Monday, July 27, 2026

How a trusted funeral director stole $1.1 million from Michigan’s most vulnerable residents


By Gus Burns 

BAD AXE, MI—Terry Kaufman was a trusted small-town funeral director who helped families prepare for the inevitable. 

That trust came at a steep cost. 

For years, Kaufman accepted money for prepaid funerals that families believed would ensure their loved ones were buried with dignity and spare relatives from future financial hardship. Instead, authorities say, he kept much of the money for himself, fueling a scheme that ultimately victimized 204 people and cost more than $1 million.

The case rattled Michigan’s Thumb region and exposed vulnerabilities in a system designed to protect some of society’s most vulnerable residents. It also prompted warnings from the Michigan Attorney General’s Office, renewed scrutiny of prepaid funeral arrangements and reviews of procedures used by public guardians around the state.

Behind the dollar figures were real people trying to settle their affairs, care for aging parents or ensure a loved one would be buried when the time came.

“There were many people who trusted him,” said Huron County Public Guardian Jacilyn Braun. “He was an upstanding member of the community, and he abused his respect from the people and his respect from our office.”

Kaufman helped establish Kaufman and Company Funeral Home in 1994 and sold his remaining ownership stake in 2011, though he continued working there as an employee.

‘TWO-FACED’

Grace Baker, 87, lives with dementia in a nursing home in Bad Axe, a small town of 3,000 and the Huron County seat.

After paying for her care, she has about $60 a month left for personal expenses. Her favorite pastime is looking through old family photographs, her daughter, Traci Baker, said.

One of Grace Baker’s few remaining assets was a $2,150 prepaid funeral plan.

The policy had been purchased with her money through the Huron County Public Guardian’s Office and arranged through Kaufman.

Prepaid funeral arrangements are designed to lock in costs and protect families from financial uncertainty after a death. They are typically funded through escrow accounts or specialized insurance policies.

Kaufman sold both.

But Grace Baker’s funeral plan never existed.

The money was gone.

And she wasn’t alone.

Kaufman is now serving a sentence of at least seven years in prison after pleading no contest to felony charges stemming from a decade-long scheme that prosecutors said victimized 204 people, including 55 wards under Huron County guardianships.

“He was very kind to people,” said Larry Brown, a former coworker. “And was two-faced about that, too.”

An MLive review of probate court files, licensing complaints, more than 100 pages of attorney general records obtained through the Freedom of Information Act and interviews with victims, officials and attorneys found that many of Kaufman’s victims were elderly residents whose finances were supposed to be protected through guardianship arrangements. 

EXPOSED 

The fraud began to unravel in March 2025 when a Huron County ward died and was taken to Champagne Funeral Chapel in Pigeon at the direction of family members.

Relatives produced records showing the Huron County Public Guardian had paid Kaufman $4,500 for the deceased ward’s funeral.

By law, the money should have been deposited into an approved escrow account or used to purchase a valid preneed insurance policy that could be transferred to another funeral home.

When officials tried to locate the funds, they discovered they did not exist. 

A complaint was filed with the Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs, triggering an investigation that uncovered a broader pattern.

State regulators found Kaufman received $218,019.98 from the Huron County Public Guardian’s Office on behalf of wards but failed to properly deposit the money or create legitimate insurance policies.

The findings prompted a criminal investigation by the Michigan Attorney General’s Office in June 2025. 

Investigators found no evidence that Braun’s office or its employees conspired with Kaufman.

But the case exposed a critical oversight problem.

Braun acknowledged her office relied largely on documentation provided by Kaufman and did not independently verify that prepaid funds had been placed into escrow accounts or that insurance policies had actually been issued. 

The lack of verification allowed the scheme to continue undetected for years.

HOW IT WORKED

According to probate court records reviewed by MLive, Kaufman sometimes represented himself as an agent for Forethought Insurance, a subsidiary of Global Atlantic Financial Group that sells preneed insurance products.

Contracts listed items such as burials, vaults, headstones and other funeral services. Some customers added services over time, increasing the value of their plans.

On paper, everything appeared legitimate.

In reality, investigators found many policies were never established or properly funded.

Some records also raised questions about signatures. In several cases, wards appeared to have personally signed contracts despite lacking the legal authority to do so.

“I don’t really know,” Braun said when asked how those signatures ended up on documents. “Typically, guardians would sign.”

Kaufman’s former defense attorney, Elizabeth Weisenbach, said the scheme functioned much like a Ponzi operation.

Money from new customers was used to satisfy obligations owed to older customers, creating the appearance that prepaid arrangements were working as intended.

“People would come in to do a pre-arrangement and he was using part of their money to pay somebody else’s funeral,” Brown said.

Some funerals were paid for, despite not being backed by escrow accounts or insurance policies.

Weisenbach said such schemes often begin with relatively small financial shortcuts.

“He’d take that money, pay the light bill and pay staff and write himself a payroll check,” she said. “They start small and then it just snowballs.”

The attorney general’s office alleged Kaufman embezzled funds for his own benefit over roughly a decade.

Coworkers and others familiar with the case said he frequently purchased lottery scratch-off tickets, though authorities did not publicly tie the thefts to gambling. The criminal case focused on embezzlement and funeral contract violations.

WORD SPREADS

As news of the investigation spread, customers throughout Huron County began wondering whether their own prepaid funeral plans existed.

Many learned they did not.

Victims ultimately numbered 204, including nearly 150 private customers who were not under guardianships or conservatorships.

Among them was Brown.

After Kaufman’s arrest, Brown contacted an insurance company to verify a $9,995 prepaid funeral policy he had purchased in 2019.

What he learned stunned him.

“They informed me that I was deceased,” Brown wrote in a complaint. “Which, I am still alive.”

According to Brown, records showed a death claim had been submitted using forged paperwork bearing his wife’s signature. A settlement check was then issued and cashed.

Brown later discovered similar issues involving additional family members.

