Sunday, March 9, 2025

Local senior service worker sentenced for exploiting elderly client's finances

by WKRC


CINCINNATI (WKRC) - An employee of a senior service provider was sentenced to nine months in jail for stealing from a woman she was supposed to help.

Brenda Cowden was a caseworker responsible for placing seniors into care facilities. The victim lived alone with no close friends or family. Cowden was assigned to the victim who could no longer safely live at home.

In February, prosecutors said Cowden convinced the 79-year-old victim to sign a power of attorney, illegally adding witness signatures afterward. Cowden gained control over the victim's accounts.

In all, Cowden obtained $13,600 of the victim's money directly and had control over more than $1 million dollars before investigators at GE Credit Union froze an account and notified Sharonville Police.

Had there not been an investigation, Cowden would have likely received all of the victim's money when she died.

Cowden pleaded guilty to theft from a person in a protected class. In exchange for the plea charges of telecommunications fraud, forgery and others were dropped.

Cowden could have been sentenced to 61 years in prison if she'd been convicted of all charges.

Full Article & Source:
Local senior service worker sentenced for exploiting elderly client's finances

Saturday, March 8, 2025

Wendy Williams To Enlist A$AP Rocky’s Attorney In Guardianship Case

by Marc Griffin


Wendy Williams is looking to use A$AP Rocky’s attorney to end her contentious guardianship. Joe Tacopina shared on the 2 Angry Men podcast that she reached out to him to represent her in a case to end the two-year court mandate.

Tacopina asserted that he was alarmed after watching Tubi’s Saving Wendy documentary and declared the treatment of the iconic talking head as “a true injustice.” TMZ quoted the lawyer saying, “Murderers have more freedom than Wendy.”

Joe Tacopina was the lawyer who helped secure Rocky’s win in his Hollywood assault case against his former associate, A$AP Relli. Although some jurors have revealed that they didn’t believe the rapper’s “prop gun” story, they chose to acquit the fashion designer.

“Everybody was really focused on delivering justice,” one unidentified juror stated. “I think that we really took our time. We discussed all the issues and all the questions that we had, we clarified those, and we really kind of looked over some pieces of the evidence that people wanted to see a little bit more closely. And I think that we did the best we could with the instructions that we had, and with the evidence that we had.”

Regardless, Ms. Williams is hoping that the 58-year-old could work his magic to win her freedom. In a January interview with The Breakfast Club, Williams gave her first public statement since the release of the controversial Lifetime documentary Where Is Wendy Williams?.

The former talk show host explained that her experience with the court mandate has felt like “jail” and called out her court-appointed guardian, Sabrina E. Morrissey, who previously claimed her to be “cognitively impaired, permanently disabled, and legally incapacitated.”

“I am not cognitively impaired. But I feel like I am in prison,” Williams detailed to DJ Envy, Charlamagne Tha God, and guest host Loren LoRosa. “I’m in this place where the people are in their 90s and their 80s and their 70s. There’s something wrong with these people here on this floor.”

Full Article & Source:
Wendy Williams To Enlist A$AP Rocky’s Attorney In Guardianship Case

See Also:
Wendy Williams, Her Guardian, and the Age of the Celebrity Conservatorship

NBC 10 I-Team: Woman accused of draining elderly mother's bank account

 by BRIAN CRANDALL


(WJAR) — A North Providence woman is accused of improperly taking more than $240,000 from her mother’s bank account and using much of it to buy a house.

State police have charged Lisa McManaman, 55, with elder exploitation of more than $100,000 and obtaining money by false pretenses.

Her mother had been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease in 2015, according to court documents obtained by NBC 10.

According to the investigation reports, McManaman’s mother sold her home in 2020 and moved in with McManaman.

Authorities accuse McManaman of then transferring the money out of her mother’s bank account into her own without her mother’s authorization.

In 2023, the police report states the mother was living in an assisted living facility and went to the bank with a staff member after McManaman did not provide her mother with bank statements as requested.

It was at that time, the report states, the mother questioned why her bank account didn’t have nearly as much money in it as she expected.

Another daughter then went with the mother to State police to file a complaint.

That daughter, not McManaman, was their mother’s power of attorney.

Police note in their report that McManaman’s mother “continually had difficulty with her memory” during their interview, but was “adamant she did not give McManaman permission to take her money.”

McManaman’s sister told investigators that when she and another sibling had confronted McManaman about the money, McManaman got very angry and said she deserved it because she was taking care of their mother for years.

Investigators wrote that they suspected a signature was forged to allow McManaman access to $213,000 of her mother’s money.

They write in their report “it is believed that she (the mother) did not have the mental capacity to agree to give McManaman access to her bank account in 2020 or approve the $243,200 in transfers to McManaman’s bank account.”

McManaman entered a not guilty plea at her arraignment Monday and is free as the case continues.

McManaman’s lawyer, Nick Hemond, told NBC10 she “categorically denies the allegations.”

Hemond said, “We believe the allegations are not motivated by her mother, but her sister for her own improper motivations.”

McManaman’s sister has not replied to a message from NBC 10.

In 2016, McManaman pleaded guilty to federal charges of stealing prescription drugs from the VA Medical Center in Providence, where she worked as a nurse in the intensive care unit, and of failing to disclose on her employment application that she was fired from another hospital in Rhode Island.

She was sentenced to two years probation and ordered to pay $1000 restitution in that case.

Full Article & Source:
NBC 10 I-Team: Woman accused of draining elderly mother's bank account

New Boston police arrest local man on theft and exploitation charges

by Daniel Duric


NEW BOSTON — The New Boston Police Department arrested Robert R. Kelly, 73, on the morning of March 1 on multiple felony charges.

Kelly faces charges of theft by unauthorized taking and financial exploitation, both exceeding $1,500, as well as witness tampering.

The investigation began on Jan. 16 following a referral from the New Hampshire Bureau of Adult and Aging Services, which alleged that Kelly was financially exploiting a 67-year-old victim known to him.

Kelly is charged with one count of theft by unauthorized taking, two counts of financial exploitation, and two counts of witness tampering.

He was previously arrested by the Newbury Police on Aug. 7, 2024, on charges of indecent exposure and lewdness at State Beach in Newbury. He is currently on bail for that case pending in Merrimack County Superior Court.

After his arrest in New Boston, Kelly was released on personal recognizance bail. He is scheduled to be arraigned in Goffstown District Court on April 8.

Full Article & Source:
New Boston police arrest local man on theft and exploitation charges

Friday, March 7, 2025

Wendy Williams, Her Guardian, and the Age of the Celebrity Conservatorship

Until she was assigned her most vocal charge in a post–#FreeBritney world, elder-law attorney Sabrina Morrissey worked in anonymity.


By Dan Adler 

Harvey Levin, the TMZ founder, was seated at the outlet’s headquarters in Los Angeles. Wendy Williams, the former daytime talk show host, was in Manhattan, looking out from a fifth-floor window of an assisted living facility. On the sidewalk, a camera streamed a feed of Williams to Levin. She gripped a phone with one hand and, as she made her latest pleas for freedom, pressed the other against the glass for emphasis.

The conversation between two of celebrity gossip’s most accomplished personalities constituted the throughline of TMZ Presents: Saving Wendy, an hour-long special released in February. It is an unsettling document defined by Williams’s face of tearful despair, and, in some other sense, a testament to each party’s capacity for spectacle. “I feel wonderful and fabulous,” Williams tells Levin. As the interview concludes, Levin addresses and empowers the audience, saying, “You don’t have to be a doctor or judge to take a stand.”

Williams rose to the highest rungs of her field as a bawdy and unabashed chronicler of starry turmoil. Her steady penchant for conflict saw her clashing with the likes of Diddy, Mariah Carey, and Whitney Houston, and to a degree, it made her one of them. Williams’s recent health issues, as well as claims of her substance abuse and her ex-husband’s infidelity surrounding the 2020 dissolution of her 21-year marriage, have often played as tabloid fodder.

When The Wendy Williams Show ended after a 14-year run in 2022, its conclusion was eclipsed by the murky circumstances surrounding it. After her bank claimed that year that Williams, now 60, was incapacitated, describing her as a “victim of undue influence and financial exploitation,” she was placed under a court-ordered conservatorship. In 2024, her team announced that she had been diagnosed with frontotemporal dementia and aphasia. In recent months, across a growing series of media appearances, including interviews with The Breakfast Club and Don Lemon, Williams has denied having dementia and said that she feels like a prisoner. She told Levin that her two cats were gone and that she was only allowed to leave the building twice in the last month.

Conservatorship, historically a semi-esoteric legal practice, has gained considerable traction in the pop culture vernacular in recent years. Framing Britney Spears, the 2021 New York Times/FX documentary, turned the pop star’s long-running battle to exit a court-ordered guardianship run by her father into a global media phenomenon, and created a template for understanding other celebrities’ struggles for autonomy. On her show that year, Williams herself went so far as to wish death on Spears’s parents for the trauma described by the singer—the clip was cut from future airings. “Is Free Amanda Bynes the New #FreeBritney?” the Daily Beast asked as scrutiny of the former child star’s own conservatorship began to mount.

Four years later, with less fame and novelty in the backdrop, the #FreeWendy movement has been more sporadic, powered by a scattering of social media pages and a recent GoFundMe campaign. But as with Spears’s father Jamie, there has been an identifiable face for the opposition.

Sabrina Morrissey is an elder-law attorney whom a Manhattan court appointed to oversee Williams’s welfare and finances. She began working on guardianship cases about 20 years ago, and Williams’s is one of 24 she is currently managing. Conservatorships can naturally entail a measure of conflict, especially in instances such as Williams’s, when a court appoints a guardian in lieu of a family member or against family members’ wishes. Williams’s 24-year-old son had initially sought to be appointed, and, along with Williams’s sister and niece, has since condemned Morrissey’s handling of the case. Williams told TMZ that it was her son’s overspending that triggered her bank to seek a conservatorship. (He has denied the allegation.)

Williams’s public complaints against Morrissey have brought additional complications. Morrissey has largely tried to filter out thousands of outraged emails and one-star Google reviews, she told me during a recent interview, but when Williams herself is the messenger, she has some level of obligation to tune in. Hours after Williams contested her dementia diagnosis in a February interview, Morrissey requested a new medical evaluation.

Morrissey sought to block the release of the 2024 Lifetime documentary Where Is Wendy Williams?, and she and the network are currently suing each other. Morrissey claims that the four-part series exploited its subject’s erratic behavior and drinking. The network accuses her of trying to “silence criticism of her controversial and failed administration.” Each party denies the other’s allegations, and Morrissey has said she has “no interest” in pursuing her suit “in the extremely unlikely event” that the new examination finds that Williams has the mental capacity to oversee it. (The judge has granted a three-month stay pending the medical evaluation.)

The judge in Williams’s conservatorship case, Morrissey said, recently granted her a limited exemption to a broad sealing order for the purpose of clarifying the record following Williams’s claims about her and other allegations made on social media and in the press. When we spoke, Morrissey had a crisis communications professional and her own lawyer on the line as she tried to clear up an emerging narrative.

“Nobody’s saying that Wendy can’t leave a building,” Morrissey said, citing Williams’s two recent trips to Florida for her son’s college graduation and her father’s 94th birthday. “But that has become a thread that people pick up on.”

According to Morrissey, Williams’s cats were a bonded pair of siblings who were rehomed amid Williams’s moves between medical facilities. Williams’s current building only allows one cat per resident. Morrissey said that Williams didn’t want to split the pair, and that, when presented with an option to get a new single cat, she declined.

Williams was diagnosed by doctors at Weill Cornell Medical Center, according to one of Morrissey’s court filings, and ruled incapacitated by a judge. In general, Morrissey described her work in terms of its adherence to court orders, explaining that Williams’s living arrangements and level of care have flowed from medical recommendations. “It’s not something that I decided,” she said.

Despite the press appearances, Morrissey said Williams hasn’t seemed angry with her when they talk. They had spoken the night before our interview, and Morrissey said that they typically see each other a few times a month. She was even but firm about how she had been conducting her job and, under the circumstances, only intermittently defensive. She said that, in addition to showing that Williams hasn’t been emotionally abused, she felt compelled to address a more sweeping disparagement of the system in which she works—one that revolves, she noted, around difficult circumstances and decisions.

On the whole, Morrissey said, guardianships are often misunderstood. In her view, the aim is to maximize a person’s ability to make choices, at least within the boundaries of safety and bureaucratic constraint. “I had one woman who all she wanted to do is listen to Frank Sinatra,” she remembered. “If she said to me, I’m going to stand here and jump out the window, we wouldn’t let her do that.”

As the push to support Spears escalated, culminating in the end of her conservatorship in late 2021, advocates saw an opportunity for a broader reevaluation of guardianship practices. The director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Disability Rights Program, Zoe Brennan-Krohn, believes the mechanism should only be used as an absolute last resort, and wondered if any less restrictive options had been tried in Williams’s case.

Even if a guardian “started with the best of intentions,” Brennan-Krohn said, “it is very hard to come back from the real harm to your personhood that people feel when they are told it doesn't matter what you want.”

Healthcare attorney Harry Nelson has worked with several prescribing doctors whose celebrity patients died of opioid overdoses, including Michael Jackson and Prince. He said that observers of Williams’s case would be right to be troubled by what they’re seeing and hearing, and he identified what he sees as fundamental issues with the care relationships formed out of conservatorships.

“There’s an aspect of self-preservation and guardians inherently become conservators of their own.” Nelson said. “Obviously you don’t accept the responsibility without believing that you’re in an essential role.”

The most restrictive forms of guardianship, he added, tend to be the most straightforward for the conservator. “The safest way to prevent Wendy Williams from self-harm or from financial abuse is just to cut her off and effectively restrain her from doing anything.”

Like Spears’s and Bynes’s fans, Williams’s most devout acolytes have been studying the conversation around guardianships. Jarrius Adams, a 27-year-old Washington, DC–based attorney focused on voting rights, runs a small account on X, @FreeWendy2025, aimed at raising awareness about what he described to me as Morrissey’s failings.

Adams grew up watching The Wendy Williams Show, and in recent years, he said, “I realized that we’re seeing the exact same thing that happened to people who a lot of supporters got behind,” including Spears. He believes that Morrissey is retaliating against Williams for her outspokenness. While he and like-minded observers have not yet organized protests, he thought a tipping point could arrive with the recent uptick of attention.

Morrissey is white, and online backlash has sometimes emphasized the racial dynamic between her and a highly visible Black woman in her care. Adams specified that Morrissey’s behavior was not in keeping with the tenets that he learned at Howard University.

“I went to law school to help people and not take advantage of them,” Adams said. “When I think of Sabrina Morrissey, I think of people who are the opposite of me.”

“Can she speak?” Morrissey said, responding to some of the social media and tabloid chatter that highlighted Williams’s interview performances. “Yes, she’s a professional speaker.”

“But when I speak to her, and it’s not scripted and it’s not repetitive, do I see issues with her speech? Yes, I do, but the public isn’t having conversations with her the way I do.”

When she was assigned the case, Morrissey didn’t know much about Williams or the news surrounding her health decline. She said she wasn’t very familiar with Spears’s case either, and that her day-to-day work hadn’t changed in its aftermath. While she could imagine general instances of exploitation within the conservatorship structure, she said she’d have nothing to gain from restricting Williams’s movements, and that, given the level of judicial oversight, “If you wanted to take money or do something that wasn’t legal or proper, a guardianship would be the absolute wrong place to do it.”

Morrissey enjoys the practical and interpersonal challenges that accompany cases such as Williams’s. “As a guardian, you are a fiduciary,” she said. “I can’t let whatever happens in the public affect how I respond to her and how I continue to help her.”

Richard Seeger is a thrift store cashier in a suburb of Detroit. He has a degree in criminal justice, he told me, and alongside “#FreeWendy,” his bio on X includes American, pride, Israeli, and Ukrainian flags. He has designs on becoming a streamer and asked if I could include his handle, @Lion2Ya, in this story.

Seeger wasn’t sure that there was a villain in Williams’s case, apart from perhaps the law itself. “I understand that [Morrissey] is the lady who was court appointed and my notion is that maybe it’s kind of a hands-off approach,” he said, but he was also “getting the sense that maybe she isn’t fully within Wendy’s best interest.”

Another onlooker I spoke to struck a similarly ambivalent note. Valerie Connolly, a 43-year-old stay-at-home mother, grew up in Yonkers and, while not a hardcore fan, became familiar with Williams in her pre-television days as a New York City shock jock. She closely followed A$AP Rocky’s and Young Thug’s recent trials and views Williams’s case in the same vein of celebrity-justice matters.

Above all, Connolly found the situation sad. She also wanted to know more, and started poking around after Williams spoke out about her distress, even if the answers have been somewhat lacking. “There’s bits and pieces of it that I don’t understand completely,” Connolly said. “Maybe you’re never really going to know the why for certain things.”

Full Article & Source:
Wendy Williams, Her Guardian, and the Age of the Celebrity Conservatorship

See Also:
Wendy Williams

County begins ‘unprecedented’ forced care

• Conservatorship law changes in California for all counties 


By MARIJKE ROWLAND

For the second time in a year, Stanislaus County is a testing ground for sweeping changes to California mental health policy.

In January, Stanislaus became one of a handful of counties to begin implementing SB 43 a year earlier than required. The new law is aimed at curbing the state’s homelessness crisis, but could also increase the number of people forced into care against their will.

Passed in late 2023, the law adds to the state’s criteria for conservatorship, a kind of legal guardianship for people living with severe mental health disorders. The law expands the definition of “gravely disabled,” which was first set in the 1967 Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (LPS) signed by then Gov. Ronald Reagan. That landmark legislation ended California’s practice of warehousing people with mental illnesses in state psychiatric facilities and instead set up criteria for who could be involuntarily committed for both short and long-term holds.

The “gravely disabled” threshold for conservatorship had previously required a corresponding mental health diagnosis, but SB 43 has now added “severe substance use disorder” and inability to provide for “personal safety or necessary medical care” as standalone criteria. Before, only those who could not provide for their own food, clothing and shelter could be placed in involuntary care.

The new broader definition was championed by Gov. Gavin Newsom along with a slate of other statewide mental health policy and funding shifts made to address homelessness, including Proposition 1 and CARE Court.

Stanislaus County implemented the latter, a new civil court division that can order those with untreated schizophrenia or other psychotic disorders into housing and treatment, a year before most other counties as part of its pilot program.

SB 43 is the first significant change to California conservatorship law in more than four decades. Getting county agencies on the same page took more than a year of monthly meetings with affected stakeholders, including law enforcement, medical staff and mental health professionals.

“This kind of LPS reform, which is unprecedented actually, affects almost all sectors,” said Bernardo Mora, medical director of Stanislaus County Behavioral Health and Recovery Services. “Hospitals, health clinics, doctors’ offices, emergency services, law enforcement, the court system, DA, PD – I’m probably leaving somebody out.”

Stanislaus County supervisors were eager to implement the new law and agreed to move the deadline up a full year. The county is among four– including Sacramento, San Bernardino and San Diego – that deployed SB 43 this year. San Francisco and San Luis Obispo counties implemented it at the start of 2024. The remaining 52 counties have until January 2026.

Critics of SB 43 said broadening the “gravely disabled” definition has the potential to place many more people into forced conservatorship, which severely limits their civil liberties. Groups like Human Rights Watch and Disability Rights California also worry that involuntary holds would skyrocket across the state. 

But Mora said that has not played out in practice, so far. He said data from San Francisco and San Luis Obispo show an initial increase in 5150 holds, but that numbers leveled off by year’s end. 

State law allows 5150 holds, which can be initiated by law enforcement or medical and mental health professionals, if people meet one of three criteria: danger to themselves, danger to others or gravely disabled. The 72-hour holds are the first step to possibly longer term holds, including 14-day 5250 holds all the way to permanent conservatorship.

Local law enforcement officials also said they were not expecting a sharp increase in their 5150 holds because of the new criteria. Representatives from the Modesto Police Department, among other Valley agencies, were part of the county stakeholder meetings on SB 43 over the past year.

Modesto Police Lt. Michael Hammond said officers already regularly make in-the-field evaluations on 5150 holds and adding the substance abuse is another part of the criteria. 

“It’s one more tool in our tool belt, but then again it’s just an application for a hold, and we still have to take them to the hospital,” said Hammond. “They still have to be seen by medical staff and mental health staff, and so I don’t expect to see a rise in holds based on that.”

He said all patrol officers participated in two days of training on the new definitions, and received new forms for 5150 hold applications. 

Local health providers, including those who manage regional hospitals were also part of the county stakeholder meetings. A spokesperson for Sutter, which has a large footprint in Stanislaus County and operates Memorial Medical Center, said along with updated training and resources the organization has hired additional substance-use-treatment navigators for its emergency departments.

But Sutter officials said, based on early data, they also are not expecting an influx of new 5150 holds at the hospital. 

Mora said this is because, while the definition may have expanded, the most affected populations often already have a combination of both mental health disorders and substance abuse. 

“It’s actually very common to have both a behavioral health disorder and a (substance use) disorder,” said More. “The estimates are something around half of folks, if you have one, you have the other – and vice versa. So we’re already serving these folks.”

Full Article & Source:
County begins ‘unprecedented’ forced care

Thursday, March 6, 2025

When Can a Probate Court Remove and Replace the Legal Guardian for an Adult?


The Michigan Court of Appeals recently answered these questions. In re Guardianship of AMS, No 372183, 2025 WL 452248 (Mich Ct App Feb 10, 2025) (unpublished).

AMS was married to Thomas, and she had two daughters, Theresa and Kristin. The daughters each petitioned for guardianship and nominated themselves to serve as guardian, but husband Thomas was appointed her guardian. Daughter Theresa filed a petition to modify the guardianship because she alleged Thomas as guardian was restricting access to her mother. In her petition, Theresa sought unrestricted access to her mother and did not ask for Thomas’s removal as guardian.

At the hearing on Theresa’s petition, the court removed Thomas as guardian and appointed a professional guardian. Thomas appealed.

The Court of Appeals addressed the procedural requirements before a probate court can remove a guardian. The probate court removed Thomas as guardian when there was not a pending petition asking the court to remove him. Rather, Theresa’s petition was asking the court for unrestricted access to AMS. Thomas argued that Michigan statute/EPIC, MCL 700.5311, has notice requirements for the removal of the guardian which include notice to the guardian as well as personal service of the petition seeking removal of the guardian on the ward (here AMS). Thomas argued he was never served with a petition seeking his removal as guardian (because that was outside the scope of what Theresa was asking of the court), and AMS was not personally served with Theresa’s petition (which was undisputed). The Court of Appeals reversed the probate court’s removal of Thomas as guardian because proper notice was not provided to Thomas or AMS.

The Court of Appeals also addressed the standard for removal of a guardian. “[T]o remove a guardian under MCL 700.5310, the probate court must find that the guardian is no longer suitable or willing to serve.” “[T]he EPIC thus makes clear that the guardian's focus of concern must be on the ward, that decisions made on behalf of the ward must be in the interests of the ward and not the guardian, and that the guardian must be qualified to achieve the purposes set forth in EPIC.” “[S]ince a suitable guardian is one who is qualified and able to provide for the ward's care, custody, and control, it logically follows that particularly relevant evidence would include (1) evidence on whether the guardian was still qualified and able, and (2) evidence on whether the guardian did, in fact, satisfactorily provide for the ward's care, custody, and control in the past.” (Internal quotations omitted.)

The Court of Appeals determined that the probate court had to conduct the above analysis and determine whether Thomas was suitable before removing him as guardian, and the probate court was ordered to do so on remand.

Finally, the Court of Appeals agreed with Thomas that the probate court could not appoint a professional guardian for AMS without first establishing that no other individuals with priority of appointment were either willing or able to serve as guardian. Michigan statute/EPIC provides the priority list for appointment as guardian at MCL 700.5313. The statutory scheme prioritizes the appointment of a family member over a professional guardian. Thus, even if there was a basis to remove Thomas as guardian on remand, the probate court would need to analyze whether Theresa or Kristin were suitable to serve as guardian if they remained interested in doing so before the court could appoint a professional guardian.

Full Article & Source:
When Can a Probate Court Remove and Replace the Legal Guardian for an Adult?

AARP Recognizes 193 Financial Organizations for Their Role in Fighting Financial Exploitation

WASHINGTON—Today, AARP announced that 193 banks, credit unions and financial advisory firms nationwide have earned the 2025 BankSafe Trained Seal in recognition of the steps they’ve taken to curb financial exploitation of older adults. This represents a 15% increase in the number of seal recipients since 2024. A list of the financial organizations that received the 2025 BankSafe Trained Seal can be found here.

A June 2023 AARP BankSafe report found that at least $28.3 billion a year is stolen from adults over the age of 60 in the U.S. This report underscores the importance of empowering financial organizations and their employees to recognize and act against financial exploitation.

“The tremendous growth in the number of financial organizations using AARP BankSafe shows just how valuable the initiative is to frontline workers across the nation,” said Jilenne Gunther, National Director of AARP’s BankSafe Initiative. “Not only do we have financial organizations coming back year after year to provide their staff with the BankSafe training, but more institutions continue to learn of its value. Our impact is growing exponentially as we provide more workers with the tools, skills and confidence to help prevent financial exploitation.”

AARP BankSafe includes a free online platform developed in collaboration with more than 2,000 industry professionals and used by nearly 250,000 frontline professionals to learn how to spot and stop financial exploitation.

Based on a Virginia Tech study, it is estimated that BankSafe-trained employees save customers 16 times more than frontline workers who don’t complete the training. Saving a record $137 million in 2024 – a 53% increase in dollars saved over the previous year – BankSafe has totaled more than $428 million in savings since its inception.

To earn the esteemed seal, organizations must ensure at least 80% of their frontline staff complete AARP's comprehensive BankSafe training annually, alongside actively pursuing policies to address suspected financial exploitation. Eligibility for the seal also requires a positive standing in Better Business Bureau ratings and adherence to specific legal and regulatory standards.

The BankSafe Trained Seal is not a product or service endorsement but indicates that a financial institution’s frontline employees have been substantially trained in financial exploitation prevention. Training courses for each respective industry are available at no cost to banks, credit unions and financial advisors in the United States.

More information about AARP’s BankSafe trainings and resources, including how to sign up for the training, can be found at aarp.org/banksafe.

Full Article & Source:
AARP Recognizes 193 Financial Organizations for Their Role in Fighting Financial Exploitation

Seymour teens start initiative to help elderly people with snow removal

Two 8th grade students are looking to make a difference in their community by starting the "Seymour Snow Brigade."

Source:
Seymour teens start initiative to help elderly people with snow removal