Pennsylvania
must do a better job of keeping nursing home residents safe, including
making sure there are enough aides to care for time and denying or
taking the licenses of bad nursing home operators.
On
top of that, it must prepare for the surge of Pennsylvania residents
who will soon need nursing home care or other help, including addressing
a looming, severe shortage of nurses and aids to care for them.
Those are the conclusions of state Auditor General Eugene DePasquale and
Secretary of Health Dr. Rachel Levine, who on Tuesday followed up on a
2016 audit of nursing homes which found assorted areas in need of
improvement.
Much of the 2016 audit focused on the
state health department’s ability to catch and punish nursing homes that
don’t provide adequate staffing or otherwise fail to provide good care
for residents. The 2016 audit faulted the health department in some
areas and made assorted recommendations for improvements.
“I think we’ve made strides but we must do an even better job,” DePasquale said.
Levine,
who heads the health department, stood next to him during a briefing at
the Capitol and said she largely agrees with his conclusions, which are
outlined in a report called “Who Will Care for Mom and Dad?”
Levine
said her department has ramped up efforts to inspect nursing homes and
crack down on violations. For example, she said the health department in
2018 issued 165 fines totaling $2.3 million, up from 11 fines totaling
$62,000 in 2014.
Still, DePasquale said assorted things
need further monitoring, including the health department’s use of
“provisional licenses” to spur nursing homes to improve. The department
applied the measure only three times in 2018, after using it up to 38
times in recent years. Levine said the department has become more
aggressive with provisional licenses, using the tactic 24 times so far
this year.
DePasquale further said the department must provide better data to shed light on which homes are truly improving.
Levine
said her department is in the process of coming up with a new state
regulation for minimum hours of daily care received by nursing home
residents. Pennsylvania’s present regulation, last updated about 20
years ago, requires at least 2.7 hours per day. But many experts and
unions representing nursing home workers have long said at least four
hours is needed, especially given the increased level of sickness and
frailty of the typical nursing home resident.
Levine
said her department is working with experts to come up with the
appropriate amount, and hopes to release the figure for public comment
by the end of the year. Levine said the state had gone too long without
revising the regulation.
Much of the focus of DePasquale and Levine
on Tuesday was on warning about a twin crisis of more Pennsylvanians
needing some form of help or care, and a shortage of workers to care for
them.
According to DePasquale, about 3
million Pennsylvania residents — nearly a quarter of the population —
will be 65 or older by 2040. By 2030, there will be 38 older and
potentially dependent state residents for every 100 working-age
residents, he said.
At the same time, a
high proportion of older people in need of care will lack the means to
pay for it, making them dependent on government programs.
Levine
and DePasquale said there must be a wide-ranging effort including state
agencies, the senior care industry, colleges and others to create and
provide services and the needed workforce.
That
includes addressing the low pay that is making it hard to adequately
staff nursing homes and retain competent workers. DePasquale stressed
that caring for the old and frail requires highly skilled and caring
people, and Pennsylvania must find a way to provide adequate wages and
benefits while also making it a meaningful, satisfying career.
DePasquale
said older Pennsylvanians will go without sufficient care and suffer
greatly if the state fails to begin preparing quickly. Younger people
will also suffer under the burden of caring for dependent loved ones who
lack other means of obtaining help, he said.
LeadingAge PA, a trade group representing
non-profit nursing homes, said in a news release it largely agrees with
DePasqaule’s follow-up findings. The organization attributed much of the
staffing and workforce shortages to what it says is insufficient
funding from the state’s Medicaid program, which covers the costs of the
majority of the 90,000 residents of Pennsylvania nursing homes.
LeadingAge
said the homes lost $630 million caring for those residents, and was
denied a request for a 2.8-percent funding increase in the 2019-20
budget.
“The problem is becoming more
than a staffing issue. Some of the best facilities in Pennsylvania are
struggling to remain open, while others are forced to sell to out of
state, low quality operators. It is our hope that state lawmakers will
begin addressing this funding crisis in next year’s state budget. We’re
running out of time,” the statement from LeadingAge CEO Adam Marles
said.
Full Article & Source:
Pa. ‘ill-prepared’ to care for older residents, faces disaster without fast action: state officials
No comments:
Post a Comment