The Connecticut Supreme Court upheld a prior ruling Thursday that a
17-year-old cancer patient cannot refuse chemotherapy treatment for
Hodgkin's lymphoma.
The state argued that the teen lacked competency extended to maturity
and that they did not believe she understood the severity of her
prognosis. Her mother and her mother's lawyer said they expect to go
back to trial court to more fully explore the mature minor argument.
The teen, who is identified in court documents as “Cassandra C.,” but
was identified by police as Cassandra Callender in a November missing
persons report, was diagnosed with Hodgkin’s lymphoma in September. At
the time, doctors at the Connecticut Children’s Medical Center (CCMC)
recommended she receive chemotherapy.
Cassandra ran away after two treatments in November and, with the
support of her mother, refused any more when she returned. After the
hospital reported Cassandra’s mother, Jackie Fortin, the Connecticut
Department of Children and Families (DCF) took temporary custody of the
teen, and her mother was ordered to cooperate with medical care
administered under the agency’s supervision.
The teen believes the chemotherapy will do more damage to her body
than the cancer will, according to the Hartford Courant. Doctors have
said the teen has an 80 to 85 percent chance of living -- with six
months of chemotherapy treatment, according to Fox News’ legal analyst
Peter Johnson Jr.
After the arguments Thursday, Fortin said she would not allow her
daughter to die. The single mother said she and her daughter want to
seek alternative treatments that don't include putting the "poison" of
chemotherapy into her daughter's body.
"This is her decision and her rights, which is what we are here
fighting about," Fortin said. "We should have choices about what to do
with our bodies."
Fortin and her lawyer said they are considering the next step after losing the case.
The teen’s doctors testified at a trial court hearing after which the
DCF was authorized to make medical decisions on her behalf. The teen
and her mother appealed the ruling, claiming it violates their
constitutional right and that the state should recognize the “mature
minor doctrine.”
The doctrine permits a minor who exhibits the maturity of an adult to
make decisions reserved for those who attained the age of majority,
meaning 18. Cassandra turns 18 in September. Johnson, who himself
battled Hodgkin's disease at age 18, disagrees that it should apply to
Cassandra.
“The family is wrong on the law, and wrong on the ethics, and wrong on the humanity,” he told Fox & Friends’ Peter Doocy.
“Wrong on the law, first of all, the state of Connecticut has an
obligation to preserve life of an infant. The state of Connecticut has
an obligation to prevent suicide. If she does not get this treatment,
this is a form of suicide, and frankly the American Civil Liberties
Union is complicit in her death if she dies,” Johnson said.
Lymphoma is a type of blood cancer that affects the body’s lymphatic
system, specifically the white blood cells that help the body fight
infection and disease. A form of chemotherapy, radiation therapy or a
combination of the two is typically used to treat Hodgkin's lymphoma,
according to the Lymphoma Research Foundation.
Prior to the ruling, Johnson said the state’s Supreme Court will have
to decide whether to send the case back down to a lower court for
another hearing to determine the competency of the mother and of the
child in terms of making the decision to halt treatment.
“Do 16- and 17-year-old children have the judgment, the perspective,
the discretion, the experience to be making these life and death
decisions? I say they do not,” Johnson said.
Fortin told the Hartford Courant that even prior to her diagnosis, Cassandra would have opted not to undergo chemotherapy.
“This is her decision, and she’s very intelligent enough to make this
decision on her own,” Fortin said. “She does not want poisons in her
body, and she does not want to be forced through the state or the
government to force her to do such a thing. And right now, at this
moment, she is being forced chemo upon her against her wish.”
Full Article & Source:
Connecticut Supreme Court upholds ruling that teen must undergo chemo
3 comments:
Seeking an alternative method of treatment is not a "life or death" decision.
SHAME on everyone involved with this decision.
They might save the body, but risk destroying the person.
I do not believe a 17 year old has the maturity to make this decision...The mother forgets the Doctor have the years of education and should know what they are doing. Many lives have been saved from this type of cancer by accepting chemo even though we know it is unpleasant. She is just beginning her life so why end it when a sure treatment is available?
Judy
Post a Comment