Showing posts with label lawmakers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lawmakers. Show all posts

Friday, October 27, 2023

Lawmakers eye tighter oversight on guardianships

By Samantha Hogan

Committee holds meeting after Monitor reports about eight unexplained deaths of adults in public guardianship. 


State lawmakers are considering more intensive oversight and frequent reviews of guardianships after eight adults in state care died in unexplained ways.

Members of the Health and Human Services Committee questioned state officials with the attorney general’s office, medical examiner’s, disability services and a probate judge about changes needed in the state’s guardianship system during a 3 ½ hour meeting in Augusta on Wednesday. 

Leaders across the agencies said better communication between Adult Protective Services and the probate courts when there is a suspicion of abuse, neglect or exploitation, training for guardians, time limits on guardianships, and more frequent reports would be most helpful.

But the lawmakers said the eight deaths that occurred in public guardianship did not need further review.

“I’m satisfied with what we heard today from both the attorney general’s office and from the department,” said co-chair of the committee Rep. Michele Meyer (D-Eliot) in an interview after the meeting.

The hearing was held after The Maine Monitor reported that eight adults under public guardianship died in unexplained ways in the past three years. 

State medical examiners said the deaths had “undetermined” circumstances, while noting that over-medication was the cause of several of those deaths. Among them is a woman whose death was deemed a “homicide” by medical examiners. The state attorney general’s office has decided not to prosecute anyone for her death.

The unexplained deaths were part of the Monitor’s ongoing investigation into Maine’s part-time probate courts.

State lawmakers responded to the article with alarm and frustration that they had not been informed about these deaths. Sen. Joe Baldacci (D-Bangor), who also chairs the committee, said the eight deaths show a need for more oversight of the state’s public guardians, who are appointed and overseen by 16 part-time, elected probate judges. 

Public guardians are a “last resort” for people that cannot safely make decisions on their own and have no family to care for them, Director of the Office of Aging and Disability Services Paul Saucier told lawmakers on Wednesday. 

In 2022, there were 1,368 adults under public guardianship of the state. The majority of the people had multiple chronic conditions, and 60% were age 59 or older, Saucier told lawmakers.

Their care is overseen by public guardians, who are employees of the Department of Health and Human Services — or DHHS. The guardians make medical, financial or social decisions for people who are incapacitated by age or because of disability. 

“We recognize the pain and grief that the deaths of these individuals have caused to those who knew and cared for them,” Saucier told lawmakers.

He acknowledged the role his office plays in protecting the health and safety of adults under public guardianship.

State medical examiners identified the eight cases while stepping up their review of deaths of adults with public guardians between 2018 and 2023. DHHS was reporting an increasing number of public guardianship deaths at that time. Medical examiners deemed most of the more than 200 deaths in that period to be natural or accidental.

DHHS by law is supposed to tell lawmakers on the Health and Human Services Committee each time it reports a death to the medical examiner’s office, but that has not happened in the 26 years since the law took effect, The Maine Monitor revealed in September.


Meyer and Baldacci said in an interview after the meeting on Wednesday they expected DHHS to begin making the required reports to the committee.

In the long-term, Meyer and Baldacci said they may look to shift the responsibility of reviewing public guardianship deaths onto the newly formed Aging and Disability Mortality Review Panel. The panel would review the deaths, look for patterns and include their findings in a yearly report to the committee.

“It makes sense for these reports to go to them, and they can vet it better than us. All they’re going to tell us is how they died, whereas this entity may be able to gather more information and provide some more insight into what happened and to tell us whether or not there’s any red flags that need to be looked at,” Baldacci said.

‘Meaningful and manageable’

Judge Libby Mitchell, of the Kennebec County Probate Court, told lawmakers that more frequent reporting by guardians would improve oversight of guardianships statewide. 

In particular, if Adult Protective Services within DHHS receives a report of possible abuse, neglect or exploitation and the person is in a guardianship, she wants to know about it, Mitchell said.

Guardians are currently required to file an annual report to the probate judge about the care of the person under guardianship. Mitchell suggested public guardians make interim reports or that the reporting window be reduced to more than annually.

Still probate judges will need to find a balance between a burdensome amount of reporting by guardians and being alerted of potential concerns, Mitchell said.

“I don’t want to deal with everyone, every minute, but I do want to know when there’s a suspicion of a problem,” Mitchell said in an interview.


Mitchell, a Democrat, served 18 years in the Maine House of Representatives and six years in the state Senate. She held the top position in each chamber serving as President of the Senate and the first female Speaker of the House. Mitchell was elected in 2016 to replace her husband Jim Mitchell as probate judge of Kennebec County following his death that September.

Saucier said he is open to talking with the probate courts to find a “meaningful and manageable” way to share information between Adult Protective Services and the probate courts.

The state does not routinely share that information with the probate courts currently, Saucier said. 

No further investigation of eight deaths

Over-medication, septic complications of prolonged immobilization, and blunt force trauma were among the causes of death for the eight people under public guardianship that the Monitor reported on.

“We’ve reviewed those eight cases very carefully, and collectively they had serious chronic conditions,” Saucier said. “… The cause of death was ‘undetermined’ and that’s always serious and worthy of further review. It doesn’t necessarily mean that there was any wrongdoing in any of these cases.”

Members of the Health and Human Services Committee said Wednesday they are satisfied with the state’s findings that there was no wrongdoing in any of the deaths. Several lawmakers said no further investigation of the eight deaths was needed.

Rep. Kathy Javner (R-Chester) has served on the committee for six years. During that time, several areas of DHHS have needed better oversight, including public guardianships, she said in an interview. 

“As far as continuing an investigation into these eight deaths, I would say that perhaps no. Simply for the fact that it seems as if the department has looked at them (and) law enforcement,” Javner said.

Maine State Police have had an open case for 30 months into the death of Laurie Wall, a woman in state care with cerebral palsy and a “profound” mental disability who died from “acute intoxication” of the combined effects of three medications.

Wall died “unexpectedly but peacefully at home,” according to her obituary. The state medical examiners later determined that “the combined effects of levetiracetam, fluoxetine and lacosamide” — three prescription medications — had caused her death. Her death was classified as “undetermined.”

State police’s investigation of Wall’s death is complete and it is finalizing its report, which is not yet publicly available, spokeswoman Shannon Moss wrote in an email on Tuesday.

Among the eight unexplained deaths is also Janice Sirois, 61, who died in a Fort Kent health care facility in August 2022. Medical examiners reported that her death was a “homicide,” records show. 

The attorney general’s office closed the homicide case without prosecution due to insufficient evidence, spokeswoman Danna Hayes said in late August.

Deaths are classified as a “homicide” by medical examiners if a person dies from the willful act of another person, said Office of Chief Medical Examiner administrator Lindsey Chasteen, who spoke to lawmakers on Wednesday. 

“Just because we said it’s a homicide, does not mean that it was a criminal act. And identifying that criminal act might prove difficult,” Chasteen said.

The committee chairs said after Wednesday’s meeting they did not think the eight deaths needed to be investigated further.

“She (Chasteen) answered the question that if there was any kind of foul play or suspicion it would be reported to the attorney general’s office,” Baldacci said in an interview. “I have confidence in the medical examiner following the law.”

A legislative path to better oversight

Maine lawmakers have proposed multiple ways to address the problem of oversight of public guardians by DHHS and the probate courts:

• Baldacci has a bill currently pending with the state Legislature to add to DHHS an independent “inspector general” with the power to investigate complaints, subpoena for records and access DHHS documents. The inspector general would report concerns to law enforcement, the attorney general, or licensing agencies. The bill currently only deals with children in state care, but Baldacci is considering an amendment to add oversight of the approximately 1,200 adults under public guardianship in Maine as well.

• Sen. Lisa Keim (R-Dixfield) has proposed breaking DHHS apart into smaller state agencies. A bipartisan coalition of lawmakers have supported a similar proposal to separate the Office of Child and Family Services from the rest of DHHS. The separation was proposed by then-Sen. Bill Diamond (D-Cumberland) in 2021 following multiple child fatalities and again in 2023 by Sen. Jeff Timberlake (R-Androscoggin). The Legislature may consider Timberlake’s bill in 2024.

• Donna Bailey, former probate judge for York County and current state senator, said lawmakers should consider reestablishing the Office of Advocacy within DHHS. The office, which was eliminated by then-Gov. Paul LePage in 2012, employed a Chief Advocate and a team of advocates who looked out for the interest of people receiving state services.

• Bailey also said it would be appropriate for lawmakers on the Government Oversight Committee to investigate the eight deaths identified by the Monitor.

Unresolved is a half-century old mandate from the voters to overhaul Maine’s probate courts.

Probate judges are the only elected judges in Maine. Each county funds and operates a probate court with an elected register and judge. The probate courts are responsible for estates, guardianships of adults and minors, conservatorships and name changes.

Voters 56 years ago amended the state constitution to set up a new probate court system with full-time judges. The constitutional amendment never went into effect, because it was contingent on legislators passing a plan to transition to a new court system, the Monitor reported.

State lawmakers, probate judges, lawyers and a state supreme court justice undertook a large review of the probate courts in 2021. The study recommended the probate courts be integrated into the state judicial branch with nine appointed judges dedicated to probate. The plan was approved but never funded or implemented. 

​​“At some point the Legislature is going to have to find the political will to do something that establishes a probate court system that hires full-time judges, because that’s what the constitution has told the Legislature to do,” Sen. Craig Hickman (D-Winthrop) previously told the Monitor.

Mitchell, who served on the study group, said the probate courts are working as they are currently structured. The Legislature can work on reforming problems with the current system, rather than the reorganization of the probate courts into the judicial branch, she said in an interview.

“If the Legislature has not acted on it, there’s not a crisis out there,” Mitchell said in an interview. 

Lawmakers may be limited in what they can accomplish to reform the probate courts and DHHS during the 2024 legislative session. 

The constitution restricts legislators to working during the second session to only matters of the: budget, “Governor’s call,” emergency legislation, bills referred to committee for study and report during the first session or by written petition of the electors.

“I’m going to take in all the suggestions, and I need to think about how best to approach it,” Baldacci said. 

Full Article & Source:
Lawmakers eye tighter oversight on guardianships

Tuesday, July 6, 2021

Inspired by #FreeBritney, Democrats and Republicans agree conservatorship is toxic

Lawmakers want court to end 13-year-long guardianship, leave Britney alone

Britney Spears arrives for the premiere of “Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood” in 2019.  (Valerie Macon/AFP via Getty Images)
Britney Spears arrives for the premiere of “Once Upon a Time... in Hollywood” in 2019. (Valerie Macon/AFP via Getty Images)
 By Jim Saksa and Sandhya Raman

At times, Congress can seem hopelessly divided. But there is one issue uniting members from both parties and chambers. Just days before the Fourth of July, Americans of all political stripes are coming together for the cause of liberty: #FreeBritney.

Following a mental health crisis in 2008, pop star Britney Spears has lived under the strict confines of a conservatorship that gives her father, Jamie Spears, almost plenary control over her personal life and massive fortune. Last week, the singer petitioned a California court to end the conservatorship, telling Judge Brenda Penny, “I’ve lied and told the whole world I’m OK and I’m happy,” she said. “I’m in shock. I’m traumatized… I’m so angry it’s insane.”

Spears’ testimony has sparked conversations across the nation about mental health, treatment, recovery and where to draw the limit on paternalistic interventions. Members of Congress have also begun to weigh in, calling Spears’ treatment outrageous.

“It’s time we #FreeBritney and countless other Americans wrongfully subjected to predatory conservatorships,” tweeted Alabama Republican Rep. Barry Moore.

Republican Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas simply tweeted “#FreeBritney,” as did House Oversight Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y.

Rep. Matt Gaetz has been the most vocal lawmaker calling for Spears’ release from conservatorship. The Florida Republican, who is attempting to weather allegations that he paid for sex with a 17-year-old, has tweeted multiple times about Spears, appeared on Fox News to discuss the matter and mentioned it at a House Judiciary Committee markup of antitrust legislation on Thursday. 

“I do believe the nation was quite taken with the control that the guardianship and conservatorship process has on far too many Americans,” Gaetz said. “I would reiterate the call that ranking member [Jim] Jordan and I made to Chairman [Jerrold] Nadler to allow us to hold hearings on conservatorship and guardianship and abuse, and I think the very first witness before the Judiciary Committee should be Britney Spears.” 

Jordan, R-Ohio, and Gaetz wrote a letter back in March to Nadler requesting a hearing on conservatorship abuse that pointed to Spears as the “most striking example” of the issue.

Massachusetts Democratic Rep. Seth Moulton was a bit more circumspect when he tweeted Friday, admitting that conservatorship was “a word I didn’t know until yesterday” and asking his followers if Congress should investigate. The overwhelming majority said yes. 

Spears, 39, has spent the last 13 years under the court-ordered conservatorship while going on to record albums, tour the nation and appear as a talent judge on the TV show “The X Factor.” Her fans have argued that a temporary solution while the pop star recovered from mental health and substance use struggles has turned into a de facto prison.

Under the conservatorship, Spears has been prohibited from speaking out about her situation and has had limited access to her $60 million fortune earned as a multi-platinum recording artist. Jamie Spears receives a salary as her conservator and a large cut of his daughter’s earnings.

It can be extremely difficult for individuals under adult guardianship to end their supervision. Spears is petitioning the court using a lawyer she herself could not select, but who is being paid a stipend per the conservatorship’s terms. 

In February 2021, The New York Times released a documentary, “Framing Britney Spears,” that examines her career and hardships in the entertainment industry that led to her public mental health struggles in 2008, including the conservatorship and losing custody of her two children with ex-husband Kevin Federline. 

The film spurred interest in the “Free Britney” movement, and supporters have argued that the conservatorship is unnecessary given her ability to continue to perform and work. 

That shift in tone is also mirrored in members of Congress speaking out, as lawmakers have historically used Spears and other celebrities as punching bags.

“Being lectured on fiscal irresponsibility by this Democratic Congress is like being lectured on parenting by Britney Spears. It makes no sense at all,” Rep. Kevin Brady, R-Texas, said in 2007 on the House floor.  

The late Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., also used photos of Spears in a presidential campaign ad in 2008, drawing comparisons between the singer and then-presidential candidate Barack Obama as celebrities who are unfit to lead.

‘I Wanna Go’ … hold a hearing

Given a number of competing issues, it is unclear what committee could have jurisdiction if the #FreeBritney movement is taken up by Congress.

Conservatorships are traditionally appointed for individuals who are very old or who may have a mental or physical disability that places limitations on their day-to-day activities. Long-term care falls under the umbrella of the House Ways and Means Committee, but that usually encompasses issues like nursing home care or Medicare.

But liberal women’s health groups have also seized on Spears’ comments about allegedly being prevented by the conservatorship from removing her intrauterine device, or IUD, which is a form of long-lasting birth control, so that she can become pregnant.

“Everyone deserves control over their own body. Period,” tweeted Rep. Katherine Clark of Massachusetts, the fourth-ranking House Democrat.

The House and Senate Judiciary committees have previously held hearings on limits related to reproductive health, such as abortion bans. Advocacy organizations like Planned Parenthood have drawn parallels to what they call reproductive coercion — policies that restrict access to birth control or attempt to control pregnancy outcomes — and the limits that prevent Spears from attempting to become pregnant.

“If a celebrity like Britney Spears’ body can be legally controlled by outside individuals, then imagine what low-income women around the world have to deal with. Reproductive freedom is a basic human right,” said Paula Ávila-Guillén, executive director of the Women’s Equality Center.

The House Energy and Commerce Committee has often taken the lead on issues related to mental health, meaning it could also fall under the jurisdiction of its Oversight subcommittee. Expanding access to a variety of treatments and reducing stigma for people living with a mental illness or substance use disorder have been bipartisan priorities for the committee in recent years.

The Twitter account for Republicans on the House Education and Labor Committee also tweeted “#FreeBritney,” drawing comparisons between federal oversight of education and a conservatorship. But it is unclear how it could fit under the committee’s jurisdiction.

Celebrities often draw more attention to issues that affect them than the similarly afflicted but less famous. Spears is just one of 1.3 million Americans under adult guardianship, and her millions are just a drop in the $50 billion bucket under conservators’ control. Still, it is rare for any issue to so quickly draw bipartisan interest. But Spears’ situation unites reproductive rights activists with freedom-focused conservatives and an ecumenical distaste for seeing individuals exploited by those who are supposed to look after them. 

Full Article & Source:

Sunday, February 14, 2021

Lawmakers look to offer new guardianship protections in New Mexico

by Joy Wang

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.- Professional guardians have control over assets, can decide a person's healthcare, and even who visits them. 

However, advocates say, there isn't enough oversight, which can lead to bad actors preying on vulnerable people.

Rio Hamilton says his mom is the victim of a bad actor.

"She is the quintessential little old lady. She's the cutest thing in the world," said Hamilton. "She's able to function and do everything like a normal person, except she's just a little slower at it."


Hamilton's mom is now 92.

"I'm an only child, and I moved back from New York City to specifically take care of my mother during these golden years of her life," explained Hamilton. "So our intention was always that she would live at home and that we would be together."

Hamilton told KOB 4 the two of them reached out to a lawyer so he could become her power of attorney. But instead, "this lawyer filed an emergency petition, declaring my mother incapacitated," said Hamilton. "From that, they were able to seize her property, change her bank accounts, and leave me off of things like the medical directive, for my mother. This means that if my mother becomes very ill or possibly passes away, this Guardian company does not have to notify me."

Now Hamilton says he has no control over what's next.

"I would have been one of those naysayers like this could never happen to me," expressed Hamilton. "But if you've got substantial money in your account, and you are over the age of 80, and you're living alone, they are coming for you. If you have veterans benefits, and you live separate from your children, they are coming for you. If you are a 90-year-old widow person who's living off her husband's pension, they are coming for you."

His only solution is to file a grievance with the courts, but that takes time.

"There's been $90,000 in legal fees, and yet there is still no resolution," said Hamilton.

"Part of what's really difficult is that once a person has a guardian it becomes very difficult to access the courts to review the case, their case," explained Rep. Joanne Ferrary, D- Dona Ana, "Once a person has been adjudicated as incapacitated, some courts cease to allow the person to have a voice in court proceedings, and instead rely solely on the guardian to speak for that person."

House Bill 234 would create an oversight body at the state government level to review and investigate guardians and complaints filed against them.

Because right now, "they're not licensed, and there is no oversight complaint process," said Rep. Marian Matthews, D- Bernalillo. "Those are major changes that will afford greater protection for this... vulnerable group of people."

With New Mexico's population getting older, "this need for.... these professionals to help has I think just grown, and as a result, with it has grown the problem of people who take unfair advantage of vulnerable people," said Rep. Matthews.

"I know that this bill does not answer all the questions, or change any of the horrors that my family has had to go through," expressed Hamilton. "But one thing is for sure. It is a start."

Full Article & Source:

Tuesday, September 10, 2019

Florida lawmakers refused to pay to investigate more guardians

By Jason Garcia

In the three years since Florida lawmakers ordered a small state agency to begin investigating professional guardians, it has struggled to find enough money to do the job.

Altogether, the Office of Professional and Public Guardians says it has been allocated $150,000 to pay for professional guardian investigations since 2016. It hasn’t been enough, and a backlog of incomplete probes has been building.

So this year, the agency asked for a little bit more -- $97,488, to be exact.

It was a rounding error in the context of Florida’s $91 billion budget. It amounted to asking for less than one-one thousandth of 1 percent of the state’s general revenue.

The Florida Legislature chose not to fund it.

The decision has infuriated advocates for the vulnerable senior citizens and disabled people who have been declared unable to care for themselves and are put at the mercy of the professional guardians who are given control over their lives -- and their money.

There are currently 75 investigations that haven’t yet been completed because of a lack of funding, said Sharon Bock, the elected clerk and comptroller for Palm Beach County whose office works with the state guardianship office on the probes.

“That means there are 75 wards out there who are vulnerable, and could be continually exploited, while we fight for a sliver of adequate funding,” she said.

State Rep. MaryLynn Magar, a Republican from Palm Beach County, chaired the House committee in charge of health-care spending, which refused to include the funding request in its budget. She did not respond to repeated phone calls and emails asking her why.

A spokesman for House Speaker Jose Oliva, a Republican from Miami, said legislators felt they had given the state’s guardianship office enough money already. He pointed out that the Legislature gave OPPG an extra $2.5 million in this year’s budget -- although that money is supposed to be used on additional public guardians to care for elderly and disabled wards who are too poor to pay for a professional guardian. There are more than 450 people unable to care for themselves on the waitlist for a public guardian.

"OPPG, it was felt by both the House and the Senate, could utilize less than 5 percent of that money to conduct the investigations,” said Fred Piccolo, the Oliva spokesman. “To allege resources were unavailable is simply untrue.”

When someone believes a professional guardian is abusing or exploiting the ward they were appointed to care for, they can file a complaint with OPPG. The state agency then does a preliminary screening and, if the complaint appears to have merit, it passes it on to one of a half-dozen county clerks’ offices around the state to conduct a full investigation. The scandal surrounding disgraced Orlando-based professional guardian Rebecca Fierle, who is now under criminal investigation after filing Do Not Resuscitate orders against the wishes of her wards, erupted after one such complaint was investigated by the clerk and comptroller in Okaloosa County.

