Monday, July 25, 2022

'She is at risk of outliving her savings': My mother, 100, was tricked into deeding her home to my brother. How can I persuade him to give her financial support?

By Quentin Fottrell

'What course of action can she take to make sure her final days are spent peacefully in a dignified home, with the caregiving help she has been used to?'

Dear Quentin,

Several years ago, our father died and left a fully paid house to our mother because he knew she would be needing some financial support in her later years. Unfortunately, a few years ago our older brother tricked our mother into deeding the house to him.

Our mother is almost 100 years old, and she is living in an assisted-living residence and at risk of outliving her savings. The financial assistance that our father had planned for her is in our brother's hands.

What can she do to make sure her son provides the financial support that her husband had planned for her all along? What course of action can she take to make sure her final days are spent peacefully in a dignified home, with the caregiving help she has been used to?

Concerned Child

Dear Concerned,

This column is replete with letters of financial malfeasance involving elderly relatives. It's all too common. Vulnerable people are often targets for financial exploitation, and unfortunately their abusers are often someone they know and trust, such as a friend or even a close family member.

The Department of Justice defines financial or property exploitation as "illegal or improper use of an elderly or adult with a disability's money, property, or other resources for monetary or personal benefit, profit or gain."

"This includes, but is not limited to, theft, misappropriation, concealment, misuse or fraudulent deprivation of money or property belonging to the elderly or adult with a disability," the Justice Department adds. In this case, elderly is defined as anyone aged 60 years or older.

Statutes of limitations vary by state, so the earlier you take action the better. In California, for instance, the statute of limitations for elder financial abuse "is generally four years from when the plaintiff discovered or should have discovered the abuse," the Velasco Law Group says.

But if the financial abuse is "current and ongoing," there is no statute of limitations in California on elderly financial abuse. Of course, even if there were evidence of abuse, it could take years -- and your mother, at age 100, likely will not have time to pursue and win such a case.

Patricia Tobin, a certified elder law attorney based in San Rafael, Calif., and fellow of the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys, recommends checking the elder-law section of your local county bar association for a referral and/or the National Academy of Elder Law Attorneys.

Assuming that your brother will not take out a home-equity credit line or use rental income from the house, Tobin said a lawsuit would likely be onerous. "Such an action may not be supported by the facts of the situation, and could be very hard to win, and create a long burdensome project, with only limited chance of success."

Generally, when someone transfers the deed of their home, it's a done deal. It's one of those irrevocable acts that can come back to haunt the former homeowner. (Exhibit A: "I quit-claimed my house to my most responsible son. Now he has blocked my calls.")

Roughly 35% of adults say there's a 50% chance or more of them outliving their savings, while the same percentage says it's more likely their savings will last; 18% say they don't know. Other surveys say more than half of people believe they'll outlive their retirement savings.

A quarter of 65-year-old Americans will have "severe need" for long-term care at home or in an assisted-living facility, this report released last year by the Center for Retirement Research found. That includes bathing and eating, and/or grocery shopping and cooking.

Even if the truth lay somewhere in between, the prospect of outliving retirement savings -- especially when there are assisted-living expenses to be paid -- is a challenge faced by millions of elderly Americans and their families who may struggle to help support them.

Given that the house is paid off free and clear, I suggest that you meet with your brother face to face, tell him that you wish to discuss your mother's care, and ask him to consider refinancing or providing funds in lieu of refinancing. No texts or emails.

If appealing to his best nature does not work -- assuming he has a "best nature" -- you could, as a last resort, use the manner in which your mother transferred the deed to him as leverage. Ultimately, however, you may have to rely on Medicaid to supplement your mother's needs.

"To be eligible for Medicaid, one cannot have assets greater than the limit," the American Council on Aging says. "Medicaid's look-back period is meant to prevent Medicaid applicants from giving away assets or selling them under fair market value to meet Medicaid's asset limit."

In 49 U.S. states and Washington, D.C., the look-back period is 60 months; in California, it's 30 months. If a Medicaid beneficiary inherits money "and gives all (or some) of the money away, they are in violation of the look back rule," the American Council on Aging adds.

I wish you the best of luck in taking care of your mother and finding a suitable path forward. There are no easy answers, especially when the one person in the family with the means to help the relative in question lives in a different moral universe.