One complaint after another filed with the attorney general told similar stories: elderly customers paid thousands of dollars believing their funeral expenses had been secured, only to discover the money was gone.

Attorney General records showed average losses exceeded $5,400 per victim.

CHARGED

In November 2025, the Attorney General’s Office charged Kaufman with embezzlement involving county wards.

He later pleaded no contest to 39 felony counts, including funeral contract conversion, embezzlement and conducting a criminal enterprise.

A no-contest plea does not admit guilt but acknowledges that sufficient evidence exists for conviction.

A judge ordered Kaufman to pay approximately $1.1 million in restitution.

Victims, however, may never recover most of the money.

Attorney General spokesman Danny Wimmer said there are no state compensation funds available for victims of this type of financial crime.

While some people may be able to pursue reimbursement through insurance companies Kaufman claimed to represent, officials cautioned that significant recovery is unlikely.

BROADER QUESTIONS

The case has sparked reviews of prepaid funeral practices both locally and around Michigan.

Following the criminal case, Braun said her office began verifying the existence of prepaid funeral funds and auditing existing contracts.

Other counties employ stricter verification practices. Midland County Public Guardian Steve Wixson said his office conducts annual audits and maintains both contract records and independently issued policy documentation.

Wimmer said the Attorney General’s Office has uncovered several prepaid funeral embezzlement cases through the years and is working more closely with state regulators to identify and prosecute offenders.

He advised guardians, family members and consumers to independently verify that prepaid funeral money has been deposited into escrow accounts or used to purchase legitimate insurance policies. State law requires funeral homes to transfer prepaid funds into approved escrow accounts within 30 days of receiving them.

Michigan Funeral Directors Association Executive Director Phil Douma said additional reforms should be considered, including requiring prepaid funds to be sent directly to escrow agents rather than passing through funeral home accounts.

The Attorney General’s Elder Abuse Task Force has also identified stronger oversight of public and private guardians as a legislative priority.

Meanwhile, civil litigation continues. Lawsuits filed by Kaufman’s former funeral home and other victims allege hundreds of thousands of dollars in additional losses.

For Traci Baker, however, the consequences remain deeply personal.

Her mother believed her funeral plans were in place.

Now they are not.

“Obviously they didn’t do a very good job protecting my mother’s money because it’s gone,” Baker said. “If she died tomorrow, I don’t have the money to do anything.”

Braun said she hopes the scandal ultimately encourages vigilance rather than discouraging people from planning ahead.

“Mr. Kaufman broke a lot of trust within this community,” she said. “I hope going forward those in our community still consider planning for their future.” 

Full Article & Source:
How a trusted funeral director stole $1.1 million from Michigan’s most vulnerable residents 

Resources to combat romance scams

Romance scams flourish in silence.

In 2025, Americans age 60 or older reported losing $584 million to romance scams – a 50% increase from losses reported the previous year, according to the FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center. Authorities believe the loss figure is probably considerably higher, because many scams go unreported by victims who are embarrassed to ask for help. This growing exploitation of our older population is infuriating. No one should lose his or her life savings to someone pretending to care about them.  That’s why the Ohio Attorney General’s Office has gone on the offensive to combat these crimes.

The resources provided here, including the video at right in which the attorney general explains our Romance Impostor Scams Forensic Initiative, are yours to use and share in whatever way works best for your purpose. 

Together, we can keep Ohioans safe. 

Source:
Resources to combat romance scams 

Sunday, July 26, 2026

Sen. Irwin Celebrates Signing of Bills to Protect Property Rights of Vulnerable Individuals


LANSING, Mich. (July 23, 2026) — Today, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer signed Senate Bills 585586 into law, bipartisan legislation to strengthen and protect the rights of individuals placed in guardianships during property or real estate sales. Sen. Jeff Irwin (D-Ann Arbor), sponsor of Senate Bill 585, has issued the following statement in response: 

“Vulnerable adults placed into guardianship deserve to have their rights protected. Once signed into law, my bill requires a professional appraisal before the sale of real estate owned by an adult placed in guardianship. This measure provides accountability and clarity, protecting the assets of people placed under guardianship.” 

This legislation protects the rights of individuals placed in guardianships by requiring a court to find that a change of residence is in the best interest of the person under guardianship and mandating professional appraisals be made before any real estate is sold.  

Source:
Sen. Irwin Celebrates Signing of Bills to Protect Property Rights of Vulnerable Individuals 

Woman accused of exploiting ailing elderly man at West Palm Beach assisted living facility

by Malcolm Shields 

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. — A Port St. Lucie woman is facing another allegation of defrauding an elderly person.

According to Palm Beach County court records, Megan E. Bernat, 46, was arrested on Wednesday, July 22, on exploitation of elderly and money laundering transactions charges.

Bernat was arrested on Sept. 3, 2025, on charges of personal identity fraud, exploitation of an elderly person and money laundering transactions of a 73-year-old woman in West Palm Beach.

Megan Elizabeth Bernat

During the West Palm Beach Police Department’s investigation into the 2025 case, it was discovered that another bank account was used to make more than $30,000 worth of payments to Bernat’s credit card.

The account was frozen by the bank, which prevented the account’s use.

Detectives determined the frozen account belonged to a 92-year-old man who lived at the MorseLife assisted living facility in West Palm Beach along with the first victim.

Bernat was a social worker at the living facility, and she was assigned as the second victim's full-time care manager beginning on Dec. 30, 2021.

She assisted with the second victim's financial records.

During that time, the second victim suffered from 18 medical problems including dementia and needed help with routine tasks like laundry, getting dressed and going to the restroom.

According to the arrest report, the second victim died on March 15, 2024, about two weeks after testing positive for COVID-19.

Detectives determined that the second victim’s bank account was used 30 times to make mobile payments to a credit card account connected to Bernat.

An investigation also revealed Bernat’s credit card was part of 30 transactions totaling $31,295.28 between May 11, 2023, and April 22, 2024.