Thorough probes are expensive. During the state’s 2017-18 fiscal year, OPPG, working with the alliance of clerks’ offices, says it investigated 128 cases statewide at an average cost of $1,289 per case. And the workload is growing as more baby boomers become infirm, more are placed into guardianship -- and more complaints are filed.

Activists were optimistic the agency would get money for investigations this year. Newly elected Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis included the $97,488 request in the proposed budget he recommended to the Legislature.

There didn’t appear to be anyone lobbying against it. Representatives for the Elder Law and Real Property, Probate and Trust Law sections of the Florida Bar, two of the most influential interest groups when it comes to guardianship law, said they did not oppose the request.

“We would never want them [OPPG] to not be funded,” said Gina Rossi-Scheiman, the executive director of the Florida State Guardianship Association, which represents professional guardians. “We want them to be fully able to do their job.”

The Florida Senate included the money in its budget. But the Florida House did not. And when the two chambers came together to work out a final budget -- a process known as “budget conference” -- the Senate dropped the issue early in the negotiations.

There was never any public discussion of the decision, as most of the Legislature’s budget conference decisions were made in private. The public meetings were formalities in which one side read out a list of decisions; meetings of the health-care budget conference committee -- which was responsible for more than $37 billion in spending -- lasted about 10 minutes each.

Budget conference is “always kind of done behind closed doors,” said Shannon Miller, a Gainesville attorney who co-chairs the legislative committee for the Elder Law Section of the Florida Bar. “We don’t have a lot of access to that process.”

The choice to not to spend an extra $97,488 on additional guardianship investigations was just one of thousands of spending decisions the Legislature made while building a $91 billion state budget. They also chose to spend $250,000 to subsidize a professional golf tournament at an Ocala development owned by a major Republican Party donor and $1 million to help build a facility for luxury corporate jet manufacturer Learjet Inc. (DeSantis vetoed the money for the golf tournament but approved the money for the Learjet facility.)

State Sen. Aaron Bean, a Republican from Nassau County who oversaw health-care spending in the Senate, said lawmakers don’t necessarily oppose spending an extra $97,488 to investigate allegations against professional guardians. But he said there’s an emphasis on finding common ground quickly during the final, frenetic days of session.

“There’s just so many things happening at once,” Bean said. “I don’t think it’s that we didn’t want it, it’s just that we’re trying to line up with the house and trying to get out of there.”

Full Article & Source:
Florida lawmakers refused to pay to investigate more guardians

Monday, June 10, 2019

Maine lawmakers pass bill allowing terminally ill patients to end their lives

The Maine state House has passed legislation that would allow physicians to prescribe lethal doses of medication to terminally ill patients who want to end their lives.

According to the Portland Press Herald, the state House passed the bill by a narrow vote of 72-68 on Tuesday with support and opposition cutting across party lines.

Under the bill, called the Maine Death with Dignity Act, patients at least 18 years old can request lethal prescriptions if a doctor has determined he or she to be suffering from a terminal disease and has less than six months to live.

However, the bill has a number of qualifications a patient would be required to meet before their request is granted.

Consulting physicians would need to assess the patient’s competency to determine if they “may be suffering from a psychiatric or psychological disorder or depression causing impaired judgment.” If the patient is determined to be suffering from a disorder, the physician is required to refer the patient to counseling.

“Medication to end a patient's life in a humane and dignified manner may not be prescribed until the person performing the counseling determines that the patient is not suffering from a psychiatric or psychological disorder or depression causing impaired judgment,” the bill states.

After the adult is determined competent, he or she must “make a written request for medication that the adult may self-administer in accordance” with the bill.

A valid request must be “signed and dated by the patient and witnessed by at least 2 individuals who, in the presence of the patient, attest that to the best of their knowledge and belief the patient is competent, is acting voluntarily and is not being coerced to sign the request,” the bill states.

The bill says the terminal disease the patient is suffering from in such cases has to be “incurable and irreversible” as well as “medically confirmed and will, within reasonable medical judgment, produce death within 6 months.”

The bill now heads to the state senate for consideration.

It arrives on the heels of a similar piece of legislation that New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy (D) said he would approve back in March that would allow terminally ill patients the right to end their lives.

If the legislation becomes law, Maine would become the eighth jurisdiction in the U.S. to have a "death with dignity" act.

Full Article & Source:
Maine lawmakers pass bill allowing terminally ill patients to end their lives