Saturday, August 29, 2015

MB Financial Bank Completes Acquisition of JPMorgan Chase Illinois Court-Appointed Guardianship and Special Needs Trust Business


CHICAGO, Aug 27, 2015 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- MB Financial Bank recently completed its acquisition of the Illinois court-appointed guardianship and special needs trust business of JPMorgan Chase, according to Mitchell Feiger, president and CEO of MB Financial, Inc. MBFI, +0.44% parent of MB Financial Bank, N.A. Terms of the deal were not announced. The acquisition added approximately $200 million of assets under management to MB Financial Bank’s existing guardianship business. Approximately five years ago, MB completed its acquisition of the Illinois guardianship and special needs trust business of U.S. Trust, Bank of America Private Wealth Management.

“MB has established an expertise and commitment to the guardianship and special needs trust business. This purchase represents a significant increase to our current portfolio, and further solidifies our strong position in this important market. We are confident that clients’ needs will be well served at MB through access to an experienced team dedicated to this customized, proactive service,” says Mitchell Feiger.

The Illinois guardianship and special needs trust business is headed by Alan Teraji, senior vice president, personal trust and guardianship group. His team will expand with the addition of Kim Bahna, Josie Sanchez and Sharon Franta, formerly of JPMorgan Chase.

About MB Financial Bank
MB Financial Bank N.A. is a Chicago-based commercial bank with approximately $15 billion in assets and a more than one hundred year history of building deep and lasting relationships with middle-market companies and individuals. MB Financial Bank offers a full range of powerful financial solutions and the expertise and experience of bankers who are focused on their clients’ success. MB Financial Bank is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MB Financial, Inc.

Learn more about MB Financial Bank at www.mbfinancial.com.

View source version on businesswire.com: http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20150827005230/en/

SOURCE: MB Financial Bank
MB Financial Bank
Karen A. Perlman
Senior Vice President
847-653-1788
kperlman@mbfinancial.com

Full Article & Source:
MB Financial Bank Completes Acquisition of JPMorgan Chase Illinois Court-Appointed Guardianship and Special Needs Trust Business

Jefferson County lawyer, wife indicted on felony theft charges


Carl Robert Ogle
A Jefferson County lawyer and his wife have been indicted on charges of felony theft for allegedly pilfering money from his clients.

A Jefferson County grand jury returned indictments charging Carl Robert Ogle, 68, and Tameline Ogle, 63, of Jefferson City, with one count each of theft of more than $60,000, according to the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation.

The couple was arrested Thursday and booked into the Jefferson County Jail in lieu of $10,000 each.

The lawyer, who had practiced law in Sevier and Jefferson counties for nearly 40 years, was disbarred by the Board of Professional Responsibility of the Tennessee Supreme Court in October 2014.

According to board's disciplinary file, trouble began when the money from a lawsuit settlement check for $161,000 disappeared from the escrow account of a client's estate.

Board investigators learned that Tameline Ogle also had access to the escrow account. They later discovered money missing from several other clients' accounts.

The thievery totaled more than $183,000.

Carl Ogle blamed the missing funds on his wife's gambling addiction.

More details as they develop online and in Friday's News Sentinel.

Full Article & Source:
Jefferson County lawyer, wife indicted on felony theft charges

Affidavit: Woman steals $30,000 exploiting the elderly



Laura Vasquez, 41, gained the trust of an elderly woman, then convinced her to hand over more than $30,000 to her, according to an arrest warrant affidavit.

San Antonio police began investigating the case in May, but believe Vasquez took money from the 76 year-old woman as far back as October of last year.

The affidavit stated that the victim told police soon after she met Vasquez, who was cutting her grass, Vasquez asked her to loan her $5.  During the next seven months, Vasquez continued to ask the victim for money—sometimes thousands of dollars at a time, the affidavit stated.  In all, police said, she took more than $30,000.

The affidavit stated that she gave the elderly woman various reasons why she needed the cash, including to pay her rent, buy medicine and pay her own bail when she wasn’t even incarcerated.

The victim told investigators that she hoped that by continuing to loan Vasquez money, she would keep her engaged and willing to pay her back, the affidavit stated.

Detectives said Vasquez admitted borrowing money from the woman, but told them it was only a few thousand dollars.

She was arrested Thursday on charges of exploitation of the elderly and theft involving the elderly.

Full Article & Source:
Affidavit: Woman steals $30,000 exploiting the elderly

Friday, August 28, 2015

New law will allow cameras in Illinois nursing homes


SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) – A new Illinois law will allow cameras in nursing home rooms.

