data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e672/8e672f7e0f459df157b232aff3d0397af4467606" alt=""
On the one hand, Mom could have all her marbles and be making a decision consistent with the way she lived her life: as a rugged individualist who makes her own decisions and is willing to live with the consequences. She has capacity. It is also possible that because of any number of factors -- new medications, leftover confusion from the hospital, early dementia -- that she is incapacitated.
My good friend Dr. Jason Karlawish is a pioneer in a field he calls neuroethics. He's a geriatrician at the University of Pennsylvania who works closely with neurologists who care for and study patients with various degrees of memory loss and dementias like Alzheimer's Disease. Last month, he gave a stunning presentation for attendees of the NYC Elder Abuse Confernce at the New School in New York City about the assessment of decision-making capacity of older adults with and without these disorders.
Full Article and Source:
Addressing Capacity Assessment
4 comments:
Right. There was a case out of WA State of a crusty old man who lived his way and he got a jury hearing. The jury found him incompetent. Was he? Or did he just not fit the mold?
It seems to me that Dr. Lachs and Dr. Karlawish tend to ignore what is really needed, not another tool to assess the patient’s competency but instead a tool to assess the patient’s situation so as to reliably determine if the patient’s infirmity is being exploited.
I agree, tvfields. I think these doctors don't have the direct experience that we have. They look at things from a book approach, not a hands-on reality.
I think that they are beginning to uncover just how complicated determining incapacity really is. One size does not fit all, and one day these discoveries and the development of better testing and better understanding will change the way the courts abuse "incapacity" for their own purposes.
Post a Comment