Seven of the 30 transactions occurred while the second victim was in hospice, including six transactions after he died on March 15, 2024.

During a Thursday, July 23 court hearing, a judge ordered Bernat to serve in-house arrest, wear a GPS monitor with bail set at $30,000. 

Full Article & Source:
Woman accused of exploiting ailing elderly man at West Palm Beach assisted living facility 

Saturday, July 25, 2026

Johnson’s guardianship reform signed

 

July 23, 2026  

LANSING, Mich. — Gov. Gretchen Whitmer has signed Sen. Ruth Johnson’s legislation to reform the state’s guardianship laws and help protect vulnerable individuals and their homes from guardians who might not be acting in their best interest.

“This reform is the result of hearing dozens of heartbreaking stories from families who were forced to endure a loved one being removed from their home — without a hearing or notice,” said Johnson, R-Holly. “Compounding the ordeal, the loved one’s home is often sold for well below market value, and families have no voice or recourse.

“With the governor’s signature, these new protections will ensure the best interests of our most vulnerable residents — not the convenience of their guardians — will drive important decisions like moving someone out of their home and selling their house.”

Johnson’s measure, Senate Bill 586, ensures that a protected individual’s living arrangements are truly in their best interest. Under the new law, a guardian will not be allowed to change an incapacitated person’s residence without court approval after demonstrating the move is necessary and appropriate for the individual’s needs.

The governor also signed SB 585, sponsored by Sen. Jeff Irwin, to require a licensed appraiser to appraise the value of a protected person’s home before any sale of that property.

“Vulnerable adults placed into guardianship deserve to have their rights protected,” said Irwin, D-Ann Arbor. “Now signed into law, my bill requires a professional appraisal before the sale of real estate owned by an adult placed in guardianship. This measure provides accountability and clarity, protecting the assets of people placed under guardianship.”

Johnson said, “This was a bipartisan effort to protect those who cannot protect themselves by adding more meaningful accountability and oversight to our guardianship system, and I want to thank Senator Irwin for his teamwork on this critical issue.”

### 

Source:
Johnson’s guardianship reform signed 

See Also:
Johnson’s guardianship reform sent to governor

Defamation trial begins over Netflix docuseries episode tied to San Antonio millionaire's guardianship case

SAN ANTONIO — A Bexar County jury this week is hearing defamation claims centered on a Netflix documentary episode about an alleged guardianship abuse case involving a wealthy San Antonio businessman.

The case stems from "Guardians Inc.," an episode of the Netflix documentary series "Dirty Money," which examined allegations of financial exploitation in guardianship cases. The episode is no longer available on the streaming service after the lawsuit was filed in 2021.

Tonya Barina sued Netflix and several other defendants, alleging the episode falsely portrayed her role as guardian for her great-uncle, Charlie Thrash. That lawsuit states her reputation was "destroyed" and that she was experiencing "daily and nearly hourly hated, disgrace, contempt and ridicule."

According to court filings, Barina was appointed guardian of Thrash and his estate after the 88-year-old San Antonio businessman, who collected $3 million in assets while operating an auto repair business, developed Alzheimer's disease and other ailments. 

Barina's lawsuit was filed in March 2021 by Austin-based attorney Carl J. Kolb. It alleges the documentary falsely suggested Barina sought to exploit her position for financial gain, juxtaposing soundbites about how "guardianship abuse is the crime of the 21st century" to paint her as a criminal. 

Instead, the lawsuit accuses several defendants of isolating Thrash and contributing to the decline of his business. Co-defendant Laura A. Martinez received power of attorney from Thrash in 2016, but Adult Protective Services believed it was "signed under undue influence," the suit states. 

Jo Ann Rivera is a close family friend of Thrash's and was featured in "Guardians Inc.," along with Martinez and others, and said she was surprised by the lawsuit. 

"I don't believe there is any merit to her claim at all," Rivera told KENS 5. "She put herself in the documentary and then was unhappy with how she was viewed."

Phillip Ross, Thrash's one-time attorney and another co-defendant, said the legal proceedings of the last several years forced him to retire early. 

"I feel like the plaintiffs are giving things their best shot," Ross said. "I still feel confident... everything we said in the context of the (Netflix) interviews was clearly true." 

An amended petition nearly 50 pages long includes what are essentially verbatim excerpts from "Guardians Inc." that  Barina argues left out important context and created a misleading narrative. The suit also claims her attorney corresponded with producers of the episode a year before it aired, but the material "was intentionally disregarded and omitted from the episode because it would prove that plaintiff was guilty of no abuse, exploitation or 'crime.'" 

While her perspective appears in "Guardians Inc.," the suit states it was "in no way a fair, true and impartial account" of the events.

Rivera said it was an emotionally charged case but stands firm that nothing said on the documentary rises to the level of defamation. 

"The fact is we are all public figures and negative comments, and, at times, ugly remarks, are things we have to live with," she said. "Tonya put herself in the boiling pot." 

"I know reputation is a very fragile thing," Ross added. 

Both Ross and Kolb told KENS 5 he expects the trial to continue into the middle of next week at least.  

Full Article & Source:
Defamation trial begins over Netflix docuseries episode tied to San Antonio millionaire's guardianship case 

Friday, July 24, 2026

Latta woman accused of stealing $34,000 from Florence nursing home resident while acting as their conservator


by: Dennis Bright

FLORENCE, S.C. (WBTW) — A 64-year-old Dillon County woman is accused of stealing more than $34,000 from a Florence nursing home resident while acting as their conservator and power of attorney, according to the South Carolina Attorney General’s Office.

Delores Ann Edge of Latta is accused of one count of exploitation of a vulnerable adult and one count of breach of trust with fraudulent intent, with a value of $10,000 or more. She was booked into the Florence County Detention Center on Wednesday.

