Showing posts with label ARDC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ARDC. Show all posts
Thursday, June 22, 2017
Maine's Aging & Disability Resource Center (ARDC)
It can be overwhelming to try to understand your options for in-home, community-based and long-term supports and services. Maine’s Aging and Disability Resource Centers (ADRCs) are here to help!
ADRCs provide answers to questions about aging and disability resources in Maine. ADRC staff are knowledgeable on a wide range of issues and can help you find the resources you need.
ADRC resource experts have designed this site to help you find your own way to the right resources. Click “Explore Your Options” to get started. If you don’t find what you need or need more help, call 1-877-353-3771.
Source:
Maine Aging and Disability Resource Center
Click to read Maine's "Elder Rights Handbook" or to order a copy of the handbook
Sunday, June 19, 2016
Elder Abuse Awareness Day shines spotlight on hidden scourge; 137 cases this year in Columbia County
A year ago, Becky Mulhern got an irate phone call.
It was a Columbia County resident, who expressed indignation about a demonstration in front of the Columbia County Courthouse to foster awareness of elder abuse.
The caller said she simply could not believe that vulnerable older adults ever experienced physical, psychological or financial abuse in Columbia County, even though, at that time, 108 cases had been reported in the county in the preceding year.
On Wednesday, World Elder Abuse Awareness Day, the purple balloons and purple pinwheels were returned to the front entrance of the courthouse — 137 of each, to represent the 137 cases of elder abuse reported in Columbia County over the last year.
Mulhern, director of Columbia County’s Aging and Disability Resource Center, said she doesn’t know why the number of reported cases has increased.
“It could be that people are becoming more aware, or it could be because times are hard,” she said. “We just don’t know.”
On Wednesday morning — for a relatively brief time, because of the heat and humidity — purple-clad people gathered at the courthouse. They included not only older adults, but also representatives of law enforcement, human services and other agencies charged with the safety of vulnerable seniors.
The term “elder abuse” applies, in general, to people age 65 or older, though it can happen to any vulnerable adult.
Elder abuse is not just physical attacks — hitting, slapping, bruising, burning with cigarettes — although all that happens.
It could entail emotional abuse, sexual abuse, financial exploitation, neglect, abandonment and self-neglect.
It was self-neglect, according to Mulhern, that resulted in Columbia County’s one death in the last year that was traceable to elder abuse. Self-neglect happens when seniors stop taking care of themselves — stop eating, bathing or tending to their medical needs — sometimes because they no longer can do those things for themselves and do not ask for help.
DeSomer, who has a background in child protective services, said she often sees elder abuse cases that are similar to child abuse cases, in that unhealthy family dynamics are hurting someone who’s vulnerable.
According to Weaver, more and more reports deal with financial exploitation of older people. Many of these reports, she said, come from employees of financial institutions, who may notice large or frequent withdrawals from a senior citizen’s account, or suspicious behavior on the part of a relative who may be taking unfair or unlawful advantage of his or her access to a vulnerable older person’s account.
What all forms of elder abuse have in common, according to Weaver, is that they often are, to the victim, astonishing and puzzling.
“You don’t want to believe that your own children would do this to you,” she said. (The abuser of an older adult isn’t always his or her child. It could be anybody, including another senior citizen.)
When people see what they suspect to be elder abuse, Weaver said, they often don’t tell anybody, out of embarrassment, fear or a misguided sense of family loyalty.
Many, however, don’t know what to do.
That’s why Weaver and DeSomer are here to help.
Anyone in Columbia County who suspects elder abuse should call the ADRC at 608-742-9233 or 888-742-9233.
Mulhern said people who are committed to safety for vulnerable older adults may also participate in the I-team — an interdisciplinary group, overseen by the ADRC, consisting of public safety workers, administrators of nursing homes or assisted living facilities and individuals from all walks of life. The I-team, according to Mulhern, brings in speakers and taps other resources for improving safety for seniors.
