Most
home health aides offer vital care to the frail and aged. But some have
other designs, leaving too many clients vulnerable to theft and worse.
It is a crisis largely unseen, one which state authorities have done
little about.
By Linda Matchan, Globe Correspondent September 15, 2018
NEW BEDFORD — At first, Sarah Estrella seemed like the answer to Deborah Lesco’s prayers.
An
old spinal injury had slowly robbed Lesco of her ability to walk,
leaving her lower body racked with pain that only medical marijuana
could ease. The 68-year-old former special education teacher got around
in a wheelchair and needed help with her daily activities.
Luckily,
Lesco had found this “nice, sweet girl” on a state-sponsored caregiver
website who was happy to take care of it all. “She had experience, she
was smart, she was clean, she could lift me up,” said Lesco, who was
further reassured because she knew some of Estrella’s relatives.
What could go wrong?
Everything.
When she hired Estrella in September 2015, Lesco didn’t know that her
new personal care attendant had faced 15 criminal charges since 1997,
including larceny, assault and battery, shoplifting, car theft,
prescription drug possession, and check forgery.
Soon,
strange things began to happen. Lesco started getting late charges on
credit cards that she couldn’t find. Her rent check bounced and she
discovered she had a $2,500 tab at Target even though she’d never opened
an account there. Over a four-month period, from February to May of
2016, Lesco estimates she lost more than $20,000 in bank withdrawals and
unauthorized credit card charges — one made at a sports bar.
Horrified,
she confronted Estrella and accused the younger woman of using her
credit cards. “She didn’t deny it,” recalled Lesco, who said Estrella
was “sneering and sarcastic. . . . She was like, ‘Yeah, so what?’ ”
Estrella pleaded innocent to charges of larceny and credit card fraud in the spring of 2016.
PEOPLE LIKE SARAH ESTRELLA are
the stuff of baby boomers’ nightmares as they increasingly rely on an
army of nurse’s aides, personal care attendants, and others to help them
remain in their homes deep into old age. The category of personal care aide is projected to add more jobs by 2026 than any other occupation in the country, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Many
of these aides enter the home as virtual unknowns, undergoing no
background check and receiving little, if any, training. Consumers often
know more about what aides cost than whether they can be trusted. And
with demand for home aides so high, those seeking care are simply
relieved to find someone to take the job.
Theirs
is an honorable calling, and many home aides feel gratified to help
clients in their time of need. Some become dear friends, almost family
members.
But
sometimes they help themselves — to their clients’ money, belongings,
medications, even identities. It can be a predator’s dream career.
Astonishingly,
there is almost no government safety net to protect people seeking home
care from these dangerous strangers. Unlike nurses — or even
hairdressers or manicurists — home aides don’t need a state license.
Anyone can call him or herself a home care worker in Massachusetts and
work privately, though state law mandates that home care agencies
perform criminal background checks on workers. Agencies typically offer
greater accountability and supervision of aides than workers hired
privately, but they’re too expensive for many families.
There
are also essentially no credentials required to work as someone’s
caregiver, just a willingness to do tedious, sometimes backbreaking work
that typically pays $11 to $13 an hour. Personal care attendants hired
through a MassHealth program, like Sarah Estrella, are merely required
to attend a state-run three-hour orientation session. Additional training is entirely optional.
Massachusetts
lags in required training for workers seeking to be certified, too —
among New England states, it is tied with Connecticut for the fewest
hours mandated.
Adding
to the general lack of oversight, major websites where customers seek
home aides, such as Craigslist or, until recently, the state-sponsored
Rewarding Work site, don’t screen workers or check the criminal
backgrounds of job seekers at all, making it easy for people such as
Estrella to slip through.
Full Article & Source:
Stranger in the house
2 comments:
We must be more vigilant on whom we let in our homes or hour parent's homes. Background checks are essential. And keep a close watch on everything going on.
Caretakers some times are takers and they feel a sense of entitlement.
Post a Comment