Wednesday, October 14, 2020

Robots to be used in UK care homes to help reduce loneliness

Machines can hold simple conversations and have been found to improve mental health

 
The wheeled robots, called Pepper, have been successfully trialled in the UK and Japan.

Robots that can hold simple conversations and learn people’s interests are to be deployed in some UK care homes after an international trial found they boosted mental health and reduced loneliness.

The wheeled robots, called “Pepper”, move independently and gesture with robotic arms and hands and are designed to be “culturally competent”, which means that after some initial programming they learn about the interests and backgrounds of care home residents. This allows them to initiate rudimentary conversations, play residents’ favourite music, teach them languages, and offer practical help including medicine reminders.

The researchers, led by Dr Chris Papadopoulos at the University of Bedfordshire, said the trial was not intended to explore the replacement of human carers with robots, but to help fill lonely periods when, because of a stretched social care system, staff do not have time to keep residents company.

The trial, in the UK and Japan, found that older adults in care homes who interacted with the robots for up to 18 hours across two weeks had a significant improvement in their mental health. There was a small but positive impact on loneliness severity among users and the system did not increase feelings of loneliness, academics found.

The robots’ limitations centred on their conversations feeling superficial and lacking “richness”, users said. They lacked personalisation and sometimes did not show enough cultural awareness, and their head movements and hand gestures were sometimes distracting. The analysis was part of a £2.3m research project funded by the European commission and Japanese government.

Advinia Healthcare, a trial location and one of the largest providers of dementia care in the UK, said it was “working towards implementing this into routine care of vulnerable people to reduce anxiety and loneliness and provide continuity of care”.

“This is the only artificial intelligence that can enable an open-ended communication with a robot and a vulnerable resident,” said Dr Sanjeev Kanoria, the Advinia chairman. “Now we are working towards bringing the robot into routine care, so it can be of real help to older adults and their families.”

He said the robots would not directly lead to job cuts but would be worth using because happier residents mean less work for staff and improve satisfaction ratings, boosting occupancy.

The initiative comes amid a continuing staffing crisis for UK care homes exacerbated by the coronavirus pandemic, during which more than 18,000 residents have died of confirmed or suspected Covid-19.

Before the outbreak, the care industry had at least 120,000 vacancies and the largest operators this week told MPs that staff are suffering “burnout”, and the strain is being increased by the financial difficulties many operators are facing, after costs soared and occupancy levels fell.

A single robot loaded with software costs about £19,000, about £1,000 more than the average salary of a care worker in south-east England. But cheaper robots could also be used.

Care England, which represents the largest providers, said the robots were not likely to replace staff but might help create deeper and higher-quality relationships with residents.

“In the UK alone, 15,000 people are over 100 years of age and this figure will only increase,” said Irena Papadopoulos, a professor of transcultural health and nursing at the University of Middlesex. “Socially assistive, intelligent robots for older people could relieve some pressures in hospitals and care homes. No one is talking about replacing humans – the evaluation demonstrates that we are a long way from doing that – but it also reveals that robots could support existing care systems. While results demonstrate that our experimental robot was more culturally competent to users, they also reveal that there is room for improvement.”

Vic Rayner, the executive director of the National Care Forum, which represents charitable care providers, said: “Robots in social care should not be seen as part of a frightening futuristic vision. They offer key additions to how care is delivered that need to be explored further and understood. Covid-19 has shown us that rather than being a sector which does not understand technology, it is in fact one that is ripe to explore how technology can improve efficiency, support data flow and enhance communication with families and loved ones.”

Full Article & Source:

Tuesday, October 13, 2020

Bertha Bernal, a Prisoner of California Probate Courts, Deserves to Be Reunited With Her Family


by Frank Parlato

Bertha Bernal is a woman who is loved by her children. She is an American citizen with Constitutional and Civil rights that are being infringed upon. She is a also a conservatee under California Probate Court, and has Resident Rights that have been systematically denied and ignored.

(The first article of this series can be read <here>.)

The ‘mother lode’ of documents.

In this series of articles, Frank Report has had exclusive access to hundreds of documents and emails that tell the struggle of the family of 93-year-old Bertha Bernal, a tragic tale of yet another victim of the broken-down California Conservatorship System.

Illegally isolated from her family in the last years of her life, Bertha is suffering from Alzheimer’s and – the family alleges – from elderly abuse, inflicted upon her by a self-perpetuating bureaucracy and by people who exploit the system for their own gain.

Bertha with daughter Cat.

“When are you going to take me out of here?” Bertha’s recurrent pleas break her daughters Sandi’s and Cathleen’s hearts, and fills them with the determination that makes them and their brother Anthony fight so hard for their mom.

It’s a living nightmare for Bertha and her adult children. They are a horrifying example of US citizens lost in the maze of Probate Courts.

“The system is corrupt,” Sandra Cobianchi, known in the family mutated into as Sandi, said without any hesitation.

“Orange County Probate system is corrupt. Their reasons for their behaviors, are not going to be logical”, she says with a sad smile. But rather, they engage in actions that are “a justification to further the horrible situation, keep their jobs and populate the system”.

“There is no good reason. The system is dysfunctional and broken.” Sandi combines the acquired knowledge that there is no apparent legal recourse, with an iron will to keep fighting against all odds.