Full Article & Source:
Elder Abuse Awareness Day shines spotlight on hidden scourge; 137 cases this year in Columbia County
Thursday, October 23, 2014
Attorney Ken Ditkowsky on Northshore "LIVE": Cooper's Corner
Source:
10-14-14 Ken Ditkowsky
Note:
Attorney Ditkowsky received a four-year suspension for advocating and speaking up against guardianship abuse, specifically the Mary Sykes case, in Cook County, IL.
See Also:
NASGA: Mary Sykes, Illinois Victim
Northshore LIVE: Cooper's Corner: Ken Ditkowsky
Friday, August 1, 2014
Illinois "Petition of the Month" July 2014: Ditkowsky v. The Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Review Committee (IARDC)
The Supreme Court Press “Petition of the Month”TM for July 2014 is Ditkowsky v. The Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Review Committee (IARDC) Supreme Court Dkt. No. 13-1473, an appeal coming out of the State of Illinois. The petition was filed pro se by the petitioner Kenneth K. Ditkowsky.
Question Presented: (two of four questions presented by Petitioner)
1. Does the First Amendment provide protection to an attorney who reports criminal conduct to law enforcement?
2. Does the Illinois Attorney Disciplinary code nullify the moral and common law obligation of requiring citizens to object to elder abuse and financial exploitation of the elderly?
Many lawyers take up the law for idealistic reasons - to fight for the weak, to correct injustices, and preserve the rule of law. Upholding these values requires action be taken - action that can be lauded as crusading and exemplary by some, but reckless and inconvenient by others. However, when the lawyer takes on corruption whose seed might be planted within the legal system itself, the system sometimes retaliates with a fury with the ultimate punishment for an attorney - a referral to the bar's disciplinary committee and long term suspension or disbarment.2. Does the Illinois Attorney Disciplinary code nullify the moral and common law obligation of requiring citizens to object to elder abuse and financial exploitation of the elderly?
In the case of Ditkowsky v. The Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Review Committee (IARDC), Supreme Court, Dkt. No. 13-1473, Kenneth Ditkowsky was suspended from the bar for four years due to his investigation of what he believed to be the looting of an elderly woman, Mary Sykes. He believed that her attorney-guardian may have gone so far as to have stripped her bank safe deposit box and gold teeth fillings.. When he pursued the investigation, he was referred to the IARDC which recommended and ultimately achieved Ditkowsky's bar suspension. The IARDC took little account of Ditkowsky's past role in ferreting out corruption, notably helping the feds uncover judicial bribe taking in the Operation Greylord scandal of thirty years ago.
The Ditkowsky petition asks the Court to consider whether a lawyer's action to protect a potential abuse victim is Constitutionally protected speech.
~Kenneth K. Ditkowsky

~Kenneth K. Ditkowsky
Full Article and Source:
Petition of the Month, July 2014: Ditkowsky v. The Illinois Attorney Disciplinary Review Committee (IARDC)
See Also:
NASGA: Mary Sykes, Illinois Victim
NASGA: Alice Gore, Illinois Victim
Monday, May 19, 2014
The War on the Elderly and Disabled - 18 USCA 4 Report
If you need more convincing as to our own holocaust check out the Alice Gore case. After she was railroaded into one of the nursing home 'death camps' the miscreants mined her teeth for their gold filings!
Across America this outrage continues! The evening news reports the kidnapping of several hundred children by terrorists, and the anguished statements of our political leaders; however, these same pols are silent as hundreds of elderly and disabled people are kidnapped and herded into abusive guardianships to be ravaged, stripped of their liberty, stripped of their money, and denied all rights of American citizenship.
Across America this outrage continues! The evening news reports the kidnapping of several hundred children by terrorists, and the anguished statements of our political leaders; however, these same pols are silent as hundreds of elderly and disabled people are kidnapped and herded into abusive guardianships to be ravaged, stripped of their liberty, stripped of their money, and denied all rights of American citizenship.
