Showing posts with label Supported Decision Making. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Supported Decision Making. Show all posts

Sunday, July 27, 2025

UCLA honors Disability Pride Month as Americans with Disabilities Act turns 35

The power of language — every language — gives us wings. Take flight with UCLA’s American Sign Language instructors Benjamin Lewis and Jennifer Marfino and interpreter Mariam Janvelyan.

UCLA is honoring Disability Pride Month in July with a look back at the many ways the campus supports the disabled community. This month also marks the 35th anniversary of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which was signed into law on July 26, 1990, to prohibit disability-based discrimination.

In 2023, UCLA extended a 16-year-old disability studies minor by launching the first disability studies major at a public university in California. The campus also offers American Sign Language courses and adaptive recreation programs — and has hosted a panel with alumni explaining how they’ve applied their disability studies education to their careers.

Here are just a few of the stories featured on Newsroom:


More online resources needed to help Californians with disabilities make critical decisions

A California law designed to protect the autonomy of individuals with disabilities to make their own decisions may fall short of its intended goals due to insufficient online resources, according to a new report from the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.

Woman in blue top helps a man, in purple top, use a digital tablet
AshTProductions/Shutterstock

Supported decision-making enables individuals with disabilities to select a trusted person or persons (often a family member or friend) to aid them in making important decisions about things like their health care and finances. The law (AB 1663) took effect Jan. 1, 2023, and it provides an alternative to guardianship (called conservatorship in California), which places full decision-making authority for an individual in someone else’s hands.

Yet when UCLA researchers reviewed online resources about supported decision-making, they found some important gaps in the kinds of available information and tools. More than 60% of the resources were targeted toward adults 18–64 years old, with fewer resources designed for older adults (65 years and older) or younger people with disabilities.

“Imagine someone else deciding for you where you get to live, how to manage your money, or what medical care you need or want,” said Kristen Choi, an associate professor at the UCLA School of Nursing and UCLA Fielding School of Public Health.  (Continue Reading)

Full Article & Source:
UCLA honors Disability Pride Month as Americans with Disabilities Act turns 35 

Sunday, March 16, 2025

Bill addresses decision-making for Ohioans with developmental disabilities


by: Ava Boldizar

COLUMBUS, Ohio (WCMH) – A bill in the Ohio Statehouse seeks to establish a presumption that all adults with developmental disabilities are capable of making their own decisions unless otherwise determined by a court. 

Senate Bill 35, sponsored by Sens. Michele Reynolds (R-Franklin County) and Jerry Cirino (R-Kirtland), was introduced in January. Along with declaring that adults with developmental disabilities should be presumed capable of managing their affairs, the bill would legally establish a “less restrictive” alternative to guardianship, called “supported decision making” (SDM), according to Reynolds. 

SDM allows individuals with developmental disabilities to retain their legal decision making authority while receiving support from chosen advisers who can help them understand, make and communicate their decisions. The bill would allow the advisors to be formally chosen through a written plan, or chosen informally.

In a guardianship, a family member or other entity is in charge of an individual’s affairs and ultimately makes decisions for them, when a court finds that person is incapable of making their own decisions due to a mental disability, according to the nonprofit Disability Rights Ohio.

“This legislation addresses a significant need in our current system,” Reynolds said at the bill’s first hearing in February. “Many adults with developmental disabilities find that full guardianship is more restrictive than necessary, while complete independence may not provide adequate support.”

Under the bill, entering into a SDM plan could not be used as grounds for a court to find that an adult is incapable of managing their own affairs. Adults with developmental disabilities who use a SDM plan would be allowed to act independently of their advisors and end the plan at any time. The bill additionally clarifies that adults with developmental disabilities could not be forced into a SDM plan.

Reynolds said that the approach recognizes that “disability exists on a spectrum” and that many adults with developmental disabilities are capable of making their own decisions. Twenty-three states have enacted similar legislation, according to the lawmakers.

“Supported decision making protects adults with developmental disabilities from exploitation because they maintain control over their own lives and decisions,” Cirino said.

If the bill were to pass, the Ohio Department of Developmental Disabilities would develop example SDM plans and educational materials. 

The bill had its second hearing earlier this month, where 13 entities testified in support of the legislation, including the Down Syndrome Association of Central Ohio and the Ohio Association of County Boards of Developmental Disabilities (OACB).

“Unfortunately, in many instances, guardianship represents an all-or-nothing decision for the courts to make when they are asked to balance a person’s health and safety with their ability to make decisions about their own future,” said Jake Dowling, a legislative affairs manager with OACB. “Supported decision making offers a middle path that preserves both.”

Greg Carter, the parent and legal guardian of an adult with developmental disabilities, told NBC4 he questions how the legislation would affect those currently under a guardianship arrangement.

“A parent who has been a part of their child’s life all along should not have to jump through any hoops to continue in the role of decision maker for their loved one simply because the calendar turns a page,” Carter said. “I question the motivation and need for a [policy] such as this.”

While a hearing for opponent testimony has not yet been held for the legislation, some critics of the concept have come out against a recently introduced budget bill including language that would codify SDM in Ohio law.

Caroline Lahrmann, an Ohio mother, testified against the budget bill (HB 96) saying those with developmental disabilities can already have friends and family assist them with decision making without new legislation. Harris Capps, a parent and legal guardian, echoed the same sentiment, calling sections of the bill addressing SDM “unnecessary” and “redundant.”

“SDM as policy could result in a degradation of Ohio’s guardianship system while providing more opportunities for frivolous lawsuits,” Capps said.

Current Ohio law requires those with developmental disabilities to be able to manage their financial affairs if they are able, participate in decisions that affect their lives, and select a parent or advocate to act on their behalf.

Cirino introduced a similar bill in the last General Assembly that did not pass before the end of the legislative session. SB 35 was assigned to the Senate Judiciary Committee and currently has one Republican cosponsor. 

Full Article & Source:
Bill addresses decision-making for Ohioans with developmental disabilities

Wednesday, October 23, 2024

Supported Decision Making Webinar to Promote Alternative to Guardianship

by Saucon Source


Supported Decision Making Pennsylvania (SDMPA) will host a webinar on Wednesday, Oct. 23 at 7 p.m. to raise awareness about Supported Decision Making (SDM), which is an alternative to guardianship for young adults with disabilities. The webinar aims to inform individuals with disabilities, their families, educators and professionals about SDM and its benefits.

SDM empowers individuals with disabilities to make their own decisions with support from a trusted network. The webinar will highlight the differences between SDM and guardianship–which is more restrictive–as well as the advantages of SDM for individuals, families and communities, plus explain how to implement SDM using resources from SDMPA.org.

