Saturday, May 24, 2014

Executors of Huguette Clark’s estate claim she was insane


Sure, the famously eccentric copper heiress Huguette Clark chose to live the last 20 years of her life in an unadorned hospital room instead of her three art-filled mansions, and yes she was more interested in her doll collection than her peers — but was she crazy?

That’s the legal stance the executors of her estate are now taking as they seek the return of $105 million in gifts the wealthy recluse gave to doctors and employees in her last decades of life.

After three years of litigation, it’s the first time the executors have used the insanity argument.

The move is “a measure of their desperation,” Lawrence Fox, an attorney for Beth Israel Hospital, said in recent court papers.

Executors would have to prove that she did not have a single “lucid episode” from age 84 until she died in 2011 — even though she closely tracked the 2000 Bush vs. Gore election recount and the stock market, Fox argues.

This current court fight comes eight months after Clark’s 20 distant relatives won a $34.5 million settlement in a separate will contest. Other payouts in that previous estate battle include $85 million to a California arts foundation established in the heiress’ memory, $35 million to the Corcoran Gallery in Washington, DC, and a whopping $24.5 million in legal fees.

Now the executors, on behalf of the family, are going after over $100 million that Clark gave away during her lifetime.

The executors’ attorney, John Morken, criticized Fox and the other defendants for seizing on the salacious term “insane.”

Full Article & Source:
Executors of Huguette Clark’s estate claim she was insane

New Blood Test Suggests Possible Breakthrough in Diagnosing Alzheimer's

A new blood test, which has the potential to accurately diagnose Alzheimer’s disease in individuals and significantly advance drug testing and research on the disease, has been developed through grant funding by Cure Alzheimer's Fund.

The test, known as Immunosignature (IS) and developed by a team led by UCLA neurologist Lucas Resrepo, uses a special method of fluorescent tagging of antibodies in the blood to recognize an identifiable binding pattern—or antibody "signature"—associated with Alzheimer's.

In their study to be presented at the 2014 American Academy of Neurology Meeting in Philadelphia, Restrepo and colleagues were able to use the test to distinguish Alzheimer's patients from elderly people without dementia with 95% accuracy.

Full Article and Source:
Diagnosing Alzheimer's: New Blood Test Suggests Possible Breakthrough

Five Traits of the Worst Nursing Facilities

Throughout last summer and most of the fall, Barry Maher, a motivational speaker and author in Corona, California, and his five siblings were on a mission to find the best nursing home for their 91-year-old mother, who has Alzheimer's.

"That's six siblings flying into the Boston area at various times from all over the country, checking out perhaps 40 different places, and a constant stream of phone calls and emails among us," Maher says.

"It was even more traumatic and disruptive than the experts we talked to told us it would be. Aside from a death in the family, it was perhaps the most traumatic thing we've ever gone through."

Like Maher, many people find the search for a nursing home for a parent to be gut-wrenching. There are plenty of safe, ethical nursing and retirement homes and assisted-living communities, but there are also ample awful ones.

Horror stories abound of elder abuse and neglect in nursing homes. In recent years, a few homes throughout the country have been cited by public health officials because family members found their parents – usually Alzheimer's victims – with maggots somewhere on their body, often in a wound.

[If]you want to avoid the worst of the worst nursing homes, what should you look for? Here are five red flags.

1. A history of violations. Nursing homes are highly regulated by public and private agencies at the state and federal levels, but there are plenty of bad players in the industry. The good news is that if you do some research online, it's easy to find out if a home has a reputation for substandard care.

2. A number of severe violations. "The key is quantity versus severity," says Diana Pelella, a senior living advisor with A Place for Mom.

3. High staff turnover. If a nursing home is a revolving door for staff members, that could be a telling sign, according to Pelella.

4. The residents lack independence. If your parent has Alzheimer's or dementia, you don't want him or her wandering in and out of the facility. But you don't want your parent in a prison, either.

5. You feel uneasy in your gut. Sometimes, you just know when a nursing home isn't the place for your parent, says Michael Schulman, a member of the elder planning task force for the American Institute of Certified Personal Accountants.

Full Article and Source:
5 Traits of the Worst Nursing Homes

Friday, May 23, 2014

"Kids for Cash" Documentary Earns Award!






















"Kids For Cash" has been honored with the award for Best Human Rights Documentary from the 2014 Documentary Edge Festival in New Zealand.

NASGA asks, "Did they do the same to the elderly?" Former Judge Michael Conahan presided over Grace Connors' guardianship at one time.  He could have helped free Grace and send her home to her loving daughter; but instead, he allowed her continued confinement and isolation at a nursing home until her premature and agonizing death.