“Investigators determined that Edge, while acting as the victim’s conservator and power of attorney, knowingly and willfully engaged in improper, unlawful, and unauthorized use of the victim’s assets and property,” the attorney general’s office said in a news release. “The investigation further established that Edge expended approximately $34,071.98 of the victim’s funds for her own personal benefit without lawful authority or permission to do so.”

The alleged exploitation occurred between April 23, 2024, and Feb. 6, the attorney general’s office said. At the time, the victim was a resident at Veterans Village Nursing Home in Florence.

The attorney general’s Vulnerable Adults and Medicaid Provider Fraud unit, known as VAMPF, investigated the case along with the Florence County Sheriff’s Office. The Dillon County Sheriff’s Office assisted with the arrest of Edge.

If convicted, Edge faces up to five years in prison and a fine of not more than $5,000, or both, for the exploitation charge, the attorney general’s office said. The breach of trust charge carries a sentence of up to 10 years in prison or a fine at the discretion of the court.

Full Article & Source:
Latta woman accused of stealing $34,000 from Florence nursing home resident while acting as their conservator 

Woman who is mentally ill assaulted at group home, complaint says

Man who identifies as female charged with sex crime at facility for women where he also lived

 
By BILL SCHANEN IV

A 33-year-old resident of a Town of Port Washington group home for women under protective guardianships is accused in Ozaukee County Circuit Court of sexually assaulting another resident of the facility earlier this year.

Madison E. Robison was charged on July 10 with second-degree sexual assault of a person with a mental illness and is being held in the county jail in lieu of $50,000 bail.

According to a criminal complaint, Robison identifies as a female but is a biological male who is listed as such on government records. The complaint refers to Robison as a man.

On July 4, Ozaukee County sheriff’s deputy Kendra Carter was called to 33 Fields, a group home for women on Highway 33 where Robison lived with women with mental disabilities, to investigate a report from a citizen that Robison posted a video online that referenced sexual activity and had taken advantage of a resident of the facility, the complaint states.

Carter interviewed a resident of the home who is under protective guardianship and diagnosed with cognitive developmental delay, autism spectrum disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and generalized anxiety disorder. Staff members said she has the mental capacity of a person who is 6 or 7 years old and produced documentation that shows the woman is classified as a vulnerable adult who “may not understand a potential threat from others,” according to the complaint.

When questioned by Carter, the woman repeatedly denied having sex with Robison, who she referred to as a woman, but said, “I don’t like Madison bullying me,” the complaint states.

When Carter asked the woman if she knows what sex is, she replied, “It’s like when you have sex with someone and they want to, like, hurt, kind of want to hurt you.” She also said, “Sex is they say I love you. They want to be like a friend,” according to the complaint.

The woman said that although Robison has long hair like a woman she knows he has male anatomy. When asked by Carter if Robison had intercourse with her, the woman began to cry and said, “I mean, like, it was only one time. I mean that’s it,” the complaint states.

Carter than asked the woman if she wanted to have sex with Robison and she said, “No, I mean I told Madison to stop doing that because ... she was doing it hard on me. I told Madison to stop, but Madison wouldn’t stop,” adding that the incident occurred in Robison’s room in the basement of the group home, according to the complaint.

The woman said she is scared of Robison and had been staying in her room to avoid him. A group home staff member confirmed this and said Robison arrived at the group home on March 11. The complaint alleges the sexual assault occurred between March and July.

Carter talked to another woman at the group home who is under a protective guardianship and diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder, has intellectual disabilities and suffers from selective mutism due to anxiety. She is at risk for self-harm and is not allowed to be in the group home without a staff member present.

This woman told the deputy that she and Robison had sexual intercourse in the basement of the group home but it was consensual, the complaint states.

She said, “We had sex. Then he said that it was both consensual. We both agreed to this. There’s nothing wrong,” according to the complaint.

The woman said Robison asked her if she fantasizes about him and told her he loved her. She said Robison also talked about wanting to have sex with the woman he is accused of assaulting, the complaint states.

Robison admitted to having sex with the woman who said it was consensual and told Carter, “Me and a housemate, we consented on it. I don’t know who would say it was assault, but it was basically consent,” according to the complaint. 

Full Article & Source:
Woman who is mentally ill assaulted at group home, complaint says 

Thursday, July 23, 2026

Records show suspended Jefferson County probate judge spent millions on PR firms, advertising, personal expenses while court fell behind

WBRC obtained financial records showing the court’s public archival fund was used to pay a political consulting firm nearly half a million dollars, buy radio advertising, and reimburse the judge personally

By Jonathan Hardison and Morgan Hightower 

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. (WBRC) - While patients allegedly sat in hospital beds waiting for mental health hearings that never came, and families watched their loved ones’ estates stall in a courthouse backlog, Jefferson County Probate Judge Yashiba Blanchard was spending public money on items at least one of her predecessors said that money was never intended for.

Suspended Judge Yashiba Blanchard appears in court for alleged judicial ethics violations.
Suspended Judge Yashiba Blanchard appears in court for alleged judicial ethics violations.(WBRC)

The records — bank statements, check registers, and contracts covering May 2024 through June 2026 — show the Jefferson County Probate Court’s Archival Discretionary Fund was used to pay a political communications firm nearly half a million dollars, purchase tens of thousands of dollars in radio and broadcast advertising, and reimburse Blanchard personally for expenses that included a gala ticket, a catering bill, and a Zoom subscription.

Blanchard took office in January 2025, so these financial records cover a period that begins before her tenure.

Blanchard was suspended in May 2026 after the Judicial Inquiry Commission (JIC) filed a 120-page complaint against her. She faces trial before the Court of the Judiciary — a nine-member panel with the authority to remove her from the bench — currently scheduled for November 2026. Her attorney, Emory Anthony, has said she denies the allegations.

The state’s Department of Examiners of Public Accounts confirmed in July 2026 that it is conducting an audit of the Jefferson County Probate Court, both the Birmingham and Bessemer divisions. That audit began in March 2026 — two months before Blanchard was suspended.