The webinar is open to anyone interested in learning more about SDM and promoting its practices across Pennsylvania.

Full Article & Source:
Supported Decision Making Webinar to Promote Alternative to Guardianship

Sunday, July 2, 2023

Liza Horvath, Senior Advocate: An alternative to conservatorship


By Liza Horvath

Question: After the Britney Spears situation shined a light on the powers that a court appointed conservator has and how easy it would be to abuse someone by getting a conservatorship, I am lying awake at night worried sick that if I lose even a little capacity, someone could get a conservatorship over me and steal all my money and even control where I live. I have also seen the movie, “I Care a Lot” where a professional woman took advantage of elderly people by using conservatorships, stripping their assets and placing them in nursing homes! What can the average person do to protect themselves against this happening? Who can I trust?

Answer: The situations you share, the highly publicized Britney Spears case and that movie which, I am sorry to say, was based on true events, do present nightmarish situations. I understand your worry.

Before addressing your concerns, however, it should be noted that some court conservatorships are often desperately needed and are the right solution for certain situations. I had the situation where a client was losing capacity and continued to borrow money from friends and then demand that I pay them back from her trust funds. The lenders could have brought suit against her for the funds absent a conservatorship – which is what we eventually put into place. We of course paid back the loans and I admonished her friends not to lend her any more money. The conservatorship protects someone like this against future lawsuits for her actions.

Conservatorships can be cumbersome, however, and due to the court’s involvement, are public in nature. They are expensive, restrictive and invasive. Having a trust, power of attorney for finances and an Advance Health Care Directive in place can obviate the need for a court conservatorship. Good estate planning is your first line of defense.

On Jan. 1, California adopted Assembly Bill No. 1663 which makes reforms to probate and conservatorship law and offer a less-restrictive alternative by way of “Protective Proceedings.” According to an article written by Klaus Gottlieb, Esq., published in the Winter 2023 California Lawyers Association Trust & Estates Quarterly, “California joins an increasing number of states that have made less-restrictive alternatives to conservatorship a legislative priority. Supported Decision Making is one of them. The idea is that adults with a disability, which could include dementia, retain their autonomy and make their own decisions, albeit with support.”

Supported Decision Making can be an informal arrangement, such as your son helping you continue to make sound decisions or can be memorialized in a written SDM agreement. Like any legal arrangement, attorneys generally support having such an agreement fully documented.

With an SDM agreement, the signer of the agreement (you in this case), can continue to act independently. There appear to be some shortcomings in the legislation which need to be worked out like should the SDM be compensated; are third parties, such as doctors or banks, required to accept the decision maker’s decision; and the big one, is the decision maker held to a fiduciary standard? These legal amendments are new and educational programs for attorneys, individuals, courts and the public need to be developed. However, once solidly in place, a supported decision-making scenario would seemingly provide for a better alternative than the current court conservatorships.

Liza Horvath has over 30 years of experience in the estate planning and trust fields and is a licensed professional fiduciary. Liza currently serves as president of Monterey Trust Management. This is not intended to be legal or tax advice.

Full Article & Source:
Liza Horvath, Senior Advocate: An alternative to conservatorship

Friday, August 12, 2022

Rethinking Guardianship: Emma’s Story

Emma Budway describes her experience as a nonspeaking autistic woman under guardianship and the benefits of less restrictive alternatives.
 
 
Guardianship is a restrictive legal arrangement that often strips many rights from disabled people, including the right to make independent decisions. But it doesn’t have to be this way—supported decision-making is a less restrictive alternative arrangement that centers the individual and their wishes and preferences. Emma Budway details how we can reimagine guardianship, including for nonspeaking autistic people like her.
 
Source:

Thursday, August 11, 2022

Forum brings awareness to Supported Decision Making, an alternative to Guardianship

KOLO spoke with a local mom who says a 2019 state law allowing those with developmental disabilities to choose who is in their support network saved his life

By Freixys Casado

RENO, Nev. (KOLO) - The Nevada Center for Excellence in Disabilities is inviting providers and parents of children with special needs to participate in a forum about supported decision-making.

In 2019, the state of Nevada passed a law which allows people with disabilities to choose people they know and trust to be part of a support network to help with decision-making. This is an alternative to guardianship which is more restrictive and involves a court order.

We spoke with a local mom who says this option saved her son’s life.

“I honestly think he would not be on the earth. His blood condition, they didn’t think he would make it to his teens and he’s made it to 21,” said Toni Richard. “So you know, being here is what has kept him alive. He gets to pick what he wants for dinner, what restaurant.”

The goal is to allow people with disabilities to have a voice and make their own decisions. However, because the law is fairly new, many families still don’t know about it.

“There’s often a pipeline from school to guardianship where that age of majority transition occurs and you have guardianship while still receiving services,” said Deputy Director of Litigation with Nevada Legal Services, Alex Cherup. “Our thought is if we can have supported decision-making then there doesn’t have to be that immediate jump from school to guardianship and we can look at lesser restrictive alternatives.”

The process to establish a supported decision-making agreement is fairly easy and doesn’t require going to court.

You can learn more about it during a virtual forum Wednesday from 6 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Click here to register.

Full Article & Source:

Thursday, April 7, 2022

The Difference Between Supported Decision Making, Conservatorships and Power of Attorney

Distinctions between the legal designations reveal an evolution in the disability community

by Hannah Herner

Will McMillan
Conservatorships have been in the spotlight lately, but they’re a concept that the disability community has reckoned with for decades.

Just last month, news landed that iconic downtown business Ernest Tubb Record Shop and its building are up for sale after 75 years on Lower Broadway. Phillip McCormick is the brother and conservator of longtime Ernest Tubb owner David McCormick. Phillip recently brought charges against the people the shop was sold to in 2020, JesseLee Jones and Emily Ann Cousins, who had power of attorney for David at the time of the sale. Phillip alleges that the couple took money from David’s personal account without his knowledge. Jones and Cousins deny wrongdoing — the two say David McCormick was fully aware of the transactions. 

Will McMillan has Down syndrome. When he turned 18, rather than a conservatorship, he and his family opted to abide by a concept called supported decision making. Instead of having a conservator, McMillan consults with a trusted circle of people before making big decisions. 

“I’ve learned a lot from my friends who make their own decisions,” McMillan says. “I made my decision to actually be independent and also supported from parents.”

When McMillan goes to the doctor, his father usually goes with him. But because he’s over 18 and not in a conservatorship, McMillan has to give permission to have another person in the room. He and his mother have joint access to his bank account. 