 See Grace Connors, California/Pennsylvania Victim

Source:
Kids for Cash Facebook Page

Investigations launched into billing by lawyers appointed as guardians


When a woman in his care fell and was injured, an attorney-guardian billed her $135 to talk to her family about what happened and give her father directions to the hospital.

An attorney-guardian charged seniors with dementia legal fees to buy them Christmas presents with their own money.

And another charged an elderly woman $300 for time the lawyer spent eating cookies with her.

When attorneys are appointed as guardians by the Franklin County Probate Court, they are supposed to look out for the best interests of the vulnerable adults, known as wards.

But a yearlong Dispatch investigation shows otherwise and has prompted criminal investigations and court audits. Among those targeted by the court is Columbus lawyer Paul S. Kormanik, who says he has more wards than any other guardian in the country.

A Dispatch examination of thousands of court records found numerous questionable bills that Kormanik submitted to the court, including more than $1,600 in legal fees to clean out a ward’s house so he could sell it. He hired his own family members to do that job, using the ward’s money to pay them.

He also billed the wards thousands of dollars for opening their mail and taking their telephone calls.

Every bill from Kormanik included this message to the court: “The services required by this ward required substantial legal skills and experience.”

Franklin County Probate Court rules specifically state that guardians cannot submit bills at legal rates for non-legal activities. Even so, court magistrates approved them. After The Dispatch raised questions about Kormanik’s billing practices, Probate Court officials began auditing some of his cases last month.

Full Article & Source:
Investigations launched into billing by lawyers appointed as guardians

Report:  Legal System Fails Many Ohioans

Patricia Conklin, Daughter of Margarita Zelada, Addresses Monterey County Board of Supervisors

Patricia Conklin implores the Monterey County Board of Supervisors to protect her mother, Margarita Zelada, from elder abuse by the Public Guardian. Margarita has been imprisoned and isolated since March 2013. The Public Guardian is seeking authority for forcible chemical restraint.

Source:
Patricia Conklin at Monterey County Board of Supervisors

Thursday, May 22, 2014

Report: Legal guardian system fails many Ohioans


COLUMBUS — The court-appointed guardian system created to help Ohio’s elderly and mentally disabled residents and children has failed many it serves and allows unscrupulous guardians to rob their wards of freedom, dignity and money, a newspaper reported Sunday.

The newspaper’s investigation of the system that controls the lives of about 65,000 Ohioans found that even judges overseeing the system say it is broken, The Columbus Dispatch reported.

Ohio’s system has ripped apart families, rendered the mentally ill voiceless, and left some elderly Ohioans dying penniless in nursing homes, according to the newspaper.

Probate judges in Ohio’s 88 counties direct the system without detailed state guidelines and often amid overloaded court dockets. The Dispatch’s yearlong investigation showed some lawyers appointed as guardians have been allowed to ignore elderly and mentally ill people while placing them in the lowest-rated nursing home and some lawyers have billed wards for thousands of dollars in questionable legal fees for routine tasks such as paying utility bills.

Other failings found included a severely autistic man whose weight rose to 513 pounds because his guardian — his mother— allowed him to gorge on junk food and microwave dinners despite caseworkers’ warnings. One guardian’s failures also separated an elderly couple married for 45 years in their final year, and an eccentric woman forced into guardianship against her will was left broke and homeless.

The newspaper’s survey of Ohio’s probate courts found that nearly 90 percent do not require credit checks for prospective guardians, and as many as 61 percent don’t require criminal-background checks of guardians entrusted with the assets and care of vulnerable people.

Guardians are required in most counties to submit paper status reports about their wards only every two years and probate courts are not required to independently verify reports. A few counties require monthly visits, but more than three-quarters of the state’s probate courts don’t require guardians to ever meet with their wards.

Full Article & Source:
Report: Legal guardian system fails many Ohioans

New Commission to Regulate Prosecutorial Misconduct


New York State is poised to become the first state in the nation to create a public commission specifically designed to investigate complaints of misconduct by prosecutors and impose discipline upon prosecutors who violate the rules. The commission is modeled after commissions on judicial conduct, which exist in every state, including New York, to regulate the conduct of judges. Given the prosecutor's unique role as a "minister of justice" who occupies a "quasi-judicial" position, the huge costs on the criminal justice system from prosecutorial misconduct, and the abject failure of other mechanisms to discipline prosecutors, it is essential to the integrity of the justice system and the public's confidence that the system functions fairly and accurately, that this commission be created.

The incidence of misconduct by prosecutors in New York and across the country is escalating. Flagrant misconduct by prosecutors has been documented in several recent high-profile cases: late Senator Ted Stevens' conviction was thrown out because of egregious misconduct by federal prosecutors; the Duke Lacrosse prosecutor Michael Nifong was disbarred and jailed because of his misconduct; and prosecutor Ken Anderson, who hid evidence that wrongfully convicted Michael Morton and sent him to jail for 25 years, also was disbarred and jailed. But these cases are the tip of the iceberg. They illustrate the terrible consequences of misconduct that occurs regularly in thousands and thousands of other cases but do not receive the same publicity.

Prosecutors claim that reports of misconduct are exaggerated, and that misconduct is the work of a few bad apples, or a handful of rogue prosecutors. Indeed, some prosecutors in New York even claim that the prosecutor commission has been created to retaliate against the Moreland Commission, which subpoenaed legislators in connection with its investigation into public corruption. But given the extent of misconduct nationally and in New York, and the fact that this proposed commission has been studied for several years, this response by prosecutors is misguided and misinformed. Indeed, in a remarkable opinion by Chief Judge Alex Kozinski of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, in which he was joined by several colleagues, Kozinski writes that the culture of prosecution has changed dramatically in recent years; no longer is misconduct by prosecutors the "exception" or "a rare blemish." One of the most pervasive forms of misconduct - hiding favorable evidence that could prove a defendant's innocence -- "has reached epidemic proportions." Judge Kozinski concludes, just as so many courts and commentators have previously concluded, that "some prosecutors turn a blind eye to misconduct because they're more interested in gaining a conviction than achieving a just result."

The increasing incidence of misconduct by prosecutors is not surprising. The phenomenon is closely linked to the post-9/11 legal and political culture of fear, secrecy and repression in which the power of law enforcement, especially of prosecutors, has become much more dominant and aggressive. Prosecutors see themselves almost exclusively as "Accusers and Convicters." This unsettling spectacle has replaced almost completely the prosecutor's other important function to respect the rights of everybody, including defendants, and ensure justice for all persons. In this changed climate, the goal of finding the truth becomes submerged in an overly-aggressive law enforcement culture. In this troubling period of criminal justice, prosecutors get the message that they can prosecute as hard as they want and as far as they want, and there is virtually nothing to stop them. This new climate is manifested by massive and warrantless electronic surveillance, far broader leeway for law enforcement to search, seize and get confessions, a huge increase in drug arrests and prosecutions, a huge increase in the prison population, and more and more legislatively and judicially-created weapons in the hands of prosecutors to help them get convictions.

Full Article & Source:
New Commission to Regulate Prosecutorial Misconduct

Casey Kasem's daughter gets expanded power over dad's health care


Casey Kasem's whereabouts unclear; judge orders investigation Casey Kasem's daughter Kerri Kasem has been granted expanded authority regarding her ailing father's care, and his wife, Jean Kasem, has been told to cooperate with the effort.

A Los Angeles Superior Court judge on Tuesday ordered Jean Kasem to allow a court-appointed doctor to see her husband and also told her to give Kerri Kasem access to her father, the Associated Press reported. Jean Kasem's lawyers were told to find out and, unless ethically bound, share the patriarch's current address with the rest of the family.
While two attorneys from different firms showed up on Jean Kasem's behalf Tuesday, Judge Daniel S. Murphy said, "I'm not sure she's even complying with my order" from last week. Part of that order sought an assessment of Casey Kasem's health.
The judge also gave Kerri Kasem permission to hire unarmed private investigators to look into the situation, if necessary, and to head north to see her dad. Also, his passport was to be surrendered.
Casey Kasem, whose whereabouts were unclear early last week, was found in Washington state late Tuesday, but his three oldest children, Kerri, Mike and Judie, were not notified until after they'd already filed a missing-persons report in Santa Monica on Wednesday. Kerri Kasem said at the time that she'd most recently seen her 82-year-old father at a nursing home in that city.

"This poor man was moved in the middle of the night," Kerri Kasem told People. "This is no vacation. This is a man who has a feeding tube, hooked up to an IV and has dementia. This is not a man who needs to be unfamiliar surroundings."

Full Article & Source:
Casey Kasem's daughter gets expanded power over dad's health care

See Also:
Casey Kasem, Legendary Radio Personality, Has Been Found

Authorities: Casey Kasem found in Washington state

Judge orders investigation into Casey Kasem's whereabouts

Judge rejects conservatorship for Casey Kasem

Casey Kasem Near Death but Alert, Children Suing Wife Jean for Conservatorship NOT Will and Money