The hypocrisy is amazing!
Our congress has enacted laws to protect the elderly and the disabled; however, except on rare occasions they (the laws) are ignored. Here in Illinois it is not uncommon for elderly people to find themselves under the dominion and control of ultra vires judicial domination that is akin to the gulag or the holocaust. I attached a copy of a brief that Ms. Denison and I filed in the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals that details how a senior citizen was railroaded into a guardianship, and when her friends and family tried to obtain JUSTICE for her they were thwarted and Ms. Denison and I have had to deal with the problem of being unwelcome whistle blowers who will not adhere to the code of silence.
The brief has been filed and is of record. Therefore, the 4th estate can reprint any of the statements made therein without fear of defamation. The miscreants including but not limited to the Administrator of the Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission, Guardian ad Litem Adam Stern, Guardian ad Litem Cynthia Farenga et al cannot censor the content and if you chose to be upset by the kidnapping of hundred of elderly people ****. (Even social media was intimidate by our miscreants - video's of Mary were posted demonstrating that she was very competent and demanding legal representation - legal representation was denied her - Mr. Stern told the Court she did not want to represented. He did this in the fact of handwritten notes smuggled out by Mary! (See Appendix)
The brief deals with a Taliban type assault on the First Amendment and demonstrates how vulnerable American liberties have become. I invite you to do an INDEPENDENT, HONEST, COMPLETE AND COMPREHENSIVE INVESTIGATION. I respectfully you sojourn to the Daley Center, go to the clerk's office on the 12th floor and access the Mary Sykes file 09 P 4585. It is an interesting read, if you also access the guardianship statute 755 ILCS 5/11a - 1 et seq.
The first step in any litigation is to check and see if jurisdiction has been obtained. 755 ILCS 5/11a - 10 deals with the method of obtaining jurisdiction. Examine the summons. The form of the summons is not compliant. Look to see if Mary was served with any process. There is no sheriff's return! Worse yet, the address on the summons is a Chicago address - Mary had been forcibly moved to Naperville! Thus, from the file it is apparent that Mary was not before the Court.
To make certain that a senior citizen is not railroaded, the statute requires that close relatives be notified 14 days prior to a hearing on competency. The Supreme Court of Illinois has said that such is jurisdictional. The file does not indicate that there was any notification of Mary's younger daughter or her two sisters. In point of fact none of these three individuals was notified and in fact in an effort to keep the proceedings secret Mary's two sisters were not disclosed on the Petition to appoint a guardian for her so as to strip her of her citizenship rights.
Mr. Schmiedel (the guardian's attorney) is not ashamed of the fact that there was no incompetency hearing - neither are the guardians. To Hell with the requirement that before a senior can be kidnapped and rendered a non-entity he/she has to be proven incompetent by clear and convincing evidence! All that was necessary was an agreement by the people who count - i.e. the elder cleansers.
The long and short is that State and Federal law are ignored as hundreds of senior citizens are taken prisoner and stripped of their liberty, property, and human rights the Administration on the Federal and State level are silent.
Full Article and Source:
The War on the Elderly and Disabled
See Also:
NASGA: Alice Gore, Illinois Victim
NASGA: Mary Sykes, Illinois Victim
The War on the Elderly and Disabled
See Also:
NASGA: Alice Gore, Illinois Victim
NASGA: Mary Sykes, Illinois Victim
Sunday, April 13, 2014
Tonight on T.S. Radio: Ken Ditkowsky - Sanctioned for Bucking the System
Join us this evening as Ken Ditkowsky discusses the case that resulted in him being sanctioned by ubiquitous BAR Association.
Why? Ken actually tried to represent his client against the
kangaroo probate court. We can't have that!
Ken will join us for the first hour, at 7:45 pm CST
At issue is the theft of estates, the kidnapping, isolation and profiting from the abduction of seniors who committed the new
age crime of "aging with assets".
