By Brad Schrade
A state audit identified damning new evidence that Georgia’s system to
protect seniors and vulnerable adults from abuse, neglect and
exploitation is failing and the breakdowns are causing additional harm.
Among the significant gaps cited in Friday’s report by State Auditor Greg S. Griffin
on Georgia’s Adult Protective Services system was that investigators
are taking too long to respond to urgent cases, such as when the elderly
were going hungry or were sexually abused. One year, some 500
vulnerable adults facing serious situations waited three days or more
before an investigator arrived. APS employees also were rejecting
reports that should have been investigated, the audit found.
The system failures leave thousands of elderly and disabled
adults at risk. The report says one in 10 older Georgians may be victims
of abuse, neglect or exploitation during their lifetimes.
Failures of law enforcement to communicate with APS play prominently in the breakdowns, the audit found.
Multiple
law enforcement personnel the auditors interviewed indicated they don’t
report all cases of abuse, neglect or exploitation to APS, despite
statutory requirements to do so.
The audit noted that law enforcement officers “are hesitant to
report cases that involve certain types of victims or abuse.” Officers
said they prefer to handle cases themselves because of negative
experience with APS or a belief that APS is overworked and can’t handle
all the cases reported.
And nearly half of law enforcement officials surveyed in Georgia
and more than half of district attorneys surveyed didn’t have a firm
grasp on Adult Protective Services’ critical role in helping victims.
Reporting
is haphazard, depending on what county the victim lives in, the audit
indicates. Cobb and Gwinnett, for example, have about the same number of
vulnerable adults. But in fiscal 2018, Cobb reported 50 percent more
cases to APS. Law enforcement in the two counties had an even larger
disparity.
In 29 counties across Georgia there were no reports from law enforcement, and another 24 had just one report for 2018.
“If
reports are not made, victims cannot obtain potentially necessary
services and may be at continued risk for future occurrences of abuse,
neglect, or exploitation,” the report concludes.
The audit was
also critical of the Georgia Bureau of Investigation. It notes that
after the General Assembly approved funding in fiscal year 2016 to hire
eight agents to focus on elder abuse, GBI didn’t use the funds to hire
the allotted additional agents. Instead, it trained an agent in each of
its 15 regions to be a resource on elder abuse. The audit questioned how
effective the agency has been in addressing elder abuse, although the
agency in its response said it had increased its caseload.
The
audit also took aim at the way APS manages calls for help. The office
only accepts calls from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. That
can lead to delays for reports that come in at night and on weekends,
when the agency’s website in the only way to report a call.
Auditors
also found the APS lacks any systematic way to analyze its work and
ensure the decisions on cases are consistent and appropriate. As a
result, the agency may be rejecting cases that warrant investigation. In
FY 2018, 6,300 cases were rejected and 41 percent of those had no
documented reason in the case file for why the decision was made.
About
40% of cases alleging sexual abuse were classified as standard cases,
despite an APS policy that such allegations should be designated as
priority.
The breakdowns point to the need for significant training and awareness across Georgia’s system.
The
Department of Human Services, which oversees APS across the state,
generally agreed with the report’s findings. It noted that it has
expanded training and outreach to law enforcement and other mandated
reporters through its At-Risk Adult Crime Tactics training program that
has educated more than 3,000 front-line workers across the state on how
to recognize and report abuse. It also noted that it believes policies
about investigator response to categorizing reports as standard or
priority are confusing and need review.
It did not agree with the
recommendation to change its business hours, nor with the recommendation
that it lacks a process to ensure decisions are appropriate.
While
APS investigates abuse, neglect and exploitation and connects victims
with services in the community, it is not the only state agency tasked
with protecting seniors from abuse and neglect.
The agency is not responsible for investigating reports of abuse and neglect in state-licensed facilities.
But the audit mirrors similar problems identified by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution in its recent investigation
of assisted living and personal care homes. The AJC found that the
Department of Community Health, which is responsible for investigating
cases in state-licensed homes, had gaps in its oversight. The AJC also
found significant problems with the way police and regulators
communicate, which led to few crimes ever being prosecuted.
Full Article & Source:
Audit: State failing elderly victims of abuse, neglect
No comments:
Post a Comment