The Florida Supreme Court in recent court orders disciplined 12
attorneys, suspending five, reprimanding one, revoking the licenses of
five, and admonishing one. There are three reciprocal orders and one
discipline order from prior to September 26 included.
Timmy W. Cox, Sr., 7401 SW 16th St., Plantation, suspended until
further order of the Court effective immediately following an October
11 court order. (Admitted to practice: 2014) Cox failed to respond to
The Florida Bar File No. 2022-50,604(17C). The Florida Bar filed its
Petition for Contempt and Order to Show Cause on August 16, 2022, and
the Florida Supreme Court order Cox to show cause by September 1, 2022.
Cox failed to file a response to the Court’s Order to Show Cause. (Case
No: SC22-1063)
Calvin Carl Curtis, 1135 E. South Temple, Salt Lake City, UT, disciplinary revocation with
leave to seek readmission effective immediately following a September 1
court order. (Admitted to practice: 2012) In the United States District
Court, District of Utah, Case Number 2:21-cr-00464, Curtis plead guilty
to one count of wire fraud, a felony violation of 18 U.S.C. §1343; and
one count of money laundering, a felony violation of 18 U.S.C. §1957.
(Case No: SC22-697)
Steven Konstantinos Dimopoulos, 6671 Las Vegas Blvd. S., Unit D-275, Las Vegas, NV, admonishment for minor misconduct.
(Admitted to practice: 2011) This is a reciprocal discipline action,
based on Dimopoulos’ notice to The Florida Bar of a Letter of Reprimand
dated November 20, 2020, by the Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board.
While representing a client in a personal injury matter, Dimopoulos
failed to adequately supervise his staff. Dimopoulos’ nonlawyer staff
members exchanged emails with the insurance company’s adjuster without
copying the associate attorney assigned to the matter. Therefore, it
appeared that the nonlawyers were negotiating the client’s settlement.
(Case No: SC22-162)
Vegina Trimetrice Hawkins, 4824 S.W. 24th St., West Park, suspended for 90 days
with automatic reinstatement pending a Florida Lawyers Assistance,
Inc., evaluation, effective immediately following an October 6 court
order. (Admitted to practice: 2004) While a circuit judge in 2019,
Hawkins placed her hands near or on a court employee’s neck and made
back and forth shaking motions for less than two seconds. The Judicial
Qualifications Commission filed charges and suspended Hawkins during the
investigation. Ultimately, Hawkins resigned from the bench. (Case No: SC22-590)
Brian Alfred Mangines, 1515 N. Federal Hwy., Suite. 300, Boca Raton, suspended for two years, nunc pro tunc,
effective August 24, 2022, per the October 13 court order. (Admitted to
practice: 1997) Mangines pled guilty to one count of Patient Brokering,
a third degree felony, and was sentenced to 24 months of probation,
which included a condition that he could not engage in the practice of
law during probation. The Florida Supreme Court suspended Mangines on
August 24, 2022, after the Bar filed a Notice of Determination or
Judgment of Guilt following his guilty plea. The court then suspended
Mangines for two years after he entered into a consent judgment with the
bar. (Case No: SC22-1110)
Scott Leonard Newman, 16 Sutton Ter., Jericho, NY, suspended for one year
effective 30 days following a September 1 court order. (Admitted to
practice: 1998) This is a reciprocal discipline action, based on a New
York Opinion and Order dated March 3, 2021, which imposed a one-year
suspension. Newman submitted an affidavit in the New York matter in
which he conditionally admitted that he (1) misappropriated funds
entrusted to him as a fiduciary incident to his practice of law; (2)
commingled personal funds with funds entrusted to him as a fiduciary,
incident to his practice of law; (3) failed to make or maintain required
bookkeeping records for his escrow account; and (4) engaged in conduct
that adversely reflects on his fitness as a lawyer. Newman failed to
participate in The Florida Bar’s disciplinary proceeding. Newman had no
prior discipline, and he made restitution prior to the bar’s
involvement. Rules violated: 1.15(a) and (d), and 8.4(h) of the Rules of
Professional Conduct (22 NYCRR 1200.0). By operation of Rule 3-4.6,
Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, the Opinion and Order of the Supreme
Court of The State of New York Appellate Division, Second Judicial
Department was conclusive proof of such misconduct in this disciplinary
proceeding. (Case No: SC22-148)
Gordon Thomas Nicol, 8845 Chambore Dr., Jacksonville, disciplinary revocation
with leave to seek readmission effective 30 days following a September
29 court order. (Admitted to practice: 1989) Nicol’s law firm failed to
handle multiple client matters in a proper manner. Nicol failed to
properly supervise non-lawyer staff and associates who were assigned to
these cases. Nicol had no prior disciplinary history. (Case No: SC22-981)
Robert Laurence Pelletier, 233 E. Bay St., Suite 1020, Jacksonville, public reprimand
and attendance at ethics school within six months of a September 1
court order. (Admitted to practice: 2012) Pelletier was hired to
represent a client in a criminal matter. He was hired to represent the
client by a co-defendant to the criminal charges pending against the
client he was hired to represent. Pelletier did not obtain a waiver from
the parties involved related to the potential conflict. Pelletier
failed to diligently pursue his client’s criminal cases and failed to
adequately communicate with the client. Pelletier also failed to timely
respond to the Bar’s inquiries. (Case No: SC22-397)
Nah-Deh E. W. Simmons, P.O. Box 41083, Jacksonville, suspended for 90 days,
attendance at ethics school, DDCS, FLA, Inc., evaluation and payment of
disciplinary costs effective 30 days following an October 20 court
order. (Admitted to practice: 2007) Simmons engaged in multiple cases of
neglect, inadequate communication, failure to respond to orders to show
cause issued by appellate courts, failure to appear for hearings, and
lack of candor to the court in two separate cases. Simmons had
significant mitigation. (Case No: SC21-21 and SC21-1762)
Thomas Edward Stone, P.O. Box 292, Madison, disciplinary revocation
with leave to seek readmission effective 30 days following a September
29 court order. (Admitted to practice: 1976) Stone, an assistant public
defender, was assigned to represent a defendant in several criminal
matters that included felonies. The client violated probation related to
her plea of the criminal matters. Stone was again appointed to
represent the client in the violation of probation matters. Thereafter,
Stone admitted that he engaged in a sexual relationship with the client
who he still represented at the time. The client reported she felt
pressured to engage in the inappropriate relationship because Stone was
handling the client’s criminal matters. (Case No: SC22-945)
Thomas Edmondson Whigham Jr., 4310 W. Spruce St., Unit 238, Tampa, disciplinary revocation
with leave to seek readmission effective 30 days following a September
29 court order. (Admitted to practice: 2013) Whigham was previously
suspended for 30 days and placed on probation conditioned on his
compliance with a Florida Lawyer’s Assistance, Inc., rehabilitation
contract. Thereafter, Whigham is alleged to have failed to comply with
the terms of his FLA, Inc., contract. During the Bar’s investigation of
Whigham’s non-compliance, he filed a Petition for Disciplinary
Revocation with Leave to Seek Readmission. (Case No: SC22-979)
James Santos Wilkie, 1333 S. Ocean Blvd., Ste. 1323, Pompano Beach, disciplinary revocation
with leave to seek readmission after five years following an October 27
court order. (Admitted to practice: 2013) Wilkie agreed to a
disciplinary revocation concerning the misuse of client funds. (Case No: SC22-1009)
The Florida Supreme Court, The Florida Bar and its Department of
Lawyer Regulation are charged with administering a statewide
disciplinary system to enforce Supreme Court rules of professional
conduct for the more than 110,000 members of The Florida Bar. Key
discipline case files that are public record are posted to attorneys’
individual online Florida Bar profiles. To view discipline documents, follow these steps. Information on the discipline system and how to file a complaint are available at www.floridabar.org/attorneydiscipline.
Court orders are not final until time expires to file a rehearing
motion and, if filed, determined. The filing of such a motion does not
alter the effective date of the discipline. Disbarred lawyers may not
re-apply for admission for five years. They are required to go through
an extensive process that includes a rigorous background check and
retaking the Bar exam. Attorneys suspended for periods of 91 days and
longer must undergo a rigorous process to regain their law licenses
including proving rehabilitation. Disciplinary revocation is tantamount
to disbarment.
Full Article & Source:
November 1, 2022 Disciplinary Actions