5:00 pm PST … 6:00 pm MST … 7:00 pm CST … 8:00 pm EST
LISTEN LIVE or listen to the archive later
Thursday, October 10, 2013
A Word About Attorney Ken Ditkowsky
Friday, October 11th at 11:00 a.m., Illinois Attorney Ken Ditkowsky will stand in front of the ARDC Review Board* in oral argument, defending himself against a four-year suspension of his law license for his involvement in the Mary G. Sykes unlawful guardianship case.
NASGA stands firmly with Attorney Ditkowsky, as we have all along. Attorney Ditkowsky is one of a dying breed of attorneys - those who chose and went in to the legal profession to help people in need instead of just to make a lot of money; a man who is outraged by injustice; and a champion and voice for the vulnerable.
We pray for justice at this hearing.
The world can't stand to lose an attorney like Ditkowsky; in fact, we need more like him!
*One Prudential Plaza
15th Floor
Chicago, IL
11:00 a.m.
NASGA stands firmly with Attorney Ditkowsky, as we have all along. Attorney Ditkowsky is one of a dying breed of attorneys - those who chose and went in to the legal profession to help people in need instead of just to make a lot of money; a man who is outraged by injustice; and a champion and voice for the vulnerable.
We pray for justice at this hearing.
The world can't stand to lose an attorney like Ditkowsky; in fact, we need more like him!
*One Prudential Plaza
15th Floor
Chicago, IL
11:00 a.m.
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Illinois judges seeking assistance at faster pace
SPRINGFIELD — The cocaine-induced death of a downstate Illinois judge in March and the arrest last month of a colleague on drug-related charges comes at a time when more attorneys than ever are seeking help for mental health issues and addiction problems.According to the most recent annual report of the Illinois Lawyers Assistance Program, which helps find treatment for attorneys, 299 new cases were opened during the most recent fiscal year, the most of any time in the agency's 32-year history.
Janet Piper Voss, executive director of the assistance program, attributes the increase to a rise in awareness of the program and an acceptance that treatment is a better option than hiding problems.
But, she said, judges often are a different breed.
"They are very concerned about letting anyone know there is a problem," Voss said. "And they tend to be more isolated in their work setting."
Joe Christ, 49, had been an associate judge in St. Clair County for less than a month before he died of a cocaine overdose in March. The Illinois State University graduate was a county prosecutor for nearly two decades before his elevation to the bench.
Christ's body was recovered at a hunting lodge in Pike County owned by the parents of St. Clair County Circuit Judge Michael Cook, 45, who has since been charged with possessing a weapon while using a controlled substance and misdemeanor possession of heroin.
According to a review of disciplinary action against judges at the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board, the behavior of the two men would be considered among the most egregious when compared to cases going back for decades.
Since 1973, there have been 82 cases filed against wayward judges by the inquiry board.
Of them, only one other judge was connected to a drug-related crime.
In October 1996, Cook County Associate Judge Frank Edwards was nabbed for transporting marijuana at an airport in Belize.
A review of inquiry board documents shows 12 judges have been penalized over the past 40 years for allegations of alcohol abuse. Of those, cases against five judges were filed in the past decade.
Other inquiry board findings center on issues ranging from the attempted use of judicial clout to the mistreatment of people in their courtrooms.
In 2006, for example, the board opened an inquiry into Logan County Associate Judge Donald Behle, who was accused of having dated a woman while presiding over her divorce and child custody case.
He also faced an allegation that he contacted a witness in a case in which he was the presiding judge.
The case was closed in 2007 after Behle resigned from office.
Among the highest-profile cases of the inquiry board was the 1997 censure of James Heiple, the chief justice of the Illinois Supreme Court.
Heiple was accused of trying to use his position to keep from being charged with a traffic violation.
But those cases affected judges who remained in office after they were investigated.
Once a judge leaves office, the inquiry board loses jurisdiction over the case. That means a judge accused of a drug-related crime might not be investigated by board.
"There could be others because they left (the job,)" said Kathy Twine, executive director of the Judicial Inquiry Board.
Former Sangamon County Associate Judge Philip Schickendanz serves as an example. He resigned in 1990 after being convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol and cocaine possession.
He eventually was stripped of his law license by a separate agency, the Illinois Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission.
Full Article and Source:
Illinois judges seeking assistance at faster pace
Thursday, May 23, 2013
Illinois Lawyer Faces 3-Year License Suspension
An attorney who questioned the integrity and fairness of
four judges should lose his law license for three years and until further court
order, a lawyer-discipline panel recommended.
The Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission
Hearing Board found 'Lanre O.Amu knowingly made false statements or statements
with reckless disregard for the truth.
The hearing board consisted of its chair, Debra J. Braselton (pictured at left), Andrea D. Rice and Donald D. Torisky, a non-lawyer. In
the matter of Lanre O. Amu, No. 2011 PR 00106.
Full Article and Source:
Lawyer Faces 3-Year License Suspension
See Also:
Information regarding 'Lanre O.Amu
The Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission
Hearing Board found 'Lanre O.Amu knowingly made false statements or statements
with reckless disregard for the truth.
"Given the respondent's lack of remorse, failure to
understand the wrongfulness of his misconduct and inclination to personalize
adverse rulings, we are concerned that he will be unable to conform his future
conduct to professional standards," the hearing board report says.
The ARDC administrator filed a four-count complaint against
Amu in December 2011 asserting that he made statements about the integrity of
four judges that were false or made with reckless disregard as to their truth
or falsity.
Amu represented clients in two personal-injury cases, a
medical-malpractice action and a legal-malpractice lawsuit. Those cases were
before then-Cook County Circuit Judges Francis J. Dolan and Thomas R. Chiola, along with Circuit Court Judges Lynn M. Egan and Irwin S. Solganick.
The four judges all made rulings adverse to Amu's clients.
Amu asserted that Dolan's ruling in a personal-injury case
barring all the plaintiff's witnesses was improper and attacked the judge's
integrity and fairness.
Amu, who represented himself before the hearing board,
testified that he "stands by [his] statements," and his statements
were 100 percent correct, the report says. Amu also called his statements
"courageous."
The ARDC administrator's office urged that Amu be disbarred.
The hearing board disagreed.
"While we recognize respondent's misconduct is serious
and deserving of substantial discipline, we do not believe disbarment, the
harshest possible sanction, would better advance the goals of the disciplinary
system," says the hearing board report, which was issued last week.
"We do, however, believe a three-year suspension is
necessary to impress upon respondent the wrongfulness of his misconduct and
deter future misconduct."
As for the suspension-until-further-court-order condition,
the report says, "We are confident this hurdle is necessary for respondent
because he continues to view his conduct as not only acceptable but necessary,
lacks remorse and has demonstrated throughout these disciplinary proceedings
that he will likely continue to engage in the same course of conduct whenever
he believes he has been treated unfairly."
Amu said the ARDC is "abusing its processes" and
he plans to file exceptions to the hearing board report with the ARDC Review
Board, an appellate tribunal.
"What they have done there is a miscarriage of
justice," he said. "I reject it completely."
ARDC Deputy Administrator James J. Grogan declined to comment about the hearing board
report.Full Article and Source:
Lawyer Faces 3-Year License Suspension
See Also:
Information regarding 'Lanre O.Amu
Labels:
Adoption,
ARDC,
Discipline,
Illinois,
Lawyer
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Probate Sharks: Some Thoughts on Illinois Attorney Ken Ditkowsky

Ken Ditkowsky is a modern John Brown who placed his life on the block to fight a "peculiar" institution called slavery.