“It’s happening again and again. It’s like a plague on our senior citizens,” Berkeley City Council member Ben Bartlett, a voice calling for reform, told the Orange County Register.

Investigative journalist Tony Saavedra asks the million-dollar question: “How can legal professionals have such power over the life of a noncriminal, to the point that even family has no voice?”.

There is ample evidence, as seen in the graphic above, that clearly shows Bertha’s preference for her daughters Sandi and Cat, and her son Anthony over the hostile strangers that she is now subjected to.

Bertha’s daughter Sandi spoke exclusively to the Frank Report, sharing the distressing reality of a family fighting the madness in the Conservative System imposed by the Probate Court on her mom.

By relentlessly calling state-appointed people to properly perform their sworn duties, she became feared and hated by them, who repeatedly labeled her “disruptive”, thus progressively mining her image with the probate court.

“Well, if standing up for my mom is disruptive, I will be disruptive all day long!” Sandi reminds us that Board and Care elders have clear residential rights – and that these rights are being denied to Bertha.

The more the family insists on respecting Bertha’s rights, the more the Conservator and Caregivers become restrictive in their arbitrary rules.

Suzette Smith conservator and Maila Soliven, the care giver.

Senior Deputy Public Guardian Suzette E. Smith is the current court-appointed Conservator for Bertha. She has become the nemesis of the siblings, synonymous of everything that’s wrong with the Probate Court’s handling of the situation.

One of the most contested actions of Suzette was to put Bertha in a gloomy, sub-standard home run by Maila Soliven. The relationship got very ugly over the years.

Maila’s hostility towards the family necessitated Sandi to have a police officer escort her during the visits. Photos taken by family members that Frank Report has had exclusive access to, show that, under Suzette’s conservatorship, there is a previous history of very unsanitary conditions.

In November 2019, the siblings fought in Probate Court for Conservatorship and, shockingly, they LOST. Even though the law clearly states that the family is preferred over outside caregivers to be the guardian of an elderly parent.

Actually, Conservator Suzette, burned-out by the constant fighting, was ready to hand over the conservatorship to the family, in return for a promise that they would not sue or file a complaint against them.

But, according to Sandi, the presiding Judge said “No – there is a reason this case came to Probate Court. The trial must proceed”.

The Court, unbelievably, stipulated there was nothing negative about Suzette’s Conservatorship after a one-sided interview with just Suzette!

No lawyer would touch a case fighting a Conservator. The family had to self-represent.

They had to fight for every little detail: to have caregiver Maila allow Bertha to have pictures of the family on the walls of her bedroom – even though it’s a proven medical fact that having family pictures are good for patients with dementia.

Maila’s crew also got rid of a stuffed teddy-bear the family gifted her. “They are afraid of anything that could conceal a nanny-cam”, Sandi ventures to suggest as an explanation.

Maila was always very careful to forbid her resident’s loved ones from visiting unannounced – apparently, because she wasn’t willing to be transparent about what happens there when no family member was watching.

 

By far, the greatest point of contention was the visitation rights. Two days after Bertha took residence there, Maila changed the “House Rules” demanding that the family give 3 days’ notice before visiting.

Like many Conservators, Suzette abused the powers she was entrusted into, and without any consideration to family member’s feelings, denied family visitations.

The literature of these constant denials is mind-boggling.

 

The Conservator canceled Bertha’s Kaiser insurance, forcing her to see Dr. Brian Shaw, who worked at a different nursing home which was not Bertha’s residence, and consequently had very limited contact with her. This progressively led to curtailed visitation that gravely infringed upon her resident rights.

On one occasion, the family took Bertha to her brother’s 92nd birthday party. They were 15 minutes late in bringing her back. Read again: 15 minutes. Suzette railed at them and made a big deal of it.

Subsequently, no more overnights stays were “authorized”, and ‘visits’ and ‘out passes’ were limited to 4 hours duration.

 

Next, the same doctor recommends the curtailing of Bertha’s rights even more, by denying her any out-of-facility visits.

The absurd element is that, by his own written admission, he made these recommendations, not based on direct contact with the patient, but by referring to the notes provided by caregiver Maila.

He merely repeated her narrative, it would seem.

The hostility between Maila and the family got to such a degree, that in all future visits, Sandi felt the need to take along Placente PD officers to not only ensure her safety but also to be witnesses to give her credibility if a need arises.

Little did she know that the Conservator would argue to the court that “Police being called 28 times” was proof of the daughter’s ‘disruption’, never disclosing to the Judge that it was actually Sandi who called the officers on Suzette’s chosen caregiver, Maila.

When Sandi visited Bertha at the activities center she frequented, the staff there was instructed to not talk to her or inform her of anything, and pictures were strictly forbidden.

 

 Finally, the doctor commits the final outrage and recommends NO MORE FAMILY VISITS.

What kind of mad medical advice is that?

Here is one of the reasons that the Frank Report calls you to join the chorus for URGENT justice for Bertha Bernal.

Let’s review the faulty process:

* Conservator gets a doctor to make ‘recommendations’ on her ‘needs’ regarding Bertha and her family.

* The doctor has admittedly, a very limited interaction with the patient.

* His ‘recommendations’ are admittedly made based upon notes given by caregiver – not actual and verifiable medical facts.

