Showing posts with label attorney disbarred. Show all posts
Showing posts with label attorney disbarred. Show all posts

Friday, March 15, 2024

Matt Shirk, former 4th Circuit public defender, disbarred

He was found to have practiced law after he was suspended by The Florida Bar for violating Bar rules.

By Max Marbut

Matt Shirk

Matt Shirk, former 4th Judicial Circuit Public Defender, was disbarred from the practice of law March 13 by the state Supreme Court.

Shirk was found in contempt of an August 25, 2022, order from the court suspending him from practice for one year after he was found to have violated Florida Bar rules.

The suspension was ordered after Shirk was investigated by a grand jury and also by The Florida Bar for misconduct, including that he hired women to work in the public defender’s office and then directed that they be fired “for the private benefit of himself and to save his marriage.”

Shirk also was alleged to have kept alcoholic beverages in a Jacksonville city-owned building.

According to a petition for contempt filed Oct. 18, 2023, against Shirk by The Florida Bar, in the months after his suspension, Shirk engaged in the practice of law by filing his Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Accredited Representative and by filing motions on behalf of four different immigration clients with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service.

In its March 13 order, the court said: “As a sanction, Respondent is disbarred from the practice of law in the State of Florida.”

In addition, judgment was entered against Shirk for recovery of $1,250 in costs.

Shirk was elected in 2008 and reelected in 2012 to be public defender for the 4th Circuit, comprising Clay, Duval and Nassau counties.

Full Article & Source:
Matt Shirk, former 4th Circuit public defender, disbarred

Sunday, March 3, 2024

Jacksonville attorney, former US Senate candidate disbarred for practicing law while suspended

By Travis Gibson

Reginald Luster campaign picture (Campaign website)

JACKSONVILLE, Fla.
– Reginald Luster, a Jacksonville lawyer who tried to run for a U.S. Senate nomination as a Democrat in 2016, has been disbarred following a court order earlier this month.

According to the Florida Bar, it got several complaints that Luster was practicing law while he was suspended.

The Florida Bar said he was contacting insurance companies to settle claims for “clients” and bank records also indicated he was receiving settlement money while suspended.

According to the Florida Bar, disbarred lawyers cannot re-apply for admission for five years and are required to go through an extensive process that includes a background check and retaking the Bar exam.

Full Article & Source:
Jacksonville attorney, former US Senate candidate disbarred for practicing law while suspended

Thursday, February 29, 2024

Parma attorney who took clients’ money but did no work is disbarred

Parma attorney Gary A. Vick Jr., left, shown here in Lake County Common Pleas Court in 2014, was permanently disbarred after the Ohio Supreme Court found he stole from several clients and then failed to cooperate in the disciplinary process.Duncan Scott, The News-Herald

CLEVELAND, Ohio -- The Ohio Supreme Court on Tuesday permanently disbarred a Parma attorney who pleaded guilty in 2022 to stealing from six clients.

Gary A. Vick Jr., 49, of Strongsville also failed to file paperwork with the high court to show he was complying with the indefinite suspension he received after clients said he took their money but didn’t do any legal work for them.

The court’s unanimous opinion said Vick must pay the ultimate professional price for not only the multiple ethical violations but also a “complete failure to cooperate in the resulting disciplinary proceedings.”

Justices first placed Vick on an interim suspension in July 2022 after finding that he took money from a woman who needed a lawyer for child support case and a man who was charged with drunken driving. He then stopped responding to them.

The court extended its suspension in December 2022, when Vick pleaded guilty to grand theft, a fifth-degree felony, in Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court. In addition to his two clients who filed disciplinary complaints, prosecutors said Vick stole money from four more people. Judge Kathleen Sutula sentenced Vick to five years on probation and ordered him to pay $19,000 in restitution to his former clients.

Bank records showed that Vick deposited the fees he charged two of the clients into his business checking account and then used the account for personal expenses. In August 2021, Vick’s business account had a balance of just $88, when it should have had more than $6,000 in legal deposits it, the court found.

After his suspension, Vick failed to file an affidavit saying that he had informed his clients of his suspension and otherwise was complying with the terms of his suspension.

Vick earned his law license in 1997 after he graduated from Cleveland State University’s law school. In addition to private practice, Vick also worked as an assistant Cuyahoga County prosecutor from 2003 to 2006.

Vick represented a Parma man who was arrested and accused of creating a parody Facebook account of the Parma Police Department in 2016. The man was found not guilty, and the case garnered national attention for its First Amendment implications.

He also represented former Cleveland Browns wide receiver Josh Gordon in a speeding ticket case in 2014, as well as a former Fairview Park High School principal who stole more than $60,000 from the district and used it on personal expenses in 2012.

Full Article & Source:
Parma attorney who took clients’ money but did no work is disbarred

Thursday, March 30, 2023

Elkton lawyer disbarred for misappropriating ‘hundreds of thousands’ from client

By: Madeleine O'Neill

A unanimous Maryland Supreme Court has disbarred a Cecil County lawyer who used a client’s power of attorney to withdraw hundreds of thousands of dollars from the woman’s bank account without permission.

The lawyer, Wendy B. Culberson, stopped practicing law in 2020 and claimed she “has no intention to practice or seek to practice law again,” according to the Supreme Court’s 31-page opinion.

Even so, her misappropriation of hundreds of thousands of dollars and subsequent efforts to cover up the misconduct merit disbarment, Justice Brynja M. Booth wrote.

“To say that misappropriation of a client’s funds ‘reflects adversely on the attorney’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness’ is an understatement and constitutes an obvious violation of (the Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct),” Booth wrote.

Culberson, who worked as a solo family law practitioner in Maryland from 1995 until 2020, could not be reached for comment. She did not appear for an evidentiary hearing on the Attorney Grievance Commission’s allegations in October 2022 and represented herself in oral argument before the Maryland Supreme Court, according to the opinion.

Acting Maryland Bar Counsel Erin A. Risch declined to comment on the case.

The disciplinary proceedings against Culberson stemmed from her representation of Gabrielle Buck, who lives on the Mt. Ararat Farm in Port Deposit, and is the beneficiary of two family trusts that were valued at $23 million as of 2014, according to the opinion.

Buck hired Culberson in 2014 to help manage her business interests and the farm, which cost several thousand dollars per month in upkeep and other expenses.

Buck agreed to pay Culberson a flat monthly fee of $3,500, with the cost of any additional legal matters to be added on top of the monthly fee. The agreement also required Culberson to provide Buck with an accounting of all payments made for Culberson’s services.

For the next two years, Buck wrote checks from her bank account to Culberson to cover the monthly fee and some additional expenses. In 2016, on Culberson’s advice, Buck gave the lawyer power of attorney and access to her bank account and to another account that held funds intended for the farm.

From April 2016 through July 2019, Culberson made 323 cash withdrawals totaling more than $940,000, according to the opinion. She deposited $342,500 into the farm bank account but could not account for the other $597,797 that was not deposited into the bank account, a hearing judge found.

Culberson did not provide her client with any documentation to support payments of more than $133,000, the amount in monthly fees she would have earned during that time, the hearing judge concluded. Culberson told Buck that the withdrawals were used to pay farm bills or to cover other expenses.

“The hearing judge found that Ms. Culberson failed to advise Ms. Buck that Ms. Culberson retained the majority of the cash withdrawals for her own personal use and benefit,” Booth wrote.

Buck terminated Culberson’s representation in July 2019 after discovering the cash withdrawals from her account. Culberson later provided Buck with invoices totaling about $300,000 for legal work, though they included costs that should have been covered under her monthly fee and did not provide an accounting for the cash withdrawals from Buck’s bank account, according to the opinion.

When bar counsel requested information from Culberson about the withdrawals, Culberson claimed that Buck had increased the monthly fee to $5,000 and had asked Culberson not to provide invoices.

The hearing judge concluded these were intentional misrepresentations, and that spreadsheets Culberson provided to bar counsel to explain the withdrawals contained numerous errors and had been created after the fact to cover up the misappropriation of funds.

The Supreme Court agreed with the hearing judge’s findings that Culberson violated attorney ethics rules governing communication with clients, conflicts of interest, safekeeping property, record-keeping and general misconduct.

The court overruled a series of exceptions raised by Culberson and found that the sole mitigating factor in her favor, a lack of prior disciplinary history, did not support a lesser penalty than disbarment.

Full Article & Source:
Elkton lawyer disbarred for misappropriating ‘hundreds of thousands’ from client

Sunday, January 15, 2023

Ellsworth attorney disbarred by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court


By WABI News Desk

AUGUSTA, Maine (WABI) - An Ellsworth attorney has been disbarred by order of the Maine Supreme Judicial Court.

In a December 19th decision, the court determined Christopher Whalley had engaged in professional misconduct that included dishonesty, fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation.

The court further determined Whalley’s misconduct was intentional and violated his duties .

According to court documents, Whalley allegedly took tens of thousands of dollars from the estate of a client.

As a result of his misconduct, Whalley has been disbarred from the practice of law in Maine for at least ten years.

Full Article & Source:
Ellsworth attorney disbarred by the Maine Supreme Judicial Court

Tuesday, December 20, 2022

Ellsworth attorney disbarred after allegedly taking $189,000 from a client’s estate

Friends of a Milbridge man who died in 2018 had sought help since then to get eight $10,000 gifts distributed.

by Samantha Hogan

Christopher J. Whalley, was disbarred Monday at the Penobscot Judicial Center in Bangor. Photo by Fred J. Field.

Suspended Ellsworth attorney Christopher J. Whalley was disbarred Monday following a state disciplinary investigation for allegedly transferring more than half of a client’s estate to his law office’s bank accounts. 

Whalley had been ordered to immediately stop practicing law last February amid a state investigation into his alleged “misuse, or outright embezzlement” of client money, according to court documents. He appeared virtually at a hearing with his lawyer Walter McKee and signed an agreement Monday morning acknowledging the misconduct, or that the state could have proven the allegations had a scheduled two-day hearing taken place, McKee said. 

At the center of the controversy was the estate of Wilbur Knudsen, a Milbridge man who died in October 2018. Whalley is accused of moving nearly $190,000 from the deceased man’s $378,000 estate to bank accounts in Whalley’s control.

Knudsen intended for eight gifts of $10,000 each to be distributed to family members, friends and a local animal shelter, according to his will. The remainder of his estate was to be sold and divided between two grandchildren, which included setting up a trust to help one grandchild pay for college.

“He said he felt they were the ones that could truly use it financially,” Wendy Jipson, a family friend and neighbor of Knudsen, told The Maine Monitor.

Jipson said she was pleased with the disbarment.

“I’m pleased because there’s not a chance he could do this to another,” she said.

Jipson helped care for Knudsen near the end of his life — taking him grocery shopping and to the bank. She said she was at his bedside when Knudsen signed his final will, which Whalley prepared, making himself the “personal representative” of the estate with the power to distribute Knudsen’s assets after his death. 

Much of the money appears to have been paid to Whalley instead, according to court documents filed by the Board of Overseers of the Bar, an independent judicial agency that investigates and prosecutes attorney misconduct in Maine. Checks totaling $99,022 were eventually written to the beneficiaries of the will and creditors of the estate, according to court documents.  

The board of overseers filed seven counts against Whalley accusing him of violating the rules of professional conduct, including allegedly making false statements, taking an unreasonable fee, failing to keep a client’s property separate from his own, making advance payments to himself, and failing to diligently perform legal services or to comply with the Maine Probate Code. Whalley denied the alleged misconduct through his lawyer, McKee, in June.

“This is certainly a black mark. We would recognize that but at the same time it’s not the only thing that is the measure of a person. (Whalley) did a lot of good in Hancock County and many counties over his 31 years. Certainly this event was unfortunate,” McKee told the court Monday.

Christopher J. Whalley, bottom center, acknowledged his disbarment to Superior Court Justice Ann Murray, top center during a disciplinary hearing Monday at the Penobscot Judicial Center. Also present were, clockwise from upper left, William Devoe, Walter McKee (Whalley’s lawyer), Assistant Bar Counsel Suzanne Thompson and Bar Counsel Julia Sheridan. Photo by Fred J. Field.

McKee said the agreement was not an admission of criminal conduct. A spokeswoman with the Office of the Maine Attorney General confirmed the agency is investigating Whalley. 

Whalley and his lawyer declined the Monitor’s request for an interview. 

‘I’m still working on taking care of him’

Knudsen, a retired millwright, split his time between Milbridge and Port Charlotte, Fla. He was short with a big mustache, a “quirky little sense of humor,” said Karen Schevenieus, who cut his hair and whose father was one of Knudsen’s friends.

Wilbur Knudsen
Shortly after Knudsen’s death at age 79 in October 2018, Jipson gave the deed, checkbook and bank statements to Whalley at his request. She also agreed to look after Knudsen’s house each week to save the estate the cost of Whalley driving the 31 miles from Ellsworth to Milbridge to check on the home.

The home’s heating oil ran out in November 2018 and it took Whalley until January 2019 to approve Jipson’s requests that more oil be delivered, she said in a complaint to the board of overseers and an interview with the Monitor. When the boiler wouldn’t start, it took several more weeks for Whalley to approve a repairman to come, she said. By then the walls inside the home had cracked from the extreme cold. In May, seven months after Knudsen’s death, Emera Maine disconnected the electricity because bills had not been paid.

“This isn’t how (Knudsen) operated. When he got a bill, he paid it that day,” Jipson said in an interview.

Whalley met Jipson at the house in January 2019 and appraised the value of the contents at $2,000, according to probate records. He sold it all to Jipson except for a few items in the garage.

Jipson said she was told it would take three months to execute the will and distribute the money to the people in the will — including her own father, Everett West. But three months quickly turned into five months. Jipson told the Monitor her phone calls went unreturned and she didn’t see Whalley again until making an unannounced visit to his office in Ellsworth on March 29, 2019.

“That’s when I asked him, ‘Why now, Whalley? Why are we waiting now? And he knew, of course,” Jipson said in the interview. “My interest the whole time was not just because my dad is in the will. My interest is because these other people want their money. (Knudsen) left it to them — that was his last wishes — and I told him when I became his power of attorney, I would take care of him. And I’m still working on taking care of him.”

Jipson said Whalley promised during their meeting that he would write the checks the following week. 

Whalley instead paid himself $69,000 between June 2019 and August 2019 from Knudsen’s estate, according to the accusations filed by the board of overseers in court. Knudsen’s case file from that time period contained two letters that Whalley wrote to creditors and one letter from the county probate registers, which Whalley didn’t respond to at the time, according to court records.

In total, Whalley allegedly paid $189,375 to his law office and trust accounts with Knudsen’s money, according to a board analysis of banking records. The timing of the payments “is not consistent with any regular ‘billing cycle’ ” and the frequency of the checks written to Whalley’s law office is “not consistent with legitimate payments” for services rendered or expenses incurred, according to information filed by the board of overseers in support of further sanctioning Whalley.

Whalley wrote dozens of checks in round amounts — ranging from $500 to $8,000 at a time — to his law office, which was inconsistent with payments for services and expenses he billed to the estate, according to the board of overseers complaint. Whalley wrote additional checks ranging from $2,000 to $30,000 from Knudsen’s estate to his own trust account. 

Meanwhile, Whalley neglected Knudsen’s other assets that were to be divided between two grandchildren. His largest assets — the house — sat vacant for nearly two years. A close friend reported Whalley to the board of overseers in June 2019. 

Then, Jipson reported Whalley to the board of overseers as well on July 3, 2019, according to a copy of the complaint provided to the Monitor that noted the deteriorating condition of her late friend’s house.

“This home sits directly on the ocean and is worth over $200,000. It’s an absolute shame to watch it be neglected, and to know that Wilbur would be heartbroken at the shape it’s in. It was his pride and joy and it gave him such joy and pleasure to sit on the deck and watch the lobster boats in the bay. Mr. Knudsen’s last wishes are not being carried through. He trusted Mr. Whalley to handle his affairs and Mr. Whalley is not fulfilling his duties and obligations to Wilbur. Something needs to change,” Jipson wrote to the board. 

Court records show the board of overseers opened an investigation in 2019 but agreed to delay taking action. Through 2020 and into 2021, Whalley asked for extensions to finish his work on the estate. Then he stopped responding and in April 2021, the board of overseers reopened the investigation, records show.

Three prior suspensions

This is not the first time Whalley has been investigated by the board of overseers.

Whalley was suspended for three months in 2003 but was allowed to continue practicing law as long as he agreed to be monitored by an attorney for a year. A judge ruled that Whalley had engaged in the “improper handling of client trust funds” during a case where he simultaneously represented multiple people and businesses from whom a woman had stolen tens of thousands of dollars, according to board records. 

Whalley was later reprimanded — the lowest tier of public discipline — in 2005 for having a conflict of interests and again in 2008 for his lack of attention to a time-sensitive divorce case, according to board records. The records also reveal Whalley was also given warnings in 1995, 2000, 2001, 2005 and 2015.

In 2007, Whalley was suspended again — this time for 30 days — for neglecting a client’s case and for not diligently pursuing another matter. He was again allowed to continue practicing law as long as he agreed to be monitored for another year. 

Whalley was suspended for a third time in April 2021, after he was found to have forged a client’s signature on a document submitted to the court years earlier, Superior Court Justice Ann Murray ruled. The suspension was supposed to last a year, though again he was allowed to continue working as long as he participated in a psychological evaluation and treatment.

Penobscot County Superior Court Justice Ann Murray accepted an agreement to disbar Christopher J. Whalley during a disciplinary hearing Monday. Photo by Fred J. Field.

By the time Whalley was suspended in 2021, the board of overseers had already received complaints from Jipson and another person about Whalley’s handling of Knudsen’s estate.

While still on probation, the board of overseers requested in February that the court immediately suspend Whalley from practicing law. The state didn’t notify Whalley or his attorney prior to sending the request.

“… The board has determined that exigent circumstances exist in this case due to attorney Whalley’s extensive prior disciplinary history, and his continued access to substantial amounts of client funds that are susceptible to misappropriation or embezzlement in the event he receives prior notice of this request for his suspension,” the board wrote.

The court granted the emergency request. During his fourth suspension in nine years, Whalley would finally be ordered to stop practicing law while the state investigated. 

Elder financial exploitation

Older adults in Maine collectively lose at least $4 million annually as a result of financial exploitation, according to an analysis of Adult Protective Services and Legal Services for the Elderly cases. 

The majority of abuse and financial exploitation is done by family members, who may take money from bank accounts, get deeds transferred to themselves or evict older family members from their homes, said Jaye Martin, executive director of Legal Services for the Elderly, which provides free legal services to Maine residents age 60 and older when their basic needs are at stake. 

Exploitation by a financial advisor or trusted professional is far less common, she said.

“All of this is really hard for people to picture and imagine. I think all of us want to think of it like, ‘Oh, those doggone romance scams’ or grandparent scams or all the anonymous scamming, which is very predatory and very awful, but it isn’t doing near the harm that the familial exploitation is doing,” Martin said.

For this reason, Martin recommends that seniors consult an attorney when writing wills, healthcare directives or documents giving a person power of attorney. Lawyers are beholden to professional rules of conduct and ethical standards, which if broken have consequences, she said.

Martin declined to comment on any specific case. In general, Martin said it can still be considered financial exploitation if the person is dead, because the final wishes for the assets aren’t being honored.

Martin co-chaired the Elder Justice Coordinating Partnership that was formed by Gov. Janet Mills, which brought together private and public groups to evaluate Maine’s response and prevention of elder abuse. The group released a report in December 2021, which was to be a “roadmap” for how the state could improve. 

Among the “top priority” recommendations were that Maine assign a dedicated elder fraud prosecutor within each district attorney’s office to make it more likely that cases were pursued. They also recommended that there be more forensic auditing resources to support law enforcement in investigating financial exploitation cases. 

In response to the board of overseers case against Whalley, the court assigned a lawyer to take control of client files and computers at Whalley’s law office. The lawyer reported to the court earlier this year that he had spoken with the attorney general’s office and Maine State Police, court records show. Jipson also told the Monitor that she had been contacted by a state trooper about Whalley.

“The case is under investigation by the Office of the Attorney General,” Danna Hayes, a spokeswoman for the agency, wrote in an email to the Monitor.

Probate court unable to intervene

What happened to Knudsen’s estate was sad, unusual and the result of a “perfect storm” of problems, said Carlene Holmes, who has worked as register of probate in Washington County for 24 years and plans to retire on Jan. 1. 

The register office for the Washington County Probate Court has three employees, including Holmes. At three different occasions, there were job vacancies and new people who needed to be trained while Knudsen’s case was open. The COVID-19 pandemic also shut down the office and forced them onto new laptops and new technology. 

“We couldn’t have been any busier,” Holmes said.

Holmes sent letters to Whalley asking him to complete necessary tasks, like notifying Knudsen’s heirs of the case. Whalley had a string of excuses, she said.

Knudsen’s friend, Dale Schevenieus, wrote letters, submitted editorials and called Holmes about his concerns with how Knudsen’s estate was being handled. He witnessed Knudsen sign the will, but wasn’t named as a beneficiary so he had no authority to intervene in the probate case, Holmes said. The court’s hands were tied.

“He wanted the judge to ‘do something, do something,’ and there’s nothing we can do until somebody files something. And it has to be an interested party,” Holmes said. 

One of the beneficiaries requested a final settlement and distribution of the estate nearly a year after Knudsen’s death, probate court records show. It doesn’t appear she took all the necessary steps to intervene in the will. 

As the third anniversary of Knudsen’s death approached, probate judge Lyman Holmes ordered Whalley to provide the register with addresses of Knudsen’s surviving relatives and file an inventory of the estate. 

By the time Whalley wrote checks to the beneficiaries of the will, Jipson’s father and Margaret Deoca — a friend of Knudsen’s wife, Sue — had died and didn’t receive the $10,000 that was promised. Schevenieus died from a COVID-19 infection in December 2021, two months before the court suspended Whalley, according to his daughter, Karen.

She said her father, Dale Schevenieus, fought until the very end to have his close friend’s final wishes followed.

“He didn’t like anyone being bad to anyone else. He stood his ground,” Karen Schevenieus said.

Full Article & Source:
Ellsworth attorney disbarred after allegedly taking $189,000 from a client’s estate

Tuesday, November 22, 2022

Fake heiress Anna Delvey’s former lawyer disbarred over alleged financial crimes

By Olivia Land

A former lawyer for scammer Anna Delvey was disbarred for her own alleged financial crimes this month, leading the fake heiress to mock her with a sketch illustrating their troubled relationship.    

Audrey A. Thomas, of Queens, was disbarred on Nov. 9, court documents show. The results of a disciplinary hearing published Tuesday allege that she misappropriated $630,000 in escrow funds from Rhea Murray, an elderly client who hired Thomas to oversee the sale of her Brooklyn apartment in 2013.

Thomas, who is also the author of the book “Ego Has No Place in the Law,” claimed that she had Murray’s permission to take the money, which she reportedly used to “promote [herself] as an author and radio show host.”

Murray’s daughters confronted Thomas about the missing cash in 2016, at which point the lawyer promised to repay the money over several months. Disciplinary proceedings against Thomas began in 2018, after she defaulted on the payment plan.

Fake heiress Anna Delvey alongside former lawyer Audrey A. Thomas in an undated photo.
Fake heiress Anna Delvey alongside former lawyer Audrey A. Thomas in an undated photo.
Twitter/Audrey Thomas
Audrey A. Thomas was disbarred this month.
Audrey A. Thomas was disbarred this month.
Twitter/Audrey Thomas

The Queens District Attorney’s Office subsequently took Thomas into custody in July 2019 on second-degree larceny charges, qns.com reported. She pleaded not guilty and is awaiting trial. If convicted, she faces up to 15 years in prison.

In a text message statement to The Post on Thursday morning, Thomas denied the allegations against her.

“I did not misappropriate anyone’s funds,” she wrote. “The Appellate Division got their facts wrong.” When pressed on what happened to Murray’s funds, Thomas retorted, “Call her and ask her! Or call her daughters and ask them.”

Delvey pictured near her apartment in Oct. 2022.
Delvey near her apartment in October 2022.
Getty Images

Amid her own legal woes, Thomas was reportedly hired by Delvey in March 2021, when the German native was taken into ICE custody shortly after being released from Rikers Island. The would-be socialite — whose real name is Anna Sorokin — was famously convicted in 2019 of scamming New York businesses, banks and upper-crust individuals as part of her fake heiress act. 

Delvey fired Thomas in April this year, citing a lack of progress in her criminal and immigration cases due to Thomas’ lax work habits.

“I do not work the month of April for it is my birth month,” Thomas explained in her formal response to Sorokin’s new lawyers. “Anna is fully aware of this.”

Delvey's mock book cover aimed at Thomas' disbarment.
Delvey’s mock book cover aimed at Thomas’ disbarment.

In a statement to Insider after her firing, Thomas referred to her former client as an “ungrateful b—h.”

Delvey subsequently sued Thomas in September, claiming she was withholding recordings of her deportation hearings and some of her personal effects.

Speaking to Insider this week from house arrest — where she remains since being released from ICE detention in October — Delvey says she is glad Thomas can no longer represent other clients.

“I’m happy that the real story is being told and shedding light on my issues,” she told the outlet. “I’m mostly comforted that she cannot do damage to anyone else’s case and life.”

Delvey, who is currently earning thousands of dollars hawking her prison artwork, also included a cheeky drawing of a mock book cover titled “How to Get Disbarred in 10 Days.” In addition to “ungrateful b—h,” the pencil sketch pays homage to Thomas’ “birth month” demand.

The hand-drawn details are set against what appear to be collaged elements from alleged exchanges between Thomas and Sorokin. “You are incorrigible and for now the Anna Delvey show is not my favorite program,” one text says. It is unclear if Thomas actually wrote these words or if Delvey made them up.

Thomas shared her own mock book cover with The Post on Thursday.
Thomas shared her own mock book cover with The Post on Thursday.
Audrey A. Thomas

In the image, Delvey included Thomas’ byline with her legal credentials crossed out.

Thomas, however, appeared nonplussed by her former client’s taunts, and called out both Delvey and one of the Insider authors, Jacob Shamsian, alongside an image of the mock cover on Twitter early Thursday.

“Jacob Samshian [sic] and Anna Sorokin are having a great time serving as Penninah. I guess I must be Hannah,” Thomas wrote, referring to a story in the Old Testament Book of Samuel in which Peninnah mocks her husband’s favored wife, Hannah, for her childlessness. After enduring Peninnah’s attitude for several years, God blesses Hannah with several children of her own.

Delvey's ankle bracelet that she wears after being released from ICE custody.
Delvey’s ankle bracelet that she wears after being released from ICE custody.
Getty Images

Speaking to The Post on Thursday, Thomas accused Sorokin of “puppeteering” Shamsian. 

“I can still appear [on my own behalf],” she argued. Thomas, who is Jamaican American, also said Sorokin is “evidence that it is great to be white in America.” 

Thomas also countered Delvey’s snark with her own proposed book cover. In an edited mock-up shared with The Post, the tome titled “The Anna Delvey Reality: Social Antagonism is the Worst Form of Oppression” is splashed with images of Thomas alongside Delvey. In one picture, which shows the pair in what looks like a prison yard, Delvey is clad in a high-end Canada Goose puffer.

Anna Delvey in court in May 2019.
Anna Delvey in court in May 2019.
AFP via Getty Images

“Anna and I can release our books at the same time,” Thomas wrote. “Thank G-d I can’t get disbarred again. Maybe we will both make [the New York Times] bestseller list side by side.”

News of Thomas’ disbarment comes at a busy time for Delvey, who shuttles from her East Village apartment to parole meetings in expensive Ubers with a tracking device clipped to her ankle. Earlier this month, The Post reported that she is hoping to parlay her newfound freedom into hosting a series of free, trendy dinners.

“Although not yet confirmed, the dinner series is one of the many projects Anna currently has in development,” her rep said at the time.

Full Article & Source:
Fake heiress Anna Delvey’s former lawyer disbarred over alleged financial crimes

Monday, September 26, 2022

Former San Luis Valley District Attorney disbarred from practicing law in Colorado

By Dan Beedie

SAN LUIS VALLEY, Colo. (KRDO) -- Former 12th Judicial District Attorney Alonzo Payne is disbarred from practicing law in the state of Colorado. The order was approved by the Office of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge - a branch of the Colorado Supreme Court - on Wednesday.

According to the order, both the Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel and Payne agreed to the "Stipulation to Discipline" that was filed with the Presiding Disciplinary Judge on Monday. It's unclear why Payne would sign off on his own disbarment.

Payne's disbarment officially goes into effect on October 26. 

Alonzo Payne

The 12th Judicial District, located in the San Luis Valley, went without an official DA for weeks after Payne resigned from the position on July 13. Before stepping down, Payne had been at the center of a recall effort and an investigation by the Colorado Attorney General's Office.

After a seven-month investigation, the Colorado Attorney General found that Payne repeatedly violated the rights of crime victims.

"Not only have I not seen victims rights act violations of this magnitude, but in the entirety of the victims' rights act in Colorado history, we have never gotten to this point," Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser said.

According to Wednesday's order obtained by 13 Investigates, Payne violated several of the Colorado Supreme Court's Rules of Professional Conduct for attorneys. Some of these violations include failing to provide competent representation to a client, failing to act with reasonable diligence and promptness in representing a client, and representing a client when that representation involves a conflict of interest.

The order goes on to accuse Payne of knowingly making a false statement regarding the facts or the law to the courts or a judge.  The order says Payne engaged in dishonest and deceitful conduct. 

In an email to 13 Investigates, a spokesperson for the Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel, who filed the stipulation, said that only Payne can answer the question as to why he agreed to the resolution.

"The alternative to a stipulation was that the Presiding Disciplinary Judge would convene a hearing board and hold formal proceedings, likely involving many days of testimony from many witnesses and incurring significant additional costs, in which the hearing board would have decided whether Mr. Payne should be disbarred," the spokesperson said via email when 13 Investigates asked if Payne possessed an alternative to disbarment.

Payne is required to comply with the order by “winding up” his affairs, which include informing current clients of his disbarment and providing notice to other jurisdictions where he is licensed or authorized to practice law. 

Payne has 14 days to file an affidavit with the Office of the Presiding Disciplinary Judge attesting to his compliance with the disbarment order. 

After weeks of being run by the state, Colorado Governor Jared Polis appointed Anne Kelly, a former Boulder County deputy district attorney, to take over the legal responsibilities in the San Luis Valley.

Kelly officially took over the responsibilities of the office late last month. The new DA told 13 Investigates that holding violent criminals accountable will be at the top of her list of priorities.

Full Article & Source:
Former San Luis Valley District Attorney disbarred from practicing law in Colorado

Tuesday, September 6, 2022

Attorney for a Top Florida Insurance Law Firm Disbarred After Forgeries, Misconduct

By William Rabb

A former attorney with one of Florida’s top insurance defense firms has been disbarred after the Bar said she engaged in repeated acts of neglect, deception and forgery.

Erika Lynn Muller, until recently a partner with the Cole, Scott & Kissane firm, based in Fort Lauderdale, can no longer practice in the state, the Florida Supreme Court said in an order last week. The court agreed with the Bar’s complaint and a referee’s recommendation that she be disbarred, following months of disciplinary proceedings.

The Bar’s complaint lists several issues, including lack of truthfulness, misconduct and lack of communication, and details one case in particular that unfolded in 2020 and 2021. In a slip-and-fall claim against Rooms To Go furniture company in Miami, Muller offered to settle the claim for $325,000, even though she was not authorized to do so, the Bar said.

She then sent the plaintiff’s attorney a photocopy of a check that she had allegedly fabricated. The plaintiff’s lawyer filed motions to enforce the settlement, which resulted in a court judgment in March 2021 of $425,000, the complaint explains.

Despite garnishment actions against the law firm, the money never materialized. Muller then agreed to send $550,000 to stop the garnishments. She allegedly sent a photocopy of another fabricated cashier’s check, then said she would hand-deliver the check.

But on the day of the planned transfer, she falsely said she was in an automobile accident, the bar said.

Meanwhile, Muller told the furniture company and an adjuster for the insurance company that the case was still in mediation, the Bar said.

On April 7, 2021, Muller informed Cole, Scott & Kissane attorneys that she was resigning.

In an affidavit, “respondent acknowledged that she made misrepresentations to multiple parties and presented altered documents to plaintiff’s counsel,” the Bar’s complaint reads. “In her affidavit, respondent further stated that she was suffering from a mental health crisis during the time of the misconduct.”

Muller later failed to respond to any of the Bar’s inquiries into the matter. The Rooms To Go litigation, brought by an independent contractor who was injured at an RTG parking lot, was dismissed in June 2021.

A referee judge who reviewed the case against Muller agreed with the disbarment action.

“It is imperative that a clear and unmistakable message be sent that callous disregard for clients, the Florida Bar, and the attorney disciplinary process are serious infractions which may not be committed with impunity,” Judge James Martz II wrote in April of this year.

The state Supreme Court, which in recent years has often disagreed with referees’ recommendations, accepted it in this case and said the disbarment will be effective Sept. 25. Muller must also pay $1,315 to cover the Bar’s costs in investigating the case.

The case made headlines in Florida in 2021 and raised eyebrows around the legal community. Court records show that Muller was listed as an attorney on four cases before Florida’s 3rd District Court of Appeals, including an insurance claim appeal that is still pending.

Muller is a graduate of the University of Miami School of Law and was a member of the Florida bar since 2008. The Cole, Scott & Kissane website notes that she focused on bad-faith litigation, personal injury defense, premises liability and insurance defense litigation. She and the law firm’s leadership could not be reached for comment Wednesday evening and Thursday morning.

Full Article & Source:

Wednesday, August 24, 2022

Columbus criminal defense attorney disbarred, informed of disciplinary by a judge

by: Chuck Williams

COLUMBUS, Ga. (WRBL) — A Columbus attorney has been disbarred, and he was told about the disciplinary action by a judge in court on Tuesday morning.

Criminal defense attorney Michael Eddings was disbarred on Aug. 9, 2022, following the recommendation of the State Bar Disciplinary Review Board.

“I’m in shock,” Eddings said when reached by WRBL.

Chattahoochee Circuit Superior Court Judge Gil McBride told Eddings of the state Supreme Court’s decision, Eddings said. The murder trial Eddings was defending was stopped.

At the core of the reason for the suspension is a 2017 meeting that Eddings had with a witness in a murder case.

That witness was represented by Stacey Jackson, now a DA but a criminal defense attorney at the time.

During that court case Eddings testified under oath he did not have permission from Jackson. The next day he sent an e-mail to the judge, prosecutors, Jackson saying he recanted his testimony. And he did have Jackson’s permission.

Jackson provided a sworn statement to the state bar saying he never gave consent.

“Stacey Jackson lied,” Eddings said.

The Supreme Court found Eddings actions violated the Georgia Rules of Professional Conduct.

Here’s Eddings reaction to the disbarment. He draws comparisons to former DA Mark Jones, who was convicted last year of public corruption.

“They have been trying to see me hurt and fall in this city for years,” Eddings said. “But you know what, I am standing tall. I am standing firm. I am going to continue to stand firm. All you want to do is punish good people and reward liars like Mr. Jackson. And it’s ridiculous. They did Mark Jones the same way. That man didn’t deserve to lose his license. And he didn’t deserve to go to prison. Every time you turn around, this city ruins the careers of good people.”

“The 22-page Georgia Supreme Court decision speaks for itself,” Jackson said.

Eddings can’t appeal the state Supreme Court’s unanimous decision, but he can ask the high court to reconsider.

In court documents obtained by WRBL, reasons cited for Eddings disbarment include giving false statements to a tribunal, giving false statements to third persons in connection with the representation of a client, communications with persons represented by counsel, giving false statements in connection with a disciplinary proceeding, and dishonesty in professional conduct.

According to the formal complaint, the Bar asserted that, while representing a client, who had been charged in Muscogee County with murder, Eddings tape-recorded his July 22, 2017 interview with a material witness, who had been charged with making a false statement in connection with the victim’s death. Because the witness’s interview contained information exculpatory as to Eddings’s client and inculpatory as to the witness, Eddings provided a copy of the recording to the Assistant District Attorney in his client’s case, who subsequently indicted the witness as a codefendant in the murder case.

The complaint continues, apparently, the two co-defendants were tried separately, and both were acquitted. However, during the witness’s May 2018 trial on the murder charge, Eddings was called by the State to authenticate his recording of the witness’s statement to him, and Eddings testified under oath that he knew at the time he interviewed the witness that the witness was represented by attorney Stacey Jackson; that he was unsuccessful in his attempts to contact Jackson to obtain his consent to interview the witness; and that he conducted the interview anyway because he believed he did not need Jackson’s permission.

The very next day, however, on May 18, 2018, Eddings sent an email to the Judge who presided over the witness’s murder trial, and to the Chief Judge of the circuit, the Assistant District Attorney in
the witness’s case, and Jackson. In that email, Eddings attempted to disavow his sworn trial testimony from the day before, asserting that he had “forgotten” that he actually had received consent from Jackson to interview the witness; that he obtained that consent in a June 30, 2017 telephone conversation with Jackson; that there had been witnesses to the consent because he had engaged in the conversation with Jackson via speakerphone while he was in a meeting with his client’s family; and that his wife, Cynthia Eddings, who was also his legal assistant, had reminded him of the meeting and Jackson’s consent immediately after he completed his testimony under oath at the witness’s trial. During the Bar’s investigation of this matter, Eddings presented to the State Disciplinary Board (“SDB”) sworn affidavits from his wife and from two men, both of whom are related to Eddings’s original client. In those affidavits, the witnesses supported the version of events laid out in Eddings’s email.

At the time in 2017 and 2018, Jackson was a criminal defense attorney. Jackson was appointed earlier this year as the Chattahoochee Circuit district attorney by Gov. Brian Kemp.

“The 22-page Georgia Supreme Court decision speaks for itself,” Jackson told News 3.

Eddings, who has offices in Atlanta and Columbus, said he has not had time to digest the 22-page order.

This is the third time that Eddings has been disciplined by the Georgia Bar Association, the organization that governs Georgia attorneys.

The Georgia Bar Association recommended disbarring Eddings from practicing law in the state of Georgia in 2016 when more than $2 million was found missing from his office’s legal trust fund. Eddings was a prominent real estate closing attorney.

The State Supreme Court rejected the Georgia Bar’s recommendation in December 2016 and agreed to issue Eddings a public reprimand instead.

Eddings ex-wife and former office manager, Sonya, pleaded guilty to fraud in federal court and was sentenced to three years in prison.

In February 2016, Eddings received his first reprimand from the State Bar. It was a similar offense to the one that he was disbarred for.


Full Article & Source:

Sunday, July 24, 2022

Former Howell attorney disbarred after panel investigates allegations

by Sophia Lada

Garry Flanary, right, sits with his attorney Stephen LaCommare, left, in a hearing on Oct. 22, 2020.  Kayla Daugherty

Former Howell attorney Stephen LaCommare has been disbarred after the Michigan Attorney Discipline Board reviewed a misconduct case in which he previously had been suspended.

The nine-member panel, at the request of the grievance administrator, conducted a review June 15 of the attorney's two-year suspension. LaCommare did not file a response to the petition for review, nor did he show up to the review hearing. Seven of the board members supported increasing the penalty to disbarment, two recused themselves.

LaCommare did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment.

The panel found that LaCommare failed to represent his clients in a timely manner, and failed to keep them informed about the status of their legal requests. He also failed to protect his clients' interests and did not refund advanced payment of legal fees. 

The panel also found that he misappropriated funds from Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts, using them for personal expenses. The two counts are the "most serious allegations," according to a document from the Michigan Attorney Discipline Board.

"Therefore, even when a lawyer has had a long and unblemished career, the lack of disciplinary record will not mitigate the sanction when the offense is very serious, such as, for example, conversion of client funds," the board wrote in its decision filed July 7.

The disbarment was retroactive to Nov. 16, 2021, the date LaCommare initially received a temporary suspension. LaCommare also did not show up for a hearing on the complaint on Nov. 1 that year.

In April this year, the panel extended LaCommare's suspension to two years, retroactive to Nov. 16, 2021. The panel said "that respondent committed professional misconduct, as charged in a six-count formal complaint, in his representation of four separate clients in their various legal matters; misused his IOLTA account; failed to timely answer one request for investigation and completely failed to answer two additional requests for investigation."

The panel also ordered him to pay $4,250 in restitution — $750 to one client and $3,500 to another — and an additional $2,262 in costs. He also was assessed $97 for the case review in June. The discipline board documents do not indicate whether he has paid any of the fees.

LaCommare was accused of scamming several Livingston County residents and businesses by taking their money and not providing legal services in 2018 and 2019.

Kizer Law Firm, where LaCommare worked, also fell victim to his fraudulent activity as LaCommare misappropriated funds from the firm.

LaCommare graduated from the Michigan State University-Detroit College of Law in 1995. He went on to work as an assistant prosecutor in the Livingston County Prosecutor's Office until 1999, when he moved to Boston to join a civil law firm.

He moved back to Michigan and started working for the Kizer Law Firm in 2002.

Full Article & Source:

Friday, July 15, 2022

Kingsport lawyer Jason McLellan disbarred


NASHVILLE — The Tennessee Supreme Court has permanently disbarred Jason R. McLellan of Kingsport from the practice of law.

It was effective on Wednesday.

According to a news release from the court’s Board of Professional Responsibility, McLellan consented to permanent disbarment because he could not successfully defend the charges alleged in a petition for discipline, supplemental petition for discipline and complaints filed against him in two files.

In the pending disciplinary matters, the release said McLellan misappropriated estate funds in the representation of a client and attempted to conceal the misappropriation; made misrepresentations to a court; engaged in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit and misrepresentation; failed to abide by a client’s decision regarding the dismissal of a pending lawsuit; failed to reasonably consult with a client about the means by which the client’s objectives were to be accomplished; and failed to obtain the client’s informed consent before taking action.

He also failed to keep client information confidential; failed to withdraw after a conflict of interest developed; allowed a third person to direct his professional judgment; failed to comply with his ethical requirements upon discharge from representation; and failed to comply with the requirements of a suspended attorney.

Finally, he failed to comply with court orders and failed to respond to disciplinary complaints.

McLellan’s conduct violated Rules of Professional Conduct 1.2 (scope of representation), 1.3 (diligence), 1.4(a) (communication), 1.5 (fees), 1.6 (confidentiality of information), 1.7(a) (conflict of interest), 1.15 (safekeeping property and funds), 1.16 (declining or terminating employment), 3.2 (expediting litigation), 3.3(a) (candor toward the tribunal), 3.4© (fairness to opposing party and counsel), 5.4 (professional independence of a lawyer), 5.5(a) and (b)(2) (unauthorized practice of law), 8.1(a) and (b) (bar admission and disciplinary matters), 8.4(a) (misconduct), 8.4(b) (committing a criminal act), 8.4© (engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, or deceit), 8.4(d) (conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice) and 8.4(g) (knowing failure to comply with a final court order).

Full Article & Source:

Saturday, July 9, 2022

Attorney Runs Law Practice While Locked Up In Jail, Gets Disbarred For His Efforts

He gave 'new meaning to the term ‘jailhouse lawyer.’'

 
By Kathryn Rubino 

Attorney Jay Silvernail was disbarred by the Oklahoma Supreme Court. In 2019, he was convicted of assault and battery with a deadly weapon for shooting a man in front of an Oklahoma City nightclub. But that wasn’t the reason — or at least not the full reason — he’s getting the boot from the profession. That ignominious distinction occurred because, post-conviction and pre-sentencing, while waiting in jail, Silvernail continued to run his law practice.

The Oklahoma Supreme cheekily referred to Silvernail as giving “new meaning to the term ‘jailhouse lawyer.’”

Nice.

The court noted Silvernail “was more interested in cash flow than client care,” and “placed his own financial interests above the interests of his clients by trying to keep his practice on life support while he awaited sentencing.”

And it wasn’t like his jailing was a surprise — the charges against him were filed three years prior, in 2016, when the shooting occurred. But, as has been reported, his plan for his practice was to operate “vicariously, as a sort of general manager” while finding other attorneys to cover appearances. As you might imagine, the Oklahoma Supreme Court thinks that’s… less than an ideal way to run a practice:

“And yet, for more than three years, Silvernail apparently took no steps to prepare for that contingency,” the state supreme court said.

Silvernail thought that as long as he could find lawyers to stand in for him at hearings, “he could operate his practice vicariously, as a sort of general manager,” the Oklahoma Supreme Court said. But it was not a good idea.

“The obstacles to effective representation from a jail cell should be obvious,” the state supreme court said. “As an inmate, Silvernail was unable to confer with clients confidentially. He was unable to communicate freely with prosecutors or other opposing counsel about his clients’ cases. He was obviously unable to appear in court on his clients’ behalf. His ability to access legal resources, a computer or even his own clients’ files was hampered, to say the least. Finally, practicing law from a jail cell arguably gives the appearance of impropriety. These conditions would have prompted a reasonable attorney to take a different tack.”

Plus, in opting for disbarment, the court noted his decision to carry a loaded weapon to a verbal dispute “gives us grave concerns about his fitness to practice law,” and Silvernail “resorted to deadly force in circumstances that did not justify such a response.”

And now there’s one less attorney in the profession.

Full Article & Source: