A
Nevada Supreme Court commission on Thursday called for sweeping reforms
of the state’s guardianship system in hopes of better protecting the
state’s growing elderly and infirm population.
The
236-page report comes as a culmination of 15 months’ worth of commission
meetings dating back to June 2015 and includes dozens of
recommendations for changes in guardianship law, policy and court rules.
The 27-member commission was formed after a Review-Journal series highlighting the flaws and lack of oversight of the guardianship system in Clark County that watches over thousands of at-risk adults, called wards, who suffer from mental or physical incapacities.
Most
notably, the report calls for all people under guardianship to have the
right to an attorney, which is not currently granted in Nevada.
“I
think that was a fundamental thing that was missing and could have
avoided so many of the problems seen in the courts,” commission member
and Assemblyman Mike Sprinkle, D-Sparks, said Thursday.
The
commission was originally slated to be in place for just six months.
But after several meetings that included heated and emotional speeches
by victims of exploitation and their families, the commission extended
its length of operation to more than a year and met 15 times. After
seeing how deep the issues ran in the system, members voted to make the
commission permanent.
“Some of the cases were just
horrible to read, and there’s no doubt that many of these
recommendations, if enacted by the Legislature, will stop some of those
abuses,” said Barbara Buckley, executive director of the Legal Aid
Center of Southern Nevada, a nonprofit law firm that began handling
guardianship cases earlier this year.
Buckley echoed
Sprinkle’s thoughts that providing legal representation is the most
impactful change recommended by the commission.
“Individuals
in this situation are being stripped of their civil liberties, the
right to run their life as they see fit, without anyone speaking to them
or advocating on their behalf,” Buckley said.
Having an
attorney from the outset of a case will prevent much of the abuse seen,
including the loss of civil liberties and the financial exploitation
seen in several cases, she added.
Other notable recommended law and policy changes include:
■ Providing independent investigators and accountants to help detect and prevent fraud and abuse in guardianship cases.
■
Reining in the fees charged by private guardians, who can charge upward
of $250 per hour to wards, even for tasks such as making phone calls
and sending emails.
■ Prohibiting guardians from selling a ward’s assets — such as their house or car — without prior court approval from a judge.
■ Implementing a guardianship Bill of Rights for wards.
In
total, the report calls for 16 changes to state law and 14 statewide
changes for guardianship court rules. The proposed law changes would
need to be drafted into bills and approved by the Legislature in 2017.
For Buckley, the recommendations are a giant leap in helping those who can’t help themselves.
“It will put the focus back on where it should have always been: on the protection of the individual,” Buckley said.
Full Article & Source:
Nevada high court panel calls for guardianship system reforms
READ the final report

6 comments:
Sweeping reform is needed in all states. Let Nevada lead the nation!
Don't all states require a guardian go to the judge before selling real estate?
I am glad all the attention to Nevada has resulted in something so positive. I wish the thieves were charged with the crimes they committed, though.
It's a great beginning. None of the victims and their families will see restitution but to see reform is just as important. Most people die and their family continues to suffer. Seeing reform is like witnessing a miracle.
WHY WILL THE VICTIMS NOT SEE RESTITUTION ? i DON'T UNDERSTAND.
The money's gone, Anonymous. Guardianship victims rarely see restitution and that's only when the guardian is convicted of theft. Otherwise, it's just gone -- all gone.
Post a Comment