Ken Ditkowsky is fighting a "peculiar" institution within the probate court system called legalized theft.
The similarities between the two men and their struggles are haunting. Brown's plan was a statement rather than a plan. Brown fought the might of the United States and the slave state of Virginia with 18 men; Ken Ditkowsky fights the powerful probate court and ARDC with his wits, skill and knowledge.
Even die hard abolitionists felt that Brown rocked the boat...until his off the cuff, spontaneous and eloquent 600 word speech denouncing slavery in the Virginia courtroom after he was sentenced to death.
I have faith that Ken Ditkowsky's eloquence will be heard and his mission will succeed. *
~ Lucius Verenus, Schoolmaster, ProbateSharks.com
*NASGA wholeheartedly agrees with our Shark collegues!
Source:
Some Thoughts on Ken Ditkowsky
See Also:
Northshore Live: Interview with Ken Ditkowsky
Saturday, September 22, 2012
Quincy lawyer Cashman disbarred by Illinois Supreme Court
A Quincy lawyer has been disbarred by the Illinois Supreme Court as a result of a complaint to the Illinois Attorney Registration and Discipline Commission.
Devin Cashman, 53, was disbarred on consent. Cashman had been licensed to practice in Illinois since November 1984 and is a partner in his own firm in Quincy.
According to a report posted on the ARDC website, Cashman "misappropriated funds from three clients, including the executors of two probate estates. He also presented a report to a count in one of the probate manners where he falsely stated that estate assets had been distributed to persons entitled to receive them under the decendent's (sic) will."
Peter Roskoff, chief of litigation for the ARDC, said Cashman will not be allowed to practice law in Illinois for at least three years from his disbarment date, which was Sept. 17.
"Reinstatement is not automatic," Roskoff said. "Most people who are disbarred are never reinstated."
The initial complaint against Cashman alleged that he took nearly $200,000 from a client trust bank account without authorization for personal ad business uses and that he didn't show up at a hearing concerning the allegations to make a sworn statement.
Full Article and Source:
Quincy lawyer Cashman disbarred by Illinois Supreme Court
Quincy lawyer Cashman disbarred by Illinois Supreme Court
Monday, September 10, 2012
Ken Ditkowsky on the ARDC Hearing
The second day of trial - by agreement with my direct testimony. Larry had a funeral, and the panel had expressed the fact that it was not going to allow him the time to attend the funeral. (his aunt - or some other close relative had died, and in Jewish tradition the funeral was required to be held within I believe 48 hours) As it would have been extremely difficult for me to conduct my own examination, Larry had to do it. Thus we were accommodated. The net was the fact that the morning was taken up by my examination. After Lunch it was Dr. Patel and Farenga. The last witness of the day was me - and my cross examination. Dr. Patel testified that he received a letter from me and he just put the letter in his file. He did nothing with it and never responded to it. Farenga was the next witness and after telling people that she received over 500 e-mails from me. (The number that she received was more probably less than fifty) she admitted that she never blocked a single e-mail or did anything to stop the flow. Indeed, she was so hungry to hear from me that she ran out and when to not only your blog but NASGA and others so that she could garner every golden word that I uttered. She then testified that 1) it is higly unusual for a GAL to still be in the picture after a appointment of a guardian, and 2) even though she was well aware that Carolyn was opening safety deposit boxes neither she nor Stern really cared and they ahve no idea what is in the box. She told the panel that her interest in the case and whether or not Mary was being railroaded so as to lose her liberty, her property, her civil rights and human rights was so intense that she never went to visit Mary! Carolyn brought Mary to Farenga's office so that Farenga could write a report.
Larry 'ate Farenga up." (What a disgusting way of putting that!) It was reported that after she left the stand she was crying as she left the ARDC proceeding.