A fund built on fees from everyday residents

To understand why these records matter, it helps to understand the source of the money.

Under Alabama law, every time a Jefferson County resident records a property document at the probate court — a deed, a mortgage, a lien — they pay an $11 special indexing and filing fee on top of standard recording costs. That money flows directly into the Archival Discretionary Fund, which the judge of probate controls. The law says it is to be used for salaries of judicial assistants and for improving the office’s indexing, recording, archiving, and retrieval systems.

Former Jefferson County Probate Judge Alan King helped write that law. He lobbied for and helped pass the 2012 legislation that created the fund, and he oversaw it until he left office in 2020.

“It was created to safeguard our millions of records, deeds, other real estate records, marriage licenses, judicial records for future generations,” King told WBRC.

King said that during his tenure, every expenditure from the fund went through a review process, despite the law not requiring oversight and giving the probate judge discretion over the spending of the funds.

“Everything that was ever spent out of these funds was approved by the county attorney’s office in advance, and also, by the state auditor’s office,” he said. “All those proceeds that I used were all approved in advance, and then I oversaw the expenditures.”

When Blanchard took office on January 20, 2025, the Bessemer division’s Archival Discretionary Fund held $5.9 million. The Birmingham division’s account held approximately $1.38 million. Combined, the office she inherited had roughly $7.3 million in public funds under her control.

By the time she was suspended 16 months later, the Birmingham account had dropped to approximately $250,000 — a decline of more than $1.1 million. The Bessemer account had grown to a peak of nearly $6.5 million by December 2025, then fallen to under $1 million by May 2026.

The single largest vendor in the financial records is CBG Strategies LLC, a communications and consulting firm.

According to contracts and check registers obtained by WBRC, CBG Strategies was paid at least $192,000 under a 2025 agreement before Blanchard signed a new contract with the firm on January 5, 2026. That new contract, which runs through December 2026, is valued at $440,200, billed at $115,050 per quarter.

DatePayeeMemoPaymentArchival Discretionary Fund
3/27/25CBG Strategies, LLCConsulting Services$67,500.00Birmingham
5/9/25CBG Strategies, LLCDirect Mail, Reimbursement$31,301.69Birmingham
10/20/25CBG Strategies, LLCConsulting Services$76,559.80Birmingham
12/11/25CBG Strategies, LLCConsulting Services$17,000.00Birmingham
1/15/26CBG Strategies, LLCConsulting Services$115,050.00Birmingham
1/15/26CBG Strategies, LLCConsulting Services$60,252.00Birmingham
5/12/26CBG Strategies, LLCDirect Mail$22,331.50Birmingham
5/29/25CBG Strategies, LLCConsulting Services$67,500.00Bessemer
3/24/26CBG Strategies, LLCInv#1364 &1371; Feb 2026 Mailer/Consulting Service Quarter 2 payment$157,713.00Bessemer
5/12/26CBG Strategies, LLCDirect Mail$22,331.50Bessemer

According to the contract, the firm manages the court’s Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok accounts, writes press releases, handles media inquiries, develops “talking points for court leadership,” plans community events, and provides what the contract calls an “onsite administrative coordinator” — a person physically working inside the courthouse every day.

In total, CBG Strategies received at least $637,000 from the Archival Discretionary Fund across 2025 and 2026, based on the records reviewed by WBRC.

King, who wrote the law that created the fund, said that kind of spending was never what the legislation intended.

“That was not the intent of the legislation,” he said. “It’s up to each person, whether they’re a probate judge, circuit judge, mayor, to run their own campaign. To use personal or county funds for basically their own personal campaign purpose, is incredible to me. I’m astounded that the money was allegedly spent in that way.”

The second major consulting firm in the records is Greene Consulting Group LLC, based in Huntsville.

Greene Consulting was brought on to provide election-related services — voter education, poll worker training, election communications, and what the contract describes as an “Elections Operations Modernization Initiative.” The firm’s principal is Samuel T. Greene, whose business contact listed on invoices is a personal Gmail address.

Greene Consulting signed a contract with Blanchard on January 5, 2026 — the same day as the CBG contract — for $350,000 per year, billed at $87,500 per quarter, plus a $35,000 upfront retainer.

But something unusual appears on the signature page of that contract. A handwritten notation reads: “voided terminated at Date 1/13/2026.” The contract, in other words, appears to have been canceled just eight days after it was signed.

Despite that notation, the financial records show that on February 5, 2026, the Bessemer Archival Discretionary Fund paid Greene Consulting Group $124,500.

DatePayeeMemoPaymentArchival Discretionary Fund
7/2/25Greene Consulting Group, LLCProfessional Services$31,250.00Birmingham
9/22/25Greene Consulting Group, LLCConsulting - Yashiba Blanchard$62,500.00Birmingham
12/22/25Greene Consulting Group, LLCConsulting $31,250.00Birmingham
12/22/25Greene Consulting Group, LLCProfessional Services$17,500.00Birmingham
1/14/26Greene Consulting Group, LLCDeposit-Staff for Additional Services and Support$35,000.00Birmingham
4/16/26Greene Consulting Group, LLCConsulting$135,431.00Birmingham
2/5/26Greene Consulting Group, LLCConsultant Pay, Executive Dashboard Summary, Staff Travel Reimbursement$124,500.00Bessemer
2/18/26Greene Consulting Group, LLCProject Manager-Elections Communications/Voter Education Coordinator$24,000.00Bessemer

The invoice submitted for that payment — dated January 30, 2026 — lists $100,000 for “1st Quarter Consultant Pay” and $22,000 for an “Executive Dashboard Summary.” The Executive Dashboard Summary itself is a single page of narrative describing vague “foundational infrastructure” work with no measurable outcomes, no attendance data, and no deliverables.