Check out the Moneyist private Facebook group, where we look for answers to life's thorniest money issues. Readers write in to me with all sorts of dilemmas. Post your questions, tell me what you want to know more about, or weigh in on the latest Moneyist columns.

The Moneyist regrets he cannot reply to questions individually.

Full Article & Source:

Sunday, July 24, 2022

Witnesses Sought in Daytime Attack on Elderly Woman


by Dionne Waugh, Police PIO,

Boulder Police detectives are looking for witnesses to a violent attack that occurred on the city’s bike path at Central Park yesterday afternoon.

At approximately 12:45 p.m. on July 21, a couple visiting from out of state was walking on the bike path near the 1700 block of 13th Street when a man walked up and attacked the woman unprovoked.

The suspect grabbed the 75-year-old woman by her hair and threw her to the ground. Passersby pulled the suspect off the victim and detained him until officers arrived.

The suspect has been identified as James Moore, 24, who has no known ties to Boulder and no local address. Moore was taken to the hospital for a medical hold and issued a felony summons for assault on an at-risk adult due to the age of the victim.

Anyone who witnessed any part of this crime or has information related to this investigation is asked to call Detective S. Ramos at 303-441-3323 reference case 22-06932. Those who have information but wish to remain anonymous may contact the Northern Colorado Crime Stoppers at 1-800-222-TIPS (8477). Tips may also be submitted through the Crime Stoppers website at https://nococrimestoppers.com/

As in every criminal case, these charges are an accusation, and the defendant is presumed innocent unless or until proven guilty.

Full Article & Source:

Former Howell attorney disbarred after panel investigates allegations

by Sophia Lada

Garry Flanary, right, sits with his attorney Stephen LaCommare, left, in a hearing on Oct. 22, 2020.  Kayla Daugherty

Former Howell attorney Stephen LaCommare has been disbarred after the Michigan Attorney Discipline Board reviewed a misconduct case in which he previously had been suspended.

The nine-member panel, at the request of the grievance administrator, conducted a review June 15 of the attorney's two-year suspension. LaCommare did not file a response to the petition for review, nor did he show up to the review hearing. Seven of the board members supported increasing the penalty to disbarment, two recused themselves.

LaCommare did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment.

The panel found that LaCommare failed to represent his clients in a timely manner, and failed to keep them informed about the status of their legal requests. He also failed to protect his clients' interests and did not refund advanced payment of legal fees. 

The panel also found that he misappropriated funds from Interest on Lawyers Trust Accounts, using them for personal expenses. The two counts are the "most serious allegations," according to a document from the Michigan Attorney Discipline Board.

"Therefore, even when a lawyer has had a long and unblemished career, the lack of disciplinary record will not mitigate the sanction when the offense is very serious, such as, for example, conversion of client funds," the board wrote in its decision filed July 7.

The disbarment was retroactive to Nov. 16, 2021, the date LaCommare initially received a temporary suspension. LaCommare also did not show up for a hearing on the complaint on Nov. 1 that year.

In April this year, the panel extended LaCommare's suspension to two years, retroactive to Nov. 16, 2021. The panel said "that respondent committed professional misconduct, as charged in a six-count formal complaint, in his representation of four separate clients in their various legal matters; misused his IOLTA account; failed to timely answer one request for investigation and completely failed to answer two additional requests for investigation."

The panel also ordered him to pay $4,250 in restitution — $750 to one client and $3,500 to another — and an additional $2,262 in costs. He also was assessed $97 for the case review in June. The discipline board documents do not indicate whether he has paid any of the fees.

LaCommare was accused of scamming several Livingston County residents and businesses by taking their money and not providing legal services in 2018 and 2019.

Kizer Law Firm, where LaCommare worked, also fell victim to his fraudulent activity as LaCommare misappropriated funds from the firm.

LaCommare graduated from the Michigan State University-Detroit College of Law in 1995. He went on to work as an assistant prosecutor in the Livingston County Prosecutor's Office until 1999, when he moved to Boston to join a civil law firm.

He moved back to Michigan and started working for the Kizer Law Firm in 2002.

Full Article & Source:

Two arrested in connection with scam targeting elderly Northwest Alabama woman

Isaia Hernandez, 56, and Presley Martinez, 36, were arrested and charged with first-degree financial exploitation of the elderly. (Photo courtesy Florence Police)

by: Bobby Stilwell

FLORENCE, Ala. (WHNT) – Florence Police said two Florida residents have been arrested in connection with a scam targeting an elderly woman.

FPD said detectives were informed that a 71-year-old woman was contacted by somebody claiming to be from the FBI. The “FBI” told her that her bank accounts were compromised and that she needed to withdraw a large amount of cash.

After she had the money, she was told to meet the “FBI” in person. FPD detectives followed the victim and kept an eye on the exchange. Around 12:30 p.m. Thursday, local and federal authorities stopped a vehicle of interest in the case outside a Florence Blvd. business.

Isaia Hernandez, 56, and Presley Martinez, 36, were arrested and charged with first-degree financial exploitation of the elderly. Bond was set at $30,000 apiece.

As of Friday morning, police said a hearing was pending to revoke those bonds. In addition to the vehicle, a Muscle Shoals hotel room was searched; a firearm was recovered from the room.

FPD reminded the public that law enforcement will never call asking for somebody to pay fines with cash or a gift card, or ask for personal information over the phone. Anyone concerned that a call from law enforcement is a scam should hang up and call the law enforcement agency directly through posted phone numbers.

Full Article & Source:

Saturday, July 23, 2022

Artist Peter Max’s Daughter Sues N.Y. Judge Over Guardian Talks

Pop artist Peter Max poses in his New York studio on June 18, 2012 with seven portraits he created of Sir Paul McCartney to commemorate McCartney's 70th birthday.
TIMOTHY A. CLARY/AFP via Getty Images

 by Holly Barker

COURT: S.D.N.Y
TRACK DOCKET:1:22-cv-06156

Artist Peter Max’s daughter, Libra Max, has filed a lawsuit against Deborah Kaplan, Deputy Chief Administrative Judge for the New York City Courts, alleging systemic due process violations in the city’s guardianship courts.

The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on Wednesday, claims state court judges routinely meet ex parte, or privately, with court-appointed guardians to discuss matters before them—even where the disputes concern adversarial petitions to remove the guardian.

Kaplan is named as a defendant in her official capacity.

The German-born Max, now 84 and suffering from dementia, has been in a guardianship since 2015. His bright, often psychedelic art, made him a 1960s pop culture icon.

Libra Max says that all of the judges presiding over her father’s guardianship have defended ex parte meetings with guardians as permissible, with one judge allegedly referring to ex parte meetings as a “right of the guardianship judge.”

The lawsuit acknowledges that ex parte communications are sometimes allowed, where, for example, the communications are made for scheduling or administrative purposes, but argues that the ex parte communications in Peter Max’s case have been substantive and prejudicial.

Consequently, his daughter claims, she has been deprived of “her ability to fairly advocate for her father’s freedom.”

Libra Max has been trying since 2019 to have her father’s personal needs guardian removed. After Max spoke publicly with media outlets about alleged abuse of her father, the guardian sued her for defamation.

‘Hotly Contested Matters’

Max says she is aware of at least four separate incidents where one of her father’s court-appointed guardians, either directly or through counsel, had ex parte communications on “hotly contested matters.”

One of the alleged ex parte meetings with the guardian occurred immediately prior to a hearing that would address Libra Max’s petition to remove the guardian.

According to Max, the guardian’s has a corresponding three-hour billing entry that referencing the conference with the judge, which states “Court will issue an Order to support Guardian.”

And the court did “support the guardian” in the matter, Max claims, by issuing an order declaring Libra Max’s petition to remove the guardian as moot, based on her father’s court-appointed counsel’s representation that he wasn’t seeking to terminate the guardianship.

Causes of Action: 18 USC §1983, alleging violations of the due process under the The Fourteenth Amendment

Relief: Injunctive relief requiring Kaplan, in her official capacity, to “take such steps to ensure that litigants and judges in the guardianship part in Supreme Court, New York County do not engage in a pattern or practice of unconstitutional ex parte communications;" attorneys’ fees.

Response: Judge Kaplan’s office did not immediately respond to Bloomberg Law’s request for comment.

Attorneys: Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP and Jonathan Gerald Martinis LLC.

The case is Max v. Kaplan, S.D.N.Y., No 1:22-cv-06156, complaint 7/21/22.

Full Article & Source:

Delaware County attorney suspended by Ohio Supreme Court for allegedly bilking clients

by Dean Narciso


The Ohio Supreme Court has suspended indefinitely a Delaware County attorney accused of bilking four of his clients and lying to them.

Robert M. Owens was accused of "deceitful and dishonest conduct, failing to communicate and failing to provide a timely refund to four separate clients." according to the complaint filed last year by the court-appointed Ohio Board of Professional Conduct.

The court issued its ruling Tuesday following several months of investigation, detailing four cases where the board determined that Owens' clients were strung along by false promises, questionable billing and outright theft.

Owens, 48, who could not be reached immediately for comment, is facing criminal investigations in at least two of the cases. Records show that Delaware police are investigating.

Robert M. Owens: What the attorney misconduct complaint says

The most egregious misconduct began in 2018 with a client seeking a divorce, according to the board's complaint.

Owens falsely told the man that he should deposit more than $60,000 in a special account, which would be controlled by the court. Owens told him that he could only gain access to the client funds if Owens proved he had earned it.

Client trust funds are commonly used by attorneys for retainers and other funds, but they are not controlled by the court.

Mismanagement of such trust accounts is "one of the most common ethical violations committed by lawyers," according to Investopedia, an online financial media company.

Owens also advised the man to leave him with additional funds "to shield it from bankruptcy action that (the client) was intending to file," according to the complaint.

The client eventually gave Owens payments totaling more than $150,000, only $46,000 of which Owens had earned by performing services. Much of the client's funds in Owens' account were depleted and shown to be used by Owens for personal expenses.

Three other similar cases involved smaller amounts but included clients who trusted Owens and became angry and desperate as their hearing dates approached and Owens failed to respond to them or return their money.

The suspension order noted that Owens must not provide any type of legal advice, must repay client debts, and must notify all parties that he had contact with that he is not permitted to practice law. He is eligible to petition for reconsideration at a later date if certain conditions are met. If he doesn't, he faces permanent disbarment.

Owens, whose billing rate was $300 per hour, last year closed his practice in downtown Delaware, telling some of his clients that he was dealing with "deep depression" following the death of his father, the complaint states. He began his law practice in 1998.

Owens faced a similar one-year suspension in 2018 for the same type of misconduct.

Full Article & Source:

Merced PD: Elder abuse suspect arrested after ‘stomping’ on elderly man

Steven Austin Jr.
by: Gabriela Garcia

FRESNO, Calif. (KSEE/KGPE) – A 33-year-old man has been arrested and accused of felony elder abuse after a violent assault on a 67-year-old victim, according to the Merced Police Department.

Officials say on Thursday around 6:30 p.m. officers responded to the 2400 block of N Street for a fight in progress. When officers arrived, Steven Austin Jr., 33, was detained by a neighbor that intervened on behalf of the victim.

Upon arriving at the scene, officers located a 67-year-old victim who police say had been seriously assaulted by Austin. According to police, witnesses reported that Austin punched the victim in the face, stomped on him while on the ground, and used his forearm to choke him.

The victim was transported to an area trauma center for medical treatment and is listed as stable condition.

Officials say they suspect alcohol or drugs were a contributing factor to the assault. Austin was arrested and booked into custody at the Merced County Jail for felony elder abuse and battery causing serious bodily injury, according to police.

Merced Police are asking anyone with any information regarding this crime to contact Officer Alejandro Arias at (209) 385-6905 or by email at ariasa@cityofmerced.org.

Full Article & Source:

Friday, July 22, 2022

When Is a Nursing Home Eviction Legal, and What Can I Do?


Nursing home evictions, or involuntary discharges or transfers, disrupt the lives of residents, leading to homelessness, separation from familial support systems, and loss of care. As federal law covers all federally funded nursing home residents, nursing home evictions are legal only in particular instances, such as:
  • The nursing home can no longer provide for a resident's needs.
  • The resident does not pay for care after "reasonable and appropriate notice," which varies by state.
  • The resident no longer needs care.
  • The resident jeopardizes the health or safety of other residents.
  • The nursing home closes.

Causes of illegal nursing home evictions

Financial motives are a significant cause of illegal nursing home evictions. When residents can no longer pay for nursing home care, some nursing homes evict residents without providing sufficient notice and time to apply for Medicaid.

Additionally, some nursing homes discharge residents early to avoid financial risks. For instance, some nursing homes remove residents transitioning from higher-paying Medicare to lower-paying Medicaid.

Other nursing homes discharge residents prematurely, suspecting residents will not pay for their stays. Medicare covers the initial 20 days of care. After 20 days, residents are responsible for copayments. A 2019 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association Internal Medicine found that nursing homes more often discharged Medicare recipients on the final day of full coverage than before or after, suggesting that some nursing homes prioritize financial considerations over resident care.

"Hospital dumping," where individuals returning from hospitalizations may find their beds taken, is another illegal practice, according to the American Council on Aging. State laws require that nursing homes hold beds open for hospitalized residents for one to two weeks. Residents receiving Medicaid are also entitled to available Medicaid-certified beds.

Other nursing homes may attempt to remove residents they perceive as disruptive or challenging, such as individuals with dementia. These facilities claim that they cannot meet the resident’s needs as a pretense for evicting them. Yet once nursing homes open their doors to residents, they have already determined they can meet residents' needs. According to the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services, discharging residents because nursing homes cannot provide for their needs should not be a common practice.

Dynamics between residents and nursing homes

Residents facing involuntary discharges or transfers from nursing homes may be hesitant to speak up and may not know their rights under federal law. They may feel pressure to accept discharges, even when they are not ready to go home.

If you or your loved one are facing a nursing home eviction, keep the following in mind:

  • Nursing homes must provide 30-day notices of discharges. Residents do not need to depart immediately.
  • In addition, residents have the right to appeal a release. They may remain in the nursing home during the appeal process unless doing so would endanger the health and safety of themselves or others.
  • Nursing homes claiming to be unable to provide for a resident's needs must document why they can no longer assist the resident. Similarly, nursing homes must tell residents their reasons for discharging residents and provide these reasons in writing. Residents may request explanations of their discharges.
  • A long-term care ombudsman is an official who advocates for people in nursing homes. You may contact your ombudsman through the Department of Aging in your state for assistance with nursing home evictions.
  • The national nonprofit Justice in Aging provides a useful resource on resolving common problems with nursing homes.

For further insight and support, be sure to consult a qualified elder law attorney in your area as well.

Full Article & Source:

Top Michigan Democrat Allegedly Used Brain-Damaged Old Lady To Defraud Insurance

Photo by Eduardo Munoz Alvarez/Getty Images

by Mary Rooke

The treasurer for the Michigan Democratic Party allegedly falsified records connected to the care of an elderly woman with brain damage to bill an insurance company improperly.

Traci Kornak, a licensed attorney, is being accused of intimidating employees at a Michigan nursing home into using her brain-damaged client’s account to help her allegedly commit insurance fraud, the Detroit News reported.

Chief executive of The Village of Heather Hills Joe LeBlanc told the outlet that he has documents that show Kornak used her powerful connections to allegedly create a new employee paper trail using the nursing home’s invoicing services.

LeBlanc said that Kornak, acting as the woman’s guardian, allegedly sent these invoices, along with other correspondence, to State Farm, the woman’s insurance company, claiming the additional care for her client costs almost $50,000 over two years, the outlet reported.

“What would you call it? Kornak used our tax ID number. She used someone else’s billing system. She told the insurance company that her handpicked caregiver was our employee when she wasn’t,” LeBlanc told the Detroit News.

LeBlanc said a letter he obtained a letter from Kornak to State Farm, where she claims to have hired the extra caregiver through Heather Hills after another health care provider, Best Care Nursing, was experiencing a staffing shortage, the outlet reported.

Marc Kidder, a lawyer for Heather Hills, told the outlet the nursing home never gave Kornak permission to use its tax ID number. Kidder also denies hiring the extra attendant in Kornak’s letter, the Detroit News reported.

LeBlanc became concerned something wasn’t right in November 2021 after he questioned Kornak over Heather Hills receiving a $23,401.05 check from State Farm, according to the outlet. 

“I asked Kornak, ‘What was the meaning of all this?’ She asked me to just cash it, and then she said she’d pay us a little money for the trouble,” LeBlanc told the Detroit News.

The Federal Election Commission found Kornak, in her official capacity as treasurer of the Michigan Democratic Party, guilty in Oct. 2021 of failing to disclose over $25,000 sent to the party from the Slotkin Victory Fund.

The FEC imposed a $19,000 fine on the state Democratic Party for the violation.

Full Article & Source: