The Fortress: Protected by Secrecy and Ageism

by Gretchen Rachel Hammond
Part five of five
At the Oakland County Probate Court, relationships between the four judges as well as those between the judges and the attorneys who work in their courtrooms are not simply limited to judicial campaigns. They have a history that is not always on the surface.

Judge Jennifer Callaghan

Judge Jennifer Callaghan, who began her career as an Assistant Attorney General, was hired by Oakland County Public Administrator John Yun in 2010 as an associate attorney and regularly took guardianship and conservatorship cases at the Oakland County Probate Court. When Callaghan ran for Oakland County Probate Judge in November 2016, Yun’s office served as her campaign headquarters, where she received almost $160,000 in contributions.

Oakland County Probate Chief Judge Kathleen Ryan, retiring probate judge Elizabeth Pezzetti, and Judges Linda S. Hallmark and Daniel A. O’Brien attended as “Honored Guests.” Ultimately, Callaghan won with 68 percent of the vote.

Callaghan’s husband Sean is an FBI agent serving in the Detroit office.

Her Judicial Staff Attorney Christine A. Waid used to work for former Oakland County Public Administrator Jon Munger. His firm’s email address is still listed on her profile at the State Bar of Michigan (SBM) and her name is included an attorney with the firm listed as a defendant in a 2016 lawsuit.

Jon B. Munger

Yun and former Oakland County Public Administrator Jon B. Munger worked out of the same address on Gateway Park Drive in Clarkston, Michigan, before Munger relocated his Munger & Associates headquarters half a mile down the street. While Callaghan recuses herself as judge in Yun cases, Munger regularly appears in front of her.

The ongoing deceased estate hearings concerning musician and civil rights activist Aretha Franklin, who passed away in August 2018 without leaving a will, is presided over by Callaghan.

As he is presently the guardian to Franklin’s eldest son, Clarence, Munger is an interested party in the case.

Judge Linda S. Hallmark was appointed as Oakland County Probate Court Judge in 1997 by then–Governor John Engler (R) after spending three years in private practice at May’s then–law firm May & May, PC. She has been unopposed since taking the bench.

May has donated not only to judicial campaigns, but to individuals running for Michigan’s House and Senate.  ...

Civil Death for the Developmentally Disabled
According to a March 2018 report released by the National Council on Disabilities, an estimated 1.3 million Americans with disabilities have been directly impacted by guardianship. [Dohn] Hoyle asserts that 73 percent of Michigan’s developmentally disabled population are under some form of guardianship.

Dohn Hoyle

We have kind of a mill,” he says. “The issue isn’t one of a blindfolded lady justice deciding upon whether they need one or not. It’s automatically assumed. The system continues to portray the necessity of guardianship.”

In its report, the Council took the system to task.

“It has often been noted that an individual subject to guardianship moves through the world indistinguishable from the rest of the population,” the report noted, “except that he or she has undergone a kind of civil death and is no longer permitted to participate in society without mediation through the actions of another if at all.”

The report’s key findings stated that “people with disabilities are widely (and erroneously) seen as less capable of making autonomous decisions than other adults regardless of the actual impact of their disability on their cognitive or decision-making abilities. This can lead to guardianship petitions being filed when it is not appropriate and to guardianship being imposed when it is not warranted by the facts and circumstances.”

“Prisoners have more rights than people under guardianship,” Hoyle says. “I don’t think people recognize that, they ignore it or don’t pay attention to it. So, probate judges are able to continue what they’ve always done, which is not to the benefit of the people who are given guardians.” 

Full Article and Source:
The Fortress: Part Five of Five: Protected by Secrecy and Ageism

Rethinking Guardianship: Facilitating Life-Long Self-Determination, Part 2

Source: Rethinking Guardianship: Facilitating Life-Long Self-Determination, Part 2 of 2

Rethinking Guardianship: Facilitating Life-Long Self-Determination

(Part 1 of 2) with Dohn Hoyle, Executive Director of The Arc Michigan.
Source:
Rethinking Guardianship: Facilitating Life-Long Self Determination, Part 1 of 2

Boomers Against Elder Abuse: Letter to Mr. Jim Jackson

 

Dear Mr. Jackson*-- I am a national advocate for vulnerable adults and elders under guardianship. My Facebook Page, Boomers Against Elder Abuse, which researches this subject has 61,000 followers This page was started here in New Mexico. As you know, news is breaking all over the nation about severe financial abuse by guardians and conservators who are not adequately supervised by experts outside the court.

I attended the International Congress on Adult Guardianship in Washington D.C. in May, and would like our New Mexico task force on guardianship to consider reforms in legislation that would improve the situation in our state. Highlights of reform include: Michigan is reinforcing rights of wards, requiring courts to specifically state the exact powers of the guardian/conservator. All other ward rights are retained. "Best interest" can't override these without a court order. In California ward's rights to visitation, mail, and phone calls have been bolstered as well.

The head of Michigan's Arc, Dohn Hoyle, suggests that guardianship/conservatorship works against the safety the ward. He feels that the idea of protecting an elder or vulnerable adult by removing the fundamental rights that serve as their protection is fundamentally flawed. Limited guardianships only are allowed in Germany, and wards do not lose legal capacity to properly defend themselves. In Hong Kong, only $12,000 per month can be removed from a guardianship account in order to protect the ward's assets. Limited guardianships are insisted upon as first priority.

Supportive decision-making with a circle of support is being considered as a future option among many reformers. Treating a ward like a child, with the guardian acting as a parent of a child is no longer acceptable in the 21st century. Persons with Disabilities and Disabled Elders need to be treated as integrated members of society, not separated from the world around them by social discrimination, restriction, and loss of quality of life. This, unfortunately is the case for many wards in our state. I became interested in this topic when a friend of mine was put under guardianship and charged perhaps as much as 1 million a year for "services." Heirs are not allowed an audit of where and how the ward's money was spent, and the records are sequestered.

Illinois is proposing that clear and convincing concrete proof be required to remove previously assigned P.O.A. and Health Directives. My friend had all of his documents in place, and they were quickly tossed out the window. Too often these documents are rescinded by the court without concrete evidence of mis-management or wrong-doing. Often the elder's wishes when expressed while having capacity are completely ignored, as was the case with my friend. This is true throughout the nation. If P.O.A.'s were respected and not allowed simply to be tossed without question, this would reduce the number of guardianships/conservatorships in our state.

When it comes to wards with substantial assets, a small number of wealthy families in New Mexico are claiming that 50 million dollars is missing from their parents' estates after conservatorship. They aren't allowed to hire outside accountants to review the records which are also sequestered by the courts. With no one outside the court carefully examining guardianship accounts, even though there are honorable conservators and guardians, the laws basically, as reformers see it, encourage unmonitored theft by family guardians and professional guardians. With the laws as they are, theft can too easily be covered up, and severe conflicts of interest exist in the courtroom setting.

Some families are forced to sign confidentiality agreements to receive inheritances, and there is no attention to any of these malpractices by law enforcement which claims that guardianship and conservatorship theft is a civil matter. It's not. It's potentially criminal, which can only be ascertained by thorough investigation, which is obviously no possible due to the egregiously insulated, cozy, closed system. The very nature of the conflicts of interest and secretive nature of the guardianship court proceedings in our state looks very suspect to the public. This perception will only grow as publicity of practices increases, which is occurring everywhere. We need to act proactively to protect the reputations of those who are honorable in these professions, and to weed out those who are not. Only stronger enforcements will do that.

In Palm Beach, guardianship fraud is so rampant that the state has given all county clerks throughout the state the independent authority to subpoena records for three levels of audits depending on each case brought to their attention.. A guardianship fraud hotline was established in Palm Beach due to the severity of complaints.

We need a mechanism here for complaints because there is no recourse for investigation into the practices of conservators and the fees charged by guardians and their employees. Heirs have no recourse under our system, and even though an elder's money does not belong to heirs during an elder's lifetime (and some families seem to forget that) those assets should be for use by the elder. However, most of these assets are diverted to often unwanted "services" that are truly suspect.

One million dollars per year for one person's care, for example, with no proper auditing outside the courtroom where these charges are considered fine, is outrageous and obviously not in an elder's best interest. Elders have spent a lifetime accumulating legacies to pass along for generations to come. It is not in any elder's best interest to have everything they have worked for depleted mercilessly by total strangers, who often isolate and medicate the ward beyond recognition. I have seen this behavior personally, and in any other arena, these practices would be considered financial, emotional, and physical elder abuse.

My Facebook page on this topic is gravely concerned with the rights of elders as Boomers approach old age. Too many abuses are occurring under the guise of protection. This needs serious attention in our state. Since stories in the press are breaking out at a steady clip, around the nation, it's only a matter of time before the industry here is put under scrutiny. 12 family members of victims have confided in me, and the abuses they have suffered are immeasurable.

I appeal to you, as having been in the forefront of guardianship/conservatorship reform in our state, to see to it that elders who choose to retire here in our state are safe. I hope that the work of the task force on guardianship will continue to examine these problems. I also strongly believe that efforts towards reform must include elder advocates who have studied reforms in other states and countries. We want to be part of the solution. Right now, as outsiders, all we can do is point out the problems.

Thank you--

Marcia Southwick
Boomers Against Elder Abuse

*Mr. Jim Jackson is Director of Disability Rights and a member of the NM 2013 Legislative Task Force on Guardianship