*Conservator illegally trasmutates the ‘recommendations’ into ‘doctor’s orders’ and curtails Bertha’s Resident Rights.

* Conservator willfully overlooks and ignores the fact that the doctor himself admits his opinions are based on reports from caregiver Maila, and not from his direct interaction with the patient.

* Conservator willfully overlooks and ignores the fact that Bertha has repeatedly said on record that she wants her daughters around.

* Most importantly, Conservator willfully overlooks and ignores the fact that medical recommendations do NOT supersede Bertha’s Constitutional Rights, her Civil Rights and her Resident’s Rights.

Bertha’s godson, respected doctor Gaston R. Molina, Jr., MD, former physician for baseball pros San Diego Padres, has gone on the record in support of his godmother. He states that, family stimulation is vital for Bertha’s mental and physical health.

There is also documented declaration by health care professionals describing the relationship between mothers and daughters as healthy and in no way detrimental to the patient’s well-being.

There are also worries regarding family heirlooms that have gone missing, like this treasured 24k gold ring that has been yet another point of contention between the family and the Caregiver.

So, there you have it: Bertha Bernal is a woman who is loved by her children. She is an American citizen with Constitutional and Civil rights that are being infringed upon. She is also a conservatee under California Probate Court, and has Resident Rights that have been systematically denied and ignored.

Her family can’t see her at all. That’s total alienation of an elderly woman from her family in the last and difficult period of her life.

THAT’S ELDERLY ABUSE – let’s call it what it is.

At the house where she resides, caregiver Maila has “Bertha’s” phone, not Bertha. She is a veritable court-appointed hostage, sequestered away from her family without any visitation rights.

All she has is a 30-minute window for phone calls once a week – and if her children miss the call by even a split second – it’s gone – no retrial. The caregiver doesn’t answer, when the family calls back.

“Why can’t I go to my daughters’ anymore?” Bertha usually asks.

The Frank Report asks you: WHY CAN’T BERTHA BERNAL SEE HER CHILDREN? WHY ARE HER RIGHTS BEING TRAMPLED UPON?

Suzette Smith.

Bertha’s family found, on Facebook, that Orange County has honored Suzette E. Smith for her work. There she basks in glory, posing as a ‘rights advocate’ in social media while reportedly infringing on elderly rights on a daily basis.

In one heartbreaking post, Suzette is supporting a Woman’s March in which the theme – believe it or not – is ‘Families belong together’.

Let’s have Suzette make this empty slogan come true by letting Bertha’s family come back together.

Let’s help reunite Bertha and her family!

On the next article of this series, Frank Report examines Bertha Bernal’s family’s complaints about the current Conservator and Caregiver’s handling of medical emergencies with their Mom, and we look into verifying the family’s claims that they have both been lying to the relatives.

 
Full Article & Source:
 
See Also: 
 

Committee report bolsters Ernst’s nursing homes, elder care reform bill

By Ripon Advance News Service

A recent U.S. Senate Finance Committee report affirms legislation proposed by U.S. Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) to support elder care in nursing homes and assisted living facilities across the country, particularly those impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

“This report sheds light on steps Congress can take to better protect nursing homes and their residents, including advancing legislation that I’m supporting to increase PPE and testing,” Sen. Ernst said on Monday, noting that elderly Iowans are some of the most at-risk during COVID-19.

The September Senate Finance report, “COVID-19 and Nursing Homes: What Went Wrong and Next Steps,” recommends policies such as those contained in Sen. Ernst’s bill, the Emergency Support for Nursing Homes and Elder Justice Reform Act of 2020, S. 4182, which she cosponsored on July 2 with bill sponsor U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA).

“To help nursing homes promptly identify and contain outbreaks of COVID-19, a portion of Federal COVID-19 relief assistance should be used for the purchase of personal protective equipment and to support diagnostic testing in nursing homes (as proposed by Chairman Grassley and Senators Steve Daines, Martha McSally, and Joni Ernst in the Emergency Support for Nursing Homes and Elder Justice Reform Act of 2020 (S. 4182)),” according to the report.

The bill also would require a portion of any funds received through COVID-19 appropriations to be used for PPE and testing in Medicare skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), Medicaid nursing facilities (NFs), and long-term care facilities, including assisted living facilities, as well as for specialized strike teams to address outbreaks in SNFs and NFs, according to the congressional record bill summary.

“Strike teams have shown great promise as a method for helping nursing homes in crisis get their COVID-19 outbreaks under control,” according to the report. “We recommend that jurisdictions receiving federal relief assistance during the COVID-19 emergency period devote some of this funding to the development and maintenance of statewide or regional strike teams for struggling nursing homes, as proposed… in S. 4182.” 

The report also calls on nursing homes to continue submitting payroll data to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, ensuring there is sufficient transparency concerning the impact of staffing shortages on nursing homes during the pandemic, and that programs authorized by the Elder Justice Act to help promote the health and safety of older Americans living in long-term care facilities be reauthorized as, both items proposed in S. 4182.

“We must ensure that our nursing homes and long-term care facilities have the resources and support they need to provide high-quality care to residents both during and long after this pandemic,” said Sen. Ernst. 

The legislation remains under consideration in the Senate Finance Committee.

 
Full Article & Source: 

Deputies search for woman who allegedly stole nearly $300k from elderly person

Sheri Stallings is seen in an old mugshot provided by the Wagoner County Sheriff's Office.