Greene Consulting had also been paid under a prior contract in 2025 — records show payments of $31,250, $62,500, $31,250, and $17,500 before the January 2026 contract was ever signed. That prior contract has not been produced in the records request.

In total, Greene Consulting Group received at least $461,000 from the Archival Discretionary Fund, based on the records reviewed by WBRC.

Advertising buys, gala tickets, and a catering bill

Beyond the consulting contracts, the financial records contain a series of expenditures that raise questions about whether public archival funds were used for appropriate purposes.

Broadcast advertising: The records show the court paid Summit Media — a radio and digital advertising company — $53,875 on February 12, 2026. The memo line says the expense is for “Order 673217, 673219, 673223, 673225A.” The court also paid Richardson Broadcasting Corporation a total of approximately $49,500 across multiple payments in 2025 and 2026, with invoices described as “advertising.” Cumulus Media was paid $19,250 for a :30 commercial on Talk 99.5 Radio in March 2026. Courtney French Broadcasting was paid $20,000 between February and March 2026 for radio broadcast, and commercial spots.

What comes next

Blanchard’s trial before the Court of the Judiciary is expected in November 2026. Dozens of witnesses are anticipated. If found guilty of violating the Alabama Canons of Judicial Ethics, she could be censured, suspended without pay, or removed from the bench entirely.

The state audit of the Jefferson County Probate Court — covering both the Birmingham and Bessemer divisions — is ongoing. The Alabama Department of Examiners of Public Accounts has not said when it will conclude or whether it has flagged any specific transactions.

WBRC has submitted additional public records requests for contracts, competitive bid documentation, and authorization records related to the transactions identified in this report.

CBG Strategies declined comment on its contract and work with the Probate Judge’s office.

We reached out to Blanchard’s attorney, Emory Anthony, for comment on the financial records.

We also reached out to Greene Consulting Group and are waiting for a reply. 

Full Article & Source:
Records show suspended Jefferson County probate judge spent millions on PR firms, advertising, personal expenses while court fell behind 

See Also:
State auditors make routine probe of probate court spending as judge fights for her job

Suspended judge spent more than $1 million on PR firms and radio ads from discretionary fund

Suspended Alabama probate judge denies all accusations of bullying and other misconduct

Horrifying details released in case against suspended Jefferson County Probate Judge Yashiba Blanchard

Suspended Jefferson County probate judge accused of election interference in new lawsuit

Jefferson County judge suspended, complaint says she called herself “ultimate authority”

Glamorous judge accused of bullying, intimidation and delaying cases so she could take her DOGS for a walk 

Wednesday, July 22, 2026

Trusted caregivers accused in elder exploitation case tied to more than $659K, 2 homes - NBC 15

The allegations read like an elder exploitation nightmare: dozens of checks, two iPhones, and two Satsuma homes, all tied to one victim. 

In an NBC 15 exclusive interview, Mobile County Sheriff Paul Burch said the investigation began after the victim's daughter noticed unusual activity in her father's financial accounts — a discovery that investigators say uncovered a years-long scheme targeting an elderly Mobile County man. 

"The investigation began November of last year when a family member of the victim came forward with what they saw some inconsistencies in his financial accounts," Burch told NBC 15. "The Sheriff's Office launched an investigation." 

Court records show three people — Nora Powe Hobden, Melissa Lynn Hobden and Michael Lewis Crouch — are facing felony charges tied to allegations they stole checks, property and personal information from Tom Baxter. 

The largest accusation is against Melissa Hobden. Criminal complaints filed in Mobile County District Court allege she took and cashed 35 checks belonging to Baxter, totaling $371,980. She is charged with first-degree financial exploitation of an elderly person and first-degree theft of property connected to those checks. 

But the allegations go beyond checks. 

Investigators also accuse Melissa Hobden of forcing Baxter to sign over two Satsuma properties: one at 13165 Williams Ave., valued in the complaint at $88,000, and another at 5515 Darring St., valued at $105,000. Separate theft charges were filed over each property. 

Mobile County property records reviewed by NBC 15 show the Darring Street property has been in Melissa Hobden's name since 2022. A current property record lists her as the owner of 5515 Darring St. and shows a 2026 appraised value of $160,800. 

NBC 15 also confirmed both Melissa Hobden and Michael Crouch list the Darring Street address in jail booking records — the same address investigators say was taken from Baxter. 

Melissa Hobden is also charged with identity theft. According to investigators, she used Baxter's identifying and banking information to purchase two iPhone 17s under his name and had the phones shipped to her address.

Nora Hobden is accused in separate complaints of unlawfully obtaining and cashing a $46,842 check belonging to Baxter. She is charged with first-degree financial exploitation of an elderly person and first-degree theft of property. 

Crouch is accused of cashing or attempting to cash checks tied to Baxter. One complaint alleges he cashed a $38,042 check. Another alleges he attempted to present a fraudulently obtained check valued at $9,450. He faces charges including first-degree theft, attempted first-degree theft and possession of a forged instrument. 

Taken together, the complaints describe hundreds of thousands of dollars in checks, real estate and other property allegedly taken or targeted. Some of the charges involve the same alleged conduct under different criminal counts, meaning the court filings do not represent a final loss total. 

But in his exclusive interview with NBC 15, Burch said detectives believe they're still uncovering the full scope of the alleged scheme.

Source:
Trusted caregivers accused in elder exploitation case tied to more than $659K, 2 homes - NBC 15 

Caregiver accused of stealing thousands from elderly Idaho Falls man to buy drugs

by Trey Baylor


KEY TAKEAWAYS
  • Richard Dee Bierma Jr., 42, is accused of stealing $5,784 from an elderly Idaho Falls man.
  • Bierma faces charges including exploitation of a vulnerable adult and grand theft.
  • He allegedly used the funds to buy drugs; a preliminary hearing is set for July 29.

IDAHO FALLS — Richard Dee Bierma Jr., 42, has been accused of stealing thousands from the elderly man he lived with and cared for.

