Friday, May 15, 2026

Maine Supreme Court rules people in guardianships, conservatorships have right to effective counsel

By Carol Bousquet

In this Thursday, April 12, 2018, photo, the Maine Supreme Court sits during a hearing in Portland, Maine.

The Maine Supreme Court has ruled that people in guardianships or conservatorships have a right to effective legal counsel.

The ruling involves the case of a disabled man who sought to terminate his guardianship and alleged his attorney was ineffective. Cumberland County Probate Court denied the man's petition and he appealed to the supreme court.

Lauren Wille, Legal Director for Disability Rights Maine, said the ruling acknowledges the rights of people that have been denied in the past.

"So the court is specifically and explicitly finding that counsel has to be effective, and they're laying out a process by which people under guardianship or conservatorship can challenge the effectiveness of their counsel," Wille said.

Disability Rights Maine did an analysis of guardianship and conservatorship cases between 2019 and 2021 and found that about 75% of those clients were not represented by legal counsel. 

Full Article & Source:
Maine Supreme Court rules people in guardianships, conservatorships have right to effective counsel 

Fraudsters Scam Elderly Man Out of $25K, Claiming His Account Was Linked to an Illegal Child Exploitation Ring

by Mary Boldish James


An elderly man in Ventura County, California, was scammed out of $25,000 by a pair of fraudsters claiming he was linked to an illegal child exploitation ring in Canada. The scam began as a text message and quickly spiraled out of control. 

A Scary Situation

Shaohua Sun, of Monterey Park, and Yanwen Gu, of Rosemead, both located near Los Angeles, pleaded guilty this month after being caught scamming an elderly Ventura resident out of $25,000 with plans to extort an additional $50,000 from the man and his wife.

The victim received a text message asking him to verify a $350 purchase at the Apple Store. A phone number urged the man to call “immediately” if he hadn’t made the purchase.

The Ventura Police Step In

According to the Ventura County Police, “Once on the phone, an unidentified co-conspirator falsely claimed the elder victim’s local credit union account was linked to supposed child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) content based in Canada. The elder victim was then directed to call a telephone number supposedly belonging to the 'Ventura County Credit Union Fraud Department.'”

The caller, identifying herself as “Jade,” instructed the victim to immediately withdraw $25,000 in cash and meet a purported undercover police officer in the City of Ventura to surrender the funds as “evidence,” the police report concludes.

After delivering the money, the victim and his wife began to suspect they’d been scammed and called the police. “Jade” reached back out, demanding an additional $50,000. Ventura police helped the man complete the next drop and arrested Gu and Sun at the scene.

Elaborate Scams

These scams often target older adults, but can claim victims of any age. They are sometimes initiated as text messages, but can also be phone calls or emails. You should always ignore these messages, no matter how official they look. If you’re uncomfortable ignoring them, you can independently call your credit card company or bank to discuss the potential charges.

You should never respond to messages like these or call a number provided by the scammer. Always contact financial institutions or companies through their official communication channels, as listed on your card or on the company website.

The Recovery

Lucky for the victim, the scammers did surrender the original $25,000 cash. Now they both face up to 4 years in prison, with an additional 2 years of probation. Hopefully, the scammers will receive the longest possible punishment, and the victim will never have to endure an ordeal like this again.

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. 

Full Article & Source:
Fraudsters Scam Elderly Man Out of $25K, Claiming His Account Was Linked to an Illegal Child Exploitation Ring 

Thursday, May 14, 2026

Live-In Caretaker Charged With Felony Elder Abuse

Southampton Town Police arrested a Queens man on Monday and charged him with a felony welfare endangerment charge after being tipped off that the man was physically abusing a person in his care.

Police charged Michael Roopmarine, 63, with two counts of endangering the welfare of a vulnerable, elderly or disabled person in the second degree, a felony punishable by up to seven years in prison.

Police said they received a tip from an individual who came to police headquarters in Hampton Bays to report that Roopmarine was physically abusing an elderly man for whom he was a live-in caretaker. Officers responded to the Hampton Bays home and found the alleged victim and Roopmarine together.

The elderly man was taken to an area hospital for evaluation and treatment. Roopmarine was taken to police headquarters for questioning and was subsequently placed under arrest and arraigned in Southampton Town Justice Court on Tuesday.