My cross examination was memorable. The young male ARDC attorney repeatedly attempted to intimidate and brow beat me. He kept asking me if I was sorry for my action in reporting to law enforcement and others the violations of Mary and Gloria Sykes' rights. I informed him that I not only had a legal responsibility to do so, but as a human being I had a responsibility. Indeed, I said: As long as the Lord allows me to reside on earth and the stars and stripes flies over the United States of America I would fully and completely exercise my First Amendment Rights. He then asked me if I was repentant! I told him essentially that acting as my conscience required was an act that I was proud of and had no intention of repenting.
In final argument Ms. Black pointed out that my failure to be intimidated by the specter of the ARDC was grounds for disbarrment and I should be disbarred. My worst crime was not participating in the 'cover up' and therefore the public might discover that the appointment as 'court official' (i.e. Farenga, Stern, et al) was not an acknowledgment of 'sainthood' and that the 17 judges and the dozens who had to resign during Greylord was an anomaly and not business as usual. Speaking the truth about the 2nd oldest profession is clearly unethical.
The panel took the case under advisement.
~Ken Ditkowsky
http://www.ditkowskylawoffice.com/
An Eyewitness Account at the Attorney Ken Ditkowsky ARDC Hearing
Dear Scott,I understand your frustration at not being allowed to testify. BUT the fact is that Osorian had disallowed all testimony which he judged to be underlying the ARDC case. You were not allowed to be in the courtroom for most of this.
Nevertheless, the excellent cross examinations of Ken and of Larry Hyman of the ARDC witnesses caused the three lawyers/guardians Schmiedlel, Stern and Farenga to admit that they were guilty of failure to exercise any of their powers to protect Mary. Farenga even had to admit that she had only seen Mary in her office, because Naperville was too far for her to travel to and Adam lived closer. Farenga and Stern admitted that they were not present when Carolyn had the safety deposit box drilled, so that they had not protected Mary's potential interest against Carolyn, even though they knew that Mary had initially accused Carolyn in her initial action of stealing $4000. Farenga admitted that most guardianships end after a few months and do not continue with no pay for three years and five months. In the cross examinations it was brought out that Schmiedel knew that the Lumberman suit was against Gloria only and Mary had no part in it. Stern made numerous factual admissions which showed that he was not acting in Mary's interest at all. But most important was that the arrogance of Mr. Apostel (or whatever his name was) allowed Ken to bring in just about everything that Torosian had previously disallowed!!! The result was that Ken got to make his closing statement during the redirect questioning of him as the adverse witness, and THEN Larry was able to make his own closing statement that the three : Schmiedel, Stern and Farenga, could have merely blocked all Ken's emails FOR ALL THE USE they made of them to investigate anything whatsoever. The implication was that their discomfort was clearly the result of their inaction and time wasting. Their witness, Dr. Patel, clearly indicated that he, an ordinary family physician, did NOT see anything in Ken's letter that he thought required him to take action; thus, the letter did not in fact contain anything implying that it was mandatory no matter how the guardians, the attorney for Carolyn Toerpe, OR the ARDC wanted to parse it. Only persons who were looking for trouble could even imagine that there was trouble.
In the meantime, even Orosian, seeing my demeanor, had to see that Apostel was doing his best to drive Ken into a stroke. I saw him take immediate though subtle action, once he saw how distressed I genuinely was (I got up and gave Larry a note, and I suspect that I was pale and possible shaking) and Ken's color all too slowly did go back to normal. I do not think Osorian wanted 911 ambulances or a corpse in his hearing room. He and Hilliken could see that Ms. Black was wagging her fanny at them and emphasizing her bosom to Apostel every time she consulted with Apostel. These hearing officers, and hearing officer Mrs. Williams could see Ms. Black rolling her eyes and making faces like a pre-teen. Both men doubtless have much prettier and younger females whose shoes (with six inch heels) fit doing the same in their offices all day long and are not in need of or in awe of her attempted stimulations. Ms. Williams probably had my reactions to Ms. Black's activities.
