Showing posts with label attorney discipline cases. Show all posts
Showing posts with label attorney discipline cases. Show all posts

Friday, July 29, 2022

California Bar wants to get 'proactive' in attorney discipline cases

by Karen Sloan


(Reuters) - Leaders of the State Bar of California said Monday that they have implemented changes to the Office of Chief Trial Counsel, which investigates and prosecutes attorney disciplinary matters, with more reforms on the way.

Those efforts include increasing staff, including the addition of a full-time administrator and a forensic auditor, and increasing pay for outside lawyers hired to investigate attorney complaints.

The office is also rolling out new ways to proactively identify potential lawyer misconduct instead of relying solely on complaints, officials added at a press conference highlighting the changes.

The bar will seek to identify attorney misconduct risk factors, then provide support for lawyers before they get into trouble, said state bar executive director Leah Wilson.

“This move into proactive regulation is new for the bar,” she said. But she and other bar leaders acknowledged that it will take more than minor changes to rebuild public trust in their organization.

Each state is responsible for regulating lawyer conduct. California has the second-largest population of lawyers behind New York, and its disciplinary system has been beset by years of critical audits and high-profile scandals, in particular surrounding the downfall of prominent plaintiffs’ lawyer Tom Girardi.

Girardi, who is accused by a rival law firm of using settlement funds meant for the families of victims of the 2018 Lion Air crash to fund a lavish lifestyle, was the subject of numerous complaints over the past four decades, but the bar allowed him to keep his license. The bar ordered an outside investigation of its handling of complaints against Girardi, who was disbarred in June.

State audits have for years raised red flags about delays in attorney misconduct investigations, case backlogs and low rates of discipline. The latest audit found that the bar too often resolves allegations of lawyer misconduct behind closed doors and does not consistently address conflicts of interest with lawyers who come under investigation.

Bar leaders said Monday that they are implementing the audit’s recommendations for improvements. They also said they are looking to address racial disparities in attorney discipline, as well as the perception that the bar is reluctant to pursue disciplinary charges against lawyers at large firms.

“While we have done much, let me be clear. We have more work to do” to reform the disciplinary system, Ruben Duran, chair of the bar's board of trustees, said Monday.

Full Article & Source:

Wednesday, April 10, 2019

One lawyer used client funds for Heat tickets, another was in a $3.25M scam. Then, trouble

The South Florida lawyers on the Florida Bar’s monthly discipline report include a convicted fraudster, both name partners of one law firm and an attorney who seems to have trouble putting things in writing.
Though the last two discipline reports from the Florida Bar included a relatively light combined total of 19 attorneys combined, the stories behind the disbarments and suspensions have a little more weight.

There’s at least over $1 million in “misappropriated funds,” some of which went to Heat tickets. Lawyers victimized by fraud and lawyers who participated in fraud. And attorneys who took the money and, if not ran, disappeared, at least professionally.

So, below in Part 1 are the alphabetical first 10 of the 19. The remaining nine will be in Part 2, which will post Monday.

Golden Beach attorney Jeremy Alters, admitted 1997 out of UM School of Law, jumped in the deep end of trouble over improper transfers from Alters, Boldt, Brown, Rash and Culmo’s trust account to the operating account.

The Bar alleged that forty-nine such transfers occurred, totaling approximately $2,051,474.32, between September 2009 and December 2010. The Court approved the Bar’s Petition for Emergency Suspension and suspended Alters from the practice of law on December 28, 2011.

The Referee found that Alters should be reinstated because there was “no basis to conclude that Alters had made or authorized the improper transfers, and that no clients had been injured by the improper transfers.”

When the Florida Supreme Court reinstated Alters in January 2012, the Bar filed another complaint alleging Alters violated six Bar rules regarding the transfers. The Referee opined that Alters not be further sanctioned, but that he pay the Bar’s administrative costs ($1,250) while the Bar pays Alters’ legal defense costs ($143,913.35).

The Bar challenged everything in the Referee’s Report but the ink and asked the State Supreme Court to disbar Alters.

The Court found the Referee improperly excluded evidence that Alters lied about his personal tax status and called the Referee’s Report “inadequate.” Not only did the Court find the Referee came to “only the most basic conclusions from the summarized testimony, and oftentimes has failed to make any findings regarding undisputed evidence in the case,” but noted the findings of fact were only four pages of the 71-page report.

“It is inconceivable that the facts of such a complicated case, which has taken years to litigate and the record of which spans thousands of pages, could be reduced to four pages.”

The Court ultimately found that Alters misappropriated client funds and “must be disbarred.”

The Bar’s auditor testified at the final hearing before the Referee that in addition to funds slid straight to Alters, he used trust fund money to cover firm expenses and overdrafts and personal expenses. Among those personal expenses: Miami Heat tickets.

Orlando’s Elizabeth Anderson, a Stetson Law School graduate admitted in 2003, Stetson, has been suspended since Nov. 7 for trust account shortages of $160,000, most of which were in two accounts.

A bar audit found a shortage of $37,000 in the trust account at Seaside Bank that The Anderson Law Group used for matters involving Stoneybrook West Master Association.

“During her sworn statement on August 1, 2018, respondent admitted to the shortage in her Seaside trust account and stated that she would not have been able to pay the balances she owed to Stoneybrook without obtaining either the loan from her parents or using funds from her retirement account.”

The Bar’s audit also revealed that there was a shortage of at least $122,330.62 in another trust account at Fairwinds Credit Union.

From this account, the Bar says in its Petition for Emergency Suspension, she used settlement funds for a client to office rent, rent, herself, American Express, and Florida Lawyers Mutual.
John Borland of Ocala started his suspension Dec. 28, but seems like he suspended his law career well before that. The Bar says Borland abandoned his law practice, client files, fell behind in his Bar fees and continuing legal education credits and then ignored Bar inquiries about all this. The Florida Coastal School of Law had been a Bar member since 2006.
John Borland.jpg
John Borland The Florida Bar
Aldo Busot of Coral Gables has been disbarred. In handling a suit to collect a promissory note, Busot neglected his duties, missed deadlines and kept his client ignorant of the case’s progression. She learned he filed for voluntary dismissal from a friend. Busot was suspended for three years on April 19.

When Busot didn’t submit an affidavit with the clients, tribunals and opposing lawyers notified of his suspension and the names and addresses of people and businesses that got a copy of his suspension order, the Cal Berkeley School of Law graduate was found in contempt and disbarred. He’d been a member since 1987.

West Palm Beach attorney Richard Carey, a Bar member since 2009 out of the University of Pittsburgh’s law school, served a 10-day suspension in December. According to Carey’s guilty plea, non-lawyers at his Pinnacle Land and Title handled a real estate sale that involved a fraudulent court order. Carey said he was on vacation at the time. He tried to rectify matters upon hearing of the problem and eventually reached a settlement with the harmed party.

Miami’s Robert Dixon’s 90-day suspension in May for mishandling his trust account and suffering a shortage in trust funds required he produce trust account records from July 2015 to the present. The University of Florida School of Law graduate, a Bar member since 2006, needed to do this by June 24. Dixon came across with records June 25 that the Bar’s auditor found a day late and several dollars short of accuracy — checks that had cleared listed as outstanding, deposits that had cleared listed as not having cleared. For this failure, Dixon received a public reprimand.

John Eagen of Tallahassee, a Florida State law school man and Bar member since 1990, served a 30-days suspension that ended Jan. 7. Eagen continued to represent a defendant in Volusia County in January 2017 despite being ineligible to practice law. This got revealed after he failed to show up for a scheduled hearing and didn’t tell the judge of his status, even as the judge asked repeatedly over the phone, “Is there anything else you want to tell me?”

Eagen was ineligible because he was delinquent paying $2,500 restitution from a previous Bar discipline case involving how he charged a client.

Peter Fellows of Miami has been disbarred for a conflict of interest in a case involving his baby’s mother and, in a separate matter, lying to Bar investigators. Fellows cases were detailed in this Miami Herald story.

Full Article & Source:
One lawyer used client funds for Heat tickets, another was in a $3.25M scam. Then, trouble

Sunday, May 20, 2018

16 Florida lawyers face wrath of Orlando judges over 'vague, boilerplate' ADA lawsuits

Federal judges in Orlando say they want to know why 16 attorneys have repeatedly ignored rules about filing lawsuits over wheelchair access to businesses in Central Florida.

And they are asking for ideas on how to discipline those attorneys. U.S. District Judge Roy B. Dalton recently opened a case ordering the 16 lawyers – mostly from the Miami area – to show why they shouldn’t be fined or banned from filing similar cases in the future.

Hundreds of lawsuits have been filed in Orlando federal courts alleging that local businesses violate the Americans with Disabilities Act – by not having wheelchair ramps or wheelchair accessible bathrooms, for example. Many of the attorneys filing such cases previously did the same in South Florida federal courts.

The lawsuits most often settle after businesses make a payment, and sometimes they agree to make changes to their facilities, but business owners have said the feel like they’re been extorted.

One of the attorneys in question, Thomas B. Bacon of Cooper City, ran a law firm that employed several attorneys on the list. The Sun-Sentinel newspaper wrote about him in 2014. He told the newspaper then that “the only people who enforce the ADA are these few plaintiffs and their attorneys."

But the paper also quoted a Delray Beach code enforcement officer saying that the lawsuits are purely a money-maker and the attorneys are not concerned about compliance.

Bacon couldn’t be reached for comment for this article. His phone number on the Florida Bar’s website was disconnected, and the email address he listed bounced back.

The Orlando judges who are handling the discipline case said they have tried to be patient and inform the attorneys about how to proceed, but they’ve become frustrated.

“Also disturbing is Counsel's repeated filing of vague, boiler-plate complaints — often improperly joining multiple defendants — that fail to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,” wrote U.S. Magistrate Judge Daniel Irick, who is handling the matter.

Two of the attorneys involved responded to the Orlando Sentinel’s questions, Joshua Sheskin and Rafael Viego. Both said they had gone to work for law firms doing ADA cases, and were overwhelmed by the number of cases the firms tried to assign to them. Both said they quit as soon as they could.

According to the judges’ order, more than 200 “negative” orders have been filed against the 16 attorneys. Following is a list of the attorneys with the most negative orders, according to the case:

Thomas B. Bacon, Cooper City, 61 negative orders; Philip M. Cullen, III, Fort Lauderdale, 31 negative orders; Fort Lauderdale; Aaron Finesilver, Miami, 23 negative orders; Miami; Christine N. Failey, St. Petersburg, 7 negative orders; St. Petersburg; Barry S. Mittelberg, Coral Springs, 2 negative orders; Coral Springs; Ayesa Conger, Cutler Bay, 61 negative orders; Cutler Bay; Eric Matthew Rodriguez, Hollywood, 65 negative orders; Hollywood; Sheskin, Miami, 83 negative orders; Miami; Mario Elias Lopez, Miami, 63 negative orders; Miami; Viego, Miami, 56 negative orders; Nadine A. Brown, Winter Springs, 5 negative orders; Andrew C. Enfield, Miami, 7 negative orders; William T. Leveille, II, Miami, 23 negative orders; Michael Christine, Miami, 8 negative orders; Anthony J. Perez, Miami, 54 negative orders; Alfredo Miguel Garcia-Menocal, Miami, 35 negative orders.

Full Article & Source:
16 Florida lawyers face wrath of Orlando judges over 'vague, boilerplate' ADA lawsuits