Gov. Bruce Rauner signed legislation Friday that supporters say will help prevent abuse and neglect of nursing home residents. It takes effect Jan. 1.

The measure requires the resident and any roommate to consent to having a video or audio recording device installed. It would be up to residents or their families to pay for the devices.

Attorney General Lisa Madigan pushed for the law, saying it would give families added peace of mind and be another “line of defense” for residents.

The Illinois Department of Health responds to about 5,000 complaints annually. In 2013 the department found 106 allegation of abuse, neglect or theft of property by nursing home staff to be valid.
___
The bill was HB2462.

New Article & Source:
New law will allow cameras in Illinois nursing homes

Judge Ramsey petitions to halt recall, cites state law


A North Las Vegas municipal judge is trying to end an effort to remove her from the bench, arguing judges cannot be recalled by popular vote under the Nevada Constitution.

Judge Catherine Ramsey filed an emergency petition Thursday in Clark County District Court, asking a judge to issue an injunction barring a recall election.

A hearing on that request is scheduled for Monday.

“Nevada has been a state for 151 years,” Ramsey’s attorney, Craig Mueller, wrote in the petition.

“Never in the 151 years has a judge been removed from office relying on voter recall.”

The court filing says Ramsey’s “political adversaries” are behind the recall and are wrongly relying on a provision in Section 2 of the state Constitution that says “public officers” may be removed by popular vote.

That provision says an elected public officer can be removed if 25 percent of the voters who cast ballots in the original election sign a recall petition — and if a majority of people then vote for removal.

But Ramsey, who was elected in 2011, says several other provisions of law make it clear that a judge is not a “public officer” for those purposes and can only be removed by the state Commission on Judicial Discipline.

“ ‘Public officer’ does not include any justice, judge or other officer of the court system,” reads a section of the state’s Ethics in Government law.

A recall committee launched in March said it gathered 2,717 signatures, more than the required 1,984. The Nevada secretary of state certified last week that number is sufficient to trigger a recall, though the city clerk still has to verify the signatures are valid.

A spokeswoman for the secretary of state’s office, Catherine Lu, said officials there discussed legal issues surrounding the recall with the state attorney general’s office Thursday. But she said they could not comment further because of the pending litigation.

Ramsey’s court complaint names the city, the city clerk and members of the committee Remove Ramsey Now, asking the judge to bar them from continuing the recall.

The recall committee has accused Ramsey of misappropriating city funds to pay for a private lawsuit, asking employees to perform personal errands on city time, and reducing defendants’ sentences arbitrarily, causing the city to lose out on revenue.

Ramsey has said through her attorney that the political vendetta against her stems from her effort to protect court funding when city officials tried to spend the money on other projects. Ethics complaints filed by city employees in March say city officials, including Mayor John Lee and his chief of staff, are pulling the strings for the recall. A city spokesman has denied that.

One of the ethics complaints says the mayor and Chief of Staff Ryann Juden met with Ramsey. In that meeting, the complaint says, Juden told the judge he could “make a pamphlet of half-truths, and those stupid low-income citizens wouldn’t know what to believe.”

Ramsey’s lawyer, Mueller, said the campaign against her is a perfect illustration of why the law doesn’t allow judges to be recalled. Judges are sworn to follow the law regardless of public opinion, and that can mean making unpopular decisions, he said.

Also, judges are ethically prohibited from speaking publicly on many issues, which Mueller said makes it hard for them to respond to political attacks.

David Thomas, a political consultant working with the recall effort, said he expected Ramsey to raise arguments like the ones she did Thursday. Thomas said he’s confident the judge will lose, helping clear the way for an election.

Thomas said the recall committee has raised about $30,000, $5,000 from himself and $10,000 from the city police officers’ union. He called many of the other donors “regular employees of the city.”

Thomas had repeatedly said he would release the full list of recall donors. But on Thursday he refused, saying he would not make it public until the Las Vegas Review-Journal sought and published a list of Ramsey’s campaign contributors.

Thomas then hung up on a reporter and didn’t respond to a follow-up question.

If there is an election, both the judge and the recall organization will be required to file campaign finance reports that include names of donors. But they can keep secret the name of anyone who gives $100 or less.

Full Article & Source:
Judge Ramsey petitions to halt recall, cites state law

Robin Williams' Kids Ask Judge to Toss Wife's Estate Claims



ABC Latest News | Latest News Videos
In the latest court filing in the ongoing battle over Robin Williams' estate, the late actor's children say his wife is trying to increase her share of his estate at their expense.

Zachary, Zelda and Cody Williams are asking a judge to dismiss a petition filed by Susan Williams.

The December 2014 petition asked the court to exclude the contents of the Tiburon home that she shared with Williams from the jewelry, memorabilia and other items Williams said the children should have.

The children in their Aug. 14 filing say the estate's trustees have determined the division of all of Williams' personal property, and those decisions are final. They accuse Susan Williams of holding on to property that is theirs.

They also say the trustees have arrived at a figure for a reserve fund for Susan Williams to cover the costs of the Tiburon home, but she wants a guaranteed income stream that she is not entitled to.

"Petitioner is seeking to increase her share of the trust assets at the expense of the Williams children," despite the trust's clear language," the children say in their filing. "She cannot do so."

A call to Susan Williams' attorney was not immediately returned. The two sides are set to appear in court Aug. 28.

In court papers filed last month, Susan Williams said the trustees refused to explain how they calculated the amounts for her reserve fund, which were different from figures she arrived at. The trustees also don't have absolute discretion over her reserve fund, so the court has a role to play in deciding matters, she said.

She, however, characterized talks between the parties as "fruitful."

Full Article & Source:
Robin Williams' Kids Ask Judge to Toss Wife's Estate Claims

Thursday, August 27, 2015

Ohio Supreme Court urged to review Belinky’s tenure


Former county Probate Judge Mark Belinky

A veteran lawyer who has practiced extensively in the Mahoning County Courthouse offered this analogy to former county Probate Judge Mark Belinky’s sins of commission regarding guardianships: “It’s like a father coming home from work each day, knocking on his daughter’s bedroom door, entering and then proceeding to sexually abuse her because he knows she’s defenseless.”

The well-known lawyer, who spoke to us on condition of anonymity, was furious over Belinky’s admission that he stole money from people for whom he was a guardian and that he altered probate court documents to facilitate the theft. Belinky, who resigned from the bench in March 2014 in the midst of a criminal investigation into his activities, also admitted he used a probate court computer to create false probate court records.

The admissions were contained in affidavits filed by Ed Carlini, a special agent with the Ohio Bureau of Investigation.

“The first responsibility of a probate judge is to protect the people he is a guardian of,” the lawyer pointed out. “These are people who can’t take care of themselves. The probate judge has ultimate guardianship over individuals and over money.”

He described Belinky as a “depraved soul” for stealing from the handicapped – mentally or physically – who are at the mercy of the court.

We not only endorse that characterization of the former judge, but we would go a step further and say that he should be publicly condemned by all honest, law-abiding residents of this area. Why? Because Belinky presented himself as a paragon of virtue and the slayer of corrupt politicians when he ran for the judgeship in 2008, after being appointed in 2007 by then Democratic Gov. Ted Strickland.

In a May 2014 editorial after he had pleaded guilty to violating campaign-finance laws, we noted that he had resigned because agents from the BCI had a litany of criminal charges they were prepared to file against him if he did not cooperate with them in their wide-ranging investigation of government corruption in the Mahoning Valley.

APPEAL FOR SPECIAL MASTER
Belinky avoided jail time because he is said to be cooperating with investigators and the FBI, but given the latest revelations about his activities as a judge, we believe a fuller, independent investigation of his tenure on the bench is demanded.

We call on Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Maureen O’Connor to appoint a special master to determine the extent of Belinky’s criminal behavior.

The one question that demands to be answered is this: Was he acting alone, or were there other participants in the scheme to steal from some of society’s most vulnerable?

We find this case particularly egregious because we, along with lawyers specializing in probate law and the public, came to view Belinky as the exception to the political-corruption rule in Mahoning County.

GAMING THE SYSTEM
He was eminently qualified to serve on the bench because he had long practiced in the court. Now we see that he used his knowledge and experience to game the system.  (Continue Reading)

Full Article & Source:
Ohio Supreme Court urged to review Belinky’s tenure

See Also:
Former Probate Judge Mark Belinky Answers Questions About His Resignation 

Ohio Mahong County Probate Judge Mark Belinky Resigns!

Former South Pasadena nursing home recruited felons as patients, police chief says


Police Chief Arthur Miller at Press Conference

SOUTH PASADENA -- A nursing home that ran afoul of the state partly because it recruited convicted felons, probationers, rapists and robbers as patients is under new ownership, a city official said Wednesday.

Instead of a median age of about 75 years old, residents at the former South Pasadena Convalescent Hospital had an average age of 37, Police Chief Arthur Miller said. He accused the former nursing home of sending recruiting teams to Los Angeles to get new patients.

