Attorneys are paid to find excuses why cases are not worthy of consideration, so motions to dismiss are not uncommon or unexpected. However, in the case of Gary Harvey, it can become quite amusing to find attorneys claiming there is no basis for accusation presented in behalf of the ward of the court by his wife Sara.
Where do these people get off thinking that Sara is a non-issue and her concerns frivolous as she strives to look out for his best interest, while it appears the others have let him down? More importantly, where do they get off thinking the court, especially “all” courts, should agree with them?
My understanding is that there is a standing court order that Sara is to be kept abreast of all medical decisions related to her husband, and yet she hasn’t been; not readily so. I guess court orders are only considered relevant when the finding is considered so by the other side–the side that has ganged up against her and therefore ganged up against Gary.
In all the years that I have been aware of and following the Harvey case, I’ve tried to figure out how “the other side,” court & pals have justified so many things that have occurred. I’ve failed.
I ask myself what possible good can come from Gary Harvey’s isolation. How does it benefit him? What am I missing? I haven’t a clue.
How was Gary Harvey considered safe behind a closed door, when he cannot call for help if in distress? Common sense would suggest otherwise, no matter how the other side might protest.
It’s too traumatic for Gary to travel to be evaluated by experts, but okay to keep making those surgery & infection runs? I’m to believe this? Would any be surprised to learn that I don’t?
What is the secret life behind the Gary Harvey case?
What goes on behind the closed doors and what makes it so important to punish Sara & Gary Harvey?
Full Article and Source:
Frivolous Charges: The Secret Life of the Gary Harvey Case