Until much after the hearing, I was under the false impression that the three hearing officers were employees of the Supreme Court of the State of Illinois. In fact, they are pro-bono lawyers from big firms -- at least the two men are from large and probably national law firms and I missed which firm Ms. Williams is employed by, frankly, because I thought these were the activities that qualified them for a paying job as hearing officers, not their current affiliations. Taurig-Greenberg, of course, represents many politicos, including, in the past Abamoff, and all of the Indian tribes he was setting against each other. I think it might have been involved with either Rezko or Cellini but I have not researched that. Nevertheless, if you noticed, the men's suits did not come off the sale rack at TJMaxx, Cosco, J.C.Penney, or the like. Hilliken's tonsure probably cost what Romney's, Clinton's, Kerry's did. These are the kind of people who CONSTANTLY have to guard their own personal assets against their own financial managers, their former wives, their former trophy wives, their feuding step-children -- and there have been plenty of well publicized cases in the last few years of heirs and heiresses and other business titans who have been dispossessed by family members. Also, they also probably have to appear occasionally in court, and certainly have to manage the way their cases are run. If THEY THEMSELVES happen to guess wrong as to which political or economic powerhouse to displease, they could also be hauled before the ARDC. Maybe they were not favorably impressed by a twenty eight year old twerp almost pornographically rhapsodizing about the "Disciplinary" powers he had been granted. You and I don't know anything about the fond family relations that may OR MAY NOT exist in hearing officer Williams' family, or what depredations her immediate or extended family might have suffered in the recent or more distant past from over-reaching governmental agencies.
So, until they make their finding, which could be tomorrow but is more likely to be six months or a year distant, we do not know what they are going to do. We do know that in theory, this was not a trial of the ARDC; the hearing officers, however, do have the power to make a finding in which they denote that they expected not to have to use the second day of the hearing at all, and were reserving it only for emergency purposes. Instead they were forced to listen to the Administrator attorneys wasting their time pretending that an investigation of someone accused of miscreant behavior was properly made by asking them under oath whether they were miscreants for hour after hour, whether they were forced to listen to the administrators' lawyers reading to them as if they illiterate after they had been told not to, whether they thought that it was appropriate for Ken's arrival ten minutes late on Thursday would be mentioned when they (the hearing officers) themselves did not enter the courtroom until 9:40 AM on Friday, and when Black was herself late several times after breaks (when there were no possible issues of traffic or holdups at the front desk). They may well have noticed that hours were spent detailing a sanctions motion which was declared a non-entity by an appeals court, and they could mention that. The superiors of Black and Apostel (or whatever his name is) had OFFICIAL eyes and ears in that courtroom as well, such as the lady in purple in the desk behind me, the security guard and even the court reporter.
In short, your support was much appreciated. Both Ken and Larry are experienced courtroom lawyers. Drew Peterson was convicted by the fact that Brodsky and his cohort over-reached and allowed in testimony which totally incriminated their witness beyond a reasonable doubt to the one person who took the attitude you or I as a juror would take when faced with a defendant already adjusted guilty by the 11 other jurors -- the defendant MUST be guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. I did take that position in the one jury trial I was a juror in, which cost eleven other people, many of whom made little more than minimum wage, two days work instead of only a day's work for the pittance of seventeen dollars a day... and they were very gracious about that because they too wanted to be sure they were doing justice). When Ken and Larry decided that the case had been made by the unforced errors of their opponents, they did not continue the game and take a chance that they might make forced or unforced errors. They made points by ending early (a 20 minute instead of a 30 minute closing statement) and that donkey Apostel surely lost even more points by taking advantage of Osorian's invitation to use up a few of those ten minutes.
So if the panel is straight, they had all the evidence they needed that the proceeding was a waste of time and money. If they are not straight, no facts would change their minds!
~Judy Ditkowsky
For more information on the Ken Ditkowsky/ARDC hearing:
ProbateSharks
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






