now considered a fugitive. She faces charges including exploitation of the elderly, conspiracy to commit organized scheme to defraud and forgery.

“The thief who steals from the elderly reveals a callousness buried deep in their own heart,” State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle said in a news release. “But the relative who steals everything possible from an aged family member, can often be snatching the person’s very will to live.”


According to police, the 93-year-old man was hospitalized in August 2020 after contracting COVID-19.

He was not allowed any visitors.

A family member contacted Hialeah police earlier this year to report that his niece had forged documents that gave her power over his bank accounts, according to the report.

The joint investigation between Hialeah police and the state attorney’s office revealed that Toledo had the documents legally notarized, with her son as the witness.

Toledo, police said, signed the man’s house deed over to herself and drained all of his accounts. When questioned, Nelli told investigators that his great-uncle had signed the documents in front of him.

Police, however, said the documents were dated during the time he was quarantined for COVID and was not allowed visitors.

Nelli received $5,000 and a 2019 Mercedes-Benz E220 from the scheme, police said.

Said Fernandez Rundle: “I commend the detectives of the Hialeah Police Department and the prosecutors of my Elderly Exploitation Unit for their commitment to ending such despicable crimes.” 

Full Article & Source:

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article251913358.html#storylink=cpy
ad more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article251913358.html#storylink=cpy

Panel calls for Kansas attorney to be disbarred for misconduct in high-profile cases

by Tim Carpenter


Topeka — A three-attorney panel unanimously recommended the Kansas Supreme Court disbar an attorney for knowingly making false statements to juries during two high-profile trials and for misleading claims about her prosecutorial misconduct to justices of the state’s highest court.

Jacqie Spradling, who more recently worked as an attorney in Bourbon and Allen counties, landed before the disciplinary panel after the Supreme Court overturned the 2012 double-homicide conviction of Dana Chandler in Shawnee County and the Kansas Court of Appeals overturned a 2017 guilty verdict against Jacob Ewing in a sex-crime case in Jackson County. Spradling was lead prosecutor in both cases.

Chandler is awaiting retrial on first-degree murder charges, and Ewing accepted a plea deal in May to avoid another trial.

“Based on the deliberative pattern of serious misconduct and the serious injury that followed, the hearing panel unanimously recommends that the respondent be disbarred,” the report submitted to the Supreme Court said. “From all the evidence presented, it appears that the respondent concluded that Chandler and Ewing were guilty of the crimes charged and she adopted a ‘win-at-all-costs’ approach.”

The report obtained Friday by Kansas Reflector was submitted by panelists John Larson, Darcy Williamson and William Jeter for consideration by the Supreme Court. The panel said the issue wasn’t that Spradling engaged in an isolated incident or made an inconsequential mistake in the heat of trial. The panel said the Iola resident “knowingly and intentionally” engaged in a “deliberative pattern of serious misconduct.”

In addition, the panel determined Spradling’s handling of the two criminal cases “undermines the confidence in the judicial system and caused serious injury to the administration of justice.”

Members of the Supreme Court, who hold final authority in disciplinary cases involving attorneys, will issue a decision based on the panel’s 78-page report.

The state disciplinary administrator’s office in Kansas that investigated complaints about Spradling’s behavior as a prosecutor proposed that her license to practice law be indefinitely suspended. Spradling, however, told the disciplinary panel that she shouldn’t be disciplined at all.

Spradling had been dismissive of allegations of wrongdoing until she testified at the disciplinary panel hearing in December. During that under-oath appearance, she conceded to having “failed in these cases” to uphold the ethical duties of a prosecutor. She begged the hearing panel to accept her assertion that her work as an officer of the court was defined by a “protectiveness, a loyalty and a belief in justice.”

“When these cases were overturned, it was very difficult because I had let the system down. I had let the victims down and I had denied the defendants a fair trial,” Spradling said.

As of Friday, Spradling was employed as the Bourbon County attorney in Fort Scott. Allen County attorney Jerry Hathaway said Spradling resigned from her position Friday as assistant county attorney for Allen County.

“With regard to the recommendation of the disciplinary panel, I was disappointed,” Hathaway said.

The Supreme Court laid the foundation for advancement of a disciplinary case against Spradling in 2018 when the justices overturned Chandler’s convictions in the Topeka slayings of Mike Sisco, Chandler’s ex-husband, and his fiancee, Karen Harkness. The Supreme Court said Spradling’s conduct in the Chandler case illustrated how a compulsion for courthouse victories could subvert a prosecutor’s duty to guarantee a person’s fair-trial rights.

Supreme Court Justice Dan Biles summed up Spradling’s tactics in the Chandler trial: “Taken as a whole, this prosecution unfortunately illustrates how a desire to win can eclipse the state’s responsibility to safeguard the fundamental constitutional right to a fair trial owed to any defendant facing criminal prosecution in a Kansas courtroom.”

During the Chandler trial in Shawnee County District Court, Spradling falsely told the jury a protection from abuse order was issued against Chandler prior to the 2002 slaying of Sisco and Harkness. There is evidence Sisco requested a mutual temporary restraining order four years before his death while going through the divorce from Chandler.

When Chandler appealed her case, Spradling told Supreme Court justices in a written brief that she believed the more rigorous protection from abuse order had been put in place by a district court. That’s what she had told the Chandler jury and repeated to state disciplinary investigators despite an inability to produce evidence a judge had ever issued that type of restraining order against Chandler.

Spradling testified to the three-person disciplinary panel that she never possessed documentary proof of the protection from abuse order. She said filing of the disciplinary case led her to conduct a fresh attempt to locate such a document. That search was unsuccessful, she said.

“I was wrong. Dead wrong,” Spradling told the panel. “So, for a person who wants to be right, strives to be right, being wrong is embarrassing, humbling.”

The disciplinary panel responded to her confession in its report: “In addition to the false statement made to the jury and to the Supreme Court, during the respondent’s sworn statement made during the disciplinary investigation, she also made false statements. During the disciplinary hearing, the respondent admitted that her sworn statement included misstatements. The hearing panel concludes that the respondent took an oath to tell the truth when she gave the sworn statement and she failed to do so.”

Spradling’s reputation as an experienced prosecutor of complex crimes in Johnson and Shawnee counties led officials in Jackson County to hire her as a special prosecutor in the Ewing case. It was a case made difficult because the alleged crimes occurred in a small community and turned on the jury’s conclusions of the credibility of female witnesses.

Spradling convinced a jury in Jackson County that Ewing was guilty of rape, aggravated criminal sodomy and battery. The Holton man was sentenced to 27 years in prison.

In 2019, the Court of Appeals concluded Spradling made a half-dozen errors during the Ewing trial and had offered unsubstantiated claims to the Ewing jury during closing arguments. The case was remanded to Jackson County District Court. Rather than go through a retrial, Ewing agreed in May to a plea deal that would trigger a 10-year sentence for sexual assault.

Full Article & Source:

Guest column: Preventing elder abuse through information sharing

By Brian Maienschein

California’s population of individuals over 60 is projected to grow faster than any other age group. By 2030, one-quarter of California’s population will be an older adult, with approximately 10.8 million reaching this age marker. Given this statistic, the recent rise in elder abuse cases is particularly alarming.

An increased prevalence of elder abuse, including financial exploitation; emotional, physical and sexual abuse; as well as neglect are just a few types of abuse older and dependent adults have increasingly endured. According to the U.S. Census Bureau’s Population Projections, the number of Americans aged 65 or older may be reluctant to report abuse themselves due to fear of retaliation, lack of physical and/or cognitive ability to report, or because they do not wish to get their abuser in trouble.

(Courtesy photo)
In the midst of the rise in elder abuse cases, an increase in the circumstances involving substandard Independent Living Facilities (ILFs) has also been uncovered. ILFs are unlicensed facilities that provide housing to multiple individuals in one residence. Unfortunately, some of these facilities provide extremely substandard care, which oftentimes legally constitutes as elder abuse.

The cost of licensed facilities have risen along with the demand for the level of care they provide, and many vulnerable low-income older adults are forced to rely on ILFs to meet their needs. For licensed facilities, local Adult Protective Services agencies can easily share information with a licensing agency regarding abusive reports. However, since ILFs are unlicensed, it is often local code compliance departments, not licensing agencies, who shut down substandard facilities with violations.

I am taking action to combat elder abuse and substandard care in Independent Living Facilities throughout San Diego County and across California. My bill, AB 636, will allow Adult Protective Services to share information with code enforcement agencies and their attorneys for the sole purpose of highlighting and investigating substandard care in ILFs. AB 636 will also clarify the list of law enforcement agencies to allow a federal law enforcement agency, charged with the investigation of elder or dependent abuse, access to information in cases where they have jurisdiction.

In recent years, the San Diego County’s Health and Human Services Agency, Adult Protective Services has worked to investigate and protect older and dependent adults who are residents of unlicensed facilities that are providing substandard care. However, due to current law, Adult Protective Services has had the ability to assist in these efforts without a court order. Adult Protective Services has investigated numerous situations where elder and dependent adults were residents in ILFs providing extreme substandard care in recent years.

Rooms with multiple bunkbeds and bedsheets hanging from ceilings in rooms creating makeshift walls are just a few examples of ILFs packing rooms full to fit as many residents as possible. The county found several other disturbing conditions throughout their investigations. In one case, a facility had faulty wiring problems, creating hazards such as hot electrical wires running through shower water, which shocked anyone who took a shower. In another case, a facility had gates locked from the outside, preventing residents from being able to leave if there was a fire or other emergency, while also preventing first responders from gaining access quickly.

Current law states that Adult Protective Services is only permitted to share investigative information with local law enforcement agencies, including local police, sheriff deputies and probation officers. The lack of information sharing with code enforcement agencies puts a direct halt on proper investigations into ILFs, which lets the substandard level of care some of them provide slip through the cracks.

California cannot continue to allow the operation of Independent Living Facilities providing substandard care. The conditions so many older adults are enduring in these facilities is appalling. Across the United States, federal, state and local law enforcement agencies coordinate on cases that cross state lines and prey on senior citizens. California needs to modernize current law in order to do all we can to protect older adults, and I am confident that my legislation will help us accomplish this.

Maienschein represents the 77th District in the California Assembly. The district includes Poway, Rancho Bernardo and 4S Ranch. 
 
Full Article & Source:

Saturday, June 5, 2021

‘Spirit-of-the-Law’ vs. ‘Letter-of-the-Law’: What It Means for Alabama Guardianship Legislation

One early memory of my law enforcement career was the day I learned the concept of the-letter-of-the-law versus the-spirit-of-the-law.
 
Simply put the-letter-of-the-law means the law is applied exactly as written. For example – the speed limit on highways is 65 mph, any vehicle traveling at 66 mph or greater is in violation of traffic law and shall be issued a speeding ticket.
 
The spirit-of-the-law leaves room for officer discretion. This means I could consider other factors when deciding to issue a ticket, give a warning, or ignore a violation all together. Following the spirit-of-the-law allowed me to apply the law as the legislature intended, especially in situations with extenuating circumstances or a warning was more appropriate.
 
I think we would all agree, darting across the middle of a busy street can create a dangerous situation for all and could be grounds for a jaywalking violation, but casually walking across the middle of an empty street would not warrant a ticket. Endangering others by driving under the influence is not the same as not coming to a complete stop at a stop sign.
 
Sometimes, however, the enacted version of a law does not quite hit the mark. The spirit is clear, but the letter of the law leaves room for interpretation – a loophole. We all know, just as water follows the path of least resistance, if there is a loophole in the letter of the law – there’s a lawyer who will take advantage.
 
Terri LaPoint, an investigative journalist with RealNewsSpark, has written extensively on the exploitation and civil liberty destroying nature of Alabama’s guardianship laws.
 
In early April of this year, LaPoint testified before the Alabama House Judiciary Committee on the need for guardianship reform.
 
LaPoint gave a powerful speech in which she pointed out the guardianship and conservatorship system started out as a way to protect the most vulnerable among us – our elderly. However, LaPoint has seen the system fail even though the 5th Amendment’s guarantees that no person shall be “deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”
 
She went on to say some who have been trusted to look after our most vulnerable have used loopholes personally benefit from the way the current laws are written. In her reporting, LaPoint has also found a system, which uses fear tactics and a lack of accountability to exploit seniors and drain their estates of assets meant for their families to inherit.
 
She said so many seniors have been victimized by the current system that something must be done. At this moment, violent criminals in Alabama prisons have more rights than a senior put under guardianship. LaPoint closed by saying this could not have been the intent of the legislature and called for reforming this system.
 
I too do not believe Alabama’s guardian and conservatorship laws were intended to be abusive, but as written, the letter-of-the-law permits exploitation. If a loophole can be exploited for financial gain or billable hours, we all know there will be more than a few attorneys who will take advantage.
 
In most situations, the spirit-of-the-law is sufficient to protect most people, but as seen in Terri LaPoint’s excellent reporting on Alabama seniors, Joann Bashinsky, Marian Leonard, and Marguerite Trent Caddis – it isn’t always enough.
 
This is why I support Alabama Representative Joe Lovvorn’s (R-District 79) House Bill 603. Rep. Lovvorn’s bill will bring much needed reform to Alabama’s guardian, conservatorship, and probate court rules and procedures.
 
Among the many improvements proposed in HB603:
  • “undue influence exerted on a person is not, alone, adequate grounds for determining that person is incapacitated and in need of a guardian”
  • bill would prohibit the appointment of a guardian or conservator when a valid power of attorney or health care directive exists and the person chosen is willing and able to perform needed functions.
  • HB603 would declare a guardianship void if the due process rights of the alleged incapacitated person were determined to have been violated.
The American Bar Association Rules of Professional Conduct states, “The legal profession is largely self-governing” and the “legal profession’s relative autonomy carries with it special responsibilities of self-government.”
 
When there is a loophole in a poorly worded law, we expect people to do what is right, not what is what is allowed. Unfortunately, history has shown us, especially in Birmingham, we cannot leave the fox to guard the hen house and expect it to “self-govern.”
 
Predatory attorneys across this country know exactly what they are doing…and it is disgusting. They are pillaging the hard earned wealth away from their victims, sometimes leaving their heirs with pennies (as in the Marguerite Trent Caddis case – link).
 
I trust the Alabama legislature will do the right thing and pass Alabama HB603 into law.
 
Bernard B. Kerik was the 40th Police Commissioner of the New York City Police Department and is a New York Times bestselling author.
 
Full Article & Source:

Iowa lawyer who admitted stealing money from his employer and clients loses his license

An Iowa lawyer who admitted taking money from clients without doing any work on their cases has had his Iowa law license revoked by the Iowa Supreme Court. (Photo courtesy of Iowa Judicial Branch)

By Clark Kauffman

An eastern Iowa lawyer who two years ago admitted embezzling money from his employer, and who now admits improperly taking money from his clients, has had his Iowa law license revoked by the state’s Supreme Court.

According to the Iowa Attorney Disciplinary Board, attorney Curtis W. Den Beste, formerly of Cedar Rapids, took money from clients, transferred money from client trust accounts into his own checking account, then neglected his cases and lied to clients about the true status of those cases.

“Ultimately, Den Beste abandoned his practice and simply kept client funds that had not been earned,” the board said in a recent filing with the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa.

The board said that because a “convincing preponderance of the evidence” established that Den Beste deliberately converted client funds to his own use, it is unnecessary for the Supreme Court to “dwell on” the other alleged violations he had allegedly committed.

In a sworn affidavit filed with the court, Den Beste, now living in Nevada, admitted that in 2018, he took $2,500 from an Iowa man named Mickey Harris to represent him in a guardianship case.

“I did not file anything on behalf of Harris in the guardianship matter, and I did no work on the case,” Den Beste stated, adding that he never provided Harris with a refund. “After several weeks, Harris asked me about the status of the case, and I responded that I had taken care of it, despite the fact that I had not filed anything.”

Den Beste has consented to the Iowa Supreme Court’s revocation of his Iowa law license. Under Iowa court rules, he will become eligible for readmission after five years.

In 2019, the Iowa Supreme Court suspended Den Beste’s license for a minimum of four months after he admitted accepting thousands of dollars in cash from clients and keeping the funds for himself instead of depositing the money in the general account of the law firm where he worked.

At that time, Chief Justice Mark Cady, writing for the majority of the court, said Den Beste had committed theft, but noted that the court typically treats theft from an attorney’s employer less harshly than theft from an attorney’s own clients.

In a partial dissent, Justice David Wiggins wrote that Den Beste’s actions amounted to felony second-degree theft — the sort of offense, he said, that often leads to a license revocation.

“Plain and simple, Den Beste admitted to stealing someone else’s money several times,” Wiggins wrote. “The state would almost surely charge a non-lawyer who embezzled over $9,000 from his or her employer with theft, but this attorney, who stipulated that he embezzled over $9,000 from his employer, avoids criminal punishment and this court gives him merely an insignificant disciplinary sanction.”

Full Article & Source: