Friday, August 7, 2026

'The Bad Guardian' film on guardianship abuse screened on Capitol Hill

I-Team investigator Adam Walser appears as a panelist for the screening of Lifetime film based on real guardianship abuse cases 

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Concerns about guardianship abuse took center stage at the Whistleblower Summit and Film Festival on Capitol Hill, where the Lifetime film "The Bad Guardian" was screened for an audience that included lawmakers, advocates, and filmmakers.

The film, inspired by real stories, was selected for its accurate portrayal of guardianship abuse.

"It means that our film really hit a nerve," executive producer Elizabeth Stephen said.

From Lifetime to Netflix's top 10

The film first aired on Lifetime before reaching a wider audience on Netflix.

"It got a new life on Netflix, and in the 1st 3 weeks that it aired, it was in the top 10 movies in the country, which was incredible," Stephen said.

Stephen said viewers across the country have reached out to share their own experiences.

"I get emails from people all over the country, and it's always the same thing. This was my story. That was my father, my mother, my sister. That was the Guardian, and it's always heartbreaking," Stephen said.

A system meant to protect — but one that can harm

Guardianship is a legal process that allows someone else to make decisions about a person's finances, healthcare, and even where they live.

The system is intended to protect vulnerable people who cannot care for themselves.

But over more than a decade of reporting, our I-Team has uncovered cases where families say guardianship led to isolation, exploitation, and abuse.

Panel discussion puts accountability in focus

Following the screening, I joined a panel that included filmmaker Claudia Myers, National Center on Elder Abuse Director Julie Schoen, and guardianship reform advocate Rey Contreras.

"This was very real. It's very guttural. They got a lot of things right," I said during the panel discussion.

"People say this can't be true, and even attorneys who I speak to who end up by chance in probate court, they feel like they've gone off into Alice in Wonderland because the rules of a normal court system just don't seem to apply there," I said.

Contreras said his own family became entangled in the guardianship system despite years of estate planning.

His stepfather, Pete Beaty, created trust documents naming who should manage his affairs if he became incapacitated — wishes that were later disregarded in court.

Pete Beaty.png

"Trust documents to me are an admission ticket to a circus, a circus, because the lawyers make all the money on the back end," Contreras said.

Panelists repeatedly focused on accountability during the discussion.

Full Article & Source:
'The Bad Guardian' film on guardianship abuse screened on Capitol Hill 

Thursday, August 6, 2026

San Antonio-area woman wins nearly $8.5M after jury finds Netflix documentary defamatory

By Patrick Danner

Former attorney Phil Ross defended himself during a nearly two-week trial over allegations that he and another defendant defamed Seguin guardian Tonya Barina by statements they made for a 2020 Netflix documentary on guardianships.

San Antonio Express-News file photo

A Bexar County jury awarded nearly $8.5 million in damages to Seguin guardian Tonya Barina in her defamation lawsuit over a Netflix documentary that falsely portrayed her as exploiting an elderly man.

Jurors deliberated into Monday evening before reaching the verdict after a nearly two-week trial over “Guardianship Inc.,” a 2020 episode of Netflix’s “Dirty Money” documentary series. Although Netflix and the documentary’s producers settled with Barina before trial, former San Antonio attorney Phil Ross and Jo Ann Rivera, Ross’ former associate, remained in the case and represented themselves at trial.

The lawsuit stemmed from a yearslong legal battle over the guardianship of one-time San Antonio businessman Charles Thrash, Barina’s great-uncle. Also named as defendants were Laura Martinez, whose marriage to Thrash was later annulled, and her children, Brittany, Michelle and Joe Martinez. Ross represented the Martinez family during the guardianship litigation before surrendering his law license in lieu of discipline stemming from his role in the guardianship.

Before the case went to the jury, state District Judge Nadine Nieto directed a verdict against the Martinez family after none of them presented a defense at trial. 

The jury found Ross, Rivera, the Martinez family and Netflix defamed Barina by falsely portraying her as exploiting Thrash and awarded her $6 million in actual damages and almost $2.5 million in punitive damages.

Assigning blame

After finding Barina had been defamed, jurors assigned percentages of responsibility to each defendant and to Netflix, which settled before trial.

They assigned responsibility as follows: Ross, 30%; Netflix, 27%; Laura Martinez, 20%; Rivera 10%; Brittany Martinez, 8%; Michelle Martinez, 4%; and Joe Martinez, 1%.

Before closing arguments, Nieto declined to remove Netflix from the apportionment question despite a request from Barina’s lawyers. But because Netflix resolved Barina’s claims before trial, no liability can be attached to it. 

The jury also awarded punitive damages of $1 million against Ross, $200,000 against Rivera, $500,000 against Laura Martinez and $250,000 each against Brittany, Michelle and Jose Martinez.

“This verdict totally vindicates Tonya Barina and establishes she took no money from Charlie Thrash, nor was she ever involved in guardianship abuse,” her lawyers, Glenn Deadman and Carl Kolb, said in a statement. “The verdict shows that Ross, Rivera and the Martinez clan intentionally defamed Ms. Barina.”

Ross said he and Rivera intend to seek a new trial or appeal, arguing the judge improperly excluded evidence and that the verdict was unsupported by the evidence.

‘Crime of 21st century’

The lawsuit centered on “Guardianship Inc.,” a documentary that featured the Thrash guardianship and another case while portraying guardianship abuse as “the crime of the 21st century.” Barina alleged the episode falsely depicted her as exploiting Thrash and destroyed her reputation and banking career. The documentary was later taken off the air.

Thrash, now 88, owned a San Antonio automotive repair shop and amassed an estate valued at $3 million to $6 million before he was placed under a court-ordered guardianship after being diagnosed with dementia.

The guardianship sparked years of contentious litigation between Barina and Ross, who represented Laura Martinez and her family in challenging the court-appointed guardians.

Among the statements jurors were asked to consider were Ross’ assertions that what was happening to Thrash was “a crime,” that he was the victim of “textbook” guardianship abuse and that his estate was being exploited by the people appointed to manage it.

Jurors also considered whether Rivera defamed Barina by promoting the documentary and related allegations on a Facebook page called “The Journey of Charlie Thrash.” Barina alleged the posts republished the documentary’s false claims and further damaged her reputation.

Closing arguments

During closing arguments, Ross told jurors he was exercising his constitutional right to free speech and that his statements in the documentary were true, not defamatory. He said he had no role in producing the documentary beyond giving interviews.

Ross argued the verdict would have consequences beyond the case, saying it could discourage people from speaking to journalists. 

“Whatever happens in this trial is going to send a message to anybody that wants to talk to a reporter,” he said. 

Rivera likewise denied defaming Barina, saying she neither created false statements nor acted with malice.

“I’m not responsible for this,” Rivera said during her closing arguments. “I didn’t defame her. I haven’t been malicious. I didn’t create lies.”

Kolb argued the documentary omitted an important part of the story. About 10 months before it aired, a probate judge sanctioned Ross and Laura and Brittany Martinez in connection with the guardianship litigation. Kolb said leaving out those findings made the documentary misleading.

Deadman said that after Ross and the Martinez family lost in the courts, they went to “the court of public opinion” to get Barina removed as guardian. 

Deadman also urged jurors not to be swayed by Ross’ free-speech argument, saying the case was about accountability for false statements rather than the right to speak.

“Put a number in there that will redeem this lady’s reputation and get it published throughout the world,” he said. “Send a message.” 

Full Article & Source:
San Antonio-area woman wins nearly $8.5M after jury finds Netflix documentary defamatory

Wednesday, August 5, 2026

3 family members accused of stealing $1M from vulnerable 88-year-old in Bellevue

by Lynnanne Nguyen


BELLEVUE, Wash. — Three people are facing charges after Bellevue police say they used a power of attorney to drain more than $1 million in assets from an elderly family member, with that money going toward a new home in Kent, home improvement projects and shopping, among other expenses.

The victim, an 88-year-old woman with a medical condition, was reportedly left with no funds for her own care and had to be moved into a state-funded assisted living facility, according to police.

Bellevue police say the woman's nephew, 58-year-old Abner Eng, along with his wife, Manivone Misaengsay, and his son, Evun Eng, took advantage of their power of attorney to quickly sell off her assets for their own benefit.

Police allege the suspects quickly positioned themselves to control the woman’s finances.

"The day they get power of attorney, they end up quickly transferring the home to their care to sell, then sell off and benefit from that," said Capt. Ryan Parrott with the Bellevue Police Department. "So immediately after getting that power of attorney, they're already moving to sell the home and to start taking bank accounts."

Adult Protective Services alerted Bellevue police to the case in June 2024, after another family member reported suspicions to authorities. Investigators say the case has been under investigation for more than two years as they requested various search warrants to search through bank records and build their case.

"They're taking that money, now buying things for themselves, paying off bills, purchasing items for a catering business," Parrott said.

Parrott said the case is a stark example of financial exploitation by people the victim should have been able to trust.

"In this case, you're talking about family members who came in, someone you should trust," Parrott said. "And then the family members took advantage of that."

Police say another family member now has guardianship over the elderly victim. Eng and his family face charges of money laundering and theft from a vulnerable adult.

During the trio's court hearing Tuesday, defendants admitted to their role; Abner Eng, along with his wife, Manivone Misaengsay, were present.

Evun Eng was out on bond; his attorney waived his arraignment because the attorney was on vacation. Eng is expected to have his arraignment next week.

Bellevue police urged community members to stay vigilant for signs of abuse toward older or vulnerable adults, including staying connected with loved ones, monitoring bank accounts and helping protect valuables. Anyone who suspects abuse should report it immediately by calling 911 and notify adult protective services or a trusted health care provider, police said. 

Full Article & Source:
3 family members accused of stealing $1M from vulnerable 88-year-old in Bellevue 

Oak Park Man Arrested After Alleged Knife Attack on Elderly Victims

Ventura County Sheriff's deputies arrested an Oak Park man following an alleged domestic violence incident involving elderly family members.

by Ventura County Sheriff


Ventura County Sheriff’s deputies arrested an Oak Park man after he carried out a violent knife attack against his elderly mother and stepfather inside their home Thursday evening, leaving the 80-year-old victim injured.

On July 30, 2026, deputies responded to a report of an assault with a deadly weapon at a residence in the 5900 block of E. Sunny Vista Ave. in Oak Park. A 911 caller reported that her adult son was attacking her husband with a knife.

Deputies arrived quickly, and upon entering the residence, deputies found the suspect, Chad Nelson, standing over his injured 80-year-old stepfather, who was lying on the living room floor bleeding from multiple injuries.

Deputies immediately detained Nelson and allowed Ventura County Fire Department personnel and American Medical Response personnel to enter and provide emergency medical care for the injured victim.

While deputies were escorting Nelson from the residence, the victim spontaneously stated, “You saved my life,” indicating he feared he would have been killed had deputies not intervened.

The investigation determined Nelson allegedly became enraged at the victims following a family discussion. Nelson then armed himself with an approximately 10-inch butcher knife from the kitchen, advanced toward the mobility-impaired victim, and assaulted him with the knife. The victim sustained multiple non-life-threatening injuries and was transported to a local hospital for treatment.

Following the investigation, Chad Nelson was arrested and booked into the Ventura County Pre-Trial Detention Facility for the following felony offenses:

  • Assault with a Deadly Weapon (Penal Code § 245(a)(1))
  • Battery Causing Serious Bodily Injury (Penal Code § 243(d))
  • Felony Elder Abuse (Penal Code § 368(b)(1))

Nelson remains in custody at the Ventura County Pre-Trial Detention Facility with bail set at $200,000. He is scheduled to appear in Ventura County Superior Court on Aug. 3, 2026, at 1:30 p.m.

The Ventura County Sheriff’s Office reminds the public that domestic violence can affect victims of any age. Violence against elderly family members is a serious crime, and deputies remain committed to protecting vulnerable members of our community and holding violent offenders accountable. 

Full Article & Source:
Oak Park Man Arrested After Alleged Knife Attack on Elderly Victims 

Tuesday, August 4, 2026

Hayward woman charged with shoving 78-year-old woman from sidewalk, killing her

 By Nate Gartrell


HAYWARD — A resident has been charged with elder abuse and involuntary manslaughter for allegedly shoving a 78-year-old woman into the street, leading to her death at a hospital three days later. 

Veronica Medina, 36, was originally charged with elder abuse after the June 28 confrontation. When Pamela Cox died from her injuries, prosecutors refiled the case with the manslaughter charge.

Medina is out of custody while the case is pending and is expected to enter a plea in late August.

Police say Medina and Cox got into an argument on the 1400 block of 171st Avenue. Video from a neighbor’s security camera reportedly showed that Medina walked up and shoved Cox, who stumbled off the sidewalk and fell into the street, hitting the back of her head. She was knocked unconscious, suffered a traumatic brain injury, and died after being taken off life support on July 1, records show.

Medina told police that Cox had grabbed a child on a bicycle, sparking the initial confrontation, and that Medina shoved Cox to prevent her from coming into her yard. Police say the video contradicted Medina’s claims that Cox was the aggressor. 

Full Article & Source:
Hayward woman charged with shoving 78-year-old woman from sidewalk, killing her 

Milwaukee man charged, accused of violently attacking 99-year-old woman inside her home

 By: CBS 58 Newsroom

MILWAUKEE (CBS 58) -- Macias made his initial appearance in Milwaukee County Court on Saturday, August 1, where a Judge set a $150,000 cash bond for the defendant. 

Milwaukee County Circuit Court

The judge also issued a no contact order, and ordered Macias to maintain absolute sobriety, and said he could be in no possession of dangerous weapons or firearms.

Macias is due back in court Friday, August 7, for a preliminary hearing.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, August 3, 2026

Concerns raised about conditions inside Pennsylvania nursing home: "Heartbreaking"

A woman searching for rehabilitation care says she walked away heartbroken after touring Rochester Manor and Villa, and a former maintenance director says he repeatedly warned management about problems inside the building. KDKA's Shelley Bortz reports.  

Source:
Concerns raised about conditions inside Pennsylvania nursing home: "Heartbreaking"

 

Michigan AG Dana Nessel sues nursing home operator

Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel called the care and sheer number of violations against a Southeast Michigan nursing home operator "atrocious." 

Source:
Michigan AG Dana Nessel sues nursing home operator 
 

Sunday, August 2, 2026

AG Nessel Files Lawsuit Against Nursing Home Operator for Violating Medicaid False Claim Act, Failure of Care of Residents

LANSING – Today, Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel announced a civil cause of action (PDF) filed against Fahim Uddin, Pioneer Health Care Management doing business as Legacy Healthcare Management, and nine nursing home facilities located throughout southeast Michigan for violations of the Michigan Medicaid False Claim Act. The complaint alleges Uddin and his companies accepted more than $111 million in Medicaid reimbursement while failing to maintain staffing levels necessary to provide the services for which they billed. The Attorney General contends that this intentional failure of care placed hundreds of nursing home patients at risk of harm while Uddin operated related companies to enrich himself.

“While our case is focused on staffing data, there is a real human cost to the defendants' choices and their failure of care,” said Attorney General Nessel. “The consequences of chronic understaffing placed vulnerable residents at unnecessary risk of harm, violated their rights, and resulted in numerous injuries. I would like to thank the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General for their valuable assistance in this matter. My office remains committed to doing all we can to hold long-term care facilities accountable to ensure residents receive the high-quality care they deserve.”

"The complaint highlights two critical barriers to ensuring quality of care and life for nursing home residents: understaffing and related party transactions,” said Alison Hirschel, director of the Michigan Elder Justice Initiative. “We’re grateful to the Attorney General for seeking to hold nursing homes accountable.”

The civil complaint follows a 2-year investigation that began in October 2024 into chronic, severe understaffing at nine Michigan facilities owned and operated by Uddin:

  • Ashley Healthcare Center and Riverside Healthcare Center in Gratiot County;
  • Heritage Manor Nursing & Rehab Center, Northville Manor, and Pine Creek Manor Skilled Nursing & Rehab Center in Wayne County;
  • Lakeside Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center and Regency Manor Nursing & Rehabilitation Center in Macomb County; and
  • Oakland Manor and Oakridge Manor Nursing & Rehab Center in Oakland County.

Under the Michigan Medicaid False Claim Act, failure of care occurs when a nursing home, or nursing home owner and operator, knowingly provides care which is so substandard that it fails to meet the minimally required standards for Medicaid reimbursement, despite submitting claims that indicate otherwise. Attorney General Nessel alleges in the complaint that across the nine facilities, licensed for 508 beds and housing an average of 394 residents, the defendants failed to meet their minimal staffing requirements based on the acuity needs of their residents approximately 96% of the time.

Michigan law requires per-shift minimum ratios to ensure care and services are not concentrated in a single period. It is alleged that the defendants failed to meet these shift ratios on at least 496 instances. Michigan law also requires a nursing home to provide staff sufficient to provide not less than 2.25 hours of nursing care per resident, per day. It is further alleged that the defendants operated below the per resident, per day threshold on 1,454 occasions – higher than any other nursing home chain with four or more facilities in Michigan during this period. On at least 4,658 occasions, the defendants also allegedly failed to staff a registered nurse for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week, as required by federal law.

Between 2020 and 2025, the defendants billed Medicaid a total of $111,216,862. The Attorney General contends the defendants submitted claims for services that were not provided in accordance with Medicaid requirements and is seeking the full amount received by the defendants as a result of their alleged wrongful conduct – plus triple that amount, as well as a penalty of $5,000-$10,000 for each violation.

This matter is being handled by the Department of Attorney General’s Health Care Fraud Division (HCFD), with the assistance of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General. The HCFD is the federally certified Medicaid Fraud Control Unit for Michigan, and it receives 75% of its funding from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under a grant award totaling $5,517,524.00 for the fiscal year 2026. The remaining 25% percent, totaling $1,839,170.00, is funded by the State of Michigan. 

Source:
AG Nessel Files Lawsuit Against Nursing Home Operator for Violating Medicaid False Claim Act, Failure of Care of Residents