Police say the investigation is ongoing and have asked any members of the public who might have more information about the matter to call detectives at 631-702-2230 or 631-702-2238. 

Full Article & Source:
Live-In Caretaker Charged With Felony Elder Abuse 

Bill to help financial institutions protect vulnerable adults signed into law

by Kimberly Querry-Thompson 


OKLAHOMA CITY (KOKH) — A measure that aims to help financial institutions protect the most vulnerable citizens from being exploited was signed into Oklahoma law.

Senate Bill 2067 is supposed to create stronger safeguards to help financial institutions identify, report, and prevent suspected financial exploitation of protected adults.

“This new law will give financial institutions clear processes to help protect vulnerable adults from increasingly common financial scams,” Sen. Jerry Alvord, R-Wilson, said. “Scammers frequently target older adults, convincing them to hand over funds needed to pay for necessities like medicine, food, and rent. With SB 2067 now law, financial institutions can act swiftly and responsibly to help prevent vulnerable Oklahomans from becoming victims of financial exploitation and losing their hard-earned savings.”

Lawmakers say existing laws limit institutions' ability to give appropriate agencies the information needed to act quickly.

However, this measure removes those barriers so employees can report suspicious transactions internally and notify appropriate agencies.

Banks or credit unions may place a temporary hold on the reported account or alert a trusted contact designated by the account holder. The measure provides immunity to criminal and civil liability to any employee or financial institution acting in good faith and in compliance with the provisions of this measure.

“I was happy to carry this 'makes sense' legislation,” Rep. Mark Lepak, R-Claremore, said. “Bad actors increasingly target and prey upon our older population. Oklahomans aged 60 and older lost more than $50 million to fraud in 2024 alone, a 66 percent increase over 2023. Nationally, adults over 60 reported nearly $4.9 billion in fraud losses in 2024, with average losses exceeding $83,000 per victim. Financial exploitation is a devastating crime– real people are losing their life savings, their independence, and their dignity to these criminals.” 

Full Article & Source:
Bill to help financial institutions protect vulnerable adults signed into law 

Wednesday, May 13, 2026

Woman scammed 87-year-old widow out of $100k in romance scam, warrant says

Lori Mitchell, 59, of Fort Lauderdale, is facing charges of grand theft and exploitation of an elderly person 

By NBC6 

A South Florida woman is facing serious charges after she defrauded an 87-year-old widow out of over $100,000 by manipulating him into believing they were in a romantic relationship, authorities said.

Lori Mitchell, 59, of Fort Lauderdale, is facing charges of grand theft and exploitation of an elderly person, according to an arrest report from the Broward Sheriff's Office.

The alleged crimes happened between November 2011 and February 2013, according to an arrest warrant. During that time, Mitchell allegedly befriended the then-87-year-old victim, who was lonely after his wife died, and offered to do some interior decorating in his home.

According to the warrant, Mitchell convinced the victim that they were in a romantic relationship by spending time with him and going on dinner dates.

Mitchell would ask the victim for cash loans to fix a million-dollar home in Long Island that she claimed she owned and needed to sell, and promised she would pay him back, the warrant said.

The victim would take out cash loans from several accounts, and the loans eventually totaled up to $108,310, the warrant said. The victim also allegedly helped Mitchell lease a brand-new vehicle, took her out shopping and out to dinner a few times a week.

In the final month of their relationship, Mitchell asked the victim for another $20,000, and the victim turned her down, saying he was in financial hardship and could no longer support her, the warrant said. Mitchell proceeded to ignore the victim and no longer contacted him.

"The defendant made the elderly victim believe that they were in a romantic relationship and preyed upon his loneliness to obtain financial gain," the warrant concluded.

Mitchell was arrested Friday and appeared in bond court on Saturday, where a judge set her bond to $50,000.

The victim died in 2023, according to a prosecutor. 


Full Article & Source:
Woman scammed 87-year-old widow out of $100k in romance scam, warrant says

Warning Signs of Elder Abuse

Elder abuse can take many forms, including physical, emotional, and financial exploitation. The Department of Children & Family Services joined Daybreak to discuss. 

Source:
Warning Signs of Elder Abuse 

Tuesday, May 12, 2026

Latest on Cher’s Conservatorship Battle Over Her Son

By Aidan Lambourne

Cher remains locked in a legal battle over the well-being and finances of her son, Elijah Blue Allman, after a Los Angeles judge denied her latest request for a temporary conservatorship.

The court ruled on April 24 that there was not “sufficient urgency” to justify placing Allman under a conservatorship. In despite of Cher’s claims that her 49-year-old son struggles with severe mental health and substance abuse issues, per TMZ. The judge denied the request without prejudice, which means Cher can file again at a later date.

Allman appeared remotely at the hearing from a psychiatric hospital in New Hampshire. He is reportedly being held there while undergoing competency-related proceedings connected to criminal charges. Authorities previously arrested him on allegations including burglary, trespassing, assault, and criminal mischief earlier this year.

Cher Argued That Her Son Was “Gravely Disabled”

Cher argued in court filings that her son is “gravely disabled” and unable to responsibly manage money from a trust established by his late father, musician Gregg Allman. According to the filings, she claimed he spent trust distributions on drugs, luxury hotels, and limousine services. The judge, however, said the evidence did not prove that Allman lacked legal capacity or that immediate intervention was necessary.

At the same time, new court documents obtained by TMZ indicate that Allman plans to enter a residential treatment facility as part of efforts tied to his legal and mental health challenges. His legal team told the court that New Hampshire bail conditions require him to participate in a dual-diagnosis treatment program focused on mental health and substance use disorder recovery.

The family dispute has also expanded into financial matters. In recent filings connected to his divorce proceedings with estranged wife Marieangela King, Allman claimed Cher stopped financially supporting him in 2021. He said he now relies mainly on monthly trust payments from his father’s estate. He also is seeking to reduce court-ordered spousal support payments.

Cher first sought conservatorship over her son in 2023. She withdrew the case after the two sides reached a private agreement. The current dispute signals that tensions surrounding Allman’s health, finances, and legal troubles remain unresolved. 

Full Article & Source:
Latest on Cher’s Conservatorship Battle Over Her Son 

See Also:
Judge Denies Cher’s Bid for Emergency Conservatorship Over Son Elijah Blue Allman

Where Seniors Are Targeted by Scams — 2026 Study

Written by Toby Nelson

Millions of older Americans are targeted by financial scams each year. One analysis published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury found $27 billion in suspected elder financial exploitation in just a 12-month period. As digital banking, payments and communication become more common, scammers have more ways to reach victims and impersonate trusted institutions. Phishing scams, including business imposter and government imposter fraud, are among the most common methods used to target older Americans. 

SmartAsset analyzed fraud reports filed with the Federal Trade Commission by state and age group to determine which areas show the highest rate of reported scams involving residents age 60 and older. The analysis also identified the most common scam type targeting older Americans in each state. 

Key Findings 

  • This popular retirement state recorded the highest rate of reported scams involving older Americans. Arizona led the analysis with seven reports involving residents age 60 and older per 1,000 people in that age group. Delaware and Colorado followed in the rankings.
  • North Dakota recorded the lowest rate of reported scams involving older Americans. With just three reports involving residents age 60 and older for every 1,000 people in that age group, North Dakota had the fewest reported incidents in the analysis.
  • Business imposter scams were the most commonly reported scam type involving older Americans in most states. Among the 10 most common scam types, older Americans most often reported business imposter scams in every state except Alaska, Iowa, Maryland, South Dakota, Vermont and West Virginia. In those states, residents most often reported government imposter scams. 
  • Older Americans report job fraud and online shopping fraud less often than younger groups. Nationwide, reports involving older Americans were less likely than those involving younger age groups to cite either scam type.

States Where Older Americans are Targeted for Financial Fraud

  1. Arizona
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 7.0
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 12%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  2. Delaware
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 6.9
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 10%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  3. Colorado
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 6.8
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 13%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  4. Washington
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 6.4
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 14%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  5. New Mexico
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 6.3
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 16%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  6. Alaska
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 6.1
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 13%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Government imposters
  7. Maryland
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 5.9
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 8%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Government imposters
  8. Nevada
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 5.8
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 8%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  9. Oregon
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 5.7
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 14%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  10. Vermont
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 5.5
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 20%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Government imposters
  11. Utah
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 5.4
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 12%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  12. Florida
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 5.2
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 7%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  13. Hawaii
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 5.1
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 14%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  14. New Hampshire
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 5.1
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 15%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  15. South Carolina
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 5.1
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 9%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  16. Virginia
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 5.1
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 9%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  17. Montana
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.9
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 17%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  18. Wyoming
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.9
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 14%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  19. California
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.8
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 9%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  20. Georgia
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.8
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 5%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  21. Idaho
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.8
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 14%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  22. Alabama
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.6
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 8%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  23. Nebraska
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.6
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 13%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  24. Connecticut
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.5
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 9%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  25. Maine
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.5
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 16%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  26. North Carolina
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.5
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 8%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  27. Rhode Island
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.5
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 11%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  28. Indiana
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.4
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 10%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  29. Minnesota
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.4
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 13%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  30. Kansas
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.3
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 13%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  31. Massachusetts
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.3
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 10%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  32. New Jersey
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.3
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 7%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  33. Texas
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.3
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 6%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  34. Missouri
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.2
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 9%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  35. Tennessee
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.2
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 9%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  36. Wisconsin
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.2
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 13%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  37. Illinois
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.1
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 7%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  38. Michigan
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.1
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 9%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  39. Ohio
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.1
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 10%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  40. Pennsylvania
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.1
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 8%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  41. Arkansas
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.0
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 10%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  42. New York
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.0
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 7%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  43. Oklahoma
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 4.0
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 11%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  44. Kentucky
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 3.9
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 12%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  45. South Dakota
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 3.8
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 14%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Government imposters
  46. Mississippi
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 3.7
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 7%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  47. Louisiana
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 3.6
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 6%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters
  48. Iowa
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 3.5
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 13%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Government imposters
  49. West Virginia
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 3.1
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 13%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Government imposters
  50. North Dakota
    • Fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000: 3.0
    • Share of all fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older: 10%
    • Top scam type affecting victims ages 60 and older: Business imposters

Methodology

This analysis examined fraud reports submitted to the Federal Trade Commission in 2024, the most recent year for which data was available. To evaluate where older Americans may be most frequently targeted, the number of fraud reports involving victims ages 60 and older per 1,000 residents in that age group in each of the 50 states was calculated. Population estimates for residents ages 60 and older were drawn from the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2024 state population estimates. In addition to this primary rate, the share of all fraud reports in each state involving victims age 60 and older was calculated to provide additional context. States were ranked based on the rate of reports per 1,000 residents age 60 and older, and the most commonly reported scam type affecting that age group in each state was identified using FTC complaint categorization data. Because FTC data reflects reported incidents rather than all instances of fraud, actual fraud levels may be higher than reported totals, and differences in reporting behavior may influence comparisons. Source data providers are not affiliated with, and do not endorse or sponsor, this study or its findings.

Photo credit: ©iStock.com/Butsaya 

Full Article & Source:
Where Seniors Are Targeted by Scams — 2026 Study 

Monday, May 11, 2026

Accountant accused of stealing $13,500 from elderly client with cognitive decline


Story by Jake Jordan

A Marion County accountant is charged with serious fraud after investigators claim she stole money from clients, including an elderly woman with cognitive decline.

Cara Lee Priess, age 55, was taken into custody on May 5, 2026, by the Ocala Police Department based on a warrant from the Marion County Sheriff’s Office. She faces charges of organized fraud, grand theft, and elderly exploitation.

Investigators say the case began in 2024, when the owner of GoldMark Farm reported suspicious payments to Priess, who had been hired to handle the farm’s bills and taxes.

According to deputies, the farm owner discovered large invoices for accounting “deep dives” that were never requested. The invoices claimed 688 hours of work and totaled nearly $190,000.

Detectives discovered payments made to Priess that were reportedly not correctly recorded in the farm’s accounting records.

Months later, investigators uncovered another case involving an 89-year-old woman who trusted Priess as her accountant.

Authorities state that Priess issued checks to herself from the victim’s account and forged her signature. Detectives reported that the elderly victim, who has cognitive impairments, told them she would pay whatever Priess requested.

Records showed about $13,500 in fraudulent checks were deposited into Priess’ account, investigators said.

During interviews, Priess claimed she possessed documents verifying the transactions’ legitimacy. However, investigators state she never handed over the records and ultimately ceased communication with law enforcement.

After reviewing financial records and subpoenas, detectives secured an arrest warrant in April 2026. 

Full Article & Source:  
Accountant accused of stealing $13,500 from elderly client with cognitive decline