TULSA, Okla. (KTUL) — The Wagoner County Sheriff's Office is looking for a woman who they say stole approximately $283,000 from an elderly person.

Deputies say 51-year-old Sheri Stallings has an outstanding warrant for elderly exploitation.

She's described as five feet, six inches tall, weighing about 125 pounds with brown eyes. Stallings was last know to be living in the Broken Arrow-Coweta area. 

If you have any information, please call the sheriff's office at 918-485-3124 or submit an online tip. As always, you may remain anonymous.

Full Article & Source: 

Monday, October 12, 2020

Britney Spears’s lawyers compare singer to a comatose patient during conservatorship hearing

Britney Spears arrives for the premiere of Sony Pictures' "Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood". AFP

Britney Spears was compared to a “comatose patient” by her lawyer during a hearing regarding her conservatorship.

Amid the ongoing legal battle, Spears’s lawyers appeared in court on Wednesday to discuss her future career.

Lawyer Sam Ingham said that the singer doesn’t want to perform again, but that her father, who she wants to be removed as her sole conservator, is intent that she resume her career.

The judge asked Ingham whether Spears would be willing to sign a declaration regarding her feelings about the conservatorship, so that the court had a first hand account rather than always hearing from her lawyers.

Supporters of Britney Spears gather outside a courthouse for a #FreeBritney protest during a hearing regarding Spears' conservatorship.

In response, Ingham reportedly stated that Spears lacked the mental capacity to sign such a document.

He then likened her to a comatose patient, saying that while she was by no means unconscious, she was not capable of signing the declaration and could have a lawyer speak on her behalf.

Supporters of Britney Spears gather outside a courthouse in downtown for a #FreeBritney protest.

The “Toxic” singer has been under her conservatorship, where a guardian or protector is appointed by a court to manage the life of someone due to physical or mental limitations, since 2008. It was managed by her father for 12 years.

“Britney is in a conservatorship for good reason but a lot of the Free Britney people have no experience with the law,” he said, referring to the fan campaign that alleges Spears is being exploited and kept in the conservatorship against her will.

People gather to protest for Britney Spears.

“I have had people in conservatorship who have got themselves right and it has been terminated but you don't see that because they're not people in the public eye," Wallett said.

“Other people can be in a conservatorship their whole lives. I’m not saying that's going to be Britney but it could happen to her.”

Full Article & Source:
 
See Also: 
 

Coronavirus outbreaks ravage nursing homes again, even after Newsom safety measures

The Sundial Bridge in Redding. Coronavirus outbreaks have recently hit nursing homes in that Northern California city and also in Santa Cruz County.
(William Koplitz / Getty Images)

By Maura Dolan, Anita Chabria

After a steady slide in the statewide number of new coronavirus infections at skilled nursing homes, facilities in Santa Cruz and Shasta Counties are grappling with severe outbreaks, with several dozen people at both places testing positive and residents dying of COVID-19.

The outbreaks raise questions on whether a May directive by state health officials, requiring regular testing of nursing home residents and staff, is being comprehensively implemented. Some watchdogs fear another spike could be in the offing at facilities that care for some of California’s most frail and vulnerable.

“Something is terribly wrong because they shouldn’t be having deaths,” Charlene Harrington, a professor emeritus at UC San Francisco who studies skilled nursing facilities, said Thursday. “There is a breakdown.”

At the Watsonville-Post Acute Center in Santa Cruz County, 61 people, including nine staff members, have tested positive since mid-September. Nine residents, whose ages ranged from the low 70s to 90s, have died, county health spokeswoman Corinne Hyland said Tuesday.

The facility is licensed for 95 beds.

In Redding, the Windsor Redding Care Center, another skilled nursing home, also is coping with an outbreak. Sixty residents and 20 staff members have contracted the virus, and seven have died from COVID-19, said Shasta County Health and Human Services spokeswoman Kerri Schuette.

Patricia McGinnis, executive director of California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform, said new California testing requirements imposed on nursing homes were being followed only sporadically and with little follow-up enforcement from the state.

In addition, rapid antigen tests the federal government has sent to nursing homes recently have been “absolutely useless,” she said. They produce too many false results.

State officials did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

State records show that about a half-dozen facilities across the state have significant outbreaks, and more have minor ones. Though the worst toll of the virus for elder care and skilled nursing facilities came early in the pandemic, infection numbers crept up again in August before once again declining in California.

In July and August, there were about 1,000 deaths a month in nursing homes and assisted living facilities, according to The Times’ coronavirus tracker. That number dipped to 562 in the month of September, according to the tracker. But danger persists. Over the last week, those facilities have averaged 142 new cases and 13.7 new deaths per day.

Hyland said the Watsonville facility had been following state guidelines for employee testing, which exposed the outbreak. The center reported an infected resident on Sept. 17. An outbreak at a nursing home is defined as an infection in one resident. Visitors have been barred during the pandemic, she said.

“It spread pretty quickly,” Hyland said. “Unfortunately, this is a very vulnerable population.”

Dr. David Ghilarducci, deputy health officer for Santa Cruz County, said the county’s public health staff was working closely with the facility to control the outbreak.

Santa Cruz County health officials have been visiting the facility daily to review protocols on isolation, quarantine, testing and screening, and to respond to requests for more resources.