“In that lower age population, there were convicted felons, probationers, drug users, rapists, robbers,” Miller said. “Traditionally police officers do not go to convalescent hospitals on a routine basis, especially to handle the crimes that I just described. … The staff at the time were not equipped for it. The hospital was not equipped for it, and it wasn’t licensed to do that type of rehabilitation.”

Shlomo Rechnitz, California’s largest nursing home owner with at least 80 facilities in the state, operated the convalescent hospital at 904 Mission St. from 2007 until a week ago when new proprietors Elliot Zemel and Yudi Schmukler took over and renamed it South Pasadena Care Center.

The nursing home was decertified on Jan. 5, and the new owners are working to get it certified, Zemel said.

Sallie Hofmeister, spokeswoman for South Pasadena Rehabilitation Center LLC — often called South Pasadena Convalescent Hospital — released a statement saying the facility has provided outstanding care since 2007.

“South Pasadena Rehabilitation Center LLC has provided quality health care services to a severely underserved population of patients with few to no options for placement. Despite the challenges of care for these patients with secondary psychiatric diagnoses, South Pasadena Rehabilitation Center LLC consistently excelled in survey after survey by the Department of Public Health between 2007 and 2014.”

In the past decade, the South Pasadena Police Department received about 1,100 calls for problems unique to Rechnitz’s nursing home, including violent crimes, assault and theft, Miller said. A nearby nursing home received only 200 in the same time period, he added.

In 2012, the number of 9-1-1 calls dropped, but that’s because someone rerouted emergency calls to the nursing stations, Miller said.

“We never heard about those calls until we started having to do foot beats through the hospital,” he said. “That’s crazy. That’s insane that the people that were asking for help got rerouted to their captors. It’s just unheard of.”

Of the 156 beds at the South Pasadena Care Center, 17 are still occupied, said Dolores Diehl, the facility’s new administrator. Most of the old staff members were discharged but some have remained to work under the successive ownership, she said.   (Continue Reading)

Full Article & Source:
Former South Pasadena nursing home recruited felons as patients, police chief says

See Also:
Troubled nursing home gets new ownership 

California’s largest nursing home owner sued 

A judge's view: Take care when picking an attorney


Can you recommend a good lawyer? It’s a question we judges get asked frequently, probably because we are in a position to see a lot of attorneys.

Although we definitely have our opinions on which attorneys are at the top of their game, our judicial ethics rules forbid us from recommending specific lawyers or referring business to anyone. We have to remain fair and not play favorites, as difficult as that might be.

So how should you choose a lawyer? In a smaller community, the best source of information probably is still word of mouth. If a friend or co-worker used an attorney, ask if they would recommend that person. If you know an attorney who specializes in a different area of law, that person still might have someone they could recommend.

There are a variety of websites that offer attorney reviews, as well, but you should take the write-ups with a grain (or shaker) of salt. Typically, an angry person is more likely to write than a happy one, and sometimes lawyers get blamed for things completely outside of their control. However, if you see patterns in the reviews — such as not responding to phone calls, missing court appearances or blowing deadlines — that might be a good indicator of an attorney struggling to stay afloat.

The most important consideration in choosing an attorney is that you feel comfortable talking to that person. Lawyers have different styles, and one approach is not necessarily better than another. You will be sharing some highly personal information with your legal counsel, so you should be able to relate to him or her on a personal level and be able to have open, frank conversations.Most attorneys are willing to sit down with you for an initial consultation free of charge where they can give you some feedback on your case and give you an idea of how they would approach your representation.

Ask how long it takes them to return phone calls or emails, find out how many cases like yours they have handled and see if they’ll provide any references. And, of course, find out upfront how much the attorney will charge you for services, how often you will be billed, and what other expenses might be involved in your case so there are no surprises.Most attorneys or their law firms will have a website where you can learn more about their experience, background and areas of expertise.

Finally, if an attorney has received public discipline, that information is available on the Lawyers Professional Responsibility Board site at lprb.mncourts.gov. The site provides links to Minnesota Supreme Court decisions imposing public discipline, which can provide more information about the specific facts of the discipline. There also is a current list of suspended or disbarred attorneys so you can make sure a person is properly licensed.

We are fortunate to have many competent attorneys in northern Minnesota, so you should have several good options to guide you through the legal process.

Dale Harris is a 6th Judicial District judge in the St. Louis County Courthouse in Duluth. 

Full Article & Source: 
A judge's view: Take care when picking an attorney