by Richard Lee Abrams
Some might opine that it is economic slavery, but under slavery, the
wage theft is limited to 100%, but Judge Lippitt wants 150%. Here’s the
mechanics of the theft. After uncontradicted testimony that the Widow M
does not need a conservator, Judge Lippitt appoints a conservator who
will then rake off about 150% of the Widow M’s rental income. The
conservator’s duties are simple: drive the Widow M into economic ruin by
destroying her short-term rental business while sucking out as much of
her cash as possible through conservator and attorney fees.
To Judge Lippitt’s extreme displeasure, the Widow M is not willing to
lie and die. The widow knows that by continuing to work, she slows down
the rate at which Judge Lippitt dissipates her assets. Judge Lippitt
must financially ruin the Widow M in order to justify selling off all
The Widow M is proud that she has worked since she was a teen; she
loves taking care of her short-term rental properties. HomeAway provides
the worldwide platform for people from Italy, France, China and the
good ole USA to come to town and have a really nice place for the
families to stay. The Widow M takes great pleasure in her efforts. What
she hates is Judge Lippitt’s stealing her income and forcing her to sell
her huge home in the Kenneth Village section of Glendale to CAC Audre
Delahoussaye’s children. (“Of course, my children will pay,” assured CAC
Delahoussaye in July 2019 while again eyeing the six-bedroom house with
two living rooms, a large pool with a fenced in garden filled with
fruit trees on the largest lot in the neighborhood.)
How Does this Coven of Evil Operate?
The case of Mozer v Augustine sets forth the official framework that LA judges use to steal an elder’s property.
When one falls into the clutches of the Probate Court (including
Conservancy), the judge can send people to mediation. Unlike arbitration
where some goniff will impose his decision upon his victims, in
mediation the parties get to agree upon a resolution. Until recently,
that was thought to be fair and equitable. Here’s the new reality.
(1) Mediation has become a forum for judicial fraud.
(2) At the mediation, the mediator the judge approves commits fraud
and cheats the elderly out of millions of dollars. Judge Goetz knows
these ropes very well as she was the mediator in Mozer and she
was the Widow M’s mediator. Judge Goetz comes close to holding the
lowest score on Robing Room which apparently makes her one of Judge
(3) If victims discover the massive fraud which ex-judge Goetz or
some other mediator perpetrates in order to get their consent to the
mediation agreement, too bad they lose.
Let’s Look at the Mechanics of the Mozer Case
The widow Mozer, who is not the Widow M, opposed confirming the
mediation Settlement Agreement, “alleging the mediator (ex-judge Goetz)
had induced her agreement by means of fraud, undue influence and
duress.” Nowhere does the court say that ex-judge Goetz did not commit
fraud to deceive Mozer into signing the settlement agreement and the
court admitted that under Civil Code, § 1689, the defrauded party may
rescind the Settlement Agreement. So how do these judicial thieves get
away with it?
Here’s the Crux of the Judicial Corruption
The Mozer court ruled that because statements made during a mediation
are confidential, Mozer may not produce evidence of ex-Judge Goetz’
fraud! Really, that’s the end of the story. After a probate a judge
forces one to mediate before a corrupt mediator who commits frauds, the
victim is stuck with the multi-million-dollar loss. Really? Since one is
forbidden to mention that ex-judge Goetz or some other mediator
perpetrated fraud, no court will listen to the defrauded person’s
That is How Things Work in Los Angeles County Probate
Corrupt judges appoint atrociously corrupt mediators who commit fraud
on the elderly and infirm and the thieves get to walk away with their
But Wait it Gets Worse
The Widow M did not object to the frauds perpetrated on her by the
CAC and Judge Goetz at the mediation. The Widow M tried to go through
with the horrid agreement as ransom payment for the judicial crooks
granting her freedom from her abusive daughter. The Widow M’s daughter,
however, acted true to form and materially and incurably breached the
August 30 Settlement Agreement and thereby killed it deader than a
doornail. The Mozer-Goetz scam did not apply since the Widow M did not
complain about the frauds inducing her to sign. No rule of law requires
enforcement of a contract after the other party has killed it.
Let’s Make this So Simply That Even Judicial Thieves Can Understand
If Alfred agrees to sell his Classic 1957 Caddy to Bob for $100 based
on the mediator’s fraudulent representation that old cars have only
junk value, under the Mozer case Alfred does not have to turn over his
Classic 1957 Caddy if Bob refuses to pay the $100. That is the Widow M’s
The Widow M never challenged the formation of the agreement, which is
the basis of the Mozer-Goetz case, but instead she pointed out that the
agreement had been killed. It’s the difference between birth and death.
That is why Lippitt had to get rid of Attorney Abrams who was bright
enough to document that the daughter had killed the Settlement Agreement
without his mentioning any fraud in the inducement. His working free of
charge to make the Widow M financially solvent was more than Judge
Lippitt could tolerate, which is why she summarily fired him
mid-sentence during the November 5 hearing and why she is now engaged in
a cover-up that makes Richard Nixon look like amateur.
While the Widow M loves working on her properties and is overjoyed
when guests from around the world write how much they enjoyed her
hospitality, the Widow M does not like being financially raped by Judge
Why doesn’t the #MeToo Movement protect widows who are financially raped?
Full Article & Source:
Financial Rape: Business as Usual in LA County Probate Court