Officials from the California Department of Public Health also have made multiple visits to the facility to assess the situation and make recommendations, and the California National Guard is also providing help, the county said.

Because many nursing home employees work in more than one facility, the county immediately alerted other homes of the outbreak, Hyland said. She added that the county was tracing the contacts of the infected.

“This is really a large outbreak,” Hyland said. “We haven’t seen this sort of thing in our county until now.”

The Watsonville center’s website has reported previous infections in the past but in small numbers. The website indicates that past infections have been among employees.

Gerald E. Hunter, the facility’s administrator, said on the website that there were 23 residents and four staff members who were still positive for the virus on Oct. 5. He said the county’s numbers reflected the total infected since the outbreak started.

“Each day we evaluate all of our residents following CDPH and County of Santa Cruz guidelines to determine whom meets the criteria to be transferred out of the unit,” said Hunter on the website. He did not respond to a request for an interview.

Shasta County’s Schuette said the Windsor Redding Care Center was not accepting visitors when the outbreak occurred. The county and state public health teams, she said, were working with the facility to control the infections.

To date, nursing homes and senior facilities have accounted for 7% of California’s coronavirus cases, but 36% of its deaths, according to The Times’ coronavirus tracker.

On Sept. 29, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a law requiring skilled nursing facilities in California to report disease-related deaths to health authorities within 24 hours during declared emergencies.

The law was written in response to concerns that health agencies were slow to respond to outbreaks because they did not receive timely information about the facilities.

Earlier, in May, California required testing of all residents and staff in nursing facilities to halt the spread of the coronavirus. The effect has varied.

“It depends on the place, it depends on the facility, and I am not sure there is a lot of follow-up,” said McGinnis, the nursing home reformer.

 
Full Article & Source:

After months of isolation, long-term care facilities struggle to balance safety of residents with visitation rights as some restrictions are lifted


By Blaise Mesa and India Yarborough

About two years ago, Beverly Ketter’s husband was diagnosed with dementia.

Still, the couple led an active life, Ketter said. Every Wednesday night, they would play cards with friends. Every Saturday, they would go dancing. And until this year, Ketter was able to take care of her husband by herself.

But in the early months of 2020, things began to change.

Ketter said the “intelligent, smart” and “gentle” man she had been married to for 68 years started to show signs of aggression. He wasn’t sleeping well. And Ketter soon realized she needed help.

Her husband was approved for in-home hospice care, and nurses started coming in regularly to check on him.

Then, the coronavirus pandemic hit.

Ketter and her husband began quarantining at home around the time stay-at-home orders were handed down to Shawnee County residents in late March. Hospice nurses still visited them about once a week, but other than that, Ketter and her husband were alone.

“We didn’t go anywhere,” she said. “He would keep saying, ‘Where is everybody? How come nobody comes to see us?’”

That lack of human contact started to take a toll.

“He got so bad during March and April,” Ketter said. “I really think the isolation caused him to get bad so fast.”

After an incident in early July, Ketter knew her husband couldn’t live at home anymore. She decided to place him in a memory care facility, choosing Oakley Place in Topeka.

Ketter said she was able to visit him for about 45 minutes each day because he qualified for hospice — though there was about a month’s time during parts of August and September when COVID-19 cases had surfaced at Oakley Place, causing the facility to restrict visitation even for hospice residents.

Ketter said she was grateful for those regular visits. She recognized many people haven’t had that luxury, as a number of nursing homes in the area continue to restrict visitation.

“I just can’t imagine what it’s like,” Ketter said. “I think these people are deteriorating by not having social contact.”

Her husband died Thursday, less than three months after leaving his home.

Isolation’s impact

Visitation at nursing homes in Kansas, and across the country, has been restricted during the ongoing pandemic, as facilities attempt to limit the spread of a virus that has been shown to result in more serious health conditions for those in high-risk categories, including the elderly. Shawnee County’s health officer announced late last month that visitations may resume under certain conditions, but allowing visitations and restricting them both come with a cost.

In early September, the Office of the Kansas Long-term Care Ombudsman surveyed family members of residents living in long-term care facilities. The survey found that residents felt like they were in prison, expressed no interest in living and actually had their conditions worsen when visitations weren’t allowed.

“We know that they are dying in there, the isolation is literally killing them,” wrote one anonymous survey respondent.

“My father has aged tremendously during this lockdown,” another said. “He also is not as cognitive. Says daily he feels like a prisoner.”

Only 32% of survey respondents said their loved ones in a nursing home or assisted-living facility could answer the phone by themselves. The survey also indicated even outdoor visitation has been limited, as the majority of respondents said they weren’t allowed to visit loved ones outside for more than 30 minutes at a time.

″(My mom) is depressed, on medication and dying from loneliness,” a respondent wrote. “My God please help.”

According to Carol Adams, a licensed clinical psychologist at Stormont Vail Behavioral Health Center, social isolation and loneliness can exacerbate health issues.

“The primary impact of social isolation on the elderly, and not only the elderly, is increased depression and anxiety,” Adams said.

She added that the uncertainty surrounding the pandemic has caused many people — in and outside of nursing homes — to fear interacting with others because of the possibility of contracting COVID-19. That fear can lead to heightened stress, Adams said.

“Stress can also do things like increase blood pressure and increase blood sugars,” she said, pointing to the fact that social isolation doesn’t just take a toll on a person’s mental health.

“We know based on research that mental health conditions do have an impact on physical wellbeing,” Adams said. “Prolonged stress reduces our immune system and our response to physical conditions. ... With stress people can have headaches. They may not be eating as well as they used to. And we’ve also seen where people don’t have as much access to nutritional food because of COVID — and medicines. So it really has impacted particularly our elderly in a very intense fashion.”

Ketter, who placed her late husband in a care facility over the summer, speculated social isolation may have caused his dementia to deteriorate faster than expected. Adams said that’s certainly possible.

“I do believe that can happen,” Adams said. “Social isolation, lack of stimulation to the brain, depression, anxiety — all of those things can exacerbate cognitive difficulty in older folks.”

In her current practice, Adams works with adults of all ages, but she spent nearly 20 years in nursing homes doing consultations and providing mental health treatment for the elderly. Given that experience, Adams said it is crucial for long-term care facilities to provide residents the ability to participate in telehealth. She said those facilities must also find creative ways to meet the social and emotional needs of their isolated seniors.

“I think providing more education to residents, providing personal protective equipment and continuing to have group activities — very small groups and socially distancing people but giving people the opportunity to get out and see their peers in facilities so that they’re not feeling so socially isolated,” Adams said.

According to Carol George, vice president of operations at Aldersgate Village in Topeka, Aldersgate has already begun to get creative with its offerings.

George said Aldersgate Village personnel have created local television channels for residents to view and have purchased smartphones for the facility’s nurses so that residents can make video calls. The special TV channels, which were set up by partnering with Cox Communications, feature shows about exercising, solo activities residents can complete and daily devotionals from a pastor, George said.

Reunions on the horizon

Relief in the form of limited visitations may be on the horizon for residents of long-term care facilities and their families.

Shawnee County health officer Gianfranco Pezzino announced Sept. 17 that visitation may resume if those facilities meet requirements laid out by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. For indoor visitations to resume, facilities must have no new COVID-19 cases for 14 consecutive days. They must also limit the number of visitors at a time, regularly disinfect facilities, practice proper hygiene, have staff wear personal protective equipment and have visitors wear masks.

Restrictions are looser on outdoor visitation, and CMS recommends “all visits should be held outdoors whenever (practical).” CMS recommends limiting the number of visitors for outdoor visits, but it allows nursing homes to determine that cap.

To resume visitations, counties must also have a positivity rate lower than 10%, otherwise only compassionate care visits are allowed. Compassionate care visits may include end-of-life situations, a situation in which a resident is grieving the loss of a family member or friend, or when a resident is struggling to adjust to their new environment in a care facility.

According to George, Aldersgate Village residents were ecstatic to hear some visitation was resuming.

“I wish you could experience that,” she said. “That look in somebody’s eye when they haven’t seen their son or daughter for so long — it just makes you cry.”

Lester Israel, 85, lives at Oak Creek Senior Living in Topeka. He said a lot of the people at his assisted-living facility need to see their family. But while Israel feels safe at Oak Creek, he knows that just one COVID-19 case “could wipe out the whole facility.”

His remark points to the balancing act many long-term care facilities are performing — do they allow visits and risk cases, or do they continue to restrict visits and risk mental health?

Scott Brunner, deputy secretary of hospitals and facilities at the Kansas Department of Aging and Disability Services, said that when balancing those considerations, the scale should lean toward visitation. He said telecommunication visits and those in which a family member must communicate with their loved one from outside a window just aren’t the same as in-person interaction.

Visitation may come with a cost

The Kansas Department of Health and Environment has reported that nearly a third of the state’s coronavirus clusters are linked to long-term care facilities. But while those care facilities account for about a third of the cluster sites, they are associated with more than 85% of the state’s cluster-related deaths.

Aldersgate Village, which Medicare.gov has deemed a four-star facility, has had, as of early October, the most confirmed COVID-19 cases and deaths of any nursing home in Topeka. The facility has had 73 confirmed cases, 18 suspected cases and 14 deaths linked to COVID-19, according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ nursing home database.

A Sept. 25 memo to residents at Aldersgate Village announced outdoor visitation had resumed, but a week later on Oct. 2, the facility announced a staff member had tested positive. Still, Aldersgate is scheduling outdoor visitation.

Brian Lee, executive director of Families for Better Care, said he fears there will be a spike of coronavirus cases in long-term care facilities if these homes aren’t better supported when visitation is allowed. Lee said nursing homes and assisted-living facilities don’t have enough molecular, rapid testing at the door to get quick results for everyone entering a facility.

According to George, though, that level of testing isn’t feasible at Aldersgate, and she said the facility doesn’t have staff that are qualified to even operate a molecular test. She said her facility has plenty of antigen tests, but Lee said those tests won’t keep the virus out.

“This virus targets (the elderly) like an Exocet missile,” Lee said. “We have really been playing Rusian Roulette ... with the nursing homes and assisted-living facilities when it comes to this pandemic.”

Lee isn’t against visitation, but he said there needs to be changes to save lives.

Mitzi McFatrich, executive director of Kansas Advocates for Better Care, said banning visitation is problematic because residents who are unable to see their loved ones have a lower quality of life.

