Altogether,
the Office of Professional and Public Guardians says it has been
allocated $150,000 to pay for professional guardian investigations since
2016. It hasn’t been enough, and a backlog of incomplete probes has
been building.
So this year, the agency asked for a little bit more -- $97,488, to be exact.
It
was a rounding error in the context of Florida’s $91 billion budget. It
amounted to asking for less than one-one thousandth of 1 percent of the
state’s general revenue.
The Florida Legislature chose not to fund it.
The
decision has infuriated advocates for the vulnerable senior citizens
and disabled people who have been declared unable to care for themselves
and are put at the mercy of the professional guardians who are given
control over their lives -- and their money.
There
are currently 75 investigations that haven’t yet been completed because
of a lack of funding, said Sharon Bock, the elected clerk and
comptroller for Palm Beach County whose office works with the state
guardianship office on the probes.
“That
means there are 75 wards out there who are vulnerable, and could be
continually exploited, while we fight for a sliver of adequate funding,”
she said.
State
Rep. MaryLynn Magar, a Republican from Palm Beach County, chaired the
House committee in charge of health-care spending, which refused to
include the funding request in its budget. She did not respond to
repeated phone calls and emails asking her why.
A
spokesman for House Speaker Jose Oliva, a Republican from Miami, said
legislators felt they had given the state’s guardianship office enough
money already. He pointed out that the Legislature gave OPPG an extra
$2.5 million in this year’s budget -- although that money is supposed to
be used on additional public guardians to care for elderly and disabled
wards who are too poor to pay for a professional guardian. There are
more than 450 people unable to care for themselves on the waitlist for a
public guardian.
"OPPG,
it was felt by both the House and the Senate, could utilize less than 5
percent of that money to conduct the investigations,” said Fred
Piccolo, the Oliva spokesman. “To allege resources were unavailable is
simply untrue.”
When
someone believes a professional guardian is abusing or exploiting the
ward they were appointed to care for, they can file a complaint with
OPPG. The state agency then does a preliminary screening and, if the
complaint appears to have merit, it passes it on to one of a half-dozen
county clerks’ offices around the state to conduct a full investigation.
The scandal surrounding disgraced Orlando-based professional guardian
Rebecca Fierle, who is now under criminal investigation after filing Do
Not Resuscitate orders against the wishes of her wards, erupted after
one such complaint was investigated by the clerk and comptroller in
Okaloosa County.
Thorough
probes are expensive. During the state’s 2017-18 fiscal year, OPPG,
working with the alliance of clerks’ offices, says it investigated 128
cases statewide at an average cost of $1,289 per case. And the workload
is growing as more baby boomers become infirm, more are placed into
guardianship -- and more complaints are filed.
Activists
were optimistic the agency would get money for investigations this
year. Newly elected Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis included the $97,488
request in the proposed budget he recommended to the Legislature.
There
didn’t appear to be anyone lobbying against it. Representatives for the
Elder Law and Real Property, Probate and Trust Law sections of the
Florida Bar, two of the most influential interest groups when it comes
to guardianship law, said they did not oppose the request.
“We
would never want them [OPPG] to not be funded,” said Gina
Rossi-Scheiman, the executive director of the Florida State Guardianship
Association, which represents professional guardians. “We want them to
be fully able to do their job.”
The
Florida Senate included the money in its budget. But the Florida House
did not. And when the two chambers came together to work out a final
budget -- a process known as “budget conference” -- the Senate dropped
the issue early in the negotiations.
There
was never any public discussion of the decision, as most of the
Legislature’s budget conference decisions were made in private. The
public meetings were formalities in which one side read out a list of
decisions; meetings of the health-care budget conference committee --
which was responsible for more than $37 billion in spending -- lasted
about 10 minutes each.
Budget
conference is “always kind of done behind closed doors,” said Shannon
Miller, a Gainesville attorney who co-chairs the legislative committee
for the Elder Law Section of the Florida Bar. “We don’t have a lot of
access to that process.”
The
choice to not to spend an extra $97,488 on additional guardianship
investigations was just one of thousands of spending decisions the
Legislature made while building a $91 billion state budget. They also
chose to spend $250,000 to subsidize a professional golf tournament at
an Ocala development owned by a major Republican Party donor and $1
million to help build a facility for luxury corporate jet manufacturer
Learjet Inc. (DeSantis vetoed the money for the golf tournament but
approved the money for the Learjet facility.)
State
Sen. Aaron Bean, a Republican from Nassau County who oversaw
health-care spending in the Senate, said lawmakers don’t necessarily
oppose spending an extra $97,488 to investigate allegations against
professional guardians. But he said there’s an emphasis on finding
common ground quickly during the final, frenetic days of session.
“There’s
just so many things happening at once,” Bean said. “I don’t think it’s
that we didn’t want it, it’s just that we’re trying to line up with the
house and trying to get out of there.”
Full Article & Source:
Florida lawmakers refused to pay to investigate more guardians
No comments:
Post a Comment