The Florida Supreme Court in recent court orders disciplined 12
attorneys, disbarring one, revoking the license of three, suspending
seven, and publicly reprimanding one.
Derek Michael Aronoff, 4538 SW Darlington St., Port Saint Lucie, disciplinary revocation
with leave to apply for readmission to The Florida Bar after five
years, effective immediately following an August 31 court order.
(Admitted to practice: 2001) The Florida Bar opened an investigation
after receiving a grievance from Aronoff’s former client demonstrating
that, after the effective date of his suspension from the practice of
law in 2022, Aronoff continued communicating with the client, drafted
pleadings, and gave the client legal advice regarding an upcoming
hearing in her mortgage foreclosure case. As a result, Aronoff engaged
in the unlicensed practice of law in violation of the order of the
Supreme court of Florida suspending him in 2022. (Case No. SC23-0942)
Bryon R. Aven, 2725 Judge Fran Jamieson Way, Bldg. D., Viera, suspended for two years,
effective 30 days following a September 14 court order. (Admitted to
practice: 2008) While employed as an assistant state attorney, Aven
engaged in prosecutorial misconduct by eliciting and bolstering false
testimony from several witnesses during the criminal trial, which
resulted in the dismissal of the criminal charges. (Case No.SC23-0456)
Christopher Whittington Dudley, 598 Trelago Way, Apt. 303, Maitland, suspended
pursuant to 3-7.2(f), the felony suspension rule, effective immediately
following a September 18 court order. (Admitted to practice: 2021)
Dudley entered a plea of nolo contendere to the charges of Attempted
Burglary of an Occupied Dwelling, a third-degree felony, and Criminal
Mischief (above $200 but below $1,000), a first-degree misdemeanor. The
court withheld adjudication of guilt as to all counts and sentenced
Dudley to two years of conditional probation as to the felony count and
to credit for time served as to the misdemeanor count. (Case No. SC23-1306)
John Edward Eagen, P.O. Box 1545, Tallahassee, disciplinary revocation
with leave to apply for readmission, effective 30 days following a
September 21 court order. (Admitted to practice: 1990) Eagen had a
disciplinary case pending before the court, which involved neglect of
several client matters and multiple referrals from the First District
court of Appeal. The court approved Eagen’s Petition for Disciplinary
Revocation by Order dated September 21, 2023. (Case No. SC23-0691)
Mark Edwin Heimendinger, 1034 Long Branch Ln., Oviedo, suspended
due to a felony conviction, effective 30 days following an August 31
court order. (Admitted to practice: 2016) On August 25, 2023,
Heimendinger entered a plea of nolo contendere to Aggravated Assault (a
third-degree felony), Carrying Concealed Firearm (a third-degree
felony), Improper Exhibition of a Dangerous Weapon (a first degree
misdemeanor) and Battery (a first-degree misdemeanor). The criminal
court withheld adjudication on the two felony charges and adjudicated
Heimendinger guilty on the two misdemeanor charges. The Supreme Court
has ordered that a referee be appointed to recommend the appropriate
sanction. (Case No. SC23-1224)
Tarica C. LaBossiere, 4126 Inverrary Blvd., Apt. 2418, Lauderhill, suspended for 91 days,
effective immediately following an August 3 court order, as LaBossiere
is no longer practicing law. (Admitted to practice: 2018) LaBossiere
failed to comply with all terms and conditions set forth in the terms of
her probation, which included a requirement to comply with her FLA,
Inc., rehabilitation contract. LaBossiere violated this contract by
failing to abstain from the consumption of alcohol and testing positive
for mood altering drugs. (Case No. SC23-0313)
Andrew John Manie, P.O. Box 720236, Orlando, suspended for six months,
effective immediately following a September 21 court order. (Admitted
to practice: 2015) Manie failed to timely furnish a copy of the court’s
June 9, 2022, suspension order to some of the courts before which he was
counsel of record. Prior to his suspension, Manie also engaged in a
course of conduct whereby he failed to appear for court hearings on
behalf of several clients, resulting in the entry of default judgments
against those clients, and necessitating Manie to take corrective action
by filing motions to vacate judgment due to his excusable neglect.
Finally, in connection with his representation of a client in a personal
injury case, Manie deposited client funds related to a settlement into
his operating account. (Case No. SC23-1277)
Patrick Michael Megaro, 2431 Aloma Ave., Suite 124, Winter Park, disciplinary revocation
with leave to apply for readmission after five years, effective 30 days
following a September 21 court order. (Admitted to practice: 2004) The
Florida Bar commenced an investigation of Megaro due to two disciplinary
sanctions imposed in other jurisdictions. Megaro received a five-year
suspension as recommended by the Disciplinary Hearing Commission for the
North Carolina State Bar for entering into an improper representation
agreement with clients of a diminished capacity and engaging in conduct
that was prejudicial to the administration of justice. In addition,
Megaro was suspended by the United States Court of Appeals in the Fifth
Circuit on July 7, 2021. (Case No. SC23-1119)
Rebecca L. Morgan, 3004 Flowertree Rd., Belle Isle, suspended for four months,
effective 30 days following an August 31 court order. (Admitted to
practice: 2008) Morgan engaged in a pattern of neglect while
representing several clients in immigration matters. In one instance,
she failed to timely appear at a hearing due to a family emergency, and
the immigration judge entered an order for removal. After Morgan failed
to get a response from the chief counsel’s office to get their position
in order to have the matter reheard, Morgan failed to further address
the client’s matter because of her severe illness. In another matter, a
client repeatedly attempted to contact Morgan, and after receiving no
communication, the client went to Morgan’s law office, which was
abandoned. Morgan was unaware of the client’s matter or need for
assistance, and she did not provide a refund in the matter.
Additionally, Morgan engaged in a course of conduct in which she failed
to update her address with the United States Department of Homeland
Security resulting in letters for her clients being returned as
undeliverable. She also failed to timely respond to the Bar’s multiple
investigative inquiries. (Case No. SC23-0448)
Kevin Proulx, 406 Pursley Dr., DeLand, disbarred,
effective immediately following an August 31 court order. (Admitted to
practice: 2004) Proulx served as court-appointed defense counsel in
several criminal cases pending in Lake County wherein he failed to
provide diligent representation, failed to maintain adequate
communication with the clients, failed to obey court orders and
ultimately abandoned his clients’ matters. Because Proulx was court
appointed, new counsel was appointed to represent the clients and none
of the clients were harmed by Proulx’s misconduct. Proulx also failed to
respond timely to the Bar’s repeated efforts to communicate with him
and failed to participate in the Bar disciplinary proceedings in a
meaningful manner. (Case No. SC23-0389)
Wanda I. Rufin, 1529 SW 1st St., Miami, suspended for one year,
effective 30 days following a September 7 court order. (Admitted to
practice: 1999) While representing the husband in a dissolution of
marriage, Rufin made partial unauthorized distributions of the trust
funds from the proceeds of the sale of the marital home. When the court
ordered a final equitable distribution to the former wife, Rufin failed
to advise the court about the remaining balance of the marital funds
held in a second escrow account. Rufin has since disgorged the full
amount to the former wife. (Case No. SC22-0821)
David George Simmons, Jr., 10380 SW Village Center Dr., Port Saint Lucie, public reprimand
and ordered to complete Ethics School, effective immediately following a
September 21 court order. (Admitted to practice: 2011) Simmons entered a
notice of appearance to substitute in for a suspended lawyer believing
that the suspension was short-term, when, in fact, it required proof of
rehabilitation prior to reinstatement. Because Simmons assumed he would
not be representing the client long-term, he failed to obtain specific
details regarding the client’s case and had only a basic understanding
of the issues. Simmons failed to appear for several hearings after being
duly noticed by the court. The court ultimately sanctioned Simmons and
ordered him to pay attorney’s fees to the opposing counsel. (Case No. SC23-1260)
The Florida Supreme Court, The Florida Bar and its Department of
Lawyer Regulation are charged with administering a statewide
disciplinary system to enforce Supreme Court rules of professional
conduct for the more than 111,000 members of The Florida Bar. Key
discipline case files that are public record are posted to attorneys’
individual online Florida Bar profiles. To view discipline documents, follow these steps. Information on the discipline system and how to file a complaint are available at www.floridabar.org/attorneydiscipline.
Court orders are not final until time expires to file a rehearing
motion and, if filed, determined. The filing of such a motion does not
alter the effective date of the discipline. Disbarred lawyers may not
reapply for admission for five years. They are required to go through an
extensive process that includes a rigorous background check and
retaking the Bar exam. Attorneys suspended for periods of 91 days and
longer must undergo a rigorous process to regain their law licenses
including proving rehabilitation. Disciplinary revocation is tantamount
to disbarment.
Full Article & Source:
October 1, 2023 Disciplinary Actions