Supported decision making, power of attorney and conservatorship all fall under the umbrella term “decision-making supports.” While there are statutes in states including Indiana, Louisiana, Texas and Wisconsin, supported decision making is something that isn’t yet embedded in Tennessee law. What is codified in the state, however, is the idea that in all of this, the court should abide by the “least restrictive alternative” for those with disabilities. 

“We would like to see supported decision making adopted into Tennessee law at some point, but for now, our focus is on fulfilling the needs of individuals and families who are exploring options when it comes to making decisions,” says Penny Johnson, coordinator for the Tennessee Center for Decision-Making Support. “We trust that the work we’ve been doing on a daily basis since 2020 will showcase the need for Tennessee law to include [supported decision making] in the near future.” 

Erica Reed is senior associate counsel for the Tennessee Department of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. She warns that when someone is granted power of attorney, while less restrictive than a conservatorship, it’s still significant. A person with power of attorney can access the individual’s bank account and health care records — and act on their behalf on basically anything, Reed says. 

“With a power of attorney, the individual can still make his or her own decisions,” says Reed. “They’re not giving that up. But they are giving that other person that ability to make it for them.”

In a conservatorship — the type of guardianship agreement that entered international headlines last year due to the case of pop star Britney Spears — rights are taken away. The court is meant to go category by category and remove an individual’s rights only when absolutely necessary to keep the person safe. If a right isn’t specifically transferred to a conservator — like property ownership or the ability to make financial decisions — it remains with the individual. The court also appoints a guardian ad litem, who has the duty of considering whether a prospective conservator is a good fit for the role. If someone doesn’t have a person in their life to serve as a conservator, public guardians, law offices and advocacy groups such as The Arc Tennessee can step in. 

“Decades ago, you would see orders that would refer to a full conservatorship, and that is basically when the courts would just strip away all rights to the person and give those to a conservator,” Reed says. “That is not something that you see very much at all in modern times, because the courts, they’ve evolved — just as we’ve evolved in society — realizing that just because a person may have a limited capacity in one area, that doesn’t mean that he or she needs all of their rights and decision-making authority stripped from them.” 

Will McMillan’s mother Elise McMillan serves as co-director for Vanderbilt Kennedy Center for Excellence in Developmental Disabilities. She says supporting Will in his decision-making reminds her that to some degree, all of us use supported decision making when making big life decisions. 

“We all need support in different areas,” she says. “And it’s the same for people with disabilities too. But we have to give folks also the opportunity to make mistakes. Will has taught our family a great deal. And one of the things we learned from him early on is that he has his own life to lead. He can make his own decisions.” 

For more information on decision-making support, visit tndecisionmaking.org

Full Article & Source:

Thursday, August 26, 2021

I-Team: Getting out of guardianship, one former ward's story

by Danielle DaRos

Michael Lincoln-McCreight tells the CBS12 News I-Team how he got out of his court-ordered guardianship (WPEC).
At 26 years old, Michael Lincoln-McCreight has done what few people in a guardianship have been able to do: get out.

After losing all of his rights, becoming a ward of the state for two years, and then successfully fighting to get his rights restored, Lincoln-McCreight is sharing his story with the CBS12 News I-Team in the hopes that other wards can take the same steps and live freely again.

"There is always a way to get out," he said. "You sometimes have to out-smart the system. There are a lot of cracks in the guardianship world."

Guardianship is supposed to be a last resort to protect our most vulnerable when they can no longer care for themselves. It's a system designed for the elderly and disabled who do not have the capacity to make their own decisions and manage their affairs.

Family members can become court-appointed guardians, and so can professional guardians who can charge their wards' money to manage their lives. Once they're appointed, guardians, also known as conservators, can exercise complete control over an individual, making all of their decisions and even charging wards money to do the work.

The CBS12 News I-Team is investigating guardianship in Florida and found numerous cases of guardians exploiting their wards and stealing their money.

Lincoln-McCreight had never heard about a guardianship before he was in one. It happened when he turned 18 and aged out of the foster care system.

He says he was put into a group home, and "that's when the fishiness began."

Doctors, psychiatrists, and lawyers started to meet with him and ask him questions, but he says no one explained the purpose of the visits. It wasn't until he was appearing before a judge that he learned someone petitioned the court to declare him "incapacitated" and unable to care for himself.

Lincoln-McCreight has a disability but knew it was wrong when a judge declared he didn't have the capacity to live independently and put him under the control of a public guardian.

From there, he was placed into a group home for adults with behavioral health issues. For two years, he says he lived like an inmate: cut off from his phone and internet, unable to go anywhere or talk to anyone without permission, unable to access his own money.

"It was really wrong, and it was really annoying," he said. He found himself asking, "Why am I here? Why did I deserve this?"

One day, a friend's mother suggested he reach out to a group called Disability Rights Florida for advice. But getting into contact with them wouldn't be easy.

Lincoln-McCreight decided to ask his guardian for $60 so he could pretend to buy a book, but he secretly used the money to buy a cheap cellphone. He told CBS12 News he hid it in a closet to make his first phone call to Disability Rights Florida, and ask for help.

"Mike's experience really goes to show and speaks to what an amazing advocate he is," said Viviana Bonilla Lopez, a lawyer with Disability Rights Florida. "He realized this is not what I want, and was determined to get out of it."

A different lawyer with Disability Rights Florida took on Lincoln-McCreight's case and petitioned a judge to reconsider the capacity declaration.

A new court evaluator met with Lincoln-McCreight and determined he did have capacity. When a different judge reviewed the report, he opted to end the guardianship and enter him into a less-restrictive arrangement called "Supported Decision Making."

As Bonilla Lopez explains, Supported Decision Making is a model that gives a person all of their rights back and allows them to be the chief decision-maker for themselves. When making certain decisions, like financial decisions, the individual can turn to a designated team of "supporters" for advice and guidance.

In Lincoln-McCreight's case, his supporters are his pastor and two trusted adult friends.

Not only did Lincoln-McCreight win his freedom -- he charted a new path for other wards. He is the first person in the state of Florida to get out of guardianship using the Supported Decision Making model.

Since winning his case, Disability Rights Florida has gotten two other wards out of their guardianships using SDM.

And now, with the help of Lincoln-McCreight, they are working on a piece of new legislation that would require judges in Florida to consider SDM before putting people into restrictive guardianships.

"We are hoping it will take a lot of people out of the system of guardianship, for whom there are better alternatives," said Bonilla Lopez. "We are encouraged that there are so many stakeholders who are recognizing that Florida's guardianship law needs to be fixed and recognize that we are facing a crisis in guardianship."

In addition to working on disability rights advocacy, Lincoln-McCreight works as a security officer in St. Lucie County. He loves spending time with friends, going to church, and volunteering. He lives on his own and has made it his mission to help others.

"I'm just proud," he said. "Proud to be where I'm at. They told me I would never get my rights back. Just look at me now."

Full Article & Source:

Friday, November 13, 2020

Autism resulted in his rights being stripped away. He just won them back

By Carli Teproff

At 22 years-old, Tyler Borjas had a job, a bank account but he couldn’t legally vote, buy a house or even make travel plans. That’s because a Miami-Dade court deemed Borjas, who has autism, “incapacitated,” and placed him under guardianship. By Pedro Portal

Tyler Borjas will now be able to vote, buy a house or travel when he wants.

That’s because a judge agreed Tuesday that Borjas, 25, who was diagnosed with autism as a child, is capable of making his own decisions.

“Is was amazing,” Borjas said Tuesday of the virtual hearing. “It’s all about me getting my rights back.”

On Tuesday, a judge terminated guardianship — which essentially stripped Borjas of his rights by deeming him incapacitated — and allowed him to use a less restrictive alternative known as Supported Decision Making. He is believed to be only the second person in the state to get guardianship terminated through this manner.

Supported Decision Making allows adults with disabilities to make important decisions with assistance. In his case, his mother, Kelly Bain-Borjas, and two sisters, Hayley and Jade, will be his support team.


In August, Viviana Bonilla López, an attorney working with Disability Rights Florida, an advocacy group, turned to the court to ask a judge to give Borjas his rights back.

“We are so excited for Tyler’s big win,” she said. “This case is so important in demonstrating that Supported Decision Making is a viable alternative to guardianship,” she said Tuesday.

Borjas’ mom said a few years ago she was forced to put her son in guardianship, the result of a personal injury lawsuit filed on his behalf. She said she always encouraged her son to be independent and the guardianship did the exact opposite. In fact, when he was placed under guardianship, he had a job, his own bank account and got around by himself using Uber and Metrorail.

Borjas said now that he has his rights back he wants to get a driver’s license, get married, travel and buy a house.

Bonilla López, an Equal Justice Works Fellow working with Disability Rights Florida, took on Borjas’ case as part of her project sponsored by the Florida Bar Foundation, which is focused on expanding the use of Supported Decision Making as an alternative to guardianship.

She is now on a mission to educate people about Supported Decision Making as a substitute for guardianship. She is even working on legislation that could require Supported Decision Making to be considered.

“We plan to continue to bring cases like Tyler’s to the courts,” Bonilla López said. “We are hoping Tyler’s will be the first of many like this — not only in Miami-Dade, but in Florida.”

d more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article247106597.html#storylink=cpy


Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article247106597.html#storylink=cpy
Full Article & Source:

See Also:
Autism, Florida, Guardianship, NASGA, National Association to Stop Guardian Abuse, reclaiming rights, Supported Decision Making

Sunday, August 30, 2020

A man with autism lost his right to vote or buy a home. He’s fighting to reclaim them

By Carli Teproff

At 22 years-old, Tyler Borjas had a job, a bank account but he couldn’t legally vote, buy a house or even make travel plans. That’s because a Miami-Dade court deemed Borjas, who has autism, “incapacitated,” and placed him under guardianship.

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article244928607.html#storylink=cpy

At 22, Tyler Borjas had a job, a bank account and got around using Uber and Metrorail.

But he couldn’t legally vote, buy a house or make travel plans. That’s because a Miami-Dade court deemed Borjas, who has autism, “incapacitated,” and placed him under guardianship.

”I want to make my own decisions,” Borjas, who is now 25, said. “I want my rights back.”

Guardianship essentially stripped Borjas of his rights, meaning he couldn’t legally make decisions for himself, said Viviana Bonilla López, an attorney working with Disability Rights Florida, an advocacy group.

Bonilla López has set out to change that for Borjas and other adults by promoting a mechanism known as Supported Decision Making instead of guardianship. If Borjas succeeds, it’s believed he’ll be only the second person in the state to reclaim his rights back in this manner.

Supported Decision Making allows adults with disabilities a “less restrictive alternative” while ensuring that they have oversight and help in making important decisions. Bonilla López filed a “suggestion of capacity,” (similar to a motion) in court on Thursday asking a judge to give Borjas his rights back and name his mother, Kelly Bain-Borjas, and two sisters, Hayley and Jade, as his supporters.

“Supported Decision Making better enables people with disabilities to protect themselves from abuse and neglect,” Bonilla López said. “Guardians and guardian advocates have sole control over the person in their care’s life with little oversight.”

So if Borjas wants to go on a trip or buy a car he would run the idea by his supporters and together they would make a decision. Borjas would be able to play a more active role in controlling his own life.

Tyler Borjas, 25, with his mother Kelly Bain-Borjas, center left, and sisters Hayley, far left, and Jade Borjas at home Aug. 22, 2020. Pedro Portal pportal@herald.com

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article244928607.html#storylink=cpy

Tyler as a child


Borjas was a toddler when his mother started to notice her son wasn’t hitting certain milestones, including talking. Her brother told her not to worry, because boys tend to develop a little slower.

She ended up taking him to a neurologist and learned her son had autism.

She enrolled him in a Miami preschool that offered a program for children with autism. He was placed in an ESE class in elementary school and “he excelled,” his mom said.

Bain-Borjas said she didn’t want to hold her son back from doing anything he wanted to do. He wanted to learn martial arts. She obliged. He wanted to volunteer. So she signed him up. He wanted to work. She helped him get a job.

At 16, Borjas was already learning the importance of helping others and working. His first volunteer job was at a bird sanctuary. While in high school, Borjas was placed in a job-training program at the University of Central Florida, where he got experience by working at places including Publix and an assisted living facility.

“One thing about Tyler, is he is very self-motivated,” she said.

A life for himself


Borjas completed an internship at Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, and in 2016 he got a job at AmericanAirlines Arena working in the Papa John’s. He is currently not working because the pandemic has shut down major events.

Borjas does it all. He uses the dough machine, makes the pizza and delivers throughout the arena.

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article244928607.html#storylink=cpy


Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article244928607.html#storylink=cpy
He was living at home, but building the life he wanted.

How they fell under guardianship


When Borjas was 22, his mother filed a personal injury lawsuit on her son’s behalf. She said a lawyer told her the only option was guardianship.

She had heard about guardianship while her son was in school, but never went that route because she didn’t think her son needed it.

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article244928607.html#storylink=cpy


Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article244928607.html#storylink=cpy
Tyler Borjas, 25, is fighting to get his rights back after he was placed under guardianship by the courts. In this undated photo, Borjas makes pizzas at AmericanAirlines Arena.

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article244928607.html#storylink=cpy
She said before she knew it, the judge deemed Tyler incapacitated.

“I was thrown off,” she said. “I didn’t want to take his rights away. I was very distraught.”

What led them to Supported Decision Making


Bonilla López is an Equal Justice Works Fellow working with Disability Rights Florida.

Her project, which is sponsored by the Florida Bar Foundation, is focused on expanding the use of Supported Decision Making.

She said she met Tyler and his mom at an event in October where she presented on the topic.

That’s when Bonilla López decided to take on Tyler’s cause.

“Tyler’s case is a perfect example that a guardianship should never have happened,” she said. “He was already independent and he was being found incapacitated.”

Tyler Borjas, 25, with his Chihuahua, Tito. Pedro Portal pportal@herald.com

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article244928607.html#storylink=cpy
The first Florida case

 

Michael Lincoln-McCreight became the first person in Florida to terminate his guardianship in favor of Supported Decision Making.

In 2014, Lincoln-McCreight, who has a developmental disability and was in foster care, was deemed incapacitated after an advisor decided guardianship was the best route for him.

Now 25, he was around 20 at the time and participated in the Sheriff’s Explorers, volunteered at hospitals, went to church, and loved movies.

But that didn’t matter. In September 2014, the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County declared Michael incapacitated and he lost his rights.

“My dad always taught me to be independent,” he said. “I was shocked that it happened.”

Working with Disability Rights Florida, Lincoln-McCreight, who is a security guard, got his rights back in 2016.

He now works to help others like Tyler.

“People with disabilities can do anything if they set to their mind to it,” he said.


Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article244928607.html#storylink=cpy

Michael Lincoln-McCreight Disability Rights Florida
On a mission



Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article244928607.html#storylink=cpy
Bonilla López’s main goal is to spread the word that Supportive Decision Making should be used as an alternative to guardianship when it is appropriate.

“Guardianships are overused when really the person could be making their own decision with support,” she said. “A lot of times people confuse needing help with not being able to do something. But all of us need help, all of us need advice and people with disabilities are no different.

Bonilla López said they are also working on legislation that would require Supportive Decision Making to be considered before a disability guardianship is activated.

For Tyler, getting his rights back would mean he is in control.

For his mom: “I am just so happy that there is something in place that can help Tyler.”

Tyler Borjas, 25, with his mother, Kelly Bain-Borjas, and his Chihuahua ‘Tito’ at home Aug. 22, 2020. pportal@herald.com

Read more here: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/miami-dade/article244928607.html#storylink=cpy

Full Article & Source:
A man with autism lost his right to vote or buy a home. He’s fighting to reclaim them

Friday, September 6, 2019

In Lieu Of Guardianship, States Look To Supported Decision-Making

DAMARISCOTTA, Maine — Until last year, Joshua Strong wasn’t in charge of his own life.

Like many other adults with autism, Strong was deemed incapacitated by a judge early in adulthood. Most of his decisions were turned over to a legal guardian — in his case, his father.

If Strong wanted to make a big purchase, he needed permission. If he wanted to alter his medication regimen, he needed his father’s OK. If he wanted to begin a romantic relationship, his dad might have to make a ruling on that, too.

That all changed on June 6, 2018, when Strong became the first person in Maine to dissolve a guardianship in favor of something called supported decision-making. It allows him to create a team of people who serve as sounding boards, but all decisions — about financial matters, about health care, about relationships — are legally his to make.

Strong’s case helped pave the way for a change in the way the state’s courts will treat people with intellectual disabilities. A sweeping overhaul of Maine’s probate code that was approved by the state legislature this year and took effect Sept. 1 adds supported decision-making as an alternative to consider in lieu of guardianship.

In the 15 months since Strong became his own guardian, he said his day-to-day life looks the same. He lives in the same apartment, holds the same jobs and still receives support services through a local agency, Mobius Inc.

But the 42-year-old has a level of independence he’s never had, one that wouldn’t have been possible a few years ago.

“It doesn’t feel any different,” he said while pacing between the living room and kitchen of his tidy, one-bedroom apartment in Damariscotta. “I still need help with things, but I guess I’m not asking for permission as much.”

Asked whether he understands the significance of him dissolving his guardianship — that it’s a civil rights victory for people with intellectual disabilities — Strong shrugged. He knows he has autism, and he understands some of the challenges that come with that.

He still takes medication to manage anxiety. He has trouble making eye contact. He repeats things and sometimes returns to conversations that ended minutes earlier. When he has thoughts that he can’t vocalize, he writes them on pieces of scrap paper scattered around his apartment.

Nell Brimmer, an attorney with Disability Rights Maine who represented Strong during his petition to dissolve his guardianship, said his case was a big deal. For so long it was presumed that people with intellectual disabilities were not capable of making decisions. Only a generation ago, Strong might have been sent to live at an institution. His own original guardianship agreement, filed in 2002 in Knox County Probate Court, labels him an “incapacitated person.”

But Brimmer said Strong is a perfect example of someone with a disability who can live independently, with a little help.

“As a society, we can do a lot more to empower people like him,” Brimmer said.

Strong’s father, Jim, said he never imagined when his son was growing up that he would have this life — his own apartment, multiple jobs and control of his own checkbook.

“But this is something he really wanted and, you know, it’s gone great,” he said. “I can’t think of any downsides.”

His mother, Jaime Strong, said they never set any limits for their son.

“He’s very proud,” she said. “And I think he should be”

Parents Were Determined

Strong long had a goal of being independent, but it wasn’t always easy.

Jim Strong said when he and Jaime had him evaluated at a young age, professionals told them he needed to be institutionalized. Becca Emmons, executive director of Mobius, said that’s something she still hears from virtually every client — they are told they’ll never succeed on their own.

But the Strongs were determined never to institutionalize their son. Early in school, he was in a separate classroom because he was easily overstimulated, but eventually he joined his peers. His parents got him all the in-home support they could.

They later divorced, and their son split his middle and high school years between Maine and Massachusetts, where his mother lived. He graduated from Amherst Regional High School in 1999 at age 20.

He lived with his mother early in adulthood.

“I was always with him so there was no need for guardianship,” she said, “but I started to get afraid and think, ‘What’s going to happen when I die?'”

His father, who is an attorney, petitioned the court in 2002 for guardianship and conservatorship, when Strong was 25. A guardian has decision-making authority for all aspects of a person’s life unless excluded by other laws. A conservator is appointed to protect and manage the money and property of an incapacitated person.

Strong has received support services going back to his childhood from a variety of agencies, but he’s been with Mobius the longest, more than a decade. Mobius provides a variety of services — employment, residential, case management and behavioral health — to 130 clients, mostly in Lincoln County. When Strong first started there, he required around-the-clock care and sometimes two staff members. But through medication and behavioral health support, his anxiety lessened.

His first step toward independence came in July 2011. Janice Warring, his program manager at Mobius, wrote to the court that Strong had made steady progress, which resulted in a reduction of support.

“He is responsible for paying rent and utilities monthly. All accounts are in his name. His Social Security is sent to DHHS, who in turn send it to him for monthly expense,” Warring wrote. “Strong works up to 20 hours weekly. He manages his funds independently with minimal assistance to balance his bank account. It is the belief of Joshua, his father/guardian James Strong, DHHS, and I that Strong is no longer in need of a conservator relating to financial matters.”

A judge granted the petition in July 2012, which allowed Strong to manage his own finances, but his father remained his legal guardian.

Strong continued to become more independent. In an annual guardianship report filed with the court in September 2014, Jim Strong wrote that his son continued to thrive. He managed his own Supplemental Security Income payments, took his medication without supervision and lived independently with daytime support staff of 30 hours per week.

“Joshua continues to reduce his dependence upon SSI assistance and hopes to become totally independent financially in the foreseeable future,” his father wrote.

A similar report was filed the next year. No reports were filed in 2015 and 2016, because Strong’s situation had not changed. In January 2018, Jim Strong wrote: “He has become self-sufficient to the point that it is anticipated that a motion to terminate guardianship will be filed within the next two months.”

Strong’s service provider, Mobius, had launched a pilot program with Disability Rights Maine about supported decision-making. When Brimmer learned about Strong and that he wanted to dissolve his guardianship, she took his case.

The petition for termination of guardianship was filed in May 2018. It took the judge a month to grant it. The order included a brief note: “Joshua Strong is utilizing supported decision-making and is therefore no longer incapacitated.”

His support staff took him to lunch at Applebee’s to celebrate.

Supported Decision-Making

Supported decision-making starts with the decision-maker. He chooses a team of people to help guide him, often a parent or parents, sometimes a caseworker or employer. The decision-maker discusses what sorts of things he might need support with and what he might want to do on his own. Together, they make a formal plan that outlines everyone’s role. Then they sign it.

At least a dozen other states have laws encouraging supported decision-making, including Indiana and Nevada, which, like Maine, enacted laws this year.

Emmons, of Mobius, said supported decision-making has never had the kind of momentum it’s seeing now, but she also knows it may be slow to catch on in Maine.

“Joshua is so engaging and charismatic. It’s easy to get on board with him,” she said. “But how is it going to go for people who can’t self-advocate the way he can?”

Carrie Woodcock of Maine Parent Federation, a federally funded support network for families who have children with disabilities, said parents have been receptive to the idea of supported decision-making, but she recognizes it’s not for everyone.

“Some parents have a little panic or fear about what can happen if they don’t have that protection of a guardianship, often when it comes to medical decisions,” she said.

The probate code change that goes into effect this month doesn’t require anyone to try supported decision-making. It instructs probate courts to consider less-restrictive alternatives — including supported decision-making — before granting guardianship.

Disability Rights Maine, the state’s contracted protection and advocacy agency for people with disabilities, including developmental disabilities and mental illness, has long been looking for alternatives to full guardianship, Brimmer said.

How many Mainers might take advantage of supported decision-making is not clear. The final decisions still rest with probate judges. But hundreds or even thousands of people might be eligible, and Brimmer said judges need to be educated just like everyone else.

The number of adults in Maine who have guardianships is not tracked — those decisions are made through county probate courts. However, as of May, 5,454 people were receiving federal waivers through Medicaid for support services for developmental or intellectual disabilities, and another 1,742 were on a waiting list for services in Maine.

Jackie Farwell, spokeswoman for the Maine Department of Health and Humans Services, said the agency “supports policies that allow adults with intellectual disabilities and autism to live safely in the community with the greatest level of independence possible.”

Part-Time Jobs

Elisha Lowe, Strong’s primary support staff member, has been with him for four years. Lowe helps Strong cook and gives him rides to appointments, the grocery store and his jobs. She said he still looks to her for guidance but rarely needs it.

“He does awesome no matter what,” she said.

Last Wednesday he returned to his part-time job as a crossing guard for the Great Salt Bay Community School in Damariscotta.

He retrieved his yellow vest and double-sided stop sign from his locker, then walked outside to the buses.

“How was your summer, Josh?” a bus driver asked.

“Excellent,” he replied before asking about the driver’s family.

“How long have you been doing this now?” he asked.

“Thirteen years,” Strong said.

“Has it been that long?” the driver asked.

Strong has another job at the local IGA grocery store, where he sweeps and takes out the trash for an hour every day, Monday through Friday. He also does janitorial work at Mobius’ offices.

Once a week he attends a community supper at a local church. It’s a free supper, but he said he tries to make a donation when he can. He watches Marvel superhero movies and “Days of Our Lives.” Sometimes he swims at the Boothbay YMCA.

He has a group of friends he’s met through Mobius, and his social calendar is active. Some of his friends are in romantic relationships, but Strong labeled his current status as “playing the field.”

Strong has a great deal of self-awareness about his diagnosis. Whenever he leaves the house, he has a checklist: Check the stove. Make sure the faucet isn’t running. Turn the computer off. He calls it his “OCD.”

During the course of two interviews, Strong often looked to his direct care worker, Lowe, for guidance when asked questions.

“Am I saying things right?” he asked at one point.

“There’s no right or wrong, Joshua,” she said.

He’s continually setting goals for himself. He recently started riding a bicycle, with the goal of riding it to work and appointments. So far, he’s only been in his driveway.

He has friends who drive, but Strong isn’t sure that’s for him. One day maybe.

He knows his limits.

And even though his father is no longer his guardian, Strong said he’s “still in the habit of asking him for approval.”

“Structure is important,” Jim Strong explained. “He still calls every night, and getting that phone call in is an important part of his day.”

He paused for a moment before adding, “Mine too.”

Full Article & Source:
In Lieu Of Guardianship, States Look To Supported Decision-Making

Wednesday, November 14, 2018

Thursday, June 28, 2018

This 87-year-old D.C. woman just made it easier for you to keep your independence

The 87-year-old wore a silk dress she had sewn herself. The bright blue fabric featuring yellow, turquoise and lavender flowers pulled at the eyes, and against it, the pale pink stones of her necklace seemed a conservative choice. But that’s not why she wore it.

With a smile, she explained that she had picked the beads less for the statement they made than for the promise they held.

“They’re supposed to help you get a boyfriend,” she said, laughing.

When the woman tells people she is not far from 90, they show genuine surprise. She has not yet let her hair turn white and she speaks with a well-earned wit. She also takes care of most of her needs by herself, getting dressed on her own, taking the right amount of medications as needed and making appointments that she gets to herself by using public transportation. She recently enrolled in a college class after deciding she wants to learn Italian.

Each of these details matters, because it speaks not only to her personality but also to her capabilities. Despite all that, she was deemed an “incapacitated individual” — unable to make choices for herself. But that changed this month.

The octogenarian is the first senior citizen in the District to convince a court to terminate a guardianship placed on her in favor of “supported decision-making.” She and her attorneys successfully argued that with help from people in her life, she could make her own decisions and did not need a court-appointed guardian to do that for her.

Guardianship is often associated with people who develop or are born with intellectual disabilities. But this case shows why it should matter to everyone. As we age, and the lucky among us will, we all risk losing what we value most: the ability to choose how we live.

Putting legal protections in place will ensure that we have to give that up only when it is absolutely necessary.

“I felt very annoyed by having someone else taking care of everything,” said the woman, who for privacy reasons spoke on the condition that she be identified only by her middle name, Dolores. “I am the boss. I can do whatever I need to do.”

Her case marks the first time that the District’s supported decision-making law, which was passed in May, has been cited in court to help a resident regain independence. Most of us have friends or relatives we turn to for advice. This is the same as that — but more. The D.C. law formalizes those relationships and requires institutions and organizations to recognize the role of people who serve in those supportive positions. The District is only the fourth jurisdiction in the country to pass the law, after Texas, Delaware and Wisconsin. (Virginia and Maryland — are you listening?)+

“You’re a pioneer in many ways,” Morgan Whitlatch, the legal director for Quality Trust for Individuals with Disabilities, which handled Dolores’s case, told her recently as we sat in her apartment in Northwest Washington. “You weren’t scared to fight.”

“I had to fight against everybody,” Dolores replied.

In 2015, Dolores was facing possible eviction from a subsidized senior building after falling behind on her rent, according to court documents. Her landlord agreed to work out a payment plan if she was assigned a guardian to help her with her finances, and so she agreed to one.

But once she regained financial stability, she asked her guardian to file a letter with the court saying she no longer needed him. When she realized he failed to do that, she went to the court on her own and wrote a complaint.

She also called AARP, and the organization directed her to Quality Trust.

Years earlier, Quality Trust had handled a case in which the stakes also involved an individual’s independence. A 29-year-old woman with Down syndrome named Margaret “Jenny” Hatch had fought in a Virginia court against a guardianship request by her parents. They wanted her to remain in a group home, supervised and protected. She wanted to move in with friends and continue working at a thrift shop they owned.

When the judge denied her parents’ guardianship request in August 2013, Jenny cried and exclaimed, “Oh my God. I’m so happy to go home today. I deserve it. It’s over. My God, it’s over.”

Her lawyer, Jonathan Martinis, declared, “For anyone who has been told you can’t do something, you can’t make your own decisions, I give you Jenny Hatch — the rock that starts the avalanche.”

Dolores didn’t know it, but she was swept into that avalanche. Her case was handled through the Jenny Hatch Justice Project, which is run through Quality Trust and funded by the DC Bar Foundation to assist low-income District residents.

“For me, this is exciting because this is groundbreaking,” Whitlatch told Dolores that day at her apartment. “I hope this is going to transfer over to how we treat older adults. You being able to have this fight means maybe they won’t have to fight as hard.”

For Dolores, the court’s decision has simply meant she can now do what she has always done: take care of herself.

When she was 5 years old and growing up in South America, she said her parents used to put her on a train with her brothers, who were 4 and 6, and told her to watch them until they arrived at their grandparent’s house three hours away.

Later, when she moved to the United States, she worked for the State Department and then handled bilingual translations for several government agencies, including the Library of Congress and the Labor Department.

Dolores recognizes that she is not able to do everything alone now. But she said that for every problem she encounters, she knows whom to call. She has a person who helps her when she has health insurance issues and one who helps when she has medical questions. Recently, after someone stole her wallet, she knew exactly who could help her get a new Metro card.

“It makes you feel powerful to be in charge of your own life,” she said. “You can have a lot of help everywhere, but you are your own boss.”

Still, she said, she worries about the future, about whether one day she will be told that she can no longer live alone in her apartment.

She knows all too well what many of us, thankfully, have not yet had to learn — the suddenness with which life can change.

Full Article & Source:
This 87-year-old D.C. woman just made it easier for you to keep your independence

Wednesday, June 20, 2018

D.C. Senior Freed from Guardianship in Favor of Supported Decision-Making

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 18, 2018

Washington, D.C. – For the first time in the District of Columbia, a guardianship of an older adult has been terminated in favor of Supported Decision-Making.

Sarah Miller,* a woman in her 80s, was placed under guardianship in 2015 because she had fallen behind on her rent and faced eviction. The landlord offered to work out a payment plan only if Ms. Miller had a court-appointed guardian. Faced with the difficult choice of losing either her home or her decision-making rights, Ms. Miller consented to guardianship. However, Ms. Miller is an independent person with a robust network of family members, friends, and professionals to help her, and she shortly realized that guardianship was more restrictive than she had thought it would be. She wanted to enroll in a local program that helps older adults with memory loss manage their finances and pay bills, but was unable to do so because of the guardianship. Ms. Miller wanted to regain the right to legally make her own decisions, just like every other citizen.

Ms. Miller came to Quality Trust’s Jenny Hatch Justice Project (“JHJP”) for help. This project is funded by the D.C. Bar Foundation to assist low-income District residents with disabilities facing overbroad or undue guardianship. Working with JHJP Staff Attorney Jessica Bronson, Ms. Miller presented the judge with evidence of her history of making decisions and directing her own life using Supported Decision-Making. When people use Supported Decision-Making, they work with friends, family members, and others they trust to help them understand the situations they face, so they can make their own decisions without the need for a guardian. Ms. Miller also presented a case reviewer report and capacity assessment that supported terminating the guardianship. After reviewing this material and hearing from Ms. Miller, the Court agreed and restored Ms. Miller’s rights by ending the guardianship.

Ms. Miller is elated by the decision. “Thanks to Ms. Bronson and Quality Trust, I have my legal rights back,” she says. “I am now working with them on an Advance Directive and Durable Power of Attorney, so that I can plan for my future and avoid ending up in court again.”

“Quality Trust is committed to defending the right of District residents with disabilities to make their own decisions, receive the support they want and need, and direct their own lives,” says Tina M. Campanella, Chief Executive Officer of Quality Trust for Individuals with Disabilities.

“We are honored to work with people like [Ms. Miller] and are so pleased with the outcome of her case. Her story is a perfect example of how Supported Decision-Making can also work for older adults – getting them the help they need while preserving their decision-making rights.”

For more information on Supported Decision-Making, please visit:

www.DCQualityTrust.org
www.JennyHatchJusticeProject.org
www.SupportedDecision-Making.org

Contact:
Morgan K. Whitlatch, Legal Director, 202-459-4004,
MWhitlatch@DCQualityTrust.org

Saturday, June 16, 2018

Indiana: 28-Year-Old Jamie Beck Makes State History as First to Regain Decision-Making Rights

Jamie Beck works full-time at IU Health Ball Memorial Hospital, with benefits.

She lives in a Muncie apartment with a housemate, following and enforcing rules, cooking and cleaning.

Photo by Erskine Green Training Institute
Now, the 28-year-old has regained the legal right to make her own decisions.

Wayne County Superior Court II Judge Gregory Horn on Wednesday granted Beck's petition to terminate her guardianship by Achieva Resources Corporation and its president, Dan Stewart, and approved a Supported Decision Making agreement for Beck, who has a mild intellectual development disability.

"Yay. It feels pretty awesome," Beck said when asked how she felt after the hearing attended by about a dozen supporters for her historic moment. "To be able to make my own choices with help is really great."

Beck is the first Indiana resident to use a Supported Decision Making agreement and regain decision-making rights. About a year ago, Wayne County and Achieva were granted the state's first pilot program after the Indiana Supreme Court granted an American Bar Association request for a model Supported Decision Making program.

"Jamie, it's been an absolute pleasure to get to know you and to follow you," Horn said. "I'm glad that you're the first one, and I wish you all the success in the world."

Under the Supported Decision Making agreement, Beck, who will still receive Medicaid waiver services to make sure she is safe and thriving, selects a team to assist her and determines how they will advise her in area such as finances, healthcare, legal matters and housing, much like parents, family members and friends do for just about anyone making important life choices. In the end, though, the choices now are legally hers, which she said isn't the least bit scary.

"It's time," Beck said. "God takes you to this place."

Full Article and Source:
28 Year-Old Jamie Beck Makes Indiana History as First to Regain Decision-Making Rights

See Also:
NASGA: Supported Decision-Making

Friday, March 23, 2018

National Council on Disability (NCD) Report Examines “Civil Death” of the Rights of People with Disabilities and the Elderly under Guardianships, Calls on Department of Justice to Ensure Full and Fair Due Process Rights

Baltimore, MD – The National Council on Disability (NCD) – an independent federal advisory body – today will release and discuss the findings and recommendations of a seminal national report that thoroughly examines guardianship – the process through which an adult can be found legally incapable of making decisions for him or herself and another adult appointed to make decisions on behalf of that individual – in view of the estimated 1.3 million Americans subject to guardianship and the goals of longstanding national disability rights policy. The report release presentation will occur in Baltimore, Maryland at the Jacobus tenBroek Disability Law Symposium.

“Former Congressman Claude Pepper famously said of guardianships, ‘The typical [person subject to guardianship] has fewer rights than the typical convicted felon… It is, in one short sentence, the most punitive civil penalty that can be levied against an American citizen, with the exception, of course, of the death penalty,’” said Phoebe Ball, NCD Legislative Affairs Specialist who worked extensively on the report. “NCD chose to examine this topic at depth given the implications for someone’s civil rights and liberty under guardianship – that an individual is losing the authority to make decisions regarding where to live, whether to work and where, where to travel, with whom to socialize, and how to manage money and property. We need to explore alternatives to guardianship such as supported decision making that enable people to avoid this civil death.”

The findings and recommendations in the report, Beyond Guardianship: Toward Alternatives that Promote Greater Self-Determination for People with Disabilities, are the product of qualitative research on the experiences with guardianship and decision making alternatives of people with disabilities, their families, and professionals within the guardianship system gleaned through interviews; in addition to an extensive review of relevant scholarship and recent studies.

Report Findings:
Amongst its key findings, NCD’s Beyond Guardianship study found that:
    *Guardianship is often imposed when not warranted by facts or circumstances, because guardianship proceedings often operate under erroneous assumptions that people with disabilities lack capability to make autonomous decisions and rely upon capacity determinations that often lack sufficient scientific or evidentiary basis.

    *Although guardianship is considered a protective measure, courts often lack adequate resources, technical infrastructure, and training to monitor guardianships effectively and hold guardians accountable, which at times allows for guardians to use their positions to financially exploit people subject to guardianships or subject them to abuse or neglect.

    *People with disabilities are often denied due process rights in guardianship proceedings.

    *Although most state laws require consideration of less-restrictive alternatives, courts do little to enforce those requirements. Similarly, though every state has a process for the restoration of one’s rights lost through guardianship, the process is rarely used.

    *There is a lack of data on existing guardianships and newly filed guardianships, which frustrates efforts of policymakers to make determinations about necessary areas for reform.

    "People with disabilities should be given the maximum opportunity to make decisions for themselves and to live the lives that they want to live," said Neil Romano, Chairman of NCD. "At NCD, it is our responsibility to offer policymakers the best information available so that they can make decisions designed to move people with disabilities toward full inclusion and equality in our society and help them fully realize their American birthright of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."

    Report Recommendations:
    For each major finding, NCD offers recommendations to federal and state policymakers to address areas of concern.

    A small sampling of the report’s recommendations includes:
    *The Department of Justice (DOJ), in collaboration with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), should issue guidance to states (specifically Adult Protective Services [APS] agencies and probate courts) on their legal obligations pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

    *The Administration for Community Living (ACL) currently funds the National Resource Center for Supported Decision-Making and several demonstration projects at the state and local levels. These grants should be expanded to be able to fund more geographically- and demographically-diverse projects and pilots that specifically test SDM models and use SDM and the court systems to restore people’s rights as a matter of law, particularly for people who are older adults with cognitive decline, people with psychosocial disabilities, and people with severe intellectual disabilities.

    *DOJ should make funding available to train judges in the availability of alternatives to guardianship including, but not limited to, supported decision making. This training should also include information about the home and community-based–services system and the workforce development system so that judges understand the context in which decisions are being made by and for people with disabilities.

    *A state guardianship court improvement program should be funded to assist courts with developing and implementing best practices in guardianship, including training of judges and court personnel on due process rights and less-restrictive alternatives.

    Source:
    NCD REport Examines “Civil Death” of the Rights of People with Disabilities and the Elderly under Guardianships, Calls on Department of Justice to Ensure Full and Fair Due Process Rights
READ the report: Beyond Guardianship: Toward Alternatives That Promote Greater Self-Determination for People With Disabilities