Bierma has been charged with one count of exploitation of a vulnerable adult over $1,000, one charge of criminal possession of a financial transaction card and one charge of grand theft.

Court documents say the 73-year-old victim reported to police that $5,784 was taken from his bank account and that there were 12 unauthorized withdrawals from an ATM at U.S. Bank on 1st Street in Idaho Falls.

Officers obtained a warrant to access bank records and video footage, but could only verify that $5,120 was part of the unauthorized withdrawals.

In surveillance footage from February, officers observed what appeared to be the same man accessing the victim's account at the ATM each time, documents report.

The victim identified the man in the video as Bierma, the man who'd been living with him.

The victim confirmed to police officers that he had never given Bierma permission to have or use his credit or debit cards.

Bierma was detained and taken to the Idaho Falls Police Department for questioning, documents report.

During interviews, Bierma told police that he drove the victim around and picked up his groceries. As a general rule, he said he'd never given Bierma permission to make withdrawals from an ATM, but that he would drive the victim to the bank and the victim would make withdrawals, police said.

Bierma later confessed to police that he withdrew the funds to pay for drugs, according to court records. But Bierma claimed the victim was aware of it and had given him permission.

Bierma did admit to being the one shown in photos and videos at the ATM, according to police.

Bierma has been appointed a public defender. The Idaho State Public Defender's Office does not comment on active cases.

Bierma is set to appear in court for his preliminary hearing July 29.

The Key Takeaways for this article were generated with the assistance of large language models and reviewed by our editorial team. The article, itself, is solely human-written.

Full Article & Source:
Caregiver accused of stealing thousands from elderly Idaho Falls man to buy drugs 
 

Tuesday, July 21, 2026

AG: Upstate nursing assistant accused of stealing from vulnerable adult

By Lorenza Medley

OCONEE COUNTY, S.C. (FOX Carolina) - Attorney General Alan Wilson announced that an Upstate nursing assistant has been charged with stealing from a vulnerable adult.

A release from Attorney General Wilson states that 31-year-old Constanza Athena Tate, of Anderson, has been charged with:

  • Exploitation of a vulnerable adult
  • Financial card fraud, valued at more than $500 in a six-month period
Constanza Athena Tate
Constanza Athena Tate(Oconee County Detention Center)

The release states that a joint investigation by the Vulnerable Adults and Medicaid Provider Fraud unit and the Oconee County Sheriff’s Office found that Tate knowingly and willfully exploited a vulnerable adult.

According to investigators, Tate was employed as a Certified Nursing Assistant at Seneca Health and Rehabilitation Center, where the victim resided.

On Nov. 3, 2025, Tate fraudulently used the victim’s credit card number without permission. Investigators determined that Tate used the card number for purchases totaling more than $500 for her own personal gain.

The release states that the victim qualified as a vulnerable adult under South Carolina law during the period of the alleged misconduct.

Seneca Health and Rehabilitation Center reported the suspected financial exploitation to law enforcement and fully cooperated throughout the investigation, according to the release.

For both charges, Tate could face up to 5 years in prison. The exploitation charge carries a fine of up to $5,000. The fraud charge carries a fine of up to $3,000, according to the release.

Tate was booked into the Oconee County Detention Center on Friday, the release said. 

Full Article & Source:
AG: Upstate nursing assistant accused of stealing from vulnerable adult 

Texans Lose Millions to Crypto Scams

Written by Jake Lehrer 

Just the other day, I had a text warning me to pay a fine or else I was in trouble. The number, of course, looked like a randomly generated Facebook password. Over time, I’ve learned to ignore certain calls, delete certain texts, and yes, although this may sound rude, hang up on the A.I. trying to sell me health insurance.

Scams have always existed since people could deceive each other, and it just keeps evolving with new technology. In a surprising report by the FBI, cryptocurrency crimes are on the rise, and taking billions of dollars from consumers all around the nation. Texas was second in the nation for the amount of money lost to cryptocurrency scams in 2025.

According to an FBI report, in 2025, Texas consumers lost 1 billion in cryptocurrency fraud scams. $56 million of that was attributed to scammers having consumers deposit cash in cryptocurrency kiosks. That $56 million belonged to a total 1200 Texans scammed out of a significant amount of cash.

Those interviewed about the scams report that they deposited thousands to tens of thousands of dollars. One person reportedly put in around $100,000. Completely losing their money. Only a few were able to recover theirs.

The scam works like this: A consumer such as yourself gets a phone call from someone claiming they are from the police, bank, sheriff’s office, state agency, or other, and say that you either missed jury duty and have to pay a fine, or have an outstanding balance on an account, need to pay a toll violation, or whatever they can use that seems serious enough that you need to pay immediatly or risk consequences.

Scammers will provide documents and files that seem legitimate to trick consumers. They might even have personal info that they’ve gathered from the dark web. Once a consumer believes them, scammers direct their victims to withdraw cash and say they need to pay at a specific kiosk. They might even claim it is the official payment center for whoever they are impersonating.

These kiosks, found in convenience stores, gas stations, grocery stores, and other businesses, are cryptocurrency kiosks. They look like ATMs, and you can find them where you might find most ATMs.

If a consumer has not yet realized they are being scammed, they are directed to deposit the money, and their “fine” is covered. The cash is converted into cryptocurrency and goes to different digital wallets. Scammers will have the money bounce around with legitimate funds to look legitimate and avoid detection. After about 36-48 hours, consumers have no hope of recovering, and the money is lost.

Cryptocurrency kiosks are designed to allow people to convert cash into cryptocurrency. There are reportedly 4000 around the state of Texas, although with a lack of state oversight, it is not clear how many there actually are. Those who use crypto have digital wallets. Once cash is deposited, the consumer enters their digital wallet address.

While this seems a legitimate way for consumers of digital currency to transfer their hard cash for bitcoin, these cryptocurrency kiosks have become a staple for scammers, since these kiosks are not regulated by the state.

According to the Texas Tribune, in an article interviewing people who had been scammed, “Cryptocurrency is increasingly preferred by scammers because it is not subject to the same banking laws as traditional currency — especially in how it can be transferred internationally, where most scammers are based, according to law enforcement.”

Crystal Intelligence, a company that assists law enforcement with crypto fraud crimes, states that in Texas, “transmission of virtual currency alone is not money transmission.”

Additional crypto fraud crimes involve “investment schemes where victims buy fraudulent cryptocurrencies or use crypto to invest in fake businesses.” Or, scammers will build relationships or friendships with people online before attempting to scam them out of money.

There are mixed solutions proposed by Texas Legislators. While some seek to ban the kiosks altogether, others are skeptical about the state interfering in something that deals with the market.

Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows has charged the Criminal Jurisprudence Committee in the Texas House to consider legislation on: “Fraud and Financial Exploitation of Elderly and Vulnerable Texans: Examine trends related to the crimes of fraud, financial exploitation, and abuse targeting elderly and vulnerable Texans, including crimes involving telecommunications and emerging technologies “

Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick has charged the Business and Commerce Committee of the Texas Senate to look into “Fostering Financial Technology Innovation: Evaluate the future of blockchain technology and cryptocurrency in the state of Texas and assess Texas’s coordination with federal rules. Assess how the state’s financial regulatory agencies respond to emerging financial technologies and business models, while prioritizing the protection of consumers. Examine the prevalence of virtual currency kiosks in Texas and make recommendations to support their use while protecting vulnerable Texans from scams.”

Texas has no regulatory oversight for crypto kiosk stands around the state. With a lack of an enforcement policy, Texas officials who can enforce cryptocurrency crimes are not trained to. There is a policy on market frameworks for cryptocurrency in the state of Texas. Texas has even bought a cryptocurrency reserve. But when it comes to fraud, Texas falls behind other states in meaningful legislation to protect consumers, especially from cryptocurrency kiosk scams.

There is federal legislation that has already been passed to regulate the crypto market, with another bill in the U.S. Senate that would aid in market regulation of cryptocurrency. But state agencies will still be responsible for enforcing cryptocurrency laws.

Texas Financial Crimes Intelligence Center states that the machines are mostly used for scams. Different Texas departments and legislators acknowledge they need better oversight regulations, while some local officials around the state would prefer Texas to ban these kiosks completely, as other states have done.

According to the FBI: “In 2025, the IC3 received more than 13,400 complaints reporting the use of cryptocurrency kiosks, with losses over $388 million — a 23% increase in complaints and a 58% increase in losses from 2024. More than half of the complaints involved individuals over 50, with losses over $302 million.”

It is important to report scams. Many do not report out of feeling embarrassed for being tricked. But we should not have that type of culture. Reportedly, 1 in 4 people have been scammed in their lifetime. Scammers target everyone, and they get more advanced in tricking us by the day. They will provide documents that look real, reveal they know personal information, and can make phone numbers look legitimate. People of all ages need to be vigilant against scammers.

According to News From the States: “No bank or government agency, including a court, police department, or licensing board, will ask for cryptocurrency or request payment through a crypto kiosk. If asked to do so, contact your local authorities.”

Lastly, if you are not sure if a phone call, text, or email is legitimate or not, contact the official offices (courts, police departments, DMVs, etc.) the person claims to represent.

The FBI has a fact sheet on how to prevent yourself from getting scammed, or how to identify if you or others are being scammed out of money:

“Spotting Indicators of Cryptocurrency Kiosk Scam

  • Individuals reporting unsolicited contact and conversations by email, social media applications, or phone with individuals offering services or requesting payments in cryptocurrency,
  • Individuals in possession of QR code documentation that they cannot explain or make themselves,
  • Individuals making large cash withdrawals, especially for the first time, and requesting currency in large bill denominations,
  • Individuals exhibiting confusion or nervous behavior when asked general questions about the purpose of a cash withdrawal, needing to pay a large expense in cash, or having a new financial advisor who requires cash,
  • Individuals taking large sums of cash to a location with a cryptocurrency kiosk,
  • Individuals talking on cell phones and exhibiting signs of confusion while making cash withdrawals from a financial institution or attempting to operate a cryptocurrency kiosk, and
  • Individuals lingering at cryptocurrency kiosks and/or aiding individuals operating the kiosk.

Tips for Protecting Yourself

  • Do not send payment to someone you have only spoken to online, even if you believe you have established a relationship with the individual.
  • Do not follow instructions from someone you have never met to scan a QR code and send payment via a cryptocurrency kiosk.
  • Do not respond to a caller who claims to be a representative of a company and who requests personal information or demands cryptocurrency. Contact the entity directly for verification.
  • Do not respond to a caller from an unknown telephone number who identifies as a person you know and requests cryptocurrency.
  • Practice caution when an entity states they can only accept cryptocurrency and identifies as the government, law enforcement, a legal office, or a utility company. No legitimate law enforcement or government official will call to demand payment via a cryptocurrency kiosk.
  • If you are using a cryptocurrency kiosk and the kiosk operator calls you to explain that your transactions are consistent with fraud and advises you to stop sending money, you should stop or cancel the transaction.
  • If you send funds via a cryptocurrency kiosk, be sure to keep any receipts or cryptocurrency transaction documentation.

Report It

If you believe you have been the victim of a scam involving a cryptocurrency kiosk, in addition to filing police reports with your local police department, file a complaint with the IC3 at www.ic3.gov. Please provide the following information, if available.

  1. The transaction ID (TXID), wallet address where funds were sent, and location of the cryptocurrency kiosk.
  2. Any information related to the subject, such as phone numbers, email addresses, domains, or aliases.
  3. A description of the scam.”

By Jake Lehrer
Staff Writer

Full Article & Source:
Texans Lose Millions to Crypto Scams