Still, McFatrich shares Lee’s concerns. She indicated nursing homes aren’t much better prepared for the virus now than they were when the pandemic began, and she doesn’t think there are preventative measures in place to stop the virus from spreading through nursing homes, as it did in a number of facilities nationwide at the outset of the pandemic.

“Do we have anything in place that is going to prevent the spread of COVID-19? Best I can tell, we do not,” McFatrich said. “There is not a vaccine, not a treatment.”

McFatrich said wearing masks, testing and social distancing are the best ways to prevent the spread of the coronavirus, but there isn’t a uniform system in place, she said, for long-term care facilities to track how much personal protective equipment they have on hand or to determine whether they are adequately staffed.

According to George, Aldersgate Village has been well supported around the clock by state and local government, and she said Aldersgate was even able to get additional PPE from Shawnee County on a Sunday night.

Still, allowing visitation is tricky, she said, as Aldersgate staff attempt to balance “the good of the patient versus the good of the family.”

Lee said the level of infection in facilities will depend on how prepared they are when visitors are welcome again.

He anticipates some facilities may not be ready for visitation. Still, he said, residents need to see their loved ones.

“Families are desperate to get in there,” Lee said.

 
Full Article & Source:

Sunday, October 11, 2020

Not even a global pandemic could stop this 102-year-old from voting in this election

By Scottie Andrew

Bea Lumpkin, 102, cast her vote in the 2020 election by mail, decked out in personal protective equipment. She told CNN this election is one of the most critical of her lifetime.

(CNN)Bea Lumpkin is 102 years old and has never missed an election as long as she's been eligible to vote.

Not even a global pandemic could stop her from voting in this one
 
Lumpkin, a former Chicago public school teacher, dressed in personal protective equipment from head to toe to drop off her ballot for the 2020 presidential election at the mailbox last week. The Chicago Teachers Union, of which she was a member, shared the image
 
At her age, Bea's at high risk for becoming severely ill if she contracted coronavirus. But she would never have missed her chance to vote. She urges every registered voter in the US to exercise their right, too. 
 
"The most important reason to vote in this election is that there's so much at stake, more than any other vote I've cast, because of the great challenge to the survival of our democracy," Lumpkin told CNN.
 
If she could vote this year, so can anyone who's registered, she said. And the retired educator knows better than most the value of voting. Here's why Bea Lumpkin, proud voter and centenarian, says it's so critical to vote in 2020. 
 

There's a lot on the line

 
Many of the issues Bea cares about are especially relevant in 2020: health care, racism and climate change among them. She believes in health care for every American; she wants to see reforms in law enforcement to end brutality and racism in policing; and she warns of the destruction wrought by climate change, such as the wildfires that burned down her son's California home. 
 
She's also very over living through the pandemic, and she disagrees with the ways in which science has been undermined by the President and other federal officials charged with leading the pandemic response. She once taught biology, she said, and she's a "great respecter" of the advances scientists have made since her birth. 
 
"I'm sick and tired of this pandemic, and we'll never get rid of it unless we follow the experience of so many other countries, of the advice of science," she said. 
 
She misses her daily trips to her local YMCA, where she'd work out everyday before the pandemic. She misses hugging her grandkids and seeing her friends and getting out of the house every once and awhile. 
 
Her hairdo has also suffered as a result of the pandemic, she says. 
 
"I wear my hair short, and it's so long now -- it's going down my back!" she joked. 
 
2020 is also, she points out, the 100th anniversary of the 19th Amendment, which granted women (mostly White women, at the time) the right to vote. A lifelong feminist, Bea encourages women to vote not only to mark that anniversary but to protect their rights.
 
"Women still have so many additional reasons to vote because in this election, all rights that women have won in the hundred-odd years I've been on earth -- they're all on the line," she said. "But then, this fight for our rights is much older than we are -- it's even older than I am." 
 

Voting by mail was simple, she says

 
In a typical election year, Bea would vote early, usually at the YMCA where she worked out daily pre-pandemic. But this year, it was safest for her to vote by mail, she said. 
 
Her ballot was received within 48 hours of submission, a process she tracked online, she said. It was a quick and simple way to vote, and she's wearing a big "I Voted" button this week to celebrate. 
 
She knows many voters are anxious about mail-in voting due to the misinformation that surrounds it, so she encourages voting early to avoid crowds on Election Day. She's seen lines for early voting in Chicago stretch around an entire city block -- and she's "very proud of everyone coming out," she says. 
 

2020 might be the most important election of her lifetime

 
Lumpkin has lived -- and voted -- through some of the most pivotal periods in American history: the Great Depression and World War II, the civil rights movement and the end of segregation, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, threats of terrorism and financial crises to the present, with questions now on how the US will emerge from the pandemic. 
 
It's essential to vote this year to determine what that future will look like, she says.
 
Lumpkin, a staunch supporter of labor unions, makes a point about wealth inequality in the US as one reason to vote -- "You're not getting the value of the work you do. So unless you own everything, it's to your interest to have more equality."
 
And in spite of all the pain of this year, she's hopeful for the future. 
 
"There's a possibility of correcting so many of the wrongs if we have an overwhelming vote for our democratic rights," she said. "We don't want to just restore what we had before. And people who aren't interested in voting usually think it's not going to make a difference. And this time it can make such a big difference, not only in preventing the loss of the freedoms that we do have ... but we can gain so much. There's so much good in people that could come out if it had the chance." 
 
As for the result of the 2020 election, she's both "scared to death" and "excited about the possibility of creating a much better country." 
 
"I want to see everybody who's coming out to vote to stay involved in the process -- that's the way we can make huge advances for working people," she said. 
 
She's especially proud of American youth, whom she believes will fight for a fair future. 
 
"I have great confidence in young people, and I know they're going to do what needs to be done," she said. "So hooray for the youth!" 
 
She's got decades on this election's first-time voters, but at 102, Bea's done her fair share for democracy, too.
 
Full Article & Source:

Duty of care: the trouble with America’s nursing homes

We will sacrifice so much to save lives. So why are we indifferent to the quality of those lives?

 
by Ben Sixsmith

A couple reunite at the Life Care Center in Kirkland, Washington (Getty)

We can debate the value of sacrificing normal life to COVID-19. Personally I think the measures are increasingly destructive — but nobody can deny their scale. Social and economic activity has been tightly limited. Jobs have been lost. Businesses have collapsed, and boredom and anger set in.

Yet Western politicians have done a bad job of protecting the most vulnerable. In Europe and the US, COVID has torn through nursing homes. Sometimes, as in New York under Gov. Andrew Cuomo, infected elderly patients were knowingly returned to them.

The failure to anticipate this crisis — by politicians, public health authorities and, yes, the media — reflects a broader indifference towards the state of nursing homes. ‘I get a steady trickle of psychiatric patients who are perfectly happy to be in the psychiatric hospital,’ the psychiatrist Scott Alexander writes, ‘but who freak out when I tell them that they seem all better now and it’s time to send them back to their nursing home, saying it’s terrible and they’re abused and neglected and they refuse to go.’

There is data to back up this anecdote. In 2014, an OIG report suggested that at least one allegation of abuse or neglect had been made in 85 percent of nursing homes. Of course an allegation can be unsubstantiated, but there are grounds to believe that elderly people are often too slow rather than too quick to report mistreatment. As Professor Catherine Hawes has written, ‘many are either unable to report abuse or neglect or fearful that such reporting may lead to retaliation or otherwise negatively affect their lives’.

Abuse perpetrated by staff includes physical violence, financial exploitation and rape. A CNN investigation found that the federal government has cited over 1,000 nursing homes for ‘mishandling or failing to prevent alleged cases of rape, sexual assault and sexual abuse at their facilities during this period’.

Abuse can also be perpetrated by other residents. Sometimes this is unavoidable; other times it is the result of clear negligence. This year, a video went viral of a young man beating his bedridden 75-year-old roommate in a care home. The old man suffered four broken fingers, broken ribs and a broken jaw. Why was an unstable young man sharing a room with a septuagenarian in the first place? It defies belief.

Of course, nursing homes can be inadequate without there being actual abuse. Local reporters in Colorado investigated nursing homes where patients had been dying from COVID-19 and found that two had been previously cited for ‘dirty facilities’ and ‘improper hand-washing while providing wound care’. Loneliness is also acute in long-term care institutions, where 22 to 42 percent of residents report feelings of loneliness compared to 10 percent of the community population.

None of this means there are not admirable nursing homes, and good men and women working with harder jobs than most of us will ever have. But that does not excuse dysfunction and abuse. We could easily blame some of these failures on owners trying to minimize expenditure to maximize profits, and on weak and inefficient governmental regulations. That would not be unfair, but it would be too easy. There has been no urgency behind calls for reform. As Scott Alexander wrote, ‘Bedridden old people are very bad at complaining in ways anyone else can notice, and if we don’t want to think about them we don’t have to.’ You won’t see them on the streets, or on the TV, or even on social media. You don’t have to think about them.’

If we are prepared to sacrifice so much in order to save lives, why are we so indifferent to the quality of lives? Our year has been spent agonizing over case rates, hospitalizations and deaths — but rarely do think about the wellbeing of the people most at risk. This seems peculiar. Protecting life is valuable, of course, but protecting lives without expending time, energy and resources to ensure they are free of abuse, neglect and isolation is absurd. Perhaps we have been too absorbed with COVID in the abstract and not interested enough in the communities it threatens. Certainly, that would explain why Andrew Cuomo is treated as one of 2020’s success stories rather than a failure.

This has to change. In March, Bill Barr announced that the Department of Justice had found ‘facilities unfit for living, plagued by filth, mold, insects, and rodents,’ and pledged to ‘pursue nursing homes that provide grossly-substandard care to their residents.’ This would be a very positive step, though it will demand the Trump administration reversing its rolling back of regulations intended to prevent mistreatment, such as, for example, the ability to fine homes which unnecessarily prescribe antipsychotic drugs. Greater investment in social interventions could ease loneliness and, perhaps, make it easier for residents to report their problems.

Overall, far greater investment will be needed in residential care over the coming decades. Perhaps the answer is to appeal to selfishness and rather than just compassion. According to the National Research Council, the ‘occurrence and severity of elder mistreatment are likely to increase markedly over the coming decades, as the population ages, caregiving responsibilities and relationships change, and increasing numbers of older persons require long-term care’ All of us will be ‘older persons’